I took down the post that last night was upsetting to me. Frankly, I got tired of the insults and stupidity. I am not crazy, paranoid, or prone to fantasies. I am, like millions of Americans, simply one for whom the spell is broken. I can’t be fooled anymore, at least not for long, and I don’t trust their so-called terrorist events. Once that spell is broken, they are easy to see.
Up above is a captured still from a video taken in Boston after the supposed bombing, which was really nothing more than two very loud booms that scared the shit out of people. I have made some crude marks using Paint, not unlike the blood on the pavement there, which came from plastic bags (seen lying on pavement in other stills).
I inserted two blue triangles, best I can do with that program. These are two actors, each having a role to play. The woman in red and black was seen going towards the bomb site as others were running away. I don’t know her real name. She appears to be positioned, like the black woman between the two yellow circles, to provide cover. The black woman is operating as an assistant and in other stills can be seen signalling on the progress of the operation, so to speak.
The man is wearing a grey hoodie, and was seen crouching against a wall in front of Lens Crafters as people were running in panic. His name, we are told, is Christian Williams, but a better guess, I am told, is Carlos Arredondo Steve Kolander, who is most likely some kind of spook. His job was to supply the fake prosthetic for “John Bauman,” most likely Lt. Nick Vogt, a guy who lost his legs in Afghanistan in 2011. (Picture below fold.) As he crouches on the sidewalk in other stills, it appears as though he moves the prosthetic out of hiding and waits to move in.
The yellow triangle, just to offer perspective, is the back of Vogt’s head. It is propped up as he observes Arredondo removing his real prosthetic legs and replacing them with the fake stumps that will later appear in the shock photo as Vogt is wheeled out of the arena. If you observe inside the yellow circles, you can make out the prosthetics. The one on our left is the new one for that day, and on the right, is Vogt’s actual prosthetic leg in the process of removal. Later the new stumps will be covered with blood. (Note the similarity in the shirt on Vogt to the shirt worn by “Bauman” in the wheel chair photo.)
There ya go. It’s over folks. The incident was staged. I don’t need to know anything else, because if it was real, they would not stage this part.
_____________________
I don’t know what to tell you now. You’ve called me names, questioned my sanity. You assume that if I think I understand one small part of a larger picture, I think I understand the whole picture. I don’t. These false flag events are happening with regularity now. We’ve had them in the past, but since Osama bin Laden was “killed”, we’ve had more of them. I don’t know why they decided to kill Osama, nor why they keep hitting us with these fake terror events. I can only guess.
These are smart people we are dealing with, and expert in opinion management and human psychology. They use the trauma that these events create to implant ideas, and to achieve other unstated purposes. I only have the benefit of hindsight, which is more than the people who insulted me have. With Boston, the cell phone system was shut down. That might have been an experiment to see if they have perfected that technology. They bombed the JFK Archives – that surely has to do with the fiftieth anniversary, destruction of evidence, maybe removing possible interference with the new movie coming out later this year that will re-blame the event on the Mafia and away from the Deep State. They also locked down Middleton and performed house-to-house raids without warrants. Another Amendment bites the dust. Way to go, eternal vigilance crowd.
But I’m not privy to inside information. I can only say with certainty that the JFK bombing, quickly dropped from the news, was shielded by this event just as Vogt and Arrendondo are shielded by the two women. The rest of it – don’t we all know they are going to attack Syria? Make up some reason? And then Iran? As smart and powerful as our Deep State is, it is not invincible. Iraq set them of their heels. They really expected a cake walk. If that was tough, imagine Syria and Iran, not so foolish as to disarm, as Iraq did.
These events do serve the purpose that Osama’s face served before he was [insert chuckle] killed. They scare us. They convince us that there are people running around that want to harm us – people who have no motive! Indeed there are people who want to harm us. Unfortunately, they are our people.
But that’s all I’ll say on this matter. What the Deep State is up to cannot be known outside tight circles. The biggest problem, besides them, is you. This stuff goes down way too easy. You’re schmucks, eating up every morsel, so inured to believing everything you’re told that even though the photo above is end-game as far as Boston is concerned, you’ll still believe the official story and eat up fake photos. You are a large part of the problem. You’re not vigilant, and are highly vulnerable to suggestion.
The prime reason for your vulnerable state is your state of belief. You need to learn to be skeptical. On your own, without any assistance, you need to try to figure out what is going on and why. It’s very difficult, made even more so because if you do not march in lockstep, you need to either shut up or get ready for ridicule from … the likes of you.
I’ll carry on here, doing what I do. I’ve had an interesting life since 1988 discovering how things really work. That I cannot share it with you … is disappointing at times, but in the end, I have to say, it is your loss.
Oh yeah, one more thing: Skip ColemanDowning’s daughter. My son brought that information to me in “friend of a friend manner, and indeed it is out there. But I strongly advise that unless you know the girl and the hospital she is in, and know for certain that she was wounded in the manner we are told, to be cautious. The people who stage these events are very thoughtful and understand our psychology far better than you understand yourself. That meme, if it is as I suspect fake, is the equivalent of the celebrity endorsement. An authority figure, in this case, someone known to exist and have a daughter (?), is mourning his daughter in public. Be wary. Don’t presume to know what cannot be known at this time. Do what I do – distrust, and verify. Maintain vigilance, or in your case, find some vigilance somewhere. Maybe Amazon.com sells it online.
____________
PS: I did something I have never done before, taking down the post from last night and all comments. I am very tired of the quality and presumptions contained therein. So none are allowed here. I’ll open it up again in the future, and you will have opportunity to demonstrate that you do indeed have eternal vigilance. For now, I’m sure you don’t.
Piece of Mindful 
All right then, hissy fit over. Comments are open. Please understand that I know what you are up against – there are two possibilities:
LikeLike
Sigh.
Why do you – as usual – have to rely on the blurriest of photos to “prove” that something nefarious has happened here? I see nothing in that photo that proves your version of events. And there are thousands of other photos, many other videos. And this is your “proof?” The smoking gun that proves it’s all fake? Huh.
I don’t think you understand why this argument is so frustrating for you. It can’t be the insults. After all – you start every post by telling everybody else how god-awful stupid we are. But it’s not that. You are so immersed in your own theory of events that you can’t even venture out for a second to see how much evidence there is for the “official” story. You’re spending so much time on infowars.com that you can’t do a cursory Youtube search to see all of the victims who were interviewed from their hospital beds. You are stuck in your cycle of fake information and fake news. Because of that you can’t believe that other rational people are looking at these events and believe the official story. We’re each talking to a brick wall – although admittedly you’ve clearly been more frustrated by it than me.
Finally, you have informed us that we cannot rely on anyone. If we read bloggers who say they were there (Charles P. Pierce) – well, they were lying. In fact, that’s totally laughable! LOL Laughable! If we have met someone who has apparently lost his daughters (Skip Downing) – well, that’s just probably not true either because a Google search doesn’t make it readily apparent. And that e-mail that went out over a listserv and was subsequently forwarded to his friends – well, it was probably fabricated too.
And if we followed the events in real time – well, we were just stupid to be paying attention to mainstream outlets like the Twitter feeds of people who were actually there and the police scanner which must have been recorded beforehand. The hundreds and even thousands of people that were heard from doing real-time interviews (doctors who did amputations, runners who were there, families of the victims, victims themselves from their hospital beds) – well, none of that matters because it was part of the coverup. More actors, I’m sure. In fact all of those things are so totally laughable that I can’t believe I ever believed them in the first place. Your blurry photo and lack of an actual government motive in this attack are totally more believable.
Here’s an idea: why you don’t hold yourself to the same standard of evidence? Your only standard right now appears to be that you believe anything that doesn’t line up with the official story – no matter who it came from. As far as I can tell, you don’t have a single source with even a third-degree connection to the events of that day or the subsequent coverup. I know, it’s really convenient for you to claim that this is because some kind of government blackout of information – but that’s why this argument between the two of us is impossible. You’ve set up a world for yourself in which everything you believe doesn’t need to be vetted in the slightest – but everyone else can’t be believed unless they pulled out shrapnel from the runners themselves. It’s an awfully convenient reality, don’t you think?
LikeLike
Read my post then i’ll read your comment. [sigh]
LikeLike
Not sure why I’m doing this:
Are these actors previous amputees who are participating in a post-bombing interview drill?
LikeLike
If Vogt was so might they be. Again, read the post. Not sure why i am telling you that.
LikeLike
Anosognosia is described as a general lack of awareness or insight into one’s illness. The person believes that his delusions are real and he does not recognize that he is sick. Anosognosia is often mistaken for denial. Anosognosia is when a genuine inability to see that a problem exists. When in denial, a person knows, but can’t handle it, so suppresses awareness. Anosognosia is an actual unawareness. Reason and evidence cannot conquer anosognosia, or denial.
LikeLike
I find that people are mostly a-historical – that is, even as they know that the last incident was faked up, they accept the next one as genuine. So for instance there were no WMD’s in Iraq, but when it came time to bomb Libya, “saving” 700,000 people worked. Current events are spaced closely so that there is hardly time to unravel one before another happens. And Google is going to be clamping down now, I read, making it more difficult to access HTML on current events such as Marathon. I don’t use Google but I assume the other engines will do the same.
So not anosognosia, not denial, but rather what I like to think of as “Charlie Brown kicks the football again” while Lucy promises not to pull it on him.
LikeLike
None of it passed the smell test for me immediately when I heard it. None of it made ANY sense. The Boston Marathon?? Huh?? Why??
The ONLY possible reason is to imply that NO PLACE is safe in the world the CIA and the AristKOCKracy has created. It’s Germany, 1939. Be afraid, VERY afraid! Turn in your guns!
Very sophisticated stuff though. You gotta give’em that. You gotta give them credit. WHAT BALLS! I mean, how could ANY physicist in the entire freakin’ WORDL accept the Building Seven collapse, THE NEXT FRIGGIN’ DAY? WITHOUT BEING TOUCHED?? IN IT’S OWN FOOTPRING!! You can’t deny the laws of physics!………but they did!
Move along here, folks. Nothing to see here. Your government has everything under control. Move along.
LikeLike
Seems to me you just got angry and deleted the old post and comments because you could not handle the contradictions and gaping holes in your story. The whole thing is kooky and makes no sense. If you want to claim the bombing was a false flag…fine. No point in even getting to that issue right now. But you seem to think that as opposed to just planting an actual bomb and letting the results speak for themselves the shadowy deep state would make things overly complicated and involve more people (more security risks) by having all these actors pretend to be injured? That doesn’t pass the smell test. Suppose one of the hundreds of people standing around taking pictures with their phones actually got a clear shot of the pouring of fake blood or the prosthetics (as opposed to the actual pictures that show nothing like that)? That kind of thing would seem to me to be a security risk of catastrophic proportions.
Basically what this comes down to is you are looking at unclear or ambiguous pictures of injured people at a chaotic scene and seeing in them what you want to see. Im curious where you got the idea that the hooded guy who you claim is putting the fake prosthetics (even though you clearly cant see that in the photo) is actually Carlos Arredondo? So the hooded guy was also cowboy hat guy?
LikeLike
I can handle all of that, no problem. Been doing it for years, you know? What pissed me off last night was your being unreachable plus the smug arrogance without exposing yourself to evidence. This idea that you have it all figured out becuase someone handed it to you on your plate, that you trust without verifying, that you’re credulous and uncritical … and then get on me. Jesus. For example …
But that is what apparently happened, and beyond that, it’s been covered here time and time and time and time again, and just like now, after not having read the post or examined the photo in detail, you pooh-pooh it all. Enough of that last night and I just said to hell with it. You’re unreachable. (How do I know you haven’t read the post? You’re not even aware of the second photo above.)
If you examine the photo for a while it clears up, and there are even clearer videos out there. As to who he is, I have no clue, and only repeat that name due to a website that collects information form many sources and acts as a clearinghouse on this stuff, and ID’d him. Quite a few actors have been pegged that way in these false flag attacks.
And why would the Deep State worry about security leaks? For one, if they talk, they will be killed. For another, if they talk, you’ll say “Yeah, that’s some kind of conspiracy theory.” Lose-lose.
LikeLike
Carlos Arredondo is cowboy hat guy. Quite a few photos show him in the same picture as hooded guy that’s why I was wondering why you referred to them as the same person.
LikeLike
That clears up some confusion for me. Thanks.
LikeLike
This reminds me – much of the confusion comes from simply not understanding how false flag attacks are done. I’ve been meaning to write about that and will tomorrow. As quite a few people are required to pull these things off, many innocent government employees, cops, and even the actors have to be brought in. The means by which this is done is a practice drill. I’ll put up another post tomorrow for you to not read and then comment on about how I have my head up my ass.
LikeLike
I’m glad to know was able to get Under your skin so effectively but that was not my intention. I’ve seen lots of photos now of both bauman and vogt. They do seem to resemble each other but at the end of the day you’re left with exactly that…two guys that look a lot alike depending on the particular photo. The problem here is not with the idea that the govt may have staged some false flag event, I haven’t taken a position on that in these posts I believe, but that faking these injuries was part of it. In the picture at the top if you pan out and look at the whole picture you can clearly see on the right the woman in blue who died screaming in agony. In another photo you can see her clearly shattered body after she has passed. That woman died. She is a real person with a verified identity. Same with the little kid. How is it these alleged actors could stage all this in the midst of an actual bomb going off? As I see it the actors angle is something along the lines of many of the clearly fake theories about 911 that if nothing else are distractions from far more simple and reasoned lines of inquiry. If anything it would all be quite useful to the gov if it were a false flag event to have such focus on the fantastical as it makes it so much easier to discredit any and all questions of the entire thing. Lots of murkiness around the bombing itself and the brothers no doubt but the actors angle to me holds no water.
LikeLike
Bring me a picture of the woman in blue. If we are talking about the same one, she’s quite alive and was walking around before that. I think know which one. What I have seen that you have not are photos of the same people before the acting started. You need to get away from mainstream journalism.
Bauman/Vogt – same nose and eyes, same chin (pronounced), same hairline, body build, and one very striking feature they both have in common – no legs.
Sorry dude, same guy. That’s a slam dunk.
More tomorrow. Much tired. Your questions about the why of doing it this way- what can I do beyond speculate? I just know what I see.
LikeLike
Mark, the moorings are gone and coordinates blown. I honestly think reading some Robert Anton Wilson would do you some good.
limited hangouts, like this crisis actors meme, won’t get you anywhere but deeper in. it has divided some of the conspiracy sites I follow the way competing 9/11 theories did.
LikeLike
I’ve got a few suggested s authors for you as well. Start with Jacques Ellul. I really think reading him would do you some good.
Yes, I care what people think about me. It bothers me that I cannot bridge the gap and be ‘respectable’ except by pretending not to see what is real. I did that too long. A man cannot live a dishonest life and be a real man. Ya know?
There is no luxury of certainty. Ever.
LikeLike
By the way, 9/11 is a dead horse. It worked. The people who pulled off the event also ran the “truthers” – it completely boxed us in. Everywhere we turned was another liar. It is one of the most impressive psyops in history. Little people cannot hope to win out against such expertise and power.
So I don’t know, Lizard, what do you do in the face of futility? For me, I like to write, I like to argue. I get 200 hits a day, just like always. And I have enough presence, enough salt, enough strength to live this way, knowing how I am viewed, and yet loving my own life and my own activities. Life is beautiful. And ugly.
LikeLike
what do I do? incremental good. and I do a lot of listening to people who have lived much less fortunate lives. it’s humbling.
LikeLike
That’s a tad preachy. Explain why you cannot do that and, say, try to understand Jovian geology. We have our grandson here, and yesterday we hiked with him at a nearby open space, and then I pitched a baseball game for young children.
And, I want to know the truth about our society and its dominant forces. That’s a driving force inside me. I can do that and attend to daily business.
LikeLike
you use to say you blog for fun. it doesn’t seem like you’re having fun. being inside chapel perilous isn’t fun.
what do you know about the occult, Mark?
LikeLike
Of course this is fun. I need to know how our world is really working. “Need.” Not “want.”
I know nothing of the occult. I avoid that stuff as the people involved seem to be mentally ill. These goofy impulses are more appropriately channeled through mainstream religion. That too can be manipulative and is form of thought control as well, but is essentially harmless. It even makes people happy and strengthens their will to do good.
But for me, I’ve read quite a bit about the origins of the symbols – crosses, virgin births, dead awakening, the number twelve, all of it harmless and going deep into our past, and fascinating. If I lived 10,000 years ago, it all would have seemed normal.
So anyway, make your point here. You’re being a little clever.
LikeLike
OK, I gotcha now. “Chapel Perilous” is an occult term referring to a psychological state in which an individual cannot be certain if they have been aided or hindered by some force outside the realm of the natural world, or if what appeared to be supernatural interference was a product of their own imagination.
Imagination being the key. I am in your view, imagining all that I see, and you, as opposed to the other few who comment here, view me with sympathetic eyes. It’s a little patronizing, but I’ll take it at face.
I suggest that you are exposed here at this blog to nothing more than the unfamiliar, not the occult. What I write about is not outside the natural realm. My reading, and even thinking, on these subjects, was triggered in 1994 by a book called “Necessary Illusions,” by Chomsky. The subtitle was “Thought Control in Democratic Societies,” and was a series of lectures given in Canada, appropriate, as the originator of the term “Necessary Illusions” was a Canadian, Reinhold Neibuhr.
But that was just the seed. The essence of Neibuhr (and Lippmann) was that thought control was a force for good. Chomsky disagrees with that premise, but I don’t. We are sheep, we do need our illusions, and for better or worse are at the mercy of leadership. Pray, if you pray, that we have good leaders. All of our symbols – the flag, the statues and “great” men are used to manipulate our consciousness and keep us in the herd. Sadly, that is what makes us happy. When used by caring people, as ministers tend to be, it is a force for good.
Two further steps, later that decade I stumbled on Ellul, who wrote of the history of propaganda, and his book was nothing more than a manual on how it is done. He upset a lot of people, which is why that book is not as well accepted as his “Technological Society,” because he concluded that if we have mass media, we have propaganda, per se. He said is is neither good nor evil. It is just a tool.
From there I stumbled on Bernays, not a great thinker, just a conniver, an advertising man. He developed tools now used in that trade, but his original work was with the Creel Commission and use of propaganda, then an accepted term, to get us into World War One. Their work was frighteningly successful. In the wrong hands, it would be dangerous, and indeed the Germans picked up on it, the Nazi leaders refining its use. Bernays also referenced the work of Trotter and LeBon, and from them came work on crowd behavior. Trotter learned that crowds have a unique identity apart from the individuals therein, and can be manipulated without the knowledge of their members. This is why political technicians are always trying to identify groups – “soccer moms” and “NASCAR dads”. They are looking for crowd levers. They cannot deal with individuals. Only groups.
The key to our current situation is what was uncovered by a group of Polish psychiatrists in the later stages of World War Two. Their studies had to do with what they came to describe as “Pathocracy,” or what happens when an entire country comes under the control of psychopaths. The work was preserved in two copies, one destroyed and the other delivered to the Vatican for safekeeping. Good luck there. That copy disappeared too. Andrews Lobaczewski wrote down what he remembered.
The “psychologically deviant” ones are what we call “sociopaths.” Lobaczewski maintained that they first took control of the levers of power in out country in 1980, but I would take it back to the replacement of Wallace with the clueless Truman as VP, and more importantly, Operation Paperclip.
So please, Lizard I don’t need your condescending concern. I’m mentally all here, aware of my surroundings, not inclined towards superstition or weird outside interference. I do not understand how we came to be, the origins of the universe. I don’t believe in Jesus. I just believe in me.
LikeLike
no, I don’t think you are just “imagining” things, and I’m not trying to be condescending. and people who are interested in the occult are not mentally ill, Mark. for you to immediately make that judgement is pretty laughable considering the crisis actor meme you’ve jumped on here. you really should keep an open mind about who or what is lurking in the shadows.
LikeLike
I am speaking from my own personal experience having misspent one year in the seminary, a foolish childish turn in my life. There are real men and women of substance in those places, and also loonies. I sat in a room as maybe twenty young men babbled, “Speaking in tongues.” I was young. I could not understand it.It was a manifestation of mental illness. That’s all I can make of it, detachment from the real world down a path that might have no return. I never delved deeper into the “occult.” If you’ve got things to share that will enlighten me, please do so without being circumspect.
I’m going to repeat what I just wrote as a post before I move on to everything else in the queue here, but there is no reference to you personally. You are neither quoted nor mentioned.
LikeLike
people who have power always want more. if you just dismiss the role the occult has played with figures throughout history chasing more power for themselves, then you are missing a big piece of the puzzle, IMHO.
LikeLike
Would you please explain to me what you mean by “the occult”? We are talking by one another.
LikeLike