Note to readers: I have been vacationing on Kauai, one of the Hawaiian islands. While there we spent a lot of time on the beach. The ocean is like a a drug. I was sleeping more, and was enthralled by waves. I sat passively and watched them, the sea foam, the colors and sounds. It was so relaxing. Only a couple of times was I distracted by a human body – we are all so ordinary, there is so much obesity, so that “people watching” is not fun. Has it ever been fun outside of TV and movies and those LA bodies?
While there I received the following email from our friend Straight which includes permission to publish it. I have missed his input and insight, and so do so gladly. He is referring to Miles Mathis’s latest paper on “trannies.”While I agree that the whole tranny business is, like flat earth and pedophilia, a professional psyop, I also agree with Straight that it is not aimed at Mathis due to his work. It is a larger program aimed at de-sexualizing us. If my beach experience is any indication, it is working.
All words after this are from Straight.
“I haven’t read anything on POM or MM in a few weeks but I just checked in to read MM’s tranny paper and, my lord, he’s gone off the rails with arrogance, ego, and closed-mindedness. I’m stunned how blind I was to it.
Look, at this point, I don’t necessarily believe the celebs are trannies either but Mathis is closing off so many lines of inquiry in his paper, it’s borderline misdirection in itself.
I mean look at this stuff. Let’s start with self-importance.
The more real hoaxes I uncover, the more fakes one they have to come up with to keep you diverted. Who wants to slog through Hitler’s genealogy when they can look at trannies instead?
I have shown Swift is a project, but she is not a tranny. Funny, isn’t it, that all the people they are saying are trannies are people I have written about? Bob Dylan is supposed to be a tranny now too, as of about a month ago. Like Swift, I have written about him recently. Jennifer Aniston and Brad Pitt. I have also written about them.
In short, they are trying to sully my research by surrounding it with all this crap. They want to get you so lost and confused in an excess of contradictory information you can’t tell real research from fake research. Eventually, they hope, you will just give up and run back to the safety of the old mainstream story you grew up on.
Billion dollar tranny psyop – all about Miles Mathis and his 10k-20k visitors a month. Whatever, man.
“I give soooo much evidence, and these guys don’t”. Same thing we heard in the POM paper.
For instance, if you search on “Taylor Swift tranny or trannie”, thousands of things come up even though this project on her just started. No one thought Swift was a tranny a year ago, but after I wrote my paper on her, all of a sudden we got all this weird stuff on her and everyone else. The first video listed on a search is this one. But he gives no evidence. Zero. His argument is that she wears a lot of makeup, therefore she is tranny. He shows a lot of pictures of her and says, “That is a dude”. That isn’t evidence. That isn’t an argument. It doesn’t resemble my method at all, which is so heavy with research most people can’t get through it. I give you an 80-page pdf, for instance, while these people give you a 5-minute video with nothing in it but empty speech and a few snide laughs. Whenever I tell you something, I show you how I got there. I show you lots of evidence of many types, and footnote it all (or link it). So you can come to your own conclusion from all the same things I looked at. But this guy gives you nothing. Just a raw opinion backed up by nada.
After an appeal to quantity of evidence (which is a semi-fallacy in itself), and dismissing someone based on a lack of evidence he goes on to provide the following evidence the very next paragraph.
They are hoping to snare me with this tar-baby, but it ain’t gonna happen. They are hoping I will confirm some small part of it, at which point they can say I was pushing trannies. But I’m not. I don’t confirm any of it. Yes, they are using admitted trannies like Jenner and the Wachowskis to mess with our sexuality, but that isn’t the same thing. I confirm that—although there is nothing for me to confirm —but that isn’t the same thing. I do not confirm the rest of this ridiculous psyop, since I have better things to do. People are writing in telling me Jessica Alba is a trannie. What? I say, “Are you blind? Did you just get here? Have you never seen Jessica Alba?” Not only is she not a man or even an androgyne, she is extremely feminine. She is on the feminine end of femininity. If you can’t see that, I can’t help you.
If you think that is a trannie, you need to buy a dick somewhere. You don’t know who to get it up for.
That’s it. After dismissing somebody for lack of evidence, he provides the same exact type of evidence but in the reverse. Instead of “That’s a tranny! Use your eyes!”, he says “That’s not a tranny! Use your eyes!”.
The ego and arrogance is just awful. It makes me shudder. Look, I don’t even care about “facts” and “evidence” as much as most people since I think they are limiting tools that education brainwashes us with from an early age. But when somebody dismisses others and pumps themselves up by talking about evidence, they should provide some themselves.
The rest of the article provides no other evidence, but instead preaches that this is nothing but noise and misdirection to confuse you, make you question your sexuality, and shop more. While there is truth there, I believe it only scratches the surface of what’s going on.
While Mathis is being closed-minded, he misses the fact that there are some really questionable celebs out there like Chloe Grace Moretz, especially from the younger celeb crowd. He misses the point that they plant subconscious clues in movies, shows, and music videos (like I showed in the Ariana Grande video) to make you see women as men and men as women. There is subliminal stuff going on that Mathis completely misses with his perfect artist eyes.
Then there is his obsession with “it’s all about making you buy more stuff” which is perhaps not even in the top 10 of what’s REALLY going on.
IMO there is something very real going on with this tranny thing. As usual disinfo takes it completely overboard to make people dismiss it or go in the wrong direction, but they don’t start projects from nothing. There is always a kernel of truth, otherwise it wouldn’t ring true with people.
Mathis himself knows deep down he is closed-minded, that’s why he included the email at the end of the article where a reader accuses him of being closed-minded. He is trying to convince himself (and us) that he’s not. That’s why it bothered him enough to write about it instead of the dozens or hundreds of other emails he gets. I am so over this guy.
If you want to post this on POM, feel free to do so. Mathis is a loser, and not anywhere near as brilliant as he wants us to think he is.
I recommend you don’t fall for it. For myself, I have had a lot of firsthand experience with girls that look like Swift, Alba, and Fox, either as girlfriends or models, and believe me I have studied them as closely as I could. I have never seen the slightest indication of any of them being trannies. My second hand experience is even greater, since I have looked at millions of photographs of beautiful women.
Ughhh, yeah whatever dude. Keep bragging. That’s like the 5th paper he had to remind us.