Meeting in the shadows of the COP26 gathering in Glasgow, Scotland, the captains of private finance laid out their plans to restructure the global financial system. For months, I’ve been waiting for the banks and financial institutions to make their move. The plan is to reconfigure the role and scope of global and regional financial institutions, including the World Bank and IMF.
The officially cover story presents this massive transformation as a unified transition to a global (carbon) “net zero” economy. This new arrangement will totally change “global financial governance.” By further weakening national sovereignty by forcing nation states to follow new rules that favor wealthy of alliance members for their benefit under the guise of promoting fake United Nations “sustainability goals.” We have already seen this power-grab progression expressed in the global lockdowns, surveillance systems development via the 5G/6G rollout in “Smart Cities” around the world. That was the appetizer. This is the entrée.
Whitney Webb has written a very comprehensive analysis of the meeting, the plan, and its implications for all living things on this little planet of ours.
“This alliance, called the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), was launched in April by John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Change; Janet Yellen, US Secretary of the Treasury and former chair of the Federal Reserve; and Mark Carney, UN Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance and former chair of the Bank of England and Bank of Canada. Carney, who is also the UK prime minister’s Finance Advisor for the COP26 conference, currently cochairs the alliance with US billionaire and former mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.
“Though GFANZ has cloaked itself in lofty rhetoric of “saving the planet,” its plans ultimately amount to a corporate-led coup that will make the global financial system even more corrupt and predatory and further reduce the sovereignty of national governments in the developing world.” Id.
And here’s how “the mechanics” of this diabolical plan will work. If you thought multi-national development banks like the IMF and World Bank were uses as weapons against small, emerging economies in the global South before, this is the “nuclear” financial option enveloping (enclosure) every aspect of every penny invested in once sovereign nations.
“In addition to the creation of “corporatist” “country platforms” that focus on specific areas and/or issues in the developing world, GFANZ aims to also further “corporatize” multilateral development banks (MDBs) and development finance institutions (DFIs) in order to better fulfill the investment goals of alliance members. Per the alliance, this is described as increasing “MDB-private sector collaboration.” The GFANZ report notes that “MDBs play a critical role in helping to grow investment flows” in the developing world. MDBs, like the World Bank, have long been criticized for accomplishing this task by trapping developing nations in debt and then using that debt to force those nations to deregulate markets (specifically financial markets), privatize state assets and implement unpopular austerity policies. The GFANZ report makes it clear that the alliance now seeks to use these same, controversial tactics of MDBs by forcing even greater deregulation on developing countries to facilitate “green” investments from alliance members.” Id.
I could go on, and on, but Whitney Webb has laid it all out. I urge readers to take full advantage of her research. In order to fully appreciate the broader implications of the Covid 19 scam, it is essential to understand the importance of this ultimate merger (corporatization) of MDBs and the unimaginable deregulation that coming under the frame and narrative of “decarbonization.” Climate change is the “big enchilada” in this global takeover scheme.
Piece of Mindful 
“Green” to me is the Trojan Horse they are using, along with the “virus”, to rework the world, the great reset, along lines of fascism, totalitarian control, whatever word or phrase you choose to use. The point is that our currency will be tied to our behavior, and our various governments, as we have already seen, will be a monolith, nowhere to go, no point in protesting, as they can cancel you.
Why are they doing this? Because they can. Why did they not do it before? Because the technology had not yet been perfected. There’s a common belief among people who study this matter that psychopaths instantly recognize one another, even just walking down the street. As one traverses up the ladder of society and power, the psychopaths are more clustered. The problem with this line of reasoning is that they are generally not smart enough to make and carry out complicated schemes.
For that, they need technicians, bureaucrats, naturally smart and normal people who, as in being part of the Manhattan Project (whatever that really entailed) were co-opted into something they could not control or escape easily. I imagine that Climate and Covid are much like Manhattan, in works for years, compartmentalized, everyone sworn to secrecy, severe repercussions for speaking out. Some very evil people are behind both schemes, along with some very smart people caught up in the propaganda, and some very stupid people just reading their lines, like Al Gore.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“The bigger they come
The harder they fall one and all.” – Jimmy Cliff
There is always cause for optimism. Small is beautiful.
See also: Leopold Kohr’s first book, The Breakdown of Nations (1957 ).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ironically, deregulation may actually lead to more, not less, “carbon emissions”. If there’s no needed checks-and-balances on the activities of large multinationals and “governments”, environmental destruction will precipitate at higher levels than they already do.
Of course, this is not so about about “saving the planet” or “sustainability” as it is and has always been about the bottom line: securing and expanding their already vast control over every aspect of earthly existence at whatever cost.
Stay tuned for the ongoing saga.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Their “green revolution” is simply window-dressing for their anything-but-green agendas. Greenwashing, if you will.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“In light of GFANZ’s membership and members’ ambitions, some may wonder why the United Nations would back such a predatory initiative. Doesn’t the United Nations, after all, chiefly work with national governments as opposed to private-sector interests?
Though that is certainly the prevailing public perception of the UN, the organization has for decades been following a “stakeholder capitalist” model that privileges the private sector and billionaire “philanthropists” over national governments, with the latter merely being tasked with creating “enabling environments” for the policies created by and for the benefit of the former.”
“For decades”. This is the heart of the issue I think, the UN seems to be a trojan horse for the new paradigm that they’ve got planned. Their planned financial reset is a major component for sure but their ambition is breathtaking in it’s scope, and deeply fascist too [as per Mussolini’s definition of fascism]
About halfway down the article Whitney references Iain Davis, she links to a soundcloud item with him. I know that Iain is a decent guy< I’ve conversed with him via the comments on his site in the past. Iain has been excellent about the covid psyop, he has produced numerous articles on his website that exposed the covid nonsense. I’ve got his book “PsuedoPandemic – The New Normal Technocracy” which is excellent too. Iain has recently produced a three part series on his site about the “Global Public-Private Partnership” which is already in place. They didn’t bother to announce anything to us plebs but it is de facto operating NOW. Here is the link to the first article on his site:
https://in-this-together.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
The other 2 in the series came immediately after this intro, and all 3 are well worth a look. He’s laid it all out quite succinctly. The new NAC’s are mind boggling in their intention, their ambition is to control EVERYTHING here on planet Earth, simply everything, they are insane. Their Global warming/Climate change/Climate crisis psyop is a key vehicle it seems, but it is by no means the endgame
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think you are right, Pete, about this being already the SOP for the new model of the same old shit. We’re usually decades behind the actual change. Nice to see them so confident in their intentions. Gives me hope that the weak links in the system (5G/6G) will be understood and rejected by enough to retain some “remnant” of humanity that can slowly adapt and evolve without all the machine-mania.
LikeLike
Pete-
Thank you for this revealing comment, and the link to Lain Davis. He has composed some superb material, including the articles you reference….there is also, specifically re covid itself, this expose of part of the covid hoax: *https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud/, which leads to the D-Salud paper “https://philosophers-stone.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The-scam-has-been-confirmed-Dsalud-November-2020.pdf”, a demo of one key aspect of the fraudulent use of PCR.
I was momentarily stumped by the “NAC” reference, but finally found it in the links. “Natural Asset Company”, a lovely sounding name for a construct leading to outright predation on and control of earth’s resources (as you point out) for the benefit of “investors”, as is simply said in the happy language at the following link: https://www.intrinsicexchange.com/home.
LikeLike
Thanks Matt, I’m pleased that you had a look at Iain’s material, which is superb as you say. He has been consistently good over the whole scamdemic, and he has an easily understandable prose too I think
Their ambition regarding Natural Asset Companies is breathtaking in it’s scope, they are insane, as I said earlier. Your link NAC certainly is of a piece with all their previous fine sounding rhetoric and statements
The reader always needs to think carefully about the implications of what they are saying, about what is implied by the benign sounding words themselves. This is their usual technique of course. For instance, when I’ve previously shown friends and acquaintances their published Agenda 21 & 2030 policies then their frequent, unthinking, reaction has been something like: “sounds alright to me, sustainability makes sense doesn’t it?”. They completely miss the fascistic control implied by their statements, liberals particularly so
On a personal note, my thanks for your frequent informative and thoughtful comments on this forum, and CTTF too [I’m a lurker there, ha ha]. I have learned a lot from you over the years, so please do keep up the good work
Best wishes
Pete
LikeLike
This is a duplicate comment Mark, perhaps you will delete the first one? The para spacing disappeared when I pasted it in for some reason
“In light of GFANZ’s membership and members’ ambitions, some may wonder why the United Nations would back such a predatory initiative. Doesn’t the United Nations, after all, chiefly work with national governments as opposed to private-sector interests?
Though that is certainly the prevailing public perception of the UN, the organization has for decades been following a “stakeholder capitalist” model that privileges the private sector and billionaire “philanthropists” over national governments, with the latter merely being tasked with creating “enabling environments” for the policies created by and for the benefit of the former.”
“For decades”
This is the heart of the issue I think, the UN seems to be a trojan horse for the new paradigm that they’ve got planned. Their planned financial reset is a major component for sure but their ambition is breathtaking in it’s scope, and deeply fascist too [as per Mussolini’s definition of fascism]
About halfway down the article then, Whitney references Iain Davis, she links to a soundcloud item with him. I know that Iain is a decent guy, I’ve conversed with him via the comments on his site in the past. Iain has been excellent about the covid psyop, he has produced numerous articles on his website that exposed the covid nonsense. I’ve got his book “PsuedoPandemic – The New Normal Technocracy” which is excellent too
Iain has recently produced a three part series on his site about the “Global Public-Private Partnership” which is already in place. They didn’t bother to announce anything to us plebs but it is de facto operating NOW
Here is the link to the first article on his site:
https://in-this-together.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/
The other 2 in the series came immediately after this intro, and all 3 are well worth a look. He’s laid it all out quite succinctly. The new NAC’s are mind boggling in their intention, their ambition is to control EVERYTHING here on planet Earth, simply everything, they are insane. Their Global warming/Climate change/Climate crisis psyop is a key vehicle it seems, but it is by no means the endgame
LikeLike
For those who prefer audio, Whitney Webb explains the neo-colonial plan to control, and make money using, all life on planet earth. Starting in the global south, Latin America specifically.
LikeLike
They always conceal their narcissistic, psychopathic pursuits under benign guises like “sustainable development”, “providing equity”, and “expanding democracy”. That’s how they get away with their atrocities.
LikeLike
Regarding Latin America, we see this happen with the theft of lands and natural resources from indigenous populations by multinationals like Cargill and Monsanto that have a long track-record of causing environmental destruction in their pursuit for power and profits.
https://stories.mightyearth.org/cargill-worst-company-in-the-world/#group-Cargill-and-Soy-7XWxD7Exw7
https://earth.org/the-monsanto-effect-poisoning-latin-america/
Ironically, monopolies like Cargill have joined in the effort to greenwash their terrible legacies in order to control the “sustainable” narrative and advance their nefarious agendas.
For example, in recent years, Cargill invested in ‘vegan’ products like fake meat and veggie burgers in order to cater to a growing segment of the population who are eating primarily or solely plant-based foods. This is the same company that is one of the largest players in the meat and dairy industry.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cargill-plant-based-idUSKCN20I0EU
https://www.frankslide.com/does-cargill-own-farms/
https://www.ran.org/the-understory/monsanto_and_cargill_the_thugs_of_big_food/
It’s also involved in organic food production. This is the same company that utilises GMOs in its food production.
https://www.cargill.com/food-beverage/na/organic-non-gmo-oils
https://www.foodingredientsfirst.com/news/Cargill-to-Showcase-Organic-Product-Development.html
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2017/04/25/cargill-fire-dont-agree-gmos-unhealthy-biotech-crops-key-tool-sustainability/
https://foodrevolution.org/blog/cargill-gmo-stevia-hoodwinks-consumers/
LikeLike