About those contrails

A while back the subject of contrails (versus chemtrails) came up here, and I knew I had linked to an article on the subject and written a post. But I could not find it anywhere, nor could I find the piece I had linked to. c’est la vie. I know now that the reason I could not find the post was because the word “chemtrail” is not used in it. I searched for “contrail” a couple of days ago, and it popped up, top of the list. Clifford E. Carnicom is the man brought to us by Oregon Matt, and he does not use the term “chemtrail.” He does not want to be lumped with the chemtrail conspiracy crowd, and so goes with “aerosols” and “aerosol crimes”. Contrails, clouds and aerosols are three quite different phenomena. (Note how “conspiracy” is an effective thought control device, its intended purpose, to prevent thinking on any given subject.)

In the comments below from the original post, Oregon Matt links us to an hour-forty-minute video by Carnicom, which I had started watching in 2021 and then lost it along with the post. I will finish watching this weekend. Yippee! It looks riveting. I will reproduce that video at the end of this piece.

Here’s another link, a paper by J. Marvin Herndon, Raymond D. Hoisington and Mark Whiteside called Chemtrails are not Contrails: Radiometric Evidence, published in the Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, and brought to us by commenter Riccardowa. It is right on target with Carnicom.

https://journaljgeesi.com/index.php/JGEESI/article/view/476/952

___________________________________

The original:

This post comes to us courtesy of our friend Oregon Matt. It is about contrails. There is math involved, some intimidating formulas presented, but the kind of formulas where all of us who took high school math could solve by inserting values. It’s not terribly difficult, but I don’t expect anyone to go running to the link by Clifford E. Carnicom just to see the formulas.

A little background about me. I have long operated on the assumption that contrails depend on the amount of moisture in the sky. If there’s a lot, then we see long tails behind jets flying over, and if the air is dry the contrails dissipate right away. Also, I assume that in addition to water vapor, the stuff coming out of the end of jet planes also contains nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide and other invisible stuff. But according to Carnicom, what we see is virtually 100% water vapor.

Continue reading “About those contrails”