I made it through all 666 pages of the book Memoirs of Billy Shears, by Thomas E. Uharriet some time ago. To the left is a face split between the image on the cover of the book, and a 1957 photo, said to be of Paul McCartney, but actually the one I call Mike. In the book “Billy” claims to have undergone plastic surgery to implant plastic to create the illusion that he looks like “Paul”, or the man we know now as “Macca”. But it appears to me all they have done is take the original Mike and draft an image based on that. I see no plastic sticking out.
The book is written in two voices, that of “Billy”, who claims to have been a studio musician before the death of the original “Paul” on 9/11/1966, to have played in various bands under other names, to be a trained musician who can read music and who has written all of the songs of the Beatles (after 11/22/66) that are not separately attributed to John Lennon, George Harrison, or Ringo Starr. That part is made-up nonsense, but there is an overshadowing of truth admitted to in the time alluded to that came before the fake death on 9/11/66:
NOTE (Page 167): The Beatles’ music will evolve from the most naïve that their writers could imagine to the most liberated. The first hit in America ( being their second in the UK) credited to Lennon-McCartney, though far beyond their writing skills, was Launching the engineered social transformation that sold over 15 million copies worldwide. [MT Note: this must refer to either I Want To Hold Your Hand or She Loves You.]
I tend to agree with this note, but take it further, that all of the body of work of the group called the Beatles was far beyond the writing skills of those group members. Mike Williams (the Sage of Quay), who has also read the book and written volumes about it, claims that when Billy came aboard, the group by his pressure had to 1) play their own instruments, and 2) write their own songs. Since Paul McCartney did not die, it is safe to say that neither he nor his twin brother (the original “Paul”, the “cute one”) nor the other band members morphed into the highly skilled craftsmen who put together Sgt. Pepper and all that followed. That’s a bridge too far.
Petra Liverani, who authors the Substack blog called Psyop Detective, frequently alludes to what she calls “revelation of the method.” I’m going to highlight a footnote below that gives credence to her intuitions:
NOTE (page 489): The idea of mutual consent also comes into play with disclosure. Although the ruling elite accomplish their design by clandestine means, they tell all in words so plain that the majority disbelieves them. According to their law, when one gives notice of a course of action if those impacted do not formally object, they have lawfully agreed. With that tacit agreement, those who control the world do so according to the will of the people. Sometimes they lay out the truth so plainly that most people disbelieve it on the grounds that if it were true, the perpetrators would not admit it. However, according to their doctrine of free will, and by the rules of fair play imposed on them by others, they must give notice but are not required to convince anyone.
That, to me, sounds exactly like “revelation of the method”.
In the coming paragraphs I am going to cite some more footnotes from the book, ignoring the main text supposedly written by the fictitious Shears. I will comment here and there because I cannot help myself. (Note: All of the words that follow are far beyond the capability of Macca to either think or write.)
Page 83: The existence of objective reality is debatable. Humans operate in subjective realities created by their thoughts. By controlling what people think, such as by controlling news stories and Internet search results, master manipulators plant their intended reality into the minds of those who are attuned to the programming. In the absence of opposing narratives, the masses collectively adapt to whatever reality they receive. “Whoever controls the media, controls the minds” (Jim Morrison) of those consensually programmed.
Page 91: Many people wonder if the NWO [New World Order] will succeed. For the most part, it already has. The power has been transferred behind the scenes with only a charade of national sovereignties remaining. Central organizations already work through governments to the point that government façades are quickly becoming obsolete. The continues to increase in scope as it gradually comes out of obscurity. Those controlling the media are careful to pace that disclosure. If the public learns too much too soon, they could reverse the NWO ‘s progress. The queue must be revealed little by little else the public accepts one point at a time. Too much public awareness now could overturn the cabal’s overthrow and spark court action everywhere for treason and other capital crimes.
[MT Note: With Covid, we saw all of the world’s governments on the same page at the same time. Floor stickers saying “Stand Here” appeared everywhere at once.]
Page 127: When contracting the Beatles with EMI, George Martin attempted to explain to John and Paul that they would become a famous writing team, greater than Rodgers and Hammerstein. When John corrected him, saying that they practically never play their own material, Martin said, “Mark my words, Lennon and McCartney will be the most famous writing team in the world!”
Page 135: Jimi Hendrix (trained in Laurel Canyon) said, “If there is something to be changed in this world, then it can only happen through music.” Repetitious sounds and messages are key to mind control. Frequencies impact our energy fields. Rhythm directs a brainwave, pulse, and mood, which impacts hormone levels. Lyrics with catchy tunes carry precise messages to the conscious and subconscious as we consciously and subconsciously sing along. Enthusiastically receiving repetitious mental programming from an adored superstar multiplies the impact. Nothing directs human consciousness as effectively as music, especially when combined with plant medicine or drugs. Many people are brainwashed by giving them hallucinogens or drugs combined with repetitious audio messages.
Page 160: On 22 March 1963, the Beatles released their first album, Please Please Me, on Parlophone (their UK label). On 22 November they released With the Beatles on Par lophone (for the UK), on Odeon (for the Western European continental market), and on Capitol (only in Canada). Capitol was not permitted to release With the Beatles in the US that day. Through their intelligence network, M-16 warned EMI against releasing the album in the US on the day that John F. Kennedy would be assassinated. Doing so would hurt record sales and give the Beatles a lasting negative association. Waiting until well after the event, however, would make the traumatized Americans more receptive to their new idols. EMI understands the effects of trauma. (Emphasis added.)
Page 261: The most trusted fact-checking websites on television programs go to some expense to maintain their reputations and are often useful to check on inconsequential urban legends or threats of computer viruses. However, providing many true statements for each ruse, along with disproving false rumors, they also claim to “debunk” (a trigger word to make people believe them) proof of scams perpetrated by specific treacherous corporations. The reverse is also true. Fictional formats (songs, movies, or novels) can condition people to think in specific ways about planned events. Sometimes directors or writers are tipped off to include specific details to add those ideas to the collective consciousness. The foreshadowing technique is useful for instilling subconscious dread or acceptance. Using fiction to plant ideas in advance allows writers and directors to program how viewers and readers respond to each issue as the programming is activated by real life events.
Page 323: Most people cannot stand to be wrong. When beliefs are threatened by fact or reasoning, so accept any excuse to keep believing. Hence, this fine work to finally un-fool the fool requires far more effort than was made to hold them in the first place. Fear of being a fool makes us foolish. Regarding rock ‘n’ roll, relationships, or religion, the mind favors evidence to support its views. “You can tell me anything at all – as long as it supports what I believe.” “One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We are no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get back” (Carl Sagan).
Page 476: Among the obstacles preventing competing countries from sending astronauts to the moon and returning them alive is that astronauts would pass through the Van Allen radiation belts each way, to and from the moon. NASA cannot explain why they do not now have such technology but are working on developing new methods. Perhaps traveling through wormholes is plausible. America’s Moon Landing (a hoax mapped out years before by Pres. John F. Kennedy) was instrumental in winning the Cold War, driving the USSR to bankrupt itself for what was fundamentally impossible. That strategic intimidation, inspired by the Hollywood tricks that help the Allied forces when World War II, helped prevent World War III.
[MT Note: I no more credit JFK with mapping out the moon hoax than I do Paul McCartney for having written Yesterday.)
______________
There are many, many more footnotes in this book (180 to be precise), all written in a voice more knowledgeable, more erudite than the guy we call Macca. This entire book, then, qualifies as Petra’s “revelation of the method.”
Piece of Mindful 
Mark, thanks for summarizing this semi-fictional tome. Based on the quotes it sounds like they are trying to appeal to conspiracy theory lovers, who I would say outnumber people like ourselves on this blog, who are not into such things, by a considerable margin. Because convoluted conspiracy theories are so much more clever, and hence interesting. It can become like a game, or puzzle, trying to come up with a “theory” that fits the facts. Facts like the ones spun off from the JFK “assassination”.
Before i got here, to this site and state of mind, I was semi-obsessed with the JFK assassination. Especially Mark Lane and his theories. However, the CIA doing it all is not a very plausible theory, once you see the flimsiness of the evidence, and tie up the fake RFK assassination into the same story – super powerful family fakes death vs. lives comfortably with JFK, RFK, then Chappaquiddick, and stays friends with the Bush’s right through 9/11 and the war on terror (where George HW Bush is the leading candidate for Kennedy assassin ringleader!)
LikeLike
I did not take the reference to the JFK assassination as a real thing, so that advance knowledge of it merely meant that it was mutually shared inside info. I always wondered where he went after 11/22, Ari’s boat the most likely spot. But maybe he had plastic surgery, plastic inserted into his face, and became the guy that Lorne Michaels calls a “fucking Mozart.”
LikeLike
Do you think Ari and the Kennedy’s could have been close due to the supposed booze smuggling of the Kennedy’s during prohibition, and perhaps earlier (just plain shipping of alcohol)? Thats what everyone used to say, that the Kennedys got rich being rum runners.
LikeLike
Hard to know. JFK Jr. looked like the spittin’ image of a young Ari, hardly at all like JFK. I know that Joe Kennedy was said to have made his fortune during prohibition in smuggling booze. And then after passage of a generation, the loot is sanitized.
LikeLike
I have often wondered why George HW’s father Prescott Bush is not more widely considered as a likely ringleader of the JFK “assassination”?
LikeLike
well yes, that would be you and a large group including … nobody else.
LikeLike
The ringleader was film director John Frankenheimer. Or as they say today, “show runner”.
LikeLike
The ringleader was film director John Frankenheimer. Or as they say today, “show runner”.
LikeLike
Frankenheimr’s for film was out of Jack’s daddy’s old studio of course.
LikeLike
My understanding is that “macca” doesn’t claim to be the author of the book (or footnotes), but that Thomas E Uharriet is the supposed author (decoder). This Uharriet person (clearly a pseudonym), has his own website and other books that he claims to have written. I’ve emailed him in the past, asking him about certain things in the Memoirs book. He used to be willing to correspond with people, but I think is has distanced himself from that recently.
LikeLike
I’ve not looked into Macca having a part in this book, assuming he did not. Uharriet, you’re ahead of me if you contacted him. I would never think to do that. Well done.
The purpose of the book? All I can guess is Petra’s revelation of the method. There’s a ton of stuff revealed in the footnotes, but people will have to read the book for themselves to form their own opinions and questions. He even spouts out, at one point, on George Washington being a Freemason.
LikeLike
I’ve not looked into Macca having a part in this book, assuming he did not.
Sorry, you mentioned a couple of times that the prose was beyond what Macca could do, so I incorrectly assumed you thought that he was the supposed author.
One of the questions I had for Uharriet in my email to him, was if he was aware of John Halliday, and what did he think of the suggestion that he was the “original” Paul.
Uharriet acknowledged knowing of him. His explanation was that there were several Paul lookalikes, back in the day, that were used as Paul doubles, and that John Halliday was one of the “best ones”.
I wrote back with a couple of points that I thought shot down that explanation. I also, perhaps foolishly, mentioned that John Lennon was still alive, and that he (Uharriet) likely knew that as well.
He never responded to me about that, of course.
Ultimately, I am intrigued by the Memoirs of BS. Clearly a *lot* of work/effort was put into the project… a very niche project, to be sure.
I do find it interesting that Sage of Quay is, really, the *only* “researcher” to invest time into studying it and presenting it to an audience (and thus, promoting it). I would venture that most of the people who have found and read the book, discovered it through Mike Williams.
Whatever it’s purpose(s) (I have my suspicions about what those may be), it is an impressive book, to be sure. It was not done simply as a throw away project to promote the PID theory. There is much more going on in it than that. (though, that is a big part of it, imo)
LikeLike
His answer about Halliday is a bit too glib, as if he’s brushing it off without any inclination to investigate the evidence. This suggests he knows what’s up, and is in on the game, NDA and all.
Regarding John Lennon, did you mention the MM paper on the subject? In that paper, he also writes about Michael Jackson, who truly was a gifted entertainer, claiming that he went to Dubai to live after all of the pedophilia stuff. That paper was [is] gold!
LikeLike
Yes. I found it interesting that he seemed to already know about Halliday. It seemed that he had a stock answer, ready to go.
Also, fwiw, Mike Williams gets very irritated by John Halliday comments/questions at his PID youtube page. He claims to have “debunked” it and won’t talk about it anymore.
No, I didn’t mention MM’s Lennon paper. I just stated it, as if it was obvious. I was curious if he would ask me a question about it, or have a response ready, as in with Paul. Of course, his lack of response told me he wasn’t interested in engaging any further.
LikeLike
Well, SofQ, whose obviously pored over the book, surely knows the footnote on page 261 that says
The most trusted fact-checking websites on television programs go to some expense to maintain their reputations and are often useful to check on inconsequential urban legends or threats of computer viruses. However, providing many true statements for each ruse, along with disproving false rumors, they also claim to “debunk” (a trigger word to make people believe them) proof of scams perpetrated by specific treacherous corporations.
Me and Ab of Fakeologist asked MW to do an interview with us, and he said he would oblige but the thing about twins could not be part of it. No interview.
LikeLike
What do you think of the photo of Paul and “Billy”?
LikeLike
Well, first off…the footnote says that the bass was “stolen” in 1969. So, how did “William” have it later to be photographed with it?
Also, there is no way in heck that Paul was 5’11.
and why does it say “William *was* 6’2 1/2” tall? Was? Not *is*?
Anyway, the photo itself is small and grainy, and it’s difficult to make out details.
The “William” photo, in particular, looks faked and/or heavily manipulated. What’s up with his hands?
Clearly the heads are different shapes. Paul’s hair is darker, but they have the same hairstyle/cut…with even the little forehead curl looking almost exactly the same.
Seems a little too “perfect” for me.
Also, the bas that William is holding doesn’t look exactly like Pauls bass. It is missing the 2nd pickup. Plus, the neck of his bass seems to twist backward toward the head. Frankly, it looks like it’s a pasted together photo…and not done well. The line of Williams arms, shoulders and hips look unnatural.
What else am I missing?
LikeLike
Nothing. Thanks for checking it out. I’ll move the photo here tomorrow so people can see what you’re talking about and add their two bits.
LikeLike
That Richard Starkey at 85 is the most Jewish looking person ever.
LikeLike
When I was growing up I always thought the older Ringo gets, the more he looks like Yasser Arafat, especially if he was wearing sunglasses. Someone joked on reddit that Yasser died in a car crash in 1966 and was replaced by Ringo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe you have it backwards! It could be that neither Yasser or Ringo were worth a damn on the drums.
LikeLike
Thats very funny. This Ringo character must have a very extraordinary background/family/Masonic ties in order to be selected to be in one of top groups in the world (that became the most promoted) when he had little talent as a drummer.
One of the most interesting things I realized today about this likely high level intelligence agent/son of a Sheik is he had a hairdressers business before he was in the Beatles, and retained that interest even after becoming famous. Which reminds me of the Miles observation that hairdressers are a common business for intel agents – e.g. Paul Tate, Tex Watson, and Sebring of the Manson show. That makes intuitive sense, in that people tend to blab a lot at their hairdresser/barber, and the atmosphere is conducive to people letting down their guard and answering personal questions they would not normally answer with strangers.
LikeLike
Also having a hairdresser business is a good cover for a no-show job and money laundering, along with drug dealing, gambling, and other illicit business that no doubt to this day is an important stream of revenue to the “families”, and to those who are connected and need not worry about getting raided or busted.
LikeLike
Here is the photo BMS is analyzing above. It is grainy, but it is a poor quality photo in the book too.
LikeLike
This is obviously not a photo of the two of them together, but still, in all the years of the Beatles it has never been done before that they are placed side by side. I’m once thought we had them both in the boat photo, but not so. I have photos of them as young children, but once the Beatles got going, never together. How hard that must have been, how tightly managed they are, how difficult for Paul being out of the spotlight. No wonder he day drinks. This photo is a revelation!
LikeLike
I think this is the real Paul in this 1964 David Frost interview. Seems like he can’t wait to get out of showbiz. He mentions twice about retiring: at the 1:55 mark he says he’d like to go in a couple of years(which would be 1966!), and once again at the very end. Sounds like he was telling us what was gonna happen!
https://youtu.be/hQRKqlx2sT0?si=sOjr3NzKKu_ySbUq
LikeLiked by 1 person
He’s the one I call Mike, the current-day Macca. A lot of phoniness going on there, about him and John writing their own songs, but heck, to this day the guy is the biggest phony who ever walked.
LikeLike
Good call! Normally I can tell the difference because Paul has thinner lips than Macca, I think? And also Paul has a happier countenance. But in this interview he seems more serious, indicating Macca. But in those earlier days they could look very similar.
He’s probably wearing a hair-piece here, which makes it hard to tell. I kinda assumed it was Paul because of the retirement talk. Why would Mike talk retirement. One theory: Maybe at this early point Paul has not decided to retire yet, and Macca is frustrated and wants out.
LikeLike
They are generally easy to tell apart due to eyebrows and an impacted tooth. Paul has wraparound brows that extend down around the outer eye further than Mike, and also has an impacted tooth on the left upper part of his teeth. In the early days I think their hair (or wigs) were far enough over the forehead to disguise the eyebrows, deliberately. When it became easier to pull off the stunt, they got more careless.
LikeLike
Mike williams has corresponded with Uharriet. He seems to think he is real. There is a picture of Uharriet on his old website if you look back through arhive.org.
People seem to dismiss the book without reading it or understanding that it is as official as can legally be. Look at the foreword and who narrated the audio book version.
I believe there are many “inaccuracies” and elaborations for deliberate fictional purpose. I also understand the book is not a simple read through once. The acrostical code and later versions whisper messages and all another layer of deception that will include truths.
Mccartney is a high ranking freemason and occultist who fully understands the use of masterful speaking and sybolism ect. The majority of readers will not comprehend many apects. And that fine for him.
Afterall is the reader is already enlightened he is unlikely to need to read the book to believe it possible.
LikeLike
The book states that it skirts a line between fact and legal fiction, with enough of it contrived to make it the latter.
I do hope you’re not implying here that Paul is Dead, as I’ve got pictures of him living and doing well, day drinking even. You do know he was one-half of a set of identical twins? Please say yes!
LikeLike
I am ambiguous on if paul is dead or not. I am not sure it really matters. The important information is the bands construction and agenda. The understanding for people that music and entertainment are not created or promoted for their pleasure. The whole industry is a front for social engineering . No matter how many clues given books written or films made. This revelation is coming from the biggest living pop star of the last 60 years. If people still dont get it they never will. Paul is dead like all of the media culture presented is mockery and truth in plain sight. Maybe its easier for non fans of Beatles like me or even commercial music to get ‘it’
LikeLike
I was exposed early on, starting in the 1990s, to this guy Albert Goldman. Member of the tribe who got the privledge of writing hatchet jobs on some of the biggest of big shots in the entertainment industry.
Albert Goldman (Author of The Lives of John Lennon)
The books I read were on Lennon, Lenny Bruce, and Elvis. Extremely devastating takedowns, that in retrospect were semi-fictional revelations of the method – that our “heros” are not really what we project.
Ladies and Gentlemen, Lenny Bruce!! by Albert Goldman | Goodreads
Elvis by Albert Goldman | Goodreads
LikeLike
I dunno … the part about John Lennon having a tragic childhood is “debunked” by childhood photos that I suspect are of his real family, a nice and friendly-looking couple … one photo of him and Mimi is faked. The only one I know of.
Tempted to read it but right off the bat get a spook chill up my spine.,
LikeLike
Yeah unless you are looking for alternative material I would pass. He claims Lennon killed Stu Sutcliffe by shoving him into the pavement in a fight and giving him a blood clot in the brain, or something like that.
The best part that may have some legs to it is the “lost weekend” part of Lennons life when he went to LA to hang out with Nilsson. That rings pretty true, that he finally got away from Yoko and became a drunk for a while and hung out with that Chinese girl having fun.
LikeLike
The childhood photos are telling, one on a beach with family with another boy his age and dressed in twin-like clothing, both the same. They are here somewhere on this blog.
Similarly, Stu Sutcliff, who I maintain became the shitty artist called Andy Warhol. There’s a telling photo of JL and “Warhol” on this blog too, with Yoko aboard, JL and AW very much entwined, like lovers.
LikeLike
Goldman is good, in places, but he has a fair amount of admiration for Lennon’s music (“I Am the Walrus” and “#9 dream” are noted for capping off different eras) that isn’t usually noted …. On the debit side, Al (as he was known in NY) didn’t do many (any?) of the British interviews in his book, and he didn’t note that all-ALL-the men alleging Lennon’s gayness were named “Peter”, conventionally, a British name for people in the journalism industry like himself….
LikeLike
Yes so I would recommend reading Goldman if you like tabloid style journalism, thats not hagiographic. His tales of Lenny Bruce and Elvis were quite devastating. The claimed Lenny Bruce was a Meth addict who would get it prescribed by his doctor, which I had never heard of before. But doctors can pretty much prescribe anything off label, if you know the right person.
LikeLike
I came of age in the early 60s and so know little of Lenny Bruce. Does anyone think he was funny? He’s never made me laugh, and no, I did not see the movie starring Hoffman.
Elvis, I sort of missed out on him too, as he was 1950s when I was just a kid. But as an adult I can see why he was a big deal, talented, good looking, backed by great songwriters. MM says he was twins, his evidence is two live birth certificates, Elvis and Aaron Presley. I monkeyed with it, but man, if they were twins (one performing in Vegas while the other was making movies), they were stone-cold replicas.
LikeLike
I’ve listened to Lenny Bruce on and off since I was a teenager. He’s not so much funny as amusing, often playing the irascible victim*. Given that he died “young“ I wonder if his legal problems were staged as a warning to other comics to watch what they say.
By the 70s, with Bruce “dead”, George Carlin took up the mantle of using profane language as part of his comedy, but there is a huge difference between the cultural warfare Bruce appeared to be engaged in, i.e. sexual politics, and the somewhat juvenile potty humor that Carlin developed, Of course later, near the end, Carlin was simply ranting and raving in general terms about the haves and have-nots, which I found grating, frankly because I already knew about the haves.
*Bruce was also a very good impressionist, which was the staple of his act in the early years.
LikeLike
“If the public learns too much too soon, they could reverse the NWO ‘s progress”
I don’t see the public having any chance at reversing the course we are on. All the agendas seemed to get the results it was after. Yet all those agendas and isms were created and implemented by people that are mostly dead now. I guess their offspring now carries the NWO torch.
Faul/Mike is 83, Ringo is 85, and both last seen in the media are looking very well for their age, when most people that age are in nursing homes. They would have access to the best health care on the planet. John is probably still alive and looking good too. Maybe something going on with these old timer celebs, besides exercise and healthy diet. Take a look at Dolly Parton.
LikeLike
Photo posted upthread.. clearly fake because the value scheme on each figure is completely different. Ie black blacks vs washed out grays. In addition note how where they almost touch, there appears to be a white outline on one overlapping the other. But as to what it means, I will have to leave that to the Beatles scholars.. I would need a whole Beatles conspiracy theory for dummies book, to sort out all the names, and which camp believes what, and their evidence, and even what the mainstream believes.
LikeLike
The author makes no claim that it is a photo of Anyone but the original dead Paul and Billy Shears, whom we all know as Mike McCartney,and who goes by the name Paul. I find it revealing because they are allowing a side x side comparison of the two, never done before. The author does not claim that it is a photo of the two together, but rather the two are pasted side x side for height comparison purposes. He is saying that Paul was much shorter than Shears, but inadvertently tells us that Mike is taller than Paul.
LikeLike
Mark, get this – there’s a Spinal Tap 2 and guess who makes a guest appearance?
McCartney.
I don’t know which one, I’ll let you tell us, I don’t know shiite from shinola when it comes to the McCartneys.
Most interesting is are they giving us a clue the Beatles are a manufactured band like Spinal Tap? Just thinking out loud
Spinal Tap 2: The End Continues — release date, cast, plot and everything we know about the comedy sequel
LikeLike
McCartney starts being interviewed 32 seconds into the video. I haven’t watched the full video yet. Sequels are almost always bad, but the original Spinal Tap was extraordinary so I’ll give the sequel a chance.
LikeLike
A couple of weeks ago some movie theatres were showing the original Spinal Tap. It only played in my town two days and I missed it. Bummer, I’ve never seen it, but I’ll go see part 2.
LikeLiked by 1 person