
For a long time these type of diets, sometimes called “caveman” eating, were popular. I did it once before, in the late 1990’s, and it worked then too. But I remember hearing on the news one day that the “fad” was over, and people were going back to “normal” eating habits. After that announcement, people did indeed go back to “normal” eating habits. We are fat as ever, of course. I suspect that the fading of the “fad” was mere advertising-based news manipulation. That happens far more than people know.
I’m just speculating, but I think the problem is twofold: One, carbs are cheap. Back during the Nixon Administration, as I recently learned, food price inflation was a concern, and Nixon turned to Earl Butz, Secretary of Agriculture and a brilliant agricultural economist, who recommended that we turn towards raising more carb-intensive food and get away from meat-centered diets. Grazing animals are raised on carbohydrates, so that bypassing them and feeding the carbs directly to us is a real money-saver.
The other is that food science, like drug science, is largely funded by food manufacturers, so the the results of research is drawn like a magnet to please the funding source. That’s not overt, but rather instinctive. General Foods, for instance, is in the value-added business, taking corn and potatoes and soy and changing them into prepared foods, juices and soda. Even the sugar comes from corn. Flavoring and colors are artificial.* The more steps involved in food preparation, the greater the profit margin.
General Foods also funds all kinds of food research.
So we really don’t know what meat-centered low-carb diets do to us, because it’s really not studied. But science that existed prior to the Butz era was pretty straightforward. Sugar was to be avoided.** Sugar and starch were known to cause weight gain and bad teeth. The military would take obese draftees off carbs to slim them down.
Gary Taubes, a science journalist, wrote recently in the New York Times Magazine about these matters, and has published two books on the subject, one for science-based readers, and one for general consumption, no pun intended. His bottom line is that low-carbing shows positive results, and other forms of dieting do not; and that science on the subject has been misguided for forty years now. He further states that excessive carbs, especially refined sugar and high-fructose corn syrup (only slightly different in chemical makeup), lead not only to obesity and diabetes, but also heart disease and cancer, even Alzheimer’s.
________________
*See the January 2001 issue of Atlantic Monthly for an article by Eric Schlosser, “Why McDonald’s Fries Taste so Good”, not online. It’s about the flavors we take for granted and where they really come from. If they did not add back artificial flavor and color to processed foods, we’d be eating gray goop.
**Diabetes, when I was a kid, was called “sugar diabetes”.
Is everything political? Even diet?
Earl Butz…lived to be 98. Longest living Cabinet member ever. Taught me all I know about Catholicism. Taught me all I know about race relations.
LikeLike
It has very little to do with politics, and more about unintended consequences. It turns out that carb-centric diets, and especially sugars and starches, make us fat. That’s all.
LikeLike
Congrats on your success, Mark. I’ve had some luck with straight calorie counting, but it’s hard to keep up my enthusiasm. I think a variety of diets can be successful – societies have developed utilizing all meat diets as well as ones focused near-exclusively on carbs. But I’m glad you’ve found something that works for you.
LikeLike
Well, I’d have to say that I am not ‘dieting.’ I don’t plan to change my eating habits, and I’m not suffering. But you’re a smart guy, so take a look at Good Calories Bad Calories sometime. It’s like 550 pages and there is not one diet recommendation in it. He simply tries to follow the development of the science behind heart disease, cancer, Alzheimer’s, and obesity and diabetes. It’s quite surprising that “low-carb” is not new – it used to be normal and it was well understood that sugar and starches were not good for us. It is the early 70’s and Butz and unintended consequences. They wanted to make food cheap, and did not understand that the switch to carbs would fatten us up.
Other cultures seem to have the same responses, in that there is a correlation between sugar in diet and higher incidence of western diseases. Trouble is that we are not studying the matter.
LikeLike