“I skimmed those websites and could tell at a glance the theory was purposeful misdirection just from their form. They tend to use picture fades and chops, sort of like DallasBoldPest or Tokarski. Although the theory ought to be pretty easy to prove with straight forward analysis like I do, they never get around to that.”
“DallasBoldPest” is is Ed Chiarini, or Dallas Goldbug, controlled opposition put in place to discredit photographic analysis of faces by making absurd comparisons, such as JFK becoming Jimmy Carter or Jim Morrison transforming into Rush Limbaugh (God rest his soul). Since there are so many around us who are actors, even people who have faked their deaths to assume other roles, it was important for Intel to get out in front and establish that speculation about such matters would be verboten, and Chiarani was given the task. He has served nobly, and Mathis in the above paragraph is using him as intended, to discredit me. Interesting.
The paragraph is lifted from a Mathis essay on Amelia Earhart in which he claims her death was faked, and that ala Sharon Tate (Patty) and Nicole Brown Simpson (Denise), the alleged deceased merely became her sister, in this case, Muriel Earhart. He’s right about that, and before I do get into photographic evidence to this effect, I need to work a little bit on Mathis himself. We published an attack here by a writer using the pseudonym Robert Zherunkel attacking Mathis on personal grounds. That essay is no longer available for viewing, and I have told Mathis privately that we crossed a line that cannot be uncrossed, and that I regretted that. However, even as I can regret it all I want, I cannot un-publish it. So I understand his resentment of me even as it seems to stem from other matters as well. I can live with it. The Mathis story is interesting, and as we have discussed here and as others have noted, one man cannot possibly be the source of so much that has been revealed.
His role appears to be in our cryptocracy to fulfill the function called “now it can be told.” As some have noted, we are often warned in advance of fake events, and then those events unfold. Later, usually much later, we are told the truth, but in such a way that only a very few access it. Mathis, with his limited audience and off-putting genealogy and Phoenics, is a good source for NICBT. Long after events have occurred, he comes along to explain what really went down. But notice his role in the present moment, with the scamdemic, the most important psyop of all of our lives, that he’s not too well versed. He claims it’s a money grab, as if the people behind it are hard up for cash. He’s phoning it in, and not of much use to us.
With Amelia Earhart he gets it right, but stand back a minute. He’s not saying she kamikazied her plane into a Phoenician Navy vessel, but rather tells us that he figured out the scam based primarily on this photo:
It’s pretty easy to see after the fact, but not something we would stumble on. He had to be directed to that, and this is where “now it can be told” comes into play. Mathis was allowed to disclose the Earhart scam, as well as a host of others that have taken place in our own and European history. It’s his role. NICBT.
After reading the essay (eyes glazing over in the genealogy parts), my first impulse was to prove him wrong about Amelia becoming her sister Muriel. It was confusing at first, as the photos below which are labeled “Muriel Earhart” are indeed of Amelia.
In the last one, the photo is very clearly labeled as one of “Muriel” with her mother, as shown below. There are, to my knowledge, no family photos that include Muriel and Amelia together.
I have done the necessary analysis here but won’t bore you with it, as I only needed to convince myself that Mathis was right. Someone fed him correct information, but he did not take time to show us, instead telling us to rely on his remarkable judgment to make his case. Just trust him, he said.
What was confusing were other photos claimed to be “Muriel” Earhart, two of which (there aren’t many) were not even close in resemblance to Amelia, shown below.
The first and second line up well enough to possibly be Amelia in her younger and middle years. (Amelia died in 1998.) The two on the right are not even close.
Conclusion: Amelia Earhart’s death was faked, and she became her sister, Muriel. Mathis claims she was gay, but I don’t know how we can make such an assertion without better knowledge. Mathis thinks a lot of people are gay.
So he’s right. His gratuitous shot at me was uncalled for, and as I said at the outset, I should just walk away. But the guy can be annoying. So I gratuitously begrudge him a correct analysis.