Epoch Times (and no doubt many others) ran a story about how the (surviving) attending physicians to the JFK assassination dispute the official findings of the Warren Commission. Thanks in large part to the seminal works of Miles Mathis and Tyrone McCloskey, we know a little more about the events of 11/22/1963 than the average person. The doctors are part of a script that is still being read 60 years after the fact!
Just a few notes, as reading the Mathis and McCloskey pieces is really essential for any who have not yet done so.
- Long before the events that transpired in Dealey Plaza took place, Jack and Jackie had left the building.
- Dealey Plaza was used, that sharp turn made, as the people who were supposedly incidentally there were actors who would read a script written long before about shots and bloodshed and exploding skulls.
- Those events had been captured on film long before. The famous man spinning the umbrella was saying “… and … action!”
- There were several, perhaps many takes. Body doubles were used for JFK and Jackie.
- Miles notes that the motorcade, which was apparently real in the beginning, stopped midway so that JFK could use the bathroom in a department store. That is when the body double entered, and JFK left the building, never to be seen in public again.
- Nothing of note happened that day, though no doubt gunshots were fired so that people far away could fill in the necessary story: The King was dead.
Little did we know of misdirection and continued reaffirmation of a fake event. Who did this awful deed? Lee Harvey Oswald (whose death was also faked)? The Mob? The CIA? J Edgar Hoover? The Russians? “Wall Street”? Did the gunshots come from behind? From the grassy knoll? From a man who poked his head out of a manhole? From the buildings across near the School Book Depository?
It’s all one giant psyop, the important aspect that the questions continue to be asked. Others participated. Dorothy Kilgallen faked her own death apparently in search of the truth, two years later. Governor John Connally lay in a hospital bed with fake wounds. He would later break down in tears on the Tonight Show, though no Emmy was awarded. Woody Harrelson’s dad Charles, said to be a contract killer, would confess to fellow prisoners (he was not in prison, really) that he participated, and perhaps fired a kill shot.
Mysteriously, the Kennedy family, immensely powerful, would allow the (fake) morgue photos of JFK to be published in a best-selling book, Best Evidence. (No link offered, as it is trash. You are on your own.)
On and on it goes, 60 years later! Questions, questions, questions, never an answer. That’s the whole point.
JFK long ago died of natural causes. I imagine that he sat in a comfortable rocking chair somewhere to witness the fake moon landings in 1969. His alleged widow marrying a shipping tycoon and living with him on his yacht … there’s a story to be told there. Bobby faking his own death as well … used as a martyr to make it appear that he was a valiant liberal who opposed the Vietnam War and gave his life for that cause. John F. Kennedy Jr., a son who bore no resemblance to the father, dies in a mysterious plane crash.
I take nothing away from these actors. It has to be difficult to live in the shadows after a life of fame. John Jr. is probably still alive, perhaps living in Greece, as he bears strong resemblance to a young Aristotle Onassis. Ted Kennedy and Chappaquiddick … another story spun, the object apparently to destroy any hope in the public mind that another Kennedy would take office and solve the crime. That could not be allowed, and Ted knew it and participated in that hoax.
Enough. Take a look at the photo above. I was just glancing at it last evening, and noticed the following:
- The photographer is stationed to Jack and Jackie’s right and above them, allowing for a perfect shot, so to speak.
- They are horribly exposed. I could have made a shot that day.
- The spectators look pasty, and are most likely pasted in, dark room work. The real JFK would never appear in public in an open limousine.
- Among the spectators, there is a floating hand. See if you can find it. It is waving at us.
Have fun! This game will never end.
Piece of Mindful 
From the 56:25 to the 58:42 minute mark of this video, researcher Brian David Anderson mentions that at the tail-end of the Zapruder film that someone sits up in the right rear part of the car. Either JFK or his body-double. He says photographic experts agree on this. He mentions that this part of film goes dark but some “experts” have put light on it.
I don’t necessarily agree with all the different theories in the video, but I though this part was pertinent.
LikeLike
The Zapruder film has been over-analyzed, most analysis, as with this, based on the premise that it was real-time and that JFK and Jackie were in the limousine. They were not, and there were no wounds, only special effects given us by actors. Abraham placed himself far back even as in the Plaza there were few people. That way the actors playing the real people would be blurred and no one would see that it was fake. There were probably many takes that day, not 11/22, but some time well in advance of that day. You’re watching a psyop in the form of a home movie, planned and executed well before the day.
LikeLike
I disagree that he wasn’t killed – what’s the motive, how does the man benefit from his “death” et. al. – but since you’re into photo comparisons, why not overlay John Travolta with Officer Tippit.
LikeLike
The opening of this piece suggested two excellent sources that answer your question. Reading is required.
Tippit/Travolta … just a reminder, ridicule is the lowest form of argumentation.
LikeLike
On the floatin’ hand photo, people are standing behind the “WHITE LINE”. How come the white line doesn’t continue “between” the back of the motorcycle and the secret service ? Did they run out of paint in Dallas or was that section of the photo taken elsewhere and added in later? There always seems to be something missing from the story, is that it…it’s just a story with no end ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
You mock the notion, but then do not appear to be willing to look and see their looks in comparison for yourself. Cleft-chin Barbarino man it was
LikeLike
Here is a comment I left at Epoch site that tan the photo at the opening of this piece. So far they have let it stand.
LikeLike
If you look at the shoes including the black lady’s, the man with glasses, and the balding guy wearing the brown shir, there is an additional shoe with a white pant leg. So that hand may actually be someone behind the black lady wearing white pants, or maybe not. It does look like a doctered photo. I know a few older regular people that did shake hands with JFK, and other Presidents, including Trump, so people were and are allowed to get close. I don’t disagree that we have been lied to about this event and the mainstream story is false. what’s even more sad is that nothing as been revealed and the truth will never come out except for small hints that seem doubtful.
LikeLike
Good input and thanks. There is no head to go with the hand, so it is someone very short. Having seen other hidden hands (with Paul McCartney, Barack Obama), I tend to think something Masonic is going on. But that’s a little like magical thinking … I cannot take it any further.
When I step back and look at the spectators, I am struck by several things: Their colors are mostly drab, their lines are not sharp like Jack and Jackie’s and the motorcycle cops, and they should be bigger sized. Perspective is messed up. They are only ten feet away, but they have shrunk more than ten feet should do to them. I think they were pasted in as a backdrop, and in those days they could not simply push a button to blow them up to make them look right. The backdrop had to be done carefully, but getting it right so no one would notice something wrong was almost impossible. But people do not look carefully at photos as you and I do, so most of it just glides by without criticism. This is quality work, but far from perfect. I look at the pretty girl with the babushka and think she is more like a ghost.
I shook hands with JFK, by the way. I was ten years old and he was a candidate, not the winner yet. He got off a plane in Billings and we were on the tarmac. Since I was ten, I was able to maneuver between the grown-ups and stick my hand out, and he grabbed it momentarily as he walked by.
LikeLike
I think Greg might be right on that one, Mark. if you look at the floating hand with the red sleeve. over the shoulder of the black lady you also see a red coat or shirt with a collar. and to the back of the black ladies head appears to be a partial head and ear. I don’t think the ear belongs to the black lady… just saying.
LikeLike
I zoomed in on the floating hand and blackwoman, and there is a straight line to the left of the Buddy Holly lookalike which makes me think the head of the blackwoman has been inserted.
LikeLike
One thing I can say about this photo is that the crowd is actually looking at the president, which is not always the case in the Zapruder film. I think this pic was probably released later and that error of crowd attention was addressed. As for the hand, if that is a short kid behind the lady, she was laid over him as a kid would probably do what he could to get a better look and move in front. Also, the black lady is accompanied by two black men yet a white kid is in their center. That doesn’t seem right for Dallas, 1963. And after the light brown shoes, the shoes/legs all the way to the right edge are just mush. Nothing makes sense. The heads seem to turn but the feet/legs don’t. Even the feet behind the chopper cop don’t turn. And doesn’t the crowd look dressed for the weekend and not a work/school day? As if they were assembled when these people had a day off. And is that a white car they are standing around. And what is that black patch leading out the top of the car and out of the top of the frame? Did someone have the temerity to sit on the roof of a car? And no one but mystery hand is waiving. This crowd, cut and pasted as they seem to be, look like they are waiting for the director to call “action!”
LikeLike
I am reminded a bit of the cover of Sgt Pepper, a bunch of faces and bodies pasted together. Could the girl in the babushka be a Marylyn stand-in?
LikeLike
She’s definitely red, white and blue.
LikeLike
Their feet are pointing forward and their heads are turned to observe something coming towards them, not going past them IMO.
The floating hand looks like an adult appendage compared to the blackwoman’s, one would expect it belongs to someone tall.
LikeLike
With hindsight, I have the impression (even back home in France) that it’s just as difficult to talk about JFK’s fake death to normal people as it is to talk about it to hard-core conspiracists, because you’re damaging the myth of the hero against the “deep state”. All the more so since conspiracists like to use the alleged assassination of JFK as their first argument to “wake up” the sleeping.
It’s like when I used to debunk nuclear bombs with a new age pro ufologist. “But no, it’s precisely after the nuclear tests that UFO sightings greatly increased”.
Honestly, I’m 29, I made a video summary of Mathis’ articles on JFK 5 years ago. I expected a minimum of insults but it’s mostly indifference, about fifty comments, three thousand views and then nothing.
I have no doubt that I will leave my physical body on this earth without the world knowing about this hoax like all the others.
LikeLike
This is not pessimism but realism, I have however no regrets knowing Mathis’ work for 8 years and your blog for 5 years.
LikeLike
Yes, it’s the same difficulty and those in power understand that very well.
LikeLike
No reason why your comment went to moderation that I know about. You are free to post here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Mark, I didn’t think you were moderating me – just thought it was the usual system issue.
Actually, in my last post I forgot to mention that I started to suspect that “Operation Northwoods” was a complete fabrication … and when I went to have a look … oh my goodness … It reminded me of Abbott and Costello’s Who’s on First. I could not make any sense of how the documents related to one another and there are signs within the Pretexts document (the one that has all the false flag actions) that it was written as propaganda to be pushed out before 9/11 (it was released in 1998) in a similar fashion to the PNAC “Pearl Harbour” document pushed out the year before.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/operation-northwoods-false-flag-proposal
LikeLike
I think you are right – fabrication. The mere fact that it was released is the big tell.
LikeLike
Precisely. Why in God’s name would it be considered OK to release such a document … but then when they did “release” it they stamped it UNCLASSIFIED not DECLASSIFIED. I’ve since done further analysis and it simply blows my mind how over-the-top obvious it is that it’s all a big fabrication including documents within the bundle labelled DRAFT and unsigned and undated.
They really know how to propagandise us by waving the truth right under our noses but at the same time misleading us to believe X is really Y.
And, of course, what they also know is that:
— 95% will just wave away the seeming psyop plan, they’ll think, “Well some crazies in the military might come up with the odd dastardly scheme but it would never be put into effect,” so they have carte blanche to run with whatever
— 5% will believe it was a real plan when to a degree it is like a real plan and infer the allusion to killing people for real indicates that they were prepared to kill people on 9/11. Interestingly, the plan only makes a single mention of killing people and it’s only as a possibility:
”The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated).”
But doing it for real makes no sense. They’re not going to round up Cubans to get on a boat nor wait around for a boatload to sink. Obviously, they’d just fake it. Hilarious!
LikeLike
Ppl love their heros and the “system” knows how to supply them….on top are eg. Jesus, Hitler,JFK…in the past and today prob Trump and/or Putin. And do not dare to suggest these figures are “in on it” :))
LikeLike
Would the fake JFK assassination be the most multi-layered of any psyop I wonder? It’s layer after layer after layer.
This is a good post on the Jackie stretching-back-over-the-car photo. (The poster Proton Magic also has some good posts on virology, Manson and Kary Mullis … who is/was clearly an agent.)
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/jackie-the-car-jumper
My comment on Kary Mullis.
Here’s some clear evidence of Revelation of the Method, PM.
In Kary’s talk on his teenage rocket-making days he says that he put little piles of mixtures with different ratios of potassium nitrate and sugar and bingo! he found 50/50 KNO3/sugar worked best. He then clarified that that was by volume although by weight it was 60/40 – he didn’t say which way, however, I looked up “sugar rocket fuel” and it says 60 KNO3 / 40 sugar. I looked up the densities of KNO3 and sugar and KNO3 is actually denser which – according to my reckoning – means that if you were going by volume 50/50 wouldn’t be correct. Also, he says the father of a friend named Buzz was a pilot and flew at 2 miles above the sand pit a cop had directed the boys to experiment with their rockets at but in fact their rockets exceeded that height which strikes me as implausible … as does a friend’s father flying his plane above the sand pit as a means of testing how high the rocket went.
I do like the friend called Buzz … oh and guess what? Buzz Aldrin’s father was an aviator and assistant commandant of the Army’s first test pilot school at McCook Field, Ohio, from 1919 to 1922.
LikeLike
Mullis did a ted talk? Hnh.. well I agree he was an agent. So many details I forget now, but something about using him to obscure the IP around the whole PCR process.. smokescreen or something, with his napkin doodle.
Someone pointed out how the labs that use PCR need some kind of activator, I forget the term.. reagent or something, to make it work. Anyway this thing they have to order is proprietary from a few big superlabs, they can’t make it themselves, and it’s another black box. So whoever controls those can control the results. Going on rough memory here. Wish to hell I knew the full story, bet it’s fascinating and hilarious.
LikeLike
The whole PCR thing could be a complete hoax too, not sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Definitely a hoax on some level, even Mullis’ story is that they use it improperly, hence are conning people with the results. But how many layers deep is the con. I would speculate that the “model” we’re given of what it’s doing is intentionally wrong, the whole Watson Crick model. And they may or may not have a better model, but they at least probably have some practical control over the results, with their secret black box reagents labs require to run the tests. As well as other methods like setting the cycles to run.
LikeLike
“I would speculate that the “model” we’re given of what it’s doing is intentionally wrong, the whole Watson Crick model.”
Quite possibly.
LikeLike
Another way for the PTB to wink at us here is the alleged similarity between Lincoln’s and JFK’s assassinations. People scratch their heads in amazement, wow this must be really weird occult stuff for this to be possible! But if both events were faked, there’s nothing weird there at all. These similarities could have been introduced intentionally, as part of a script.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lincoln%E2%80%93Kennedy_coincidences_urban_legend
LikeLike
Apart from the photographic evidence, don’t they simply tell us it’s a complete cock and bull story?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-bullet_theory
The theory says that a three-centimeter-long (1.2″) copper-jacketed lead-core bullet from a 6.5×52mm Mannlicher–Carcano rifle fired from the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository passed through President Kennedy’s neck into Governor Connally’s chest, went through his right wrist, and embedded itself in Connally’s left thigh. If so, this bullet traversed a back brace, 15 layers of clothing, seven layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches (38 cm) of muscle tissue, and pulverized 4 inches (10 cm) of Connally’s rib, and shattered his radius bone. The bullet was found on a gurney in the corridor at Parkland Memorial Hospital after the assassination. The Warren Commission found that this gurney was the one that had carried Governor Connally.[4]
Are people supposed to believe:
1. The theory as is?
2. That the theory’s not correct but both JFK and John Connally suffered the injuries stated some other way?
Here’s John talking nonsense 5 days after the event from his hospital bed.
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/supreme-court-heres-whats-at-stake-in-key-texas-abortion-case-635241539728
LikeLike
Actually, I see Mark also put a link to John talking.
LikeLike
The magic bullet theory was never meant to be taken seriously by serious people. It was misdirection. These people, these experts in manipulation, do not lie. They misdirect. They get us to ask the wrong question, after which the answer does not matter. Works every time.
Wrong question: How many shots were fired?
Wrong question: Which direction did they come from?
Right question: Did he die, really?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The thing is though by telling us the magic bullet theory they pretty much give it away as:
— there is no clear evidence of Connally being injured and we wouldn’t expect him to be injured so
— not being injured but acting as if he was means he was in on it and
— we wouldn’t expect someone in on it to willingly sit in front of someone who they knew was going to be shot nor would we expect him to be asked to do so
LikeLike
The lighting… Soft and from the left on the crowd and rear cop, hard and from the right on the motorcade. If there’s a building behind the crowd putting them in shade, it should have a hard edged cast shadow like the cars, but there’s no evidence of that. The two cops are in different light but we don’t see the same blazing light contrast on the ground between them as we do between the cars. Thus the rear cop may have been part of the crowd scene, rest of the motorcade overlaid on top.
LikeLike
What is the reflection on the side of the limo? It looks like a parked motorcycle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wider out on that reflection we can see they are in a vast lot, likely at the airport, which would mean that the car portion of this paste up was inserted. Keep piling on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good catch, both of you!
LikeLike
The reflection looks like there is a small plane in it, to me
LikeLike
I do see cars and a parking lot … could be the mind’s eye. With my current and cheap photo enhancement tool, Affinity, I could easily wipe out the side reflections. Not done, indicating the age of this photo.
LikeLike
Most people don’t know or forget that this was a four city tour for JFK. Arrive in San Antonio, Houston, Fort Worth, then Dallas. He made speeches, and stayed at a couple of hotels(Rice Hotel, and Hotel Texas) reported with large crowds outside and in the lobbies each city. He also did crowd greets with Jackie(who knew she could speak Spanish?). Would have been alot easier to have him shot during those city visits, instead of the way they did it. Many photos to look at and they look like paste ups. I don’t think the entire trip was staged.
LikeLike