Heather Abbott was one of the Boston Marathon bombing victims. She lost her lower left leg below the knee. She has shown remarkable recovery, a positive mental outlook and a cheerful personality throughout. She recently threw out the first pitch in a Red Sox game.
Jamie, pictured below, is featured on a website* that advertises amputees for roles in Hollywood movies. She lost her lower left leg below the knee (BK) in a car accident before 2012.
I’m Just wondering if they know each other, and if Jamie has reached out to support Heather in her time of need. And, as with Vince Vogt and John Bauman, I wonder if it is possible to take a picture of both in the same room without use of Photoshop.
_________________
*www. amputeesinhollywood . com/TalentLower.html
Piece of Mindful 
Nice find, but I found a better one.
LikeLike
Seen this?
http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/russ-baker/49589/who-in-boston-bombing-story-mysteries
LikeLike
Larry, read Baker’s Family of Secrets” to learn how a clear-headed investigative journalist set out to accomplish one thing and stumbled on to something much bigger. He is running an investigative journalism effort as a result, and solicits public financial support. I send him money each month.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Pretty sure I saw on Baker’s site last week that even he isn’t buying the fake victims angle on the boston bombings.
LikeLike
“Even he?” He’s reticent about everything except JFK/RFK/MLK, but he is good nonetheless even as he backs away from current events.
And anyway, that is, somehow, and you seem to have pulled it off, an appeal to authority. Deal with what I wrote. [in the post today called “Implications”]
LikeLike
He is your authority that you cited to above. I am merely citing you to him as well. I think I’ve said about all I need to on the subject..in short the internet has found two previous amputees who resemble in photos two of the Boston victims. Not exactly clear and convincing to me.
LikeLike
I did not cite him. Kralj did, and then Steve W offered the YouTube.
I like him, however. In our heavily thought controlled society, for him to cross the line into current-day crimes is to invite not marginalization, but ostracism. He’s only reluctantly a JFK guy, as he came to understand by looking at evidence outside of his objectives that somethng entirely different had happened there. Even so, there is some safety for him there in that the people who did that one are almost all dead now, or out of power.
Even so, thought control only permits one question, a “complex” one: “Did Oswald act alone?” Note that in phrasing it that way, Oswald’s guilt is taken for granted. Baker discovered otherwise.
LikeLike
You told Larry to read his book and then you said you send him money every month..the implication being that you find his work authoritative and credible. This is what Russ thinks about the crises actor stuff:
Russ: “We’re a little on the judicious side, sorry to say. We don’t just publish any rumor you hear–especially not that “crisis actor” stuff. Who needs actors when you can see how many real people were injured? HONESTLY”
http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/05/14/who-in-boston-bombing-story-mysteries/
(almost all the way at the bottom of the comments)
Im with Baker on this one. To attack me is to attack Baker. Case Closed! (you like the Posner pun?)
LikeLike
Baker is running an investigative research project, which means that he is hiring staff and paying salaries for journalism. His web site has many projects going and I’m happy to support him.
However, he assumes that people were hurt in the explosion. I think not. I’ve not seen any real victims yet – that is, people in the gruesome photos, and people later ID’d as victims. It’s just the power of TV and suggestion.
I just heard on NPR yesterday that they have raised $30 million for the victims. I doubt it, but I was wondering how they were going to get around the lawsuit issue, that is, with all of those people hurt and maimed, the city of Boston, the Marathon organizers, Craft Security were going to be taken to court and would have to deal with trial lawyers, evidence and all of that.
We’ll find out down the road, but my guess is that this will quietly fade away, no lawsuits.
PS – I’m still waiting for rebuttal based on evidence of my contentions. All you’ve done is cite authority figures.
LikeLike
i found a pretty convincing video rebuttal today on youtube to the guy who lost both legs being the vet who lost both legs. He had a number of pictures of the vet and they looked different from the guy at the race. Here it is. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=32Re4roC5lU
Although I admit I haven’t googled to check the photos against what’s out there on the web.
LikeLike
What is convincing about it? I found that “Bauman” looks more like Vogt than the other “Bauman’s” do. That video goes straight for power of suggestion.
Easy fix: Put them side by side, take their picture.
LikeLike
“… the internet has found two previous amputees who resemble in photos two of the Boston victims…”
I did not know the Internet was a sentient being actually doing research.
The resemblance is not mild, but pronounced, and add to that their missing identical limbs, and it is slam-dunk. I dealt with it in the post above, and concluded by saying that those who see it will not comment, as the implications are staggering. I take it that is why you comment here, and not there, and why you are dismissive rather than engaging in rebuttal.
That post, to this moment, has no comments. I’m going to let it sit there a few days to see how much silence it draws.
LikeLike
The internet also found the woman who did interviews with CNN at the finish line and again in the neighborhood where the house to house search occurred. And Daniel Hopsicker at Mad Cow Morning News has some more interesting stuff on the CIA background of the uncle (yep, not just his high ranking CIA officer former father in law but the uncle) who was doing media interviews.
He also has some very interesting stories on Rudi Dekker (ran the Venice Beach Flight School alleged hijackers trained at) being busted on Cocaine and Heroin trafficking charges in Houston. . Now that’s really interesting.
http://www.madcowprod.com/2013/05/03/did-the-cia-commandeer-the-boston-bombing-investigation/
LikeLike
Jack R, I’m not buying it either. I’m also not rejecting it out of hand.
Is it a limited time offer?
Baker is asking some very good preliminary questions about Boston. One need not jump to conclusions. If there are fake victims, the truth will out. If it’s a red herring, that too will out.
I used to think that perhaps explosives or thermite, mate, super or nano etc might have been the cause of the destruction of the WTC. But now i know those make no sense from the tons of available evidence. I also have seen evidence that high explosives and termite were planted red herrings meant to muddy, confuse, divert and exhaust critical thinking.
Did Mr Baker express a reason for rejection of the fake victims hypothesis? Or did he just express caution?
LikeLike
I don’t recall exactly, he was responding in the comments section to a poster who asked why he wasn’t writing about the fake victims. Something along the lines of trying to keep some kind of standards at the place and leaving out the obvious crazy stuff.
LikeLike
What a difference an h makes, eh?
LikeLike
Humor is where you find it, and I know it’s just a typo, but you are the first one, Steve, to advance the theory that the WTC buildings were brought down by termites.
LikeLike
As a famous writer said, once you eliminate all other possibilities, the one remaining, no matter how unlikely, must be the truth. I think part of our differences arise from the power of TV coupled with media control. I think it was CIA head Colby who said that the Agency controlled every major asset in broadcast news, and CIA head Casey who said that they would not be through until they controlled every opinion that Americans had. (I have the quote but have not taken time to verify or source them.)
As hard as it is to believe that so many people could be “in on” a lie like that, remember that most accept it because they are suggestible and non-critical in their thinking, and when they see something on TV, no matter how incredible, they believe it. TV is truth. Also, the closer you get to the actual events and witnesses, the more you are going to find scared shitless people. Within the newspapers and TV stations, hospitals and the like, you’ll find lots of lowered voices and a realization that these who pulled this off own our reality and are cold-blooded murderers Too. It’s not that people are keeping secrets so much as laying low.,
I’ll lay out the events of Boston in a more coherent manner next week and perhaps be a little more convincing. But for now, the photo comparisons don’t speak. They shout.
LikeLike
My gut tells me that there is bogus dis-info that appears to support conspiracy but that is easily refuted, perhaps like the youtube video i posted.
That seems to be a fairly useful and repeating method to discredit suspicion where suspicion is warranted. you drag people in, set them up, and then pull out the rug from beneath their feet. Similar to claiming high explosives/thermite when all the evidence is easily shown to refute that premise.
My gut tells me the most effective way to do that is with the alleged doppelgangers. I can’t see the advantage of faking injuries. Is it a cost thing? they can’t afford to make a real bomb that injures real people, but they can spring to pay actors? I certainly don’t think it’s a moral objection to injuring innocents. So why not plant a real bomb and blame it on the estranged nephews of the CIA uncle, which has been confirmed by the way, his ties to intel.
That would make a lot more sense and seem to be a much better cover up than faking injuries.
Of course I could be wrong. But can you come up with an advantage of fake injuries over real ones?
LikeLike
I don’t see any easy refuting going on. Go back to that YouTube and compare facial features without the sound. Vogt looks like Bauman. The two Bauman’s don’t. And oddly, they could have easily doctored those, but don’t seem to have done so. They are obviously not threatened. People are buying I to these events now with hardly any real effort.
Why use actors? I cannot begin to guess. 9/11 certainly had a lot of actors in addition to real victims. I can only tell you that it is easily apparent that they did. It could be all the VIP’s at the finish line, or lawsuits that would bankrupt Boston. I’m just not privy to it, and can only relay what is so readily apparent.
Maybe I’ll have better thoughts, but even though what they are doing makes no sense to me or you, do to assume that it is without good reason.
LikeLike
An interesting article, Larry. Thanks for posting it. When i learned that the media friendly uncle was formerly married to a high ranking CIA official i thought that was a red flag. The article you posted provided a lot more information. I’m to the point that I’m very skeptical of the whole deal. It stinks. If Mark is correct and two of the victims are plants, then it certainly does call into question a hell of a lot of other events as well.
LikeLike
I found the CIA connection very curious also. They basically run the country now. The departments of State and Defense have been nutted. Bush has supplanted real government employees with moles and cronies.
LikeLike
Bush?
LikeLike
Yes. He had eight years to fire anyone who was professional in their duties. For example, his work at the Justice Dept. to fire everyone and replace them with Liberty University Law School grads.
This is quite interesting. Google naked Boston bomber and see what you get.
http://www.gaulitics.com/2013/04/was-nude-suspect-in-boston-bombing.html
LikeLike
So you’re like an Obama guy? That’s so weird.
LikeLike
Not really. I’m like a Chris Hedges, Noam Chomsky, Ralph Nader kind of guy. Or in other words, folks who tell the truth about the way things are. The country went terribly astray after WWII. I believe that that is when we lost our promise. The fascists began to take control and never looked back. I believe it’s impossible now to get any semblance of democracy back. I hope I’m wrong, but I doubt it.
LikeLike
I was just confused about why you reflexively attacked Bush II as Bush III now holds office.
LikeLike