Why the Founders wanted no standing armies

Archetype: (in Jungian psychology) a collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., universally present in individual psyches.

One of the reasons I suspect that events like Boston are probably false-flag is that normal people don’t do such things. It requires hatred of humanity, a desire to inflict pain on others, and a sense of political purpose all at once.

In case you think I have accidentally defined “terrorist” here, I have, but only as a deliberately implanted archetype. Americans are taught to believe that there are America-haters out there. Such creatures do not exist. If they did, events like Boston would be everyday occurrences, and we’d never be safe to travel. Our own “patriots,” the other side of that coin, have bombed so many countries, inflicted so much suffering on the planet that revenge ought to be the soup of the day, but it is not.

But what about psychopaths? Doesn’t terrorism require that?

Psychopaths are not angry people, by definition. They are devoid of emotion, so that American terror and crimes would not particularly bother them, and revenge would not drive them. They are incapable of both hatred and love.

So what drives these crimes? In Iraq, after the American attack we witnessed roadside bombs, shootings, explosions in places where Iraqi quislings congregated with their American overlords, and we called it terrorism. But it was not. It was intelligent violence designed to drive invaders out. It had central planners, overall strategy, and to a large degree succeeded. Coordinated efforts require such intelligence. Often enough civilians were caught in crossfire, and Americans were led to believe that this was the objective, since we were self-described “liberators.” But that was just another lie.

From the American point of view, we are dealing with wild men filled with rage who were randomly killing our soldiers over there. Instead, it was merely young men, unemployed and angered by the invasion, recruited to fight back by a highly trained military organization that had been disbanded due to American stupidity. As a young Iraqi man, I too would be tempted to join, as it was a noble cause. They were fighting for their families, their way of life, their homeland. So would we all.

There is no defense against someone who wants to randomly kill us. It is fortunate that it does not happen, at least not as we are taught to believe. Events like Boston are military in nature, the victims chosen for a symbolic purpose. The violence is inflicted without hatred or envy. It’s part of a game – that is what drives psychopaths – games. They are otherwise bored with it all. It is done to achieve a goal, as is all military activity. The ones who do this don’t hate us, don’t love us, but do need our support as they tear apart the things we love – social fabric, the Bill of Rights, and peace. They want internal confusion and suspicion, a police state to keep us from rebelling, and never-ending war on our neighbors.

The wars we fight are for control of resources, and to prevent others from amassing enough power to topple the US military from its perch. It is pursuit of power for the sake of power, a global game. Psychopaths exist in every country, and not just here. They gravitate towards occupations that require gaming skills, military being one of many – stock brokers are often of that ilk too. Our psychopaths are a breed apart, as they have access to wealth and weaponry as never seen on earth before this time. They might end up destroying us with those toys. Just the existence of the American arsenal is a threat to humanity.

Public support is crucial – witness the Soviets. Even a police state can be brought down by public dissent. These events as 9/11, Boston, perhaps Waco, are cruel, calculated, intelligent and purposeful. By definition, neither love nor hatred is involved. These are, after all, our psychopaths. They were assembled for high purpose during World War II, were given access to weaponry and wealth. After the war, they were not disbanded, as is normally done. They are now in charge, and have self-selected generation after generation. (“Skull and Bones,” as I have read of its rituals anyway, appears to be nothing more than a private place for psychopaths to gather. Secrecy is crucial, as what they do and say is really repulsive.)

We are, like the USSR, like Godwin’s Germany, a pathocracy. We have been so since 1947, when psychopaths were given formal access to all the tools they needed to solidify their place in power.
____________
PS: What about marketplace and mosque bombings in Iraq, an astute reader might ask. Such bombings heightened tensions among sects, Sunni and Shiite, creating a civil war climate. I would guess Americans and Brits behind them. The most treacherous bastards on earth are, in my opinion the Brits. Their psychopathy goes all the way back to the Medici’s. AMericans are their evil offspring.

2 thoughts on “Why the Founders wanted no standing armies

Leave a comment