Moving on …

These past couple of weeks have been spent here talking about 9/11. As an idealist, I cannot long live in duplicity, having a secret set of beliefs while pretending otherwise.

I was suspicious of the events of that day from the start and kept quiet about it due to social pressure that is part of the ongoing cover-up. As seen here, it takes no evidence to convince most of the public to believe the official story, and if doubtful, they are programmed to avoid even looking at counter-evidence.**

This is an expertly run PSY-OP. The methodology is to traumatize us, and then implant ideas in that state. Once implanted, the ideas are hard-wired and will never go away. Pearl Harbor* was such an event. It mobilized an isolationist population to participate in a world-wide conflagration.

In 1999, a group of “Neo-Cons” put together a planning document urging President Clinton to attack Iraq. It was called the “Project for a New American Century,” and a paragraph therein said that it would be difficult to get the American people to support the level of war they wanted without some mobilizing event, a “New Pearl Harbor.”

And that is all that 9/11 was – a mobilizing event to unify the American people behind the war machine as it went on the attack. Seven countries were targeted at that time – Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and the Big Kahuna, Iran. Since then it has spilled over into Egypt, Tunisia, and now Mali (as France attempts to retauke its former Algerian colony.)

In addition the U.S. is in a major redeployment as military assets are being put in a threatening position around China. Russia is again being demonized in our media, indicating that our military wants a confrontation there as well.

It appears that a new weapon was demonstrated on 9/11, a very powerful one that reduced three skyscrapers to dust. As with Hiroshima and Nagasaki, weapons demonstrations are done only with purpose, as a warning. No doubt China and Russia have been scrambling since that time to catch up, just as they did in the post-war era with nuclear weaponry. The inability of the U.S. to openly attack Syria and Iran may indicate that the Russians are on top of their game again. One can only hope.

And, of course, things are never as they appear. The African front was opened up for resources – Libya’s oil, Mali’s uranium, and god knows what else. It is geopolitics, that is, having resources under control, but also keeping them out of the hands of enemies, in the African case, China. It is still a tri-polar world.

I’ve written enough, argued enough. I’ve encountered the expected intransigence, and know the old saw that those who were not reasoned in cannot be reasoned out. I love writing and blogging, but it is time to write about other stuff. If this place seems abandoned for a while, it is only because I cannot think of anything else that grabs my interest. I am reading one source right now that is positing that the Ashkenazic Jews do not have any origins in the so-called “Promised Land,” but rather came from Central Asia. That would invalidate their bogus-anyway claim to Palestine. As long as I am tilting at windmills, that seems an interesting candidate. We’ll see where it takes me.
____________________
*To those who say FDR knew and all of that, I doubt it very much. I regard the attack that day as an intelligent military operation by the Japanese, a preemptive strike done knowing that if they did not strike first, they would be struck later. The US had already declared de facto war by implementing an oil embargo against them, making it a military necessity for them to go island-hopping to get to oil supplies. Pearl Harbor, had it been successful, would have been a master stroke. In that sense the attack might have been induced, but the war for control of the Pacific was inevitable.
** Cognitive dissonance?