I have repeatedly gotten the following comment from JJ on an old post called “We know that Sharon Tate did not die that night, but was she even pregnant?”
The “rose” is actually part of the string of Christmas lights that Candice Bergen left strewn about the fence before moving out with Terry Melcher.
I have not let the comment through. If I do, JJ becomes a regular, and I don’t want that. This person seems to be dealing on an intimate level with the Tate Massacre. Such people litter the landscape, and are either clueless or are deliberately casting about seeds of doubt on honest research. In either case, I don’t want him/her coming around. So I am answering here, as the odds are that the email address given with the comment is bogus.
JJ, we know that it is a string of lights. That is not the point. It is a staged photo designed to look like a rose and a cross, Rosicrucian, get it? Do you see a cross on the other side of Tate? We also know that is just a fence.
We are not all in total agreement here, but if you look at the odd placement of Tate’s arm, what I see is someone else’s very pregnant body below, and her head above. It is a staged photo heavily edited in a darkroom. It is not a truthful image.
In other words, not only was Tate not killed that night, she was also not pregnant. You don’t get this?