The missionary position

Our friend and fellow writer Gaiassphere and I have been going back and forth on the nature of shills, who is a shill and who is not. I don’t claim to know everything, which is comforting as it allows me to be wrong and move on. But the recent self-outing of AA Morris was revealing.

Morris, as I gather, appeared on the scene in 2017, and within a stretch of maybe ten seven months had put up 200 225 or so podcasts, each long and tedious and detailed. That does not happen in real life, so I knew he was reading a script. But what if he wrote the script and was merely reading his own stuff? Possible, I suppose. Unlikely, but possible.

Anyway, enough about Morris. I hope Gaiassphere writes more about that experience in public. He has given us some tantalizing details in private.

I mentioned to him what I take to be our cultural environment, Total Information Control. Long ago, at the urging of Miles Mathis (not directed specifically at me), I reacted to his following words, “this discovery” speaking of Elvis and Aron Presley, twins:

“We can now take this discovery back to the Beatles, who my readers tell me had doubles. Maybe they did. But I suggest we should ask first if they were twins. Maybe Paul didn’t die and he wasn’t replaced. He simply had a twin we haven’t been told about. No one has thought of that, have they? Or, maybe someone has, but it isn’t one of the primary alternative theories.”

MM could as easily as I looked at childhood photos of McCartney and found twins. It did not take much time to uncover. But he left it out there for others. I don’t know, of course, but it seems in retrospect that he gave us a breadcrumb trail. He could be part of a larger project, which Bob Z described as follows:

“Why do The Powers That Be even bother with limited hangouts?  I think it has something to do with what a police officer once told me, about this innate drive in all people, the urge to confess.  Not out of guilt or need for atonement.  Sometimes it’s just to brag, like in the movie Wag the Dog.  Keeping a juicy secret is a strain for the human psyche.  Those who pull off their con jobs on the public want just a little exposure, a little recognition of their brilliance.”

For whatever reasons, we are allowed to carry on here at this website uncovering hidden truths, some important (Jonestown was fake), and some not (McCartney is twins). We, the writers here, are privileged to see behind the veil. It is fun! But why do they let us poke our noses in?

I tend to think it is because control of the public is so total and complete that we don’t threaten anyone or anything. So, just as performers sometimes allow ordinary people to view things from behind the stage, the illusionists of our time are allowing us a look.

I was recently contacted in private by a man wanting to know more of John Lennon, Mark Staycer, that whole project. He has loaded my FB message board with evidence and photos, and I have given him some of our work here. I do not mind at all that he is giving me so much stuff, as I can see that he is on a path of discovery and is having the time of his life. I wish him the best of times. This stuff is heady and fun!

Getting back to what prompted me to sit down here, Gaiassphere and AA Morris, I said to Gaia that I believed that we are in an environment so well controlled that every outlet is a project, from Amy Goodman to Alex Jones to Rush Limbaugh and Thom Hartmann to, of course, Obama, Trump, CBS, NBC, NPR and all that alphabet soup. In this environment we are allowed to think freely, as no matter where we turn one of them will be waiting to hold our hand and guide us along.

But that is not true, is it. I am not “one of them,” nor are anyone else who writes here. Deep down I know that I operate on a leash, that I could wake up some morning and find that https://pieceofmindful.com will be a dead link. But while we are allowed to carry on, we should have fun. There’s no other purpose. I am not a missionary – even as I like the position.

 

22 thoughts on “The missionary position”

  1. Religious conversion (mission) is always, IMO, in opposition to truth. The “you should” people populating the internet today with lies, half-lies, and mostly truth “salted” with lies aren’t that hard to spot if one’s senses are working properly. Careful with the alcohol and drugs, kids! No harm in being fooled by the best of them, but never more than once, please. That’s at least a reasonable objective or aspirational goal for the amateur (lover of) truth-seeker.

    Before the Beatles, the Beach Boys (ripping off Chuck Berry’s “Johnny Be Good”) revved up everyone’s engines for the wild “free” ride into the 1960s. “Fun, fun, fun, ’till her daddy takes the TV away…” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDHErN3dOkc
    I’ve always looked at the Beatles as a “booster shot” for the late-comers to the (mind-control) party.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

    1. Did Chuck Berry even write Johnny B Goode? That’s the million $ question.
      Robert Johnson sold his sold to the devil and came back with some blues tunes. Was the devil some song writing committee?
      Elvis has song writing credit on Hound Dog, for what?
      We take it as gospel these songsters write their own material, when, like Will Shakespeare, they can bearly write their own names.

      Like

      Reply

    1. Also,Bob Dylan wrote his own version of just like a woman,after claiming he’d come back from the CROSS ROADSwhere highway 41 intersects with highway 61 in Clarksdale,Mississippi, where Robert Johnson supposedly sold and surrendered his own soul for musical prowess…Not to delve into all that demonic shit…But it wouldn’t surprise me to find that most of these people didn’t write most of what they are credited for having penned.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Bob Dylan, the man who said he sold his soul to the Commander-in-Chief. People thought he meant the Devil, but the POTUS is also known as the C-in-C.

        Like

        Reply

  4. FWIW, you can find my own reflection on the AA Meltdown in a comment I left at Fakeologist a few days ago:

    http://fakeologist.com/blog/2018/09/26/an-improper-slander/#comment-20216

    The tl;dr is this: I don’t know what to make of the entire charade. I cannot pin down in my own mind a sense of ‘why’.

    Why would a person do this?

    I know that many people in the ACT (alternative / conspiracy / truth) realm are quite happy to revert to the ‘paid shill’ meme to give them an answer to this question. ‘Well he was a paid shill, this is what paid shills do’.

    Perhaps this is one of the main reasons why the ‘paid shills’ meme is so popular and pervasive: it gives its believers/repeaters an easy answer to a difficult question.

    And after all, don’t we as human beings love easy answers to difficult questions?

    What I can say with certainty is that this is another bizarre chapter in what has been a truly bizarre year in the ACT realm. Who needs reality TV when we have this place?

    Like

    Reply

    2. All the world’s a stage … the only thing I know is that certain people come to prominence without any seeming talent … Amy Goodman comes to mind. Back before I knew who she really was, I called her the ‘queen of dour.’ She’s dull, boring, listless, overserious, plain. I thought Democracy Now! Was genuine alternative fare. Then I realized that DN! is heavily (but subtly) promoted, that it arose from the ashes of controversy as powerful people supposedly tried to shut down Pacifica … another farce. That was done only to get us to believe in the product, part of the art of persuasion, like when and they removed and then put Hugo Chavez back in power in 2002, all done to make the people of that country believe he was genuine, even throwing in a fake cancer death and supporting actor Fidel Castro to make the show work.

      Any Goodman, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro … where is my head at? My point is that we know about certain people because we are meant ro know about them, they rise to promience seemingly by their own flame feeding ther balloon and making it rise above the horizon, but it is all fake. We are meant to see certain people, and they come to our attention through the channels we are meant to trust. Why do I even know about AA Morris? That is the question. He’s just a guy doing a podcast. I could do that, but who would know about it? Who would promote it? I don’t have juice. It would be stillborn.

      None of this is accidental. AA was pulled because he was exposed. There might have been a bigger scam in the works, but someone decided the show would not go on, and AA was allowed to take it down and do a great stormout. Remember that he was born a full-fledged adult. That is a tell, as no one real comes to talent naturally. It has to be earned by sweat and effort.

      Like

      Reply

      1. Exactly,just like Lennon,McCartney and Dylan…Twenty year old kids ,writing material as if they were sages, yet they were still so wet behind the ears their diaper’s hadn’t even dried yet…and here they were speaking words of wisdom…Like a *ROLLINS STONE.

        Like

        Reply

    3. I think the paid-shill hypothesis has strong explanatory power. You dismiss it too quickly.

      As I was making my way into the Truther demimonde a few years back, I found myself asking two questions about the presentations I was encountering. Regarding video/photo evidence: how is it that I am seeing this? Why was someone there with a camera at precisely that moment? (Like the video of Gene Rosen rehearsing his lines: the only person in a position to shoot this video was someone who was in on the hoax, and therefore was also releasing this “candid” footage for a manipulative purpose as well.)

      Regarding personalities: how does this person support himself AND still find time to both research and produce all this material? The only conclusion I can reach regarding many personas is that they are paid to be Truthers and are therefore part and parcel of the Deception. A normal person managing a normal job and family life would not have the wherewithal to maintain some of those big, slick websites with lots of bells and whistles and special areas and fancy design and daily updates. (Let the reader understand …)

      I cannot explain the existence of these things without resorting to the hypothesis of paid shills.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

      1. “I cannot explain the existence of these things without resorting to the hypothesis of paid shills.”

        I might have seen things the same way as you, had I not lived the experience of a self-funded content creator.

        And no, my life is not normal. I do not have a family to take up my time, nor do I have to provide for one, which means I am able to get by on much less normie work than the regular person. This in turn means I can spend even more time on research / production / correspondence / etc.

        Perhaps in the future I may look to start a family. If this happens, my content production will surely plummet. I agree with you that a person with a normal family and worklife simply would not be able to do what I am doing. There is not enough time in the day.

        This is just my own experience, though. I cannot speak for any other content creators you may have in mind.

        Like

        Reply

  5. I don’t think, TPTB do have the need to brag. It’s our weakness not theirs. They manipulate the masses for very long and know how it is done. All they do is manipulation. They want us to become conscious and they know not many of us will. I also tend to think, the World is split in half, one part consisting of artists, actors and producers of all kinds delivering the background for the other half, to make them go to work every day. TPTB have full control of everything what happens and constantly train us to behave properly. If you ever had a dog you would know what I mean.

    Like

    Reply

    1. I am always on the lookout for background noise and so became aware of Marc Maron, a comedian I never cared for. This is the first time I have noticed his initials, MM. He does a podcast called WTF, and what is interesting is even though he is not particularly talented, he gets very high profile people to come on, like Obama and Paul McCartney. So I suppose that if I check him out on Geni.com I will find that MM is peerage and juiced. The premise is that he bottomed out, lives in a run down part of LA and that people drive to his house to be interviewed. Something not right. (Ted Danson was on, and I enjoyed the interview, as he comes off as modest and not self important. But the idea that Danson, sleep deprived because he had gotten up at 3 AM, like we seniors tend to do at times, drove across LA to do the interview anyway … WTF?)

      Why am I writing this? Oh yeah, McCartney. If anyone is bored enough to want to hear the whole interview, please report back. I could not get through it because he is a liar, a lifetime actor. But he apparently believes in himself and thinks all the approbation that comes his way is earned. Even as I know he did not write all that music, hasn’t had a hit in decades anyway, that whatever modicum of talent he has is only in performing, and not in writing music … he was so full of himself at one time, we are told, that he wrote classical music, Standing Stone, and of course the best musicians came together to play it while he modestly stood in the background.

      What is wrong with this picture? Why is Marc Maron getting all this juice to come his way? He starts off each podcast with a rant, boring as hell. Thousands of people are doing rants and calling them podcasts. Why does Maron’s take off like that? Why does McC get really talented people to play his shit?

      Something about the initials MM are a signalling device.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_Stone_(album)

      Like

      Reply

      1. I knew that Mickey Mouse was too good to be true! And as for Minnie! The little Minx.
        I digress. AA Morris, comes to mind and Game of Phonies author George RR Martin. Different initials, but perhaps still a signalling device for different projects. KK must be a marker for talentless imbecille.

        Like

        Reply

    2. It’s 20% producing the illusion for the 80%. Pareto’s natural law.

      And in that 20%, a further 80/20 refinement so that really only 4% of the population “really” has any serious string-pulling puppet mastery input.

      Like

      Reply

  6. AA Morris made me think on AA Milne (Winnie the Pooh author). Milne was an intelligence officer, writing propaganda, in the First World War. [HG Wells was a teacher of his at his old school.]

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment