From Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle Blowers, by Mary Bennett and David S. Percy (1999, three reprints, 2002, 2003, 2009):
The results of our own research have shown us that it is unsurprising that NASA, while protesting greatly, is not particularly concerned by the accusations of “hoax” when it comes to the Moon landings.
Such a reaction is similar to that of any sophisticated and highly intelligent group – the accused – under interrogation. The interrogators, convinced that they have pieced together many facts of the case, are attempting to extract confessions from the accused. However, the ammunition for the question is, in part, based on disinformation and so the accused sits there, quietly amused at the interrogator’s ineptitude. The accused feels secure in the knowledge that ultimately their group cannot be convicted because, as both parties know, there are missing parts to the picture. (Page 164)
This is not a post about the Moon landings, so well discussed recently. If it goes that way, so be it, as it is a subject that grabs the imagination. While a hoax, Apollo was a broad-daylight one, and so NASA was obliged to show us all what they were up to, kind of. They had to provide photos, movies, conversations, a room full of computers (one or two plugged in), and men willing to testify to the impossible, that they went to the Moon and back.
