Virgil, who put together the dismissive musical chart in the post below, has also done the same thing with books. booksthatmakeyoudumb is also a product of his fertile mind.
I see in his chart at the top and towards the far right (of the chart) that Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged scores high. That book is a foundation-crumbling tome that in the end may be as damaging as Das Kapital. It’s still got appeal for the young, one of whom went on to become head the Federal Reserve, and whose activities had a large part in fomenting our current crisis.
The book has a mesmerizing effect on young intellects. The same can be said of Scientology or Marxism, but most people outgrow youthful siren songs as the complexities of life become apparent. I am sure I would have fallen for it had I read it before I did in my thirties. But Atlas lingers in its devotees, it seems. They don’t discard the wooden characters full of false emotions. The economics are as suspect as the attitude of Rand herself about love and attraction and altruism.
Rand’s heroes – Galt and Roark and Reardon, are the engines that drive the economy and culture. Rand was full of contempt for most people, especially ordinary people. She saw no value in them, and had them living as remorra on the sharks who give us our sustenance. She created a cultural meme that has spawned many offspring. Her ugly philosophy underlies the supply side, the flat tax with special favors for the investing class, and the very notion of “trickle down”.
All of us have benefited from the creative efforts of a few, but little of that creative effort would have come about without a system that fosters mutual aid. Bill Gates epitomizes the successful entrepreneur, but he merely took a software developed by others used on a product that came about in large part (not totally) because of government-sponsored research, and built a business model around it. That model was dependent on patent, a government protection, and monopoly, the natural end-product of unregulated markets.
The same can be said of pioneers of aviation and communication. The Internet that allows me to publish my lightly-read prose came about because of government, but it took the private sector to make it into a wonderful toy even adolescents can enjoy. If it were government alone, the Internet would be a dreary tool used for back-channel communication among embassies and colleges. If it were the private sector alone – there would be no internet. The research that spawned it was expensive, and none involved could see a profitable outcome.
Atlas constructed an imaginary world, one that formed a Utopian vision for those who bought in. Rand herself thought it would transform our world. It has succeeded to a small degree. It is like a perfume that lingers long after the ugly aunt who overuses it has left the room.
We’re all revelling in the achievements of privatization and deregulation now. The Reagan-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama Utopia is upon us. Now what? It just doesn’t get much better than this.
LikeLike
Hooray for “government-sponsored research” in communications!
***
Telegraph (1837) Invented by Martin Van Buren (D)
Telephone (1876) Invented by Ulysses S. Grant (R)
Radio (1897) Invented by William McKinley (R)
Television (1927) Invented by Calvin Coolidge (R)
Internet (????) Invented by Al Gore (D)
LikeLike
Interesting to note Rand’s opinion about religion. From Neil Parille.
>>>Ayn Rand was an atheist. According to her one-time associate Barbara Branden, Rand became an atheist at age thirteen. Branden records Rand writing in her diary at that age: “Today I decided to be an atheist.” Branden then reports her as later explaining, “I had decided that the concept of God is degrading to men. Since they say that God is perfect, man can never be that perfect, then man is low and imperfect and there is something above him – which is wrong.” [Branden, PAR, p. 35.] Branden continues that Rand’s “second reason” is that “no proof of the existence of God exists.”
Rand therefore proposes two objections to the existence of God. First, belief in God degrades man, by positing something “higher” or more “perfect.” Belief in God is anti-man. Second, there is no proof for the existence of God. While Rand would later emphasize the irrationality of belief in God, the impression from her writings is that her principal objection to belief in God was a moral or psychological one. [Ryan, OCR, p. 270.]<<<<
Surely Mark, someone who had this conversion at a young age much like yourself, can’t be all bad.
LikeLike
I was much older when I turned agnostic – my late 30’s. Since then I have come to appreciate religious belief, though I cannot indulge in it myself.
Rand, like many Jews, was atheist because there is no intellectual support for belief in a creator. I have no problem with that at all. The question is whether or not the economic philosopohy she espoused is useful, destructive, or neutral. I say destructive.
LikeLike