Is Taylor Swift for real? (I kid! Of course she’s not!)

I draw attention to a post by Francis O’Neill, a man I have only recently come across, called “Is Taylor Swift in on it?” I think that is a fair question, even as it seems painfully obvious to me that she is ‘in on it.’ All she has to do is sit back and take it all in … the fame, the accolades, the money. Like the Beatles and Monkees*, to go generational on you, her job is to merely say nothing in public that would betray that 1) She does not write her own music, and 2) She does not perform her own music. If she were on a tell-all kick, she might also add that she has never seen Travis Kelce naked, nor he her/him/it, and that she knows as much about Covid and vaccines as she does about musical structure.

This is an easy post to write, as all I am going to do is refer you to Francis. His post is long, and anyone who knows me also knows that I believe in succinct and to the point, and that I always have in mind the attributed quote my Mark Twain,

“I didn’t have time to write a short letter, so I wrote a long one instead.”

Those who know me know that I always get quickly to the point. By the way, while we are at it, please dissect the photo below of TS and Prince William and family.

I think is fake. I’ve been wrong before. Also, she is always loaded up on lipstick, which I find so unattractive. Is it done to distract us from her mannish face?

*To be fair, the Monkees were quite open about not writing their own songs or playing their own instruments.

14 thoughts on “Is Taylor Swift for real? (I kid! Of course she’s not!)

  1. “So nobody must be allowed to think at all. Down with the public schools! Children must be drilled mentally by quarter-educated herdsmen, whose wages would stop at the first sign of disagreement with the bosses. For the rest, deafen the whole world with senseless clamour. Mechanize everything! Give nobody a chance to think. Standardize “amusement.” The louder and more cacophonous, the better! Brief intervals between one din and the next can be filled with appeals, repeated ’till hypnotic power gives them the force of orders, to buy this or that product of the “Business men” who are the real power in the State. Men who betray their country as obvious routine.

    The history of the past thirty years is eloquent enough, one would think. What these sodden imbeciles never realize is that a living organism must adapt itself intelligently to its environment, or go under at the first serious change of circumstance.” – Aleister Crowley

    Like

  2. That’s quite a quote, and sadly quite true. Their vision has been achieved. I have worked as a teacher in the public schools, and know they have deteriorated into strict indoctrination centers with little room for the normal curiosity and rambunctiousness of gifted child. If I had children now I would never let them enter public schools in America, you could do so much better on your own. I know I taught myself much more than I learned in classrooms, especially before graduate school, where you might finally meet an intellectual equal with high standards and an open mind.

    Like

    1. School is just a place to put the kids while the parents are at work, earning the tax revenue.
      Some parents work two jobs with one at night, including driving time, there’s no time to teach the kids a full academic year course load. Many times it depends on the social status of one’s community, some school districts are way better than others.

      Like

  3. Mark, so you noticed her mannish face. I dare say, as I have before, that she is likely of the T-girl variety (I say T-girl since the T word banned on this site). Her build and square jaw tip “her” into that category, along with my experience that there are a lot of these people in high places, likely due to Masonic control of the entertainment industry, and their worship of the Baphomet.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. One other interesting observation I had today was at the work gym where the History Channel was on and they were talking about the history of famous pirates, and whether they were freemasons. This particular show, based on the closed captions, was about Captain Kidd and whether he was a freemason, which they were suggesting he was.

    Which is surprising, because the consensus is the Freemasons are an umbrella of secret societies around the world, that ostensibly are in control, as some have suggested, and would not want to reveal their “power”. However, I seriously doubt the Freemasons, which encompasses a huge number of secret societies, are actually in control. Rather I believe the Masons are a control mechanism of the highest elite for the next level down, to ensure they have the most capable lackeys and henchmen to do their dirty work, on a daily basis.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I just read through the Francis O’Neill column. You know how they talk about falling in love, I will say Francis had me at “fake pandemic”. Anyone who says that gives me a little tingle up the leg.

    Like

  6. Pirates, imo, were always agents of the British in a war for the high seas with the Spanish. I liken the rather short, 75 years, history of the pirates to the even shorter period of the Wild West where untamed land was wrestled away by “outlaws’, many whom had government and military ties. Once the seas, and west, were tranquilized by the invading navies/cavalry, the ports and posts established by “pirates’ and ‘outlaws’ went to the controlling governments.

    As for being Freemasons, I have no doubt all leaders of these marauders were lodge brothers.

    Like

  7. Also, Tay Tay had some work done and that may signal a switch from the country Xtian to the satanic witch of today day. However, she does seem to have a very feminine brow/forehead. Not sure why she hides it under the bangs, but who knows…..?

    Like

  8. Thanks for comments. I understand Mark why you previously banned the trans topic – it can just go round n’ round in circle jerks of debate as to who’s a tranny, and who’s not. In the end who cares, really, especially about the private lives of celebrities.

    I have read some good revisionist history of the West, that suggests the Mormons are largely Masonic controlled – not too difficult to conceive – and that California and the gold rush have all been stage managed Mason productions, with the Jesuits/Masons controlling the ultra-valuable territory of California for 200+ years.

    Perhaps a good barometer of masonic control is the tax rate – California has outrageous tax rates on everything. One wonders where does it all go? Perhaps mainly into the pockets of lodge brothers?

    Like

Leave a reply to Mark Tokarski Cancel reply