Scaling these city walls

tsarnaevloneleg-111x351Once again I am postponing the bushel basket of writing in the queue regarding false flags. I keep running into a phenomenon that has been hidden in plain sight. I have spent maybe 90 minutes now looking at photographs of the Boston Massacre to see what is really going on there. I urge you to do the same. It’s perfectly safe. No one got hurt. It was a television show, rated R, but only intended for one viewing.

Most amazing: Carole and Skip Downing are said to have a daughter who lost her leg in that accident. They are real people and the story has been circulated among their acquaintances, who are sympathetic. Yet everything I have seen there is Hollywood – blood packets, fake prosthetic limbs, actors walking around who minutes later are in wheel chairs all bloodied up. There is an obviously Photoshopped image of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev the crowd – obvious because there is a leg in the photo with no body attached to it. Does it belong to Jeff Bauman?)

Therefore, if the Boston event was staged, and is obviously was, then Skip and Carole Downing are lying. Yet they seem like everyday citizens. Why would they do that? I can think of two reasons: Money, or intel connections. Perhaps their daughter was already an amputee – these victims doing the interviews now have made miraculous recoveries. It will come out in time, but by then, some new event will replace this one.

The subject then is “thought control,” or the use of systematic and scientific methods manipulate to others without their knowledge. It is used to control behavior on a mass scale in our country. With Boston, people of normal sensibility immediately turn their heads away from carnage, so that one glimpse is all they need to know that something awful happened. In that moment of shock, any idea can be implanted, so that it doesn’t matter that the image of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in the crowd is an obvious fake. It’s a one-shot deal. And even if it is sloppy, people are programmed to believe it – not to believe it has such huge implications that they cannot embrace the idea. So even obvious fakery, as in the photo above, goes undetected.

The far bigger problem is our city walls. Americans are brought up to believe that evil exists in other governments, but not ours. They believe that Hitler, whose image is still used as a demonic archetype 68 years after his death, would blow up a building and blame the Jews. However, Americans staging an event like this is beyond the pale. If such a thing happened, everything would crumble. Prisoners scale the walls. It would be a breakout.

I know. It won’t happen.

There is perhaps a better term than “thought control,” as it implies an hypnotic state and spooks people. Only a small percentage of the population can be hypnotized. Thought control exists in a much larger framework. We are initiated into Americanism as children, given false history, taught to admire our flag and soldiers, to pledge allegiance, to feel shivers when jets fly overhead. Every American that has died in battle did so heroically, standing for our high ideals. By the time we reach adulthood, our free thinking days are behind us. Patriotism and religion are the same animal – irrational belief systems implanted in us in youth. (If only home schooling were done for the sake of free thought rather than religious indoctrination!)

It doesn’t take much to pull off something like Boston, as we already believe in the script. It’s all a television show anyway, and because TV is pervasive, uncontrolled images and “conspiracy theory” rumors about Boston will never make the news, or if they do, only in the framework of shock and ridicule. People who don’t believe in Boston, like James Tracy, are put on notice. He has committed thoughtcrime. We allow people to be punished for speaking up, and at the same time believe we have free speech. We’re nuts. 2 + 2 = 5.

People have the notion that for Boston to be false-flag or psyop that every person involved knew in advance and keeps quiet about it. Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev did not know in advanced of the plan, but when they did find out knew they had to run for their lives. Others who were caught up in it now know to shut up. As I watched the videos of actors and directors attaching fake limbs and spilling fake blood, cutting up clothing and acting out their parts, I wondered how many knew the larger scam that was going on. Not many, I suppose. Surely Lt. Vogt (“Jeff Bauman”) had to be involved, but imagine his position – a double amputee with no future prospects, his life destroyed in 2011, is offered a pile of money. I’d probably do what he did too. Why the hell not? He gave his legs to his country. Time for his country to give back something.

There is hope! It took years to disassemble 9/11, and now less than a month for Boston to come apart at the seams. The Internet is a clever beast. The National Security State has wounded it, it is limping, but so far it has evaded capture. CISPA is stalled, but Obama is now seeking to implement it anyway without congressional approval.

Thought control is not the Manchurian Candidate in our lives. It is our grade school texts, our TV shows and movies, news and talk radio, ball games, flags, flyovers, and the pervasive manipulative force in our lives: advertising. It is our very existence. Because it is all-encompassing from birth to death, we are no more than putty. The only way to be good citizens is by means of escape, not education. It is a city wall that is rarely scaled.

16 thoughts on “Scaling these city walls

      1. Please share this video with everyone you know. It is the most watched video of recent times. THIS is our f*cking reality! If they can get away with this, it’s game over! They killed a sitting president easily, but I believe that we are better prepared this time to fight back! At least that’s my hope. I see more courage from folks like James Douglas, etc., who are unafraid to put the truth out there. Sure, sometimes it’s a death sentence, but WTF, we’re old anyway!

        http://video.cpt12.org/video/2270078138

        Like

        1. Larry, you are living proof that we are no better prepared to challenge the lies this time than we were last time.

          Once a person looks at the evidence it becomes crystal clear that neither jet fuel nor high explosives, nor thermite, nor thermate, nor nano thermite, nor super nano thermite, nor nukes, nor mini-nukes nor micro-nukes caused the destruction of the WTC.

          Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth IS a false flag operation. They are in charge of misdirecting the people who don’t buy the 9/11 commission report or the NIST Report into a blind alley. They have proactively helped to try to cover up and/or discredit the new investigation.

          The facts are this; The facts don’t support explosive demolition any more than they support jet fuel demolition. What happened at the WTC on 9/11/01 was a brand new phenomena that most people have never seen before, unlike controlled explosive demolition, which lots and lots of people have seen.

          If you want to help spread dis-information, keep posting factually challenged documentaries whose most basic premise is easily shown to be false. It won’t help bring greater understanding or a sense of empowerment, instead, it will just lead to the cynicism and apathy that the conspiracies to murder Kennedys have led to.

          Blaming the Mafia for killing Kennedy(s) is like the CIA plan to use the Mafia as cover when the CIA was attempting to kill Castro. It’s the same plan. Blame the mafia. They used it for MLK as well.

          Calling the complete molecular disassociation of approximately 80% of the entire WTC Complex (that would be buildings 1,2,3,4,5,6, and 7 specifically) a high-explosive event or high-explosives and termite event, is scientific fraud just as surely as calling it a jet-impacting-and -jet fuel event is scientific fraud.

          And that cynicism and dis-empowerment is the perfect cover-up. No one knows what to believe and no one believes anything because it all sounds like a bunch of hooey. Which it is. Game over.

          Or you fight the bullshit, both the official bullshit and the manufactured false flag truther bullshit.

          Larry, where are the burn victims from 9/11? Where are the deaf people? The brain injuries? All the stuff you get when people are close to high explosives? Where was the sustained blinding light from the thermite? Where were the steam explosions from pumping water onto molten metal at then remains of the WTC? Where are the burn victims? Where Did The Towers Go? Why was the rubble pile so small?

          Calling bullshit with bullshit equals bullshit. Garbage in, garbage out as the perfect cover-up. Same as it ever was.

          Like

          1. “Blaming the Mafia for killing Kennedy(s) is like the CIA plan to use the Mafia as cover when the CIA was attempting to kill Castro. It’s the same plan. Blame the mafia. They used it for MLK as well.”

            Huh? Excuse me, but would you please post just WHERE I said this? THAT is pure bullshit, for I have never claimed that the mafia killed Kennedy. They could have been involved for sure, but it was NOT their plan. CIA and corporate fascists all the way. I’ve been saying this for years now.

            And as far as this movie being a false flag, that’s bullshit too. Do you even understand what a false flag is? These folks are concerned with FINDING the truth. That’s all. And yes, it very well could have been a controlled demolition. All the pieces are in place.

            But I’m open to any other theories as well. The one that you have suggested makes the same mistake the rightwing uses regarding science, no peer review. THESE dudes are very much peer reviewed.

            Like

              1. p.s. Watch the original video all the way through and explain where you find fault. Be as specific as possible so that those with real scientific knowledge can peer review your findings. You see, I’m not a scientist, far from it, never claimed to be one, so I’m like everyone else here, I’m going to have to learn. But I’m all ears. I won’t reject out of hand any findings of anyone that dispute the government’s claims.

                Like

            1. Larry, who do these people say they want to conduct a new investigation? Let me guess… The Government? Again? Isn’t that the definition of insanity? Didn’t we already do that with Kennedy? These folks are concerned with directing people away from the truth while pretending to be fighting for the truth.

              Where are the head injuries? Don’t high explosives cause head injuries? Where are the burn victims? Weren’t they in place? Why isn’t there evidence on the buildings surrounding the WTC of high explosives? There should be evidence of where the material was ejected at super-sonic speeds into the surrounding buildings? But there isn’t any of that evidence. why not? Where is the seismic evidence for explosive demolition? Where is the audio evidence of high explosives? There isn’t any? Why not? Perhaps explosive demolition is bullshit? Yep. It’s bullshit. Get it, Larry? You were conned. Where are the burn victims? where are the head injuries? Why would high explosives not behave like high explosives, unless there weren’t any high explosives? Wake up, dude!

              Dr Steven Johns was instrumental in discrediting Pons and Flashmann back in 1989. He was instrumental in discrediting and getting cold fusion deep-sixed back in 1989. Check youtube. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lASyX1SP2UM

              He’s a government agent Larry. He’s paid to tell you bullshit. But the secret is out. Dr Steven Jones just helped delay it for 20 years. Low energy nuclear reactions exists and something similar or related to it was used at the WTC. Some sort of directed energy that could demolecularize around 80% of the entire complex at near room temperature/ Some non-kinetic form of energy.

              It’s the best cover up to have your own guys leading the opposition. You don’t think they demolecularized it and didn’t have a cover up planned ahead of time, do you? It’s worked well so far. Hasn’t it?

              Did you know that Mark Lane was the lawyer for Jim Jones’ People’s Temple? Mark Lane was one of the first and most prominent Conspiracy Theorists to make a career out of the Kennedy assassination. He wrote “Rush to Judgement.” Did you know that one of the original radio conspiracy theorists, Mae Brussel, knew and kind of detested Mark Lane?She spoke about meeting Lane at a conference on conspiracies, and he condemned her for working on investigative stories on mind control. He claimed there is no “mind control” in the US and anyone who said there is, or might be, was loony.

              And did you know that Jonestown was likely a mind control experiment with lots of ties to US intel? The people were all murdered, there were no confirmed suicides, and everyone in the camp got daily medical check-ups. Just as if there was some sort of medical experiments being conducted. The official story about the number of deaths changed daily. Much of the information released was bogus and shown to be so. And Mark Lane was there on the day the camp was exterminated and he was one of the few who survived. One of the few.

              Did you ever wonder if the success of the Kennedy assassination spawned other similar operations?

              How would you organize a cover up? Would you make sure the leader of the group demanding truth was independent, or would you want someone you controlled? What would you do?

              Like

              1. Wow. You’re out there, dude. BTW, what are your science degrees in again? Buh bye.

                Like

                  1. What? No degrees?? In anything?? Geez. And you’re NOT a dumbass? How so? I THINK for the record that you owe it to folks to state your credentials which enable you to be a pseudo expert interpreting scientific facts! You see, you come across as the great pretender. I don’t. I don’t pretend to be a scientist like the guys in the movie.

                    Like

                1. Forget it Steve. Larry does this – he likes to announce that he is leaving the exchange before entering the ‘last word’ into the record. I wonder about the guy, as his writing is almost indecipherable and his emotions are usually out of control. I’m not thrilled that he posts here, but it was him (he?) who introduced me to JFK: The Unspeakable, which I thought to be just another JFK book but is in fact a thoughtful work about the interactions of JFK, Khrushchev, Pope John XXIII interspersed with the work of the monk Thomas Merton. He writes about our prospects for peace and how JFK apparently knew that he was a dead man walking even as he pursued an end to the Cold War.

                  How it wound up in Larry’s hands I’ll never know, and typically, he takes all the wrong messages from it, merely to lionize JFK.

                  Anyway, move on. He’s impenetrable and I worry that if you do penetrate that cranium, you’ll be deeply troubled at what you find.

                  Like

                  1. . ” he likes to announce that he is leaving the exchange before entering the ‘last word’ into the record.”

                    Huh? Is there really more to say? Not that I’m aware of. Folks can draw their own conclusions from the video I posted. But do I think that it’s a “false flag” as steve has stated? No, for I don’t think he even knows what a false flag is! Hence, can’t argue with the guy too much! I’d have to bring my own clues so that I could LOAN him one! And I just don’t care enough to.

                    Like

  1. I am not seeing great importance to your exchange and urge that you stop. 9/11, from a distance, was a false flag, and succeeded. To argue details is pointless except in one feature that I see, that Dr. Woods has identified a new source of energy, and gives optimism that once the crazies who could only think off it in terms off geopolitics and international scheming for control of resources, will be sidelined. In the end, that technology cannot be kept under a bushel basket.

    I see Boston as a far more serious threat. Think of it – we cannot now have a public gathering without Barney Fife’s armed with weapons. In addition, they affirmed their right to enter households without warrants, hold people at gunpoint, convict “suspects” without process. Control of the media is fait accompli.

    We have a much bigger problem on our hands now. Not one true victim in Boston, except the Bill of Rights.

    Like

Leave a reply to Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers Cancel reply