Follow me on truecrimecasereopened.substack.com … Mark is a shill he just proved it. I am personally connected to this tragedy, Eric and Dylan were real. I sent Mark all their info, he knows better. Maybe this will go to your email before he bans me. (Final (I hope) deleted comment by Goodwomb420)
[For the record here, it doesn’t occur to me that people don’t see what I see. This dude, Goodwomb420, whoever he/she might be, never contacted me or this blog before the last few days. He didn’t send me “all their info”. That’s merely a strategy to gain trust, and he is playing that trust by his claim that he has the inside information on Columbine. He might have some of it, and if so, got it from inside sources familiar with the players, to be released here mixed with falsehood, classic misdirection. That falsehood is that Dylan and Eric were real persons. If anyone has looked deeply into this abyss as have I, it emerges slowly that Columbine high school was closed every year for the month of June, and in one of those Junes prior to 1999 all of the inside footage of the event was filmed. My piece on Columbine has a fatal flaw … it is long. There are therefore precious few readers of the whole piece. It needs to be worked over and published in Readers Digest to highlight that no one died, nothing happened inside the building that day, that there was no Dylan or Eric, and that SWAT patrolled the grounds for one purpose: To prevent interference by goddamned innocent bystanders.”]
Interesting strategy here … to foreordain an action and then claim victimhood. Anyway, you’re provided above with a link and are on your own to judge his worth. For myself, he’s just a bit hyperactive, perhaps knowingly so. If I say he was “sent here” to discredit me, I rise to the bait. His appearance here, I suspect, is built around my posts concerning Mathew Silverstone, whom I regard as a ghost and fake victim of the fake shooting at Evergreen Colorado High School on 9/10/ 25. My Silverstone rantings might have actually reached some people and caused them to wonder. I used NextDoor for that purpose. That’s a high-profile place, my comments sometimes drawing in excess of 2,500 reads. I provided a photo of Silverstone, noting that we had no such family living in our area, openly at least, and that the photo had been doctored. NextDoor, which warned its patrons in March of 2020 that anyone criticizing WHO or CDC would be censored, and then banned if the behavior was repeated, is a large national operation with local tentacles everywhere. It, like Facebook and YouTube, was seen as too important to be left alone during the fake pandemic and willingly went along with it. I withdrew at that time, and only recently rejoined the fracas. That comment and photo was quickly censored. But it was not without effect.
I quit NextDoor after that blowup, but they tell me I cannot do that, that they must keep my comments for legal reasons. I took that to be a veiled threat. But never mind anyway – Facebook never deletes comments. I doubt that NextDoor does either. They can always be mined for dirt.
I am drawn to controversy. I am reminded of my childhood when I and friends would visit the local dog pound. Maybe it was an asshole thing to do, but I would drag a stick down the cages, which were all outside, just to hear all the dogs bark at once. Well, not “maybe”, but actually a real asshole thing to do. But I was a kid. That’s my excuse, and I stand by it.
Anyway, I recently received an email from GoFundMe, advising me that my fraud complaint against the effort to raise money for Silverstone would be investigated. I advised them, and now everyone, that I filed no such complaint, and that whoever the impostor is will probably be found nested in Jefferson County Colorado Sheriff or School District offices. Both are infiltrated by spooks … it can be no other way. Columbine could not have been pulled off so successfully without their cooperation. I advised the school district of my noninvolvement, suggesting they look inward for the impostor.
That won’t happen. They might be forced the bring Silverstone forward, possibly in a wheelchair. If, as I contend, Silverstone is a ghost, they will have to bring in another actor to portray him. We are not without some technology here to detect such fraud.
As always, readers here are on their own. Goodwomb420 accuses me of being a shill. Defending myself from that accusation would achieve his objective. I cannot convince anyone of anything and will just carry on as usual.
Piece of Mindful 
I’m a little confused here. Eric and Dylan being real doesn’t mean the event was. Lots of real people in fake events. Or, Mark, are you saying they were complete fabrications?
This is an interesting post from a guy who attended a weekly Shakespearean workshop with David Cole Wheeler – double double agent 🙂 at Sandy Hook
https://poetseye.substack.com/p/shakespearean-turns-crisis-actor
LikeLike
I never looked into Sandy Hook, as it was so well covered by so many others, and anyway, I intuitively knew it was not real, but only later, as I was better schooled in fake events, and not at the time.
It does not matter if Dylan or Eric were real or contrived, I agree. My issue is that I spent many hours looking at photographs, and came to realize that there were two (or more) kids who played them, but that in the Yearbook they had to resort to the Stone/Parker duo. That can only be because they did not have suitable yearbook photos to use for two ghosts. Remember, it was 1999 (and the years of planning leading up to that year), so technology was still relatively primitive. They could not simply generate faces via computers. (The first time I saw that method, computer-generated images of victims, used was Pulse Nightclub. Others may offer other instances before then.)
With Klebold they found a reasonable facsimile, so in staged photos you can see his face, but it is clearly not that of Trey Parker, used in the yearbook. With Eric Harris, even less so, that is, in critical photos like them in Matrix-like clothing in their “student project” movie, his face is not recognizable. Similarly, the death shot, he’s turned away. He could be one of several boys of similar build to play the part. Even as they walk through the cafeteria with weapons on the ready, you cannot make out Harris’s face.
Also, in Moore’s Bowling for Columbine movie, they had to place the two in a 6am bowling class and hire two actresses (so I suggest) to play two other students in the same class. Stop and think, why that class? The boys supposedly underwent a full curricula, so there should have been dozens to testify to their reality and weirdness. Why a 6AM bowling class (that likely did not even exist, was invented for Moore’s movie)?
I suppose you could say there are legal liability issues. With Sandy Hook they had to invent Adam Lanza. With our recent Evergreen event, they widened the face of Desmond Holly to make him look more sinister, just as they did with Mohammad Atta back in 2001. Everyone involved in these events signs NDAs, and no one is guilty of harm or injury to others, but some might come around and lodge a complaint about their reputation and images being abused. You never know.
LikeLike
And you know what Silverstone would say if he miraculously stood up out of his wheelchair? “Mein Fuhrer, I can walk!”
LikeLike
Luckily I got Mr Goodwombs reply to my question about what his take was in my mailbox, before Mark nuked it. Anyhow, I won’t go into details – since Goodwombs sounds slightly insane, an agent, or high on speed – i.e. like an Alex Jones type provocateur/phony. He makes claims that he outed Harris and Klebold – they are still alive – and they are on the run because of his detective work! Whatever. I avoid these “justice seeking” types – they are either agents, or totally deluded into thinking there is any justice on this earth, and there is any point in pursuing it. I am just happy with the truth, and there may be justice in the next world, but not here.
LikeLike
I don’t normally ban people but the guy came in swinging and telling lies, saying that I’ve been stuffing his comments, trying to make me look afraid of his inside stuff. I would have listened better if I wasn’t sure that Klebold and Harris were ghosts. That made everything else suspicious.
LikeLike
Lots of people think the two were real, even if just actors. That doesn’t bother me. The planners did a good job in terms of creating a production out of makeshift pieces, like making a movie, creating continuity. They shot all their critical footage, mostly the cafeteria scenes, but the death scene too, the previous summer. As I see it. Just like 911 street scenes, the kids seen on camera were probably filmed the previous summer too … they were hired actors. (I almost said “shot” instead of “filmed”, a near faux pas.) Anyway, the problem they had a was a big building and no one able to see inside to see what was going on. That’s why they set up cameras in the cafeteria, to create those panic scenes. Surveillance cameras were not used in those days, and the cafeteria was the last place they needed one … to catch kids goofing off during lunch? No. The make it appear that something was going on inside the building. Nothing was going on. Maybe some bangers.
LikeLike
That reminds me of Waco, carrying on a dialogue with myself here I realize. That too was an empty building, and they needed to create an “inside event” to make it real, so they (unbelievably had it been real) sent a camera inside the compound and allowed Koresh to show his fake stomach wound to the world. Very well staged and filmed. They made drama out of filming an empty building burning up. Does that remind you of anything else?
LikeLike
Yes it’s interesting to note the security cameras – very unlikely to have them in 1999 in a school. Maybe (I mean obviously) creating the footage helped drive the market for school security systems and cameras, along with the event itself of course being a huge boon to the security industry. They kind of went overboard on some of these early school shootings like Columbine – meaning these guys had bombs (some which detonated, or not, I can’t remember), multiple guns, and two guys – making the whole scenario wildly improbable. Almost like they were trying too hard to create a horror show, a la the Manson murders.
In more recent years they scaled down the school shootings, to the point where they are almost ridiculously bare bones/no plot/completely stupid events, like Uvalde. Where the police stood around for an hour while the shooter supposedly did his business.
Mark – one mass shooting I have never, and I mean never read about as a psyop was the Virginia Tech shooting. That one in my opinion had to be one of the hardest to pull off – if as psyop, as we assume – because of the number and profile of the victims – they weren’t nobodies. It seems hard to imagine a university campus could just make several professors and a score of students disappear – or were ghosts. Universities are fairly tight knit communities, unlike a high school where kids come and go, and people know each other. If you have any info on that one I’m interested.
LikeLike
What they did, supposedly, was to smuggle in a can of propane, 5 gallon variety, the idea of being to shoot it and make it blow up. According to Wikipedia, had they succeeded, they would’ve killed over 400 people. Problem: it doesn’t work like that. Propane ignites when it is in a confined space, like a meth lab in a basement, Accumulates, and then gets ignited. Shooting bullets into a propane tank does not make it explode. It all would’ve dissipated in the atmosphere, outdoors, ducts, etc. To make matters worse, the recording equipment was supposedly not operating when the boys Brought the canister in, so a bag magically appeared, no witnesses. There was a gap in the recording, 18 or 33 minutes I suppose.
Virginia Tech, I only remember Judy Wood being there at the time. I know nothing more about it. Maybe she was a ghost professor.
LikeLike
Killing 400 people? Wiki must think people are complete retards. The bullet would/might puncture a hole and possibly create a short jet, but it would then either keep burning briefly, or just extinguish, and the liquid would evaporate through the hole. It’s not a pile of high explosives for chrissakes. If that were the case you could get killed by shooting a can of spray paint with a BB gun, like we did as kids.
LikeLike
Did Virginia Tech have a theater department? Easy to operate an in house terror event. A few local colleges in my area have their theater students sleep in tents downtown to bring awareness of the growing homeless problem. They dress up and pretend to be homeless, holding signs and begging on the side of the road. Reminds me of that Kensington street videos with people hunched over wearing nice clothes and new nike shoes.
Apparently the gofund me company makes it’s own donation pages, they are keeping the donations!!! If true then so much for exposing fraud pages. What’s wrong with asking for money for events that didn’t happen, implemented by government agencies that don’t want to be exposed. This organization may also be connected to many staged events, since these fundme pages pop up immediately( a few minutes) after an event happens:
https://www.orartswatch.org/nonprofits-beware-gofundme-created-1-4-million-unauthorized-accounts/
LikeLike
Of course! Why am I not surprised! GoFundMe provides a unique opportunity for the psychopaths among us who scan the horizon looking for potential scams. A sad event, death or shooting, provokes compassion in normal people, who want to help. A credit card donation is an easy way to “help”. Since there is no “Mathew Silverstone” someone in GFM took opportunity to make it real to set up a GFM account. Someone in Jeffco, perhaps a whistleblower, used me for my knowledge of their shooting scam, and used my name to file a fraud report, unable to do it in his/her own name.
It makes sense to me in this light, though there are other ways too.
LikeLike
I always was suspicious of Go Fuk Me, a really cynical thing to do – ask for money- right after a tragedy. I wonder what % gofundme gets to take of the normal donations.
I started reading the wiki on V Tech shooting last night. Well first of all there were 33 victims- with the shooter being #33. My hypothesis is they were mostly ghosts – and the known professors were CIA changing identities. The CIA has to have infiltrated and probably run universities from the shadows, to indoctrinate and identify potential agents and the professional class in general. Because the universities are the nodes in our civilization that nearly all the leaders and people of prominence pass through.
Having said that, my hoax meter was going off reading about this shooting. This Cho guy was like a super ninja running around killing people with mostly head shots. He even left campus to drop off a package to send to major media outlets while deleting his hard drive – a total non- sequitur if he wanted people to know about him. But it makes it a lot easier for the boys at Langley to scrip a lone madman script coming from him.
LikeLike