National Enquirer, fresh off its victory over John Edwards, now says that Sarah Palin had an affair with her husband’s business partner. The McCain camp is threatening to sue, of course (bring it on), and is relying on the Enquirer’s lack of credibility as a journalistic source in disputing the story.
After all, that’s the strategy that worked for Edwards.
Cool. Nice to see you’ve never lost your viciousness.
LikeLike
Wow. Coming from the Prince of Darkness, I have to stop and have a thought about that.
There. Done.
LikeLike
Maybe Palin’s husband had testicular cancer.
Ha ha ha.
You’ve lost it, Trotsky.
LikeLike
I recognize that National Enquirer is not a good source and that I am contributing to the Internet babble surrounding this woman. But this strikes me as plausible – honestly, if you could tap the repressed sexuality in a room full of fundamentalist Christians, you could heat the Pepsi Center for a year.
LikeLike
“I recognize that National Enquirer is not a good source and that I am contributing to the Internet babble surrounding this woman.”
You’re not “recognizing” or doing anything of the sort- you’re engaging in standard issue viciousness. It’s a low I would never go. Yes, think about that- I’m telling you I’m not that heartless. But you are.
LikeLike
Morally superior don’t wear well on you. Try again.
LikeLike
You’re using babies. Shame on you.
LikeLike