The care and management of lies

“Recent research has found that the COVID-19 virus can directly infect cardiac arteries, increasing the risk of myocardial infarction (heart attack) and stroke, and even leading to persistent long COVID symptoms. This phenomenon is particularly pronounced in individuals who already have cardiovascular diseases, as the virus tends to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques.”

I have no doubt that readers here can sort through that gobbledygook and understand what is really going on. Ellen Wan, author of this piece called Covid-19 Impacts Arteries is not lying. She’s a journalist, and consequently just doesn’t know that she is engaged in the old and venerable practice of long-term official deceit.

What she is describing is not the effects of “Covid-19” but rather the effects of the vaccines. There is an ongoing campaign – I am reading a book by Jacqueline Winspear called The Care and Management of Lies, about the Great War. Then I read the Wan piece this morning, and realized that she is engaged in the same deceit. There is no virus, no science, no variants, no “long” Covid, only lies and the lying liars who tell them, and the journalistic stooges who repeat them.

13 thoughts on “The care and management of lies

  1. Perhaps there was enough of an awakening to keep the finger off the selective kill switch but not enough to reach the collective conscious 

    In my small world the effects of the vax/virus have been nil and all reports have been online anecdotal.

    I did manage to abstain though and am happy with that.

    Like

  2. I may have posted this link before, but this may be the most informative podcast I’ve heard in the last year, certainly on the topic of science and how even scientists can be induced to “trust the science”.. Jerneja Tomsic is a mid-level lab researcher with a 30 year career, who describes her late awakening to greater skepticism during covid. This is the kind of granular detail, or close to it, that is so hard to find on these topics. How, that is, can there be so much “science” – so many complex papers full of data, and endless research – and yet so little science. Dr Grant is a regular doctor in some specialty I forget, who has studied the theory and practice of science, and dominates the discussion a little bit, but does make many good big picture points.

    https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Lester-Tomsic-Grant-Science-Scientism-Pseudoscience-Feb-26-2023:4

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I took my own recommendation and started relistening to this.. they mention a science critic writer but it’s hard to catch his name. Howard something.. Owens, Ellman, Hillman? I tried searching but no luck. It’s kind of hilarious though, “science critic” in the search brings up all this pro science propaganda in the results, if you scroll down.. really over the top stuff, literally “why is science so good?” with links to follow..

      Like

  3. Hello Mark,
    Nice to see you back, I think we all had some idea of the ways in which the covid hoax would be spun, deliberate lies first and last. There is also the element of what may be innocently repeated falsehoods:
    “The great enemy of truth is very often not the lie–deliberate, contrived and dishonest–but the myth–persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Too often we hold fast to the cliches of our forebears. We subject all facts to a prefabricated set of interpretations. We enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.” J.F.K.

    @ TIMR. Thanks for the link, very interesting. I can help with the identity of the scientist you have mentioned:
    Dr. Harold Hillman.(16 August 1930 – 5 August 2016) Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, and graduated with a medical degree, M.B., B.S., and a diploma, MRCS, LRCP in 1956. He then took a B.Sc. in physiology and biophysics at University College, London, in 1958, and a Ph.D. in biochemistry at the Institute of Psychiatry, London, in 1963.

    He was appointed Honorary Docent at the Institute of Neurobiology, Goteborg, Sweden, from 1962 to 1964. He was subsequently Lecturer in Applied Neurobiology, London, from 1964 to 1965. He was Senior Lecturer in physiology at Battersea College from 1965 to 1968, when he was appointed Reader in physiology at the University of Surrey in 1968. He was made the Director of the unity Laboratory of Applied Neurobiology at the University of Surrey in 1970. He retired from these posts in 1998. He authored about 150 full length publications on cytology, neurobiology and resuscitation and has written 6 books including “The Living Cell” which takes a highly critical look at accepted cytology and now difficult to find.

    Like

  4. Thanks very much, very interesting. Now that I see the name, I think I have come across him before and looked him up once. I wonder if any of his books are general critiques of science.. or reflect broadly on philosophy of science, even if they focus on a particular topic.

    Like

    1. The more I see about Mullis, the more I doubt him and his role. His surfing-scientist version of Hunter S Thompson schtick now reeks. And to add to the doubt: he won the dynamite prize. But…he could still be alive in Santa Catarina.

      Like

Leave a reply to Mark Tokarski Cancel reply