The origins of Americanism

The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy. (Alex Carey)

I stumbled upon the above words years ago, and only now have followed up on Carey’s (1922-1987) work. He was a misplaced sheep rancher in Australia who had strong academic leanings. (Raising “sheep” would later seem apropos.) He studied propaganda, but most of his work was unpublished due to an early death. He noticed that around 1970 American propaganda was creeping into Australian society. In academic fashion, he did research into the origins.

Alex-CareySo I spent my down time in Yellowstone reading “Taking the Risk out of Democracy,” a collection of his essays. Most of our current attitudes are a manifestation of earlier work by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM). That robust group ran education campaigns from the early twentieth century forward. The only two serious threats to corporate power in our society are government and unions. NAM demonized both, convincing even those who benefited from unions that they were a force for evil. Those attitudes are omnipresent now in our culture.

NAM was behind a Red Scare in the post World War I era, which repeated itself after World War II. The Rosetta Stone for anyone serious about avoiding propaganda is the “Manichean world-view.” This includes use of powerful symbols of Satanic and Sacred, good and evil, darkness and light. This is the seed of Americanism that germinated in the The Committee on Public Information, or CPI, sometimes called the Creel Committee. It was the group that explored propaganda techniques to rally the public behind American entry in to the First World War. So successful was CPI that its techniques were used by the Germans leading up to World War II, and Americans are now are the master practitioners. Note how all about us are forces of Satanic evil as we fight for Sacred good, and how evil communism was in short order replaced by terrorism (by non-Americans) as the symbol of evil.

Americans are drenched from birth now in propaganda, so much so that only by accident, as with me, do any of us escape it. I can easily see, as it is painfully obvious, that 9/11 and Boston were false flag events. But for most of us, there is no access to anything but reinforcement of the official story of Satanic evil attacking our sacred good. False flag events are agitprop techniques, but the guts of American propaganda is birth-to-death immersion in wide cultural assimilation of lies. By the time we graduate from high school, the “state” owns our minds. In reality, the state is the corporation.*

9/11 was twelve years ago, Boston just this year, and already they are shrouded in the cloak of official truth. Imagine that all of American history is thus.

The CIA [Committee for Immigrants in America, not the current spook agency] … produced a brilliant propaganda strategy to involve every American in an annual ritual of national identification. This ritual would embed the cultural intolerance of the Americanization movement with an identification that was formally and officially sanctified. The CIA thereby launched its campaign for the fourth of July 1915 to be made a national Americanization Day, a day for a ‘great nationalistic expression of unity and faith in America’. (Carey, The First Americanization Movement)

I have long suspected that most of our history is bogus, and that the few Enlightenment principles that the writers of the Declaration wrote about were expounded in brief window that had closed by the end of Jefferson’s term of office. Look about us now, see what we have left of speech, religion, privacy, habeas … all gone. Free speech, never really practiced until the 1950’s in the Civil Rights movement, has again gone underground, and any who practice it are likely on a list of subversives somewhere in the bowels of NSA.

So now I learn that the 4th of July was merely another propaganda device. “Americanization” became “Independence,” but it’s still going on. Why am I not surprised?
_______________
*Edward Snowden, the supposed whistle-blower, worked for Booz Allen, a private contractor. I have read (and who can know?) that 70-80% of NSA’s work has been outsourced to by private contractors. Taxpayers finance all of it, but might it be better said that corporate America has “insourced” 20-30% of its surveillance work to NSA?

3 thoughts on “The origins of Americanism

  1. What a coincidence. I was up at the Pryor Mtn. place and reading a book about soviet propaganda. Great book, has the most amazing collections of posters.

    The name is, Soviet Posters, The Sergo Grigorian Collection.

    Here’s a review. “By Henry Berry
    Format:Vinyl Bound
    With the majority of peasants illiterate when the Communists seized power in the Russian Revolution in the early 1900s, the communications system including the press primitive, posters soon took a prominent place in spreading the ideas and ideals of Communism and focusing the far-flung, heterogeneous population on central institutions such as the army. The poster never lost its prominent position in the Soviet Union. While the subject matter of the many posters was limited by government authorities to accepted propaganda themes and perspectives, considerable latitude and even considerable innovation were allowed and even encouraged. Suprematicism championed by the modernist Kasimir Malevich “created a new artistic alphabet, based on the languages of color and energy. Vladimir Mayakovsky and Alexander Rodchenko were two Russian artists who pored their skills and visions into poster art in lieu of other hospitable mediums in the totalitarian state. El Lisitzky introduced the style ‘constructivism” in the 1920, followed by photomontage done by Gustav Klutsis and others in the early 1930s. Lafont, who was born in Moscow and is the author of “Pillaging Cambodia – Illicit Traffic in Khmer Art,” cites such influential Soviet artists, whose influence spread outside of Russia, and follows the changing course of the Soviet poster according to changing artistic ideas, historical circumstances, and emphasis on certain propaganda in the Introduction.”

    Great stuff. Does Alex happen to mention any totalitarian regimes propaganda?

    Didn’t think so.

    Like

    1. Absolutely he talked about totalitarian regime propaganda. Don’t be so presumptuous.

      Ironically, even while corporate propaganda overwhelms democracy, it is able to create an ever-strengthening popular belief that the free-enterprise system which sponsors it is some kind of bulwark and guarantor of a democratic society: that is, a society where official policies and values are realistically within the free choice of a majority of ordinary citizens. Indeed it remains, as ever, an axiom of conventional wisdom that the use of propaganda as a means of social and ideological control is distinctive of totalitarian regimes. Yet the most minimal exercise of common sense would suggest a different view: that propaganda is likely to play at least as important a part in democratic societies (where the existing distribution of power and privilege is vulnerable to quite limited changes of popular opinion) as in authoritarian societies (where it is not). It is arguable that the success of business propaganda in persuading us, for so long, that we are free from propaganda is one of the most significant propaganda achievements of the twentieth century. (The Early Years)

      Carey, citing Robert Dahl (whom I am not familiar with):

      Much in the way of political theory … depends on the assumptions one makes about the sources of political attitudes … If one assumes that political preferences are simply plugged into the system by leaders (business or other) in order to extract what they want from the system, then the model of plebiscitory democracy is substantially equivalent to the model of totalitarian rule. (Ibid)

      Indeed, as he explains (and others in other works), Soviet propaganda was quite crude by comparison, as they did not need it as much as we do. They had control by force. Here our masters must own our hearts and minds as well, and that takes a sophisticated enterprise.

      If you think that American propaganda does not exist or is not incredibly effective, ask yourself why you are afraid, and I mean afraid, to question the official 9/11 story.

      Like

Leave a reply to Mark Tokarski Cancel reply