I have been unable to get anything but short snippets of an incredibly stupid speech given by Rep Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX) on the day of the Solar Eclipse. Go to timestamp 16:16 to view the entire painful exhibition. The most disturbing element here is that Lee used to sit on the House Science Committee and the House Space Committee.
Around the same time, The View’s Sunny Hostin blamed the recent solar eclipse on Climate Change, along with the New York earthquake and the return of cicadas. This was too much even for host Whoopi Goldberg, who slammed her for discrediting the show. (Link)
And the beat goes on.
Ohhh, what’s really going to bake your noodle later on is, would you believe it if I hadn’t said anything?
LikeLike
The fact they had a politician who participated in government space committees spouting this carp about the moon being a balloon is a red-flag in itself. The moon being a hologram is a more convincing argument, in comparison (e.g., Project Blueray).
LikeLike
In fact, I think they intentionally put out this garbage to test the masses’ credulity. They’re basically trolling people on both sides, at this point.
LikeLike
And the politician in question likely doesn’t even believe her own bullshit, knowing it’s a word salad scripted for the purpose of creating disbelief and confusion in her stupefied audience.
LikeLike
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEZOzA43_F4
I do not think everything is fake, not by a long shot. I hope the link above works … Alex Epstein, a very smart man, walks into a trap set by former Senator Barbara Boxer. She asks him if he is a scientist, he says no, he’s a philosopher. What’s a philosopher doing speaking to the Senate Environment and Public Works committee? He says “To help you think more clearly about things.”
She’s dead in the water, but too stupid to backtrack.
It is not unusual to encounter stupid people in high office … they don’t get there on intelligence – they are put there by people who see useful qualities, intelligence not among them.
That said, documents the public never got to see: Obama’s college records, and Trump’s tax returns. Reason: Obama is not a juris doctor, and Trump is not a billionaire. They are just useful people.
LikeLike
I never implied that everything is fake, or at least not in this specific comments section, but a lot of things they present definitely are. This could be one of them, because they love to stage these things to mock the intelligence of the masses. Not to mention it is too unbelievable to be genuine.
The same is true for George W. Bush playing stupid. I never once believed his act nor his phony Southern drawl, considering he wasn’t even born in Texas. Or Donald Trump and his ridiculous antics before and after his reality TV presidency.
LikeLike
And while it may be true that exceptional intellect is not a prerequisite to becoming their puppet, I still believe they select people who are smart enough to know what’s expected of them by their masters for these acting roles.
In fact, I would say that choosing a complete dolt is rather risky, because there’s a higher chance they might mess up or go off the script inadvertently, which is not something the psychopaths want to happen.
Stupid or incompetent people may exist in such high positions, but they’re not as common as they would have us to believe. I think they want us to think that because it gives these people the excuse to brush off any of their bad decisions as mere symptoms of stupidity or incompetence, thereby convincing people to not hold them accountable for the evil they do.
LikeLike
Three come to mind … Obama, Clinton, and GW Bush. Zbigniew Brzeziński was said to be the guy who spotted Clinton, saw charm and a man with a good memory. They can fill in the rest, build a back story. Obama had ease and ability to carry on a dialogue, they made him a family man, gave him a dog, wife, daughters. The guy is a great actor. GW Bush, a charming man, not smart by any standards, but likable. He was already branded but his older brother was lined up to be president. So he took cuts. I have to say I like GW the best. Just a nice man. Obama, Clinton, too,smooth, too polished, like narcissists, maybe sociopaths.
LikeLike
GWB may be the “nicest” among them, but he still is far from innocent in my book. And I don’t think he’s nearly as stupid as they would have us to believe, even if he’s far from brilliant. He certainly knew what he was doing when it came to his response to 9/11, for instance.
LikeLike
Anyone in his shoes would do likewise. Just as with Biden now, he was window dressing. People like to imagine their votes matter.
LikeLike
Pretzel, I’ve long thought trolling is a useful lens to use for media analysis. If you imagine master trolls scripting the stories, you can see as things unfold how they dynamically respond to audience reaction. If people get worked up about something, then a new story comes along to feed into it. Or, to undermine it and give the other side something to get “all spun up” about. It can be sort of wryly amusing if you’re detached from it or see through it. Except that it has real world consequences.
LikeLike
Good points. Donald Trump is another example of this in action. They literally fooled people into believing that a TV show caricature was a serious contender for political office who will come to “make America great again” (conservatives) or destroy the country with the help of Russia (liberals). If that isn’t a classic example of political trolling and it’s real-world repercussions on the sheeple’s psyche, I don’t know what is.
LikeLike
I’m going to weigh in on cosmology. I’ve been carefully observing the sun and moon the past few years trying to make sense of what they are. My best guess is the solar system and galaxy fit an electric universe, or charge field type hypothesis most convincingly, with gravity, it it exists as an independent force, being more temporal (time dependent), and linked simply to inertia, and the density of matter in the local environment.
I also believe that the ether exists, which exerts some kind of space pressure, and is a separate phase of matter, with a quantum number of zero assigned to it in the periodic table, and the proton or hydrogen being number one. It is likely fairly rigid and very cold, like water but much colder and nearly crystalline, so that electromagnetic waves can propagate through it quickly and efficiently.
LikeLike
Your first point is reminiscent of Mathis’ charge field theory, as it has similar ideas to yours about the universe, etc. And speaking of the electric universe, this might also explain the existence of thunder storms. Clearly, this phenomenon has something to do with it, because otherwise there’s no good explanation for why it happens, or at least that’s so to me. What do you think?
LikeLike