You might want to avoid reading the following tortuous paragraph. I copied it down while in flight today, as it struck me as so obtuse.
“In his book The Psychology of Totalitarianism, clinical psychologist Mattias Desmet provides and initial explanation of how this surveillance program could be so massively advanced with the help of the corona pandemic. In his sociopsychological analysis, Desmet illustrates “how humanity is being forcibly, unconsciously led into a reality of technocratic totalitarianism, which aggressively excludes alternative views and relies on destructive groupthink, vilifying nonconformist thought as ‘dissent'”. He speaks of mass formation (US-American virologist, immunologist, and molecular biologist Robert Malone later even interpreted this condition as mass psychosis), and he rightly warns, with good reason, “of the dangers of our current social landscape, media consumption, and dependence on manipulative technologies.” This silent unchallenged endurance of the deprivation of freedom by the technocratic standards ultimately amounts to mental enslavement. Thus, the slave trade, which Dunning cites as a historical example of extreme predatory capitalism, Finds its modern counterpart. In his book, Desmet offers simple solutions – both individual and collective – to prevent “our willing sacrifice of our capacity for critical thinking.”
I ask that you not so much pore over the excerpt from the book The Indoctrinated Brain, by Michael Nehls, MD, PhD, as set it aside for later interpretation. On the inside of the back flap of the paper cover of the hardcopy edition, Nehls’ CV reads like the second coming of Obama, “the one”, you know, said to have done so much good, and who is so worshiped by liberals and leftists with spinning spirals in their eyes, oblivious to all the real damage he did to the people of this country. He was a terrible leader in terms of actual accomplishment, but man, he could sell it.
Here’s more from the back cover of the book:
Based on the long chain of evidence of a targeted neuropathological attack on autobiographical memory, I argue before you, as my jury, for the existence of a two-stage perfidious master plan of indoctrination, implemented by a small elite without regard for life and limb, in full awareness of its implications. […] We have no choice but to resist this assault by building resilience against outside influence, and time is of the essence.
I think it was the year 2000 or so when I first stumbled on the book Propaganda, by Jacques Ellul. Nehls is aware of the two bombastic classics, Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World. He makes no mention of Ellul, though he would have benefited from reading the tract. Written in the 1960s, Propaganda examined it as practiced in the three great centers at that time: The Soviet Union, China, and the United States. My take was the US was far superior to either of the other two, and that the Soviets even came off as ham-handed. It stands to this day. Nehls apparently does not have a clue that propaganda has been with us and studied and practiced for decades, and that he cannot save us. What we have seen with Covid and Climate Change and the ascent of liberalism behind both is merely what I experienced as a boy growing up in the 1950s and 60s: Total immersion in fear. Frightened people are easier to govern. That’s all.
I did not mean to go off on him like that. I copied the opening paragraph from above from page xxii of the introduction. I am of the studied opinion that if a person cannot think properly, then he cannot write clearly. The opening paragraph I used above … I am not clear on its meaning. I do not regard him as a critical thinker. He does not get his meaning across. He comes off, especially with the inside cover CV and back cover braggadocio, as a pompous ass. And anyway, if he thinks propaganda and mind control only came about in 2020, he’s a loon.
He thinks 911 was real, he thinks that the SARS-CoV-2 virus came from a Wuhan lab, even as that is easily seen as misdirection … look here, not there. He thinks, as the subtitle of the book states, that we folks have mental freedom, and we might lose it. And since he writes like a pompous ass, he cannot possibly reach the very people he claims to be saving.
I had a private email discussion with a friend of the blog who introduced me to a newspaper called County Highway. It is 20 pages deep, large-style old fashioned newspaper print. While one has to go online to order it ($50 yearly) none of its material is available online.
Central to our discussion was how we receive and process information. Be honest now, how many here see a long paragraph,
and avoid reading it? Too much work. I do that too. But I often force myself to focus and read long tracts, just as I am going to read Nehls’ book.
I have friends who proudly claim “I don’t read.” How then do they come by their opinions? They are not thinking, cannot be thinking. They are only receiving information from talking heads, videos, but it is preprogrammed for them, and they accept it uncritically, having decided in advance which ideas they are open to, and which not. Consequently, they are Zombies. And worse yet, they are shielded, cannot be reached with any counter-information.
That, Dr. Nehls, is how propaganda works, with captive audiences. If we approach these Zombies with anything the are not preprogrammed to accept as true, their eyes roll and dart, and everything bounces off. They are wards of the state.
It is but a very short walk from deliberately not reading to functional illiteracy. Dr. Nehls, with his overly dense writing and multi-syllabic and not clearly explained wording, can only reach a precious few, probably academics. He is not reaching the very people he imagines he is saving.
And, Orwell and Huxley aside, who wrote during more literate times, the true genius of American propaganda is that we here in the land of the free truly believe we are getting it done, critical thinking-wise. You would think a country big and wealthy as ours could produce a few more mirrors.
Piece of Mindful 
“They are wards of the state.”
Exactamundo.
Have you considered how “we” got to this state? Or why it was done?
Can the purposeful elimination of true education be reversed – given the millennia entrenched hidden powers?
Can the purposeful poisoning of the air and the water and the food be reversed – given the extant dimwitted populace?
Violence has its place… I think that it is coming to a theater near you – and soon.
What a mess… yet here you are, and me, and your readers. How is this so? Are we so different from the common man?
Two good ones:
1) You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink.
Countered by:
2) You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.
Just wandering in my incredulity at the world this morning.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sometime if you’re into oldies, see a movie, A Thousand Clowns, starring Jason Robards (1966). An adman is trying to escape the madding crowd, but his sister’s kid winds up living with him, and then the social worker comes, around, and he will lose the kid if he doesn’t show gainful employment. It gets more complicated for him, as he falls in love with the social worker. The last scene … won’t spoil it, just in case.
My favorite line, there are many good ones, when asked if he is in contact with the boy’s mother: “My sister communicates primarily by means of rumor.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will do so. ________________________________
LikeLike
Hi, here is another minor classic from early 1970s I picked up in 2020. It really opened my eyes at the time, when the reality of Covid was becoming apparent. In it, the author Herzog baldly states Americans are the most propagandized people on the earth. In 2020 I found that statement shocking, now it seems about right. The Americans style of soft propaganda does seem more prevalent now worldwide than in the early 1970s. However, Covid did bring the realities of the red guard and cultural revolution from China in 1968 into George Floyd’s America of 2020, with the masked mobs bullying the masses into a craven, whimpering state. See the link book is free, highly recommended – i give 4 out of 5 stars, just some dated language and failure to see the larger picture of fakery. However his prescription of a citizenry of radical skeptics is a good one.
The B.S. Factor: The Theory and Practice of Faking it in America Paperback – May 30, 1974
by Arthur Herzog (Author)
https://archive.org/details/bsfactortheoryte0000herz
LikeLike
Your link did not lead to the actual book … there is something preventing download, something I must join.
LikeLike
This is helping:
https://annas-archive.org/md5/6bbcd2b00f997069d15cf2781d8c549c
Choose a ‘slow download’ if you don’t want to join.
LikeLike
“Covid did bring the realities of the red guard and cultural revolution from China in 1968 into George Floyd’s America of 2020, with the masked mobs bullying the masses into a craven, whimpering state.”
They didn’t even need to do that, really. They had the masses so brainwashed by then that they simply gave in themselves, no further cajoling needed. The masses are the masked mobs described here, save people like us who weren’t swindled by the con and were either on the fence about it or were vocally opposed. Hence why so many of them willingly took the jabs, and we saw how that worked out.
LikeLike
Re: “he thinks SARS COV 2 came from a Wuhan lab”
I’ve generally had the view, shared here I think, that it’s mostly been a virus of media mind control, with most real world harm coming from the “cures” and interventions. But I’ve always been ready to admit that I don’t definitively know the full big picture of human health and disease, or what mainstream science may have right and where it’s delusional or outright fraudulent.
So that said, I’m always interested in other views and came across this interesting writer recently –
https://www.arkmedic.info/p/there-was-no-virus
The title is not his view, his piece is a thoughtful and nuanced takedown of that view. I have to say it’s probably the most persuasive case I’ve seen made for there having been an actual virus. Even if you don’t agree with his overall conclusions (and I remain a fence-sitter), along the way he raises many compelling points worth considering. Lots of interesting articles on his site.
LikeLike
No virus evidence:
1. To transfect mammalian cells (a few grams) in a culture in a controlled lab it requires a relatively massive amount of DNA and cationic lipids (which form nanoparticles encapsulating the DNA and getting it inside the cell) in order to get the cells transfected with a single gene stably, or transiently. For a virus to infect an organism as large as human would require a massive infusion of DNA encapsulated in nanoparticles – not a few microscopic particles. DNase and RNase are ubiquitous enzymes found in secretions like saliva. Another major issue is the virus made in lab cultures produces extremely little virus, and the viral particles are very heterogeneous, with many particles only partially filled, making it difficult to image how a sub-optimal wild type virus could produce huge pure viral titers and subsequently infect others from a few droplets.
2. For a virus to be stable and isolatable, it needs to be producing a single pure particle, with no variants. However, if one attempts to purify lab grown virus, it is extremely heterogenous, suggesting pure viral strains are a myth.
3. At my former workplace they were doing PCR and symptom based Covid monitoring of ~1000 employees. The positive Covid cases went up ~100x between 2020 and 2021, spiking strongly a few months after mass vaccinations.
4. A mass released bioweapon could infect every human on earth and not be controllable. Why not fake the virus and make the vaccine the weapon? No one who isn’t supposed to get hurt will get hurt, and only the vaccinated will suffer. Why bother making a virus (if indeed that is possible)?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe the best analogy of getting infected by a virus would be if a tree had all of it’s leaves drop off and then dies after a few specks of dust landing on it. Not possible. Living organisms are incredibly robust and virtually impossible to hijack by simple (i.e. having a few sneaky genes that let you “break into” a cell) mechanisms. Sorry.
LikeLike
Do you think there was something released (maybe not a virus) that gave some people symptoms? I ask because I had a range of symptoms at the start of 2020. It wasn’t like a cold or the flu, more circulatory and all over my body. They started about 10 days after exposure to a man with a dry cough and fatigue. I am usually fit and healthy so fought it off after about a week and kept running and walking as a). I had to as was away dog sitting and b). I tried to ignore it as I didn’t have time to be ill. Boy, was I tired though and not hungry at all. I couldn’t taste or smell food, anyway. My whole body was affected from my thoroat and gut even down to a rash on my fingers and toes. I didn’t seem to pass it on to my husband so I later thought maybe he had natural immunity. If a virus was not used to kick start the “pandemic”, could it have been some sort of a toxin/pathogen or an infectious clone as suggested by JJ Couey? I think there was SOMETHING as too many people experienced it and this was before it was even on the news. Some of the athletes who went to the Military Games in Wuhan in October 2023 also reported symptoms. https://palexander.substack.com/p/jj-coueys-best-interview-thus-far
LikeLike
I am other people I know came down with cold-like symptoms in January of 2020, and they lasted about three weeks. That’s never happened to me before, and the other people lasted three weeks as well. Then came Covid and I became suspicious that somehow I had been introduced to a toxin, whether jet chemtrails or mere aerial spraying. I only know one thing for sure: It was not a virus.
LikeLike
I think that I commented on this before… somewhere here on PoM – looking to “cure” my loss of taste and smell. I also have commented on my health and fitness… let’s just say well above average.
Yet I was nearly immobilized for a week, with very much the same symptoms that you mention. Worse, this went on for at least a month – and to this day my taste and smell processors still are off-line.
Finally, and also previously mentioned by me: 5G had been fully activated (according to the well-buried telecom provider) in my immediate area (my workplace is already drowning in WiFi). Wifey had a similar experience about a week before mine launched.
I’m not one for psychosomatic horseshit… EMF or an unidentified [other] toxin. ________________________________
LikeLike
That’s definitely a possibility. I wouldn’t put it past them to release a small pathogen into the environment to infect a few people, then use that as the basis to fabricate infection rates/casualties for propaganda purposes. Or even alter existing ones (like the flu) and re-release them into the outside world.
LikeLike
“Covid” is a hoax and fake and gay… Really simple. But yes, I also did not know that probably all “viruses” are fake. So I can thank “Covid” that I learned about viruses 😛 Groetjes Frank / Nexus7
LikeLike
I tried to read that article supporting a virus and got an ice cream headache in 2 minutes. It’s just shit thrown against the wall 100 times over and there’s your proof. There’s too many genomic sequences, too many cures, too many drugs etc etc for Covid to be BS. Yeah and I have a big old bridge to sell..
LikeLike
That’s very interesting TimR and YCCMR … I’ve many doubts about the existence of viruses, but am open to anything. Sources of doubts:
The work of Christine Massey, scouring the medical institutions of the world (including CDC and RKI) trying to find one that had a complete copy of the SARS-CoV-2 genome, coming up empty …
They claimed that right after Wuhan Christian Drosten flew to Geneva with the genome that then became part of the PCR regime. He was shown to be wrong by a group of real scientists demanding that the published article announcing his finding be withdrawn. It was not, of course, as his “genome” was essential to the fraud.
Amplifications used with PCR … made it ludicrous as a test, with <3% relIability (assuming a complete genome) with more than 35 amps … CDC recommended 45. Whaaaa?
The work of Stefan Lanka, getting the RKI to admit in court that there was no scientific paper proving with use of the scientific method the existence of the measles virus. He then ran a real experiment for viruses using a blind without sputum, and both samples produced the same result, particles, maybe this, maybe that, nothing certain.
Me. I only reluctantly tested twice, once to have hernia surgery, and once to get back to my homeland from Mexico. No matter the outcome of the test, I knew I did not and would never have “Covid 19”, as its symptoms fit just about every disease. Further, I have never had a flu shot, and have never had the flu. I know this because virologists say that flu and colds have the same symptoms, but flu is caused by two separate viruses than are colds. What bullshit. I’ve had a cold now and then over time. That’s all. Not sure what causes it, but detoxing is certainly part of it. If I travel to Fort Myers, I will come down with cold symptoms, which I will get over on the plane trip home.
The appearance of Andy Kaufman and Tom Cowen on the scene at just the right time … classic false leaders. Their job … find out where the people who think are going, ,and lead them there, and then let them down.
IMHO … no virus(es).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Curious why Cowan and Kaufman are ” classic false leaders” .. they were among the first exposers of the virus crap. Plus both are different speakers… so they actually compliment each other. I enjoyed there lessons plus Lankas and Baileys too. Many say the no virus people are controlled op. when it is the exact opposite, the ppl (“scientists”) claiming Covid is real and/or is a bioweapon (total BS what weapon should this be, it kills no one. No ONE died from covid or got seriously ill. Except those that are exposed to toxins (here also ofc so called “vaccines”) or have a very bad lifestyle eating bad and using many chemicals etc. Strange I never got “Covid” and never took any vaccine or med “against” it. And I travelled with the bus and train for a while (which are often full of people as you should know, so if there was some “Bioweapon” I would be dead long ago, right?). Plus ofc the so called tests can cause symptoms on their own, only total dumbdumbs would take these tests which stick in ur nose and these sticks(“swabs”) are of course also poisoned…(ethylen-oxyd IIRC was one of those)
LikeLike
Thanks both for your interesting comments. I hope anyone still open-minded will try to read the actual arkmedic article I linked to give his claims a fair hearing. Ray, your summary of his views, which you admit you gave up on after reading just a tiny bit, doesn’t sound like anything I got from it.
That said I can’t dispute your claims about viruses – based on whose experience or authority I don’t know? – but nor can I assume his are less valid. He seems to have both a clinical and scientific background that gives him imo some legitimate claims to “expert status” – whether his conclusions check out, TBD of course..
Do you base your claims on lab experience or professional background? Personal study? Of what impeccable sources? You sound technically well-versed in the subject but so are others who hold a range of views – what gives yours any greater authority?
On your point 3 about PCR test results, if you had read his article, he has a lengthy section on just that, one of the most interesting in the piece – using mathematical and statistical arguments to arguably show the PCR tests were actually detecting something, not as wholly bogus as one might assume. It’s a very nuanced breakdown, I can’t summarize it, read it and decide for oneself anyone who’s skeptical.
Mark, I share many of those questions and sources of doubt. Clearly there are many layers of deception involved in the op, in the science, especially as used for mass control purposes. I just thought this guy raised some interesting points for the other “side.” Impressed also that he’s a pretty nuanced thinker and his wide ranging knowledge base and background.
LikeLike
Hi TIMR, good questions. My apologies if I was quick to dismiss the articles claims. I am weary of the Covid debacle, and so many of the blogs like the one you referenced remind me of the misdirection after JFK assassination, with clues and info going off into neverland, and towards a complex CIA hit squad based killing.
For credentials, I prefer not to disclose them publicly, since as we have seen over and over with scientific credentials that people with the highest credentials are often the biggest liars. So take what I say and judge for yourself. That being said, my credentials are 35 years working as a chemist with a BS, MS, PhD, and it goes deeper than that. I prefer to not argue from authority, which is why I don’t state this up front. Mark knows who I am and can vouch for my credentials.
I have used all the experimental methods I mentioned previously and published on them, doing the experiments myself and not as a principal investigator, who often have no idea on the technical nature of the work they publish.
To sum up, I don’t trust these virus escaped from a biolab promoting scientist/bloggers at all. Why? Because they remind me of Mark Lane, running around accusing the CIA of murdering Kennedy. Now, in the real world, if that were the truth, and you were running around accusing the CIA of the murder of a president, how long would you last? Similarly, these guys accusing Fauci and others of making a bioweapon are in a similar predicament. Do you think you could walk around freely and safely if you were claiming that Fauci and the DOD were creating bioweapons and purposely/accidentally releasing them on the public, and that was the true story? That is agent talk. And all the bluster would be just bluster if it’s a hoax. Hell, Fauci can take the Sgt Schultz defense – he never knew anything and never directed any bioweapons program, and in my view he’d be telling the 100% truth.
LikeLike
And I wanted to make the point that whether or not the virus was lab created is really of little consequence. Because if it was a virus, it was not deadly or pandemic level by any stretch of the imagination. It is a scientific fact that coronavirus, if you accept them as real infectious particles, are almost harmless viruses. The big picture questions is – was it right to shut down the world economy for 3 years, demand vaccinations and masks, to stop a weak virus? I know two people who killed themselves during Covid over the despair, one from previous experience going through Aids as a gay man with Fauci as the public health czar. They would both be dead whether or not the virus were real, and those deaths were caused by malevolence of the highest order. Similar to 9/11, who even cares if there were highjackers, or planes, or terrorist deaths – does that justify decades of war in middle eastern countries? Completely moot to the bigger picture.
LikeLike
I don’t disagree with a lot of what you say, and I don’t really think arkmedic does either, if you get the full context of the piece. And other posts of his. I tried to point out that he’s a fairly nuanced writer, not a “with us or against us”, black and white writer..
To me it’s useful to get a full picture – if there’s a virus but it’s a mild virus, or whatever the exact case, I’d like to know/ understand, and not just pick sides and fight for “my team.”
I appreciate your not wanting to use argument from authority (and that alone certainly wouldn’t be persuasive anyway), but respect to your career and experience. I don’t doubt it because you do sound knowledgeable on the topic. And while I somewhat resent experts en masse, in groupthink beuracratic mode, throwing their weight around, I do think respect is due individual experts sharing their genuine views.
What would be most useful to me perhaps, or most persuasive, would be if you shredded any or several of arkmedic’s specific claims or points. But I don’t mean to give you homework or assignments, and if you’re too put off to engage with his ideas, no problem, I appreciate your general comments as well.
LikeLike
Unfortunately I don’t think we will ever know if there is a legit Covid-19 virus. Which sounds like a cop-out, but proving a virus exists is not easy, and requires isolation, cloning, transfection, purification, characterization, and then animal and human studies for infectivity. If you can find an honest lab doing that more power to you. Just like trying to prove if nuclear weapons work or exist, you’d need a 100kg of Pt239 or U235 and a serious lab to determine if critical mass and chain reactions are real thing.
LikeLike
The idea that if there’s an infectious agent, one must find it or “grow” it in a cancerous monkey kidney cell toxic soup, is insanity.
The “virologists” (DoD agents) only use immortal cell lines so they can claim they found a virus, they then “inactivate” or “kill” the assumed particle with formaldehyde, then add other toxic “adjuvants”, and tell us that’s a “vaccine”.
What a perfect weapon. Cancer appears (during times of stress) years and even decades later, and no “scientist” can join the dots and figure out how or where the original cancer cells in a tumor, came from.
Yet, there’s an almost zero rate of cancer for those who have never been vaccinated.
We should move straight to the issue of contagion, because an inferred pathogen that defies the laws of nature and has never been found, isn’t science.
Contagion hasn’t been shown or proven in any research paper or study. So why do so many people still vehemently believe in this superstition?
Anti-contagionism was the dominant theory in the 19th century, and for thousands of years before that, until the fraudsters, Koch and Pasteur appeared (placed) on the scene.
Germ theory itself was disproven the moment Élie Metchnikoff and Max von Pettenkofer drank vibrio cholerae without suffering any ill effects.
Thousands of years of TCM and Ayurveda, in China and India, never recognizing contagion, and they are also the two most populous “nations”.
Contagion was always a cover for pesticide poisoning, industrial and environmental pollution, starvation, tainted food and water, or vaccine poisoning and increased EMF’s.
Even alleged STDs are’t transferred from one person to another.
There’s perfectly logical toxicological and even psychogenic causes for all alleged contagious dis-eases.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To get PCR numbers up you could just use primers for housekeeping proteins, or stress related proteins. A housekeeping protein is protein expressed at high constitutive levels in cells. When you are sick with something like Covid, you are coughing with congestion which is from the hemorrhaging and lysis of the cells lining the bronchial tracts, which could be caused simply by period detoxing, or the growing a new lining of cells to get rid of the surface cells full of toxins. The lysis of the cells will release a lot of DNA and RNA and light up the PCR test. That’s my educated guess at how those PCR tests work, they are lighting up to general “illness” meaning lots of DNA and RNA in the snot.
LikeLike
One should take into consideration the underlying purpose of the book and the background of the author.
All you need to know about the fake PCR tests (not a test) is the genome sequences they use are never unique, they occur in the human genome and the tests serve as random number generators and a racketeering scam. There’s also the damage that occurs by the swab, and the likelihood of toxic chemicals or smart dust on the swab itself.
Once the PCR process is run more than 16-18 times, it generates noise. We have no proof any actual tests are run, since it’s all done in closed door labs.
Many people during the pandemic who lined up for tests and gave their name and number but never hung around for the invasive probe, were contacted later by phone, with the lie they tested positive.
Cowan wrote a book on the myth of Contagion at the height of the pandemic. Even if he’s incorrect (or misdirected by his fellow Rosicrucian Steiner) on one or two points here and there, I don’t see how Cowan or Kaufman have led anyone astray.
Terrain is a valid theory and for it’s day it was quite advanced. The tenets of terrain have all since been proven, in the published scientific literature.
Germ theory was always a fraud since germs aren’t the cause of disease. Germs are all endogenous, not exogenous.
MM is literally clueless on this subject or any health related issue. He also claims anyone he disagrees with is a “spook”. Talk about paranoia and delusions of grandeur.
You wrote in another column that Mike Stone never mentions Cowan but Stone’s work and website was actually promoted by Cowan many times and he also interviewed him. Then they appeared together along with Kaufman and others on The End of Covid.
There’s some well intentioned actors and some ill intentioned actors within the faux freedom movement. The bad actors like Desmet and Michael Nehls, have what I’d consider classic intelligence operative backgrounds. I won’t be reading Nehls. Desmet’s work is highly misleading.
I saw an interview with Nehls on bitchute a couple of days ago. That was enough for me. There’s some limited truth (emotions and stress cause chemical and hormonal changes leading to illness and dis-ease) but there’s also misdirection and omission.
Whenever you see the word “resilience” or “resilient” know you are dealing with a Rockefeller-UN employee and acolyte.
“Resilience” is one of their favorite cartel signalling words.
The word resilience or resilient is used in DOZENS of government programs and the Resilient Cities Network was created by Rockefeller Org, focusing on the Climate Fraud programs of Agenda 21.
There’s also similar networks called SMART cities and towns (15 minute cities) and the STRONG cities network, where they run all the mass shooting and faux terror drills.
RESILIENCE has a 99 ordinal and a 63 reverse reduction in Gematria. RESILIENT has a 111 ordinal and a 60 reverse reduction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hi TIMR, I can try to look at his points at some point. However, as a scientist, you have to know if the dataset is clean before you can analyze it. The problem with all this Covid PCR test data is you don’t know the source, or if the analysts who ran the tests were well trained, or even if the person really stuck the swab up their nose for the test. There are so many unknowns that trying to analyze that data is unfortunately impossible, without knowing all the technical details I mentioned above. In other words, it’s all hearsay. And the majority of analytical scientists, or technicians running the assays, really have no idea of the science behind what they’re doing, nor the source of the samples they run. It looks like nursing homes were a soft target in early 2020 to juice the covid numbers, and we all know how ethical the nursing home system is.
LikeLike
Say what you will, jumping to conclusions, not having alternative hypotheses, when WHO declared worldwide pandemic on 3/11/20, could they have been more obvious, like ending the Great War at 11AM on 11/11? I knew then it was all fake. Then when they clamped down as they did, I could see the vast plans that were in place. Add to that it being world-wide, and I knew it had been in planning for years, and that we had what they had long warned us to fear, a one-world government. Probably been that way for decades, maybe longer, only now technology has enabled these Freemasons (not Phoenicians) to implement it all with great efficiency.
Is there a virus? Of course not! Go back to 1954 when John Franklin Enders won the Nobel Prize in medicine and became the father of modern vaccines. This is at the center of what Stefan Lanka was up to when he offered a €100,000 prize for anyone who could produce a paper proving the existence of the measles virus. He wanted to expose the Enders paper, and he did. He won, but search now for the episode and you will only find results of lower court cases where he lost. At issue was the scientific method, to run dummy tests alongside real ones, to have one sample with human tissue, one without, when searching for pathogens. He did not do this, a wild and careless oversight for which he was awarded the Nobel? Hmmm.
So of course, no virus, no genome, and the PCR test used as a substitute for a virus that was spreading around the world. This discredits your arkmedic link above, TimR, in that your man claims a real AIDS virus when the same situation applies, never been isolated, no proof it even exists.
All IMHO of course. I only see what I see, not what I do not, and am easy to surprise. But I stand by my lone hypothesis, no virus, anywhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Also, it took me much longer to realize that all of the intense fear propaganda served only one purpose, to create a stampede for an already developed vaccine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can remember distinctly in June 1981 when my 6th grade health class teachers announcing with great solemnity there was this epidemic upon us, and it was somehow a sexual related disease, and a lot of people were going to die of it. And I recall over the next few years having the media and my educators tell us in so many words there was a decent chance you would die from the horrible, slow infectious disease ever, with no symptoms for years, just by having unprotected sex. Remember the girl you slept with a year ago without protection – well good chance she was positive and you’ll be dead in 5 years. Good times, good propaganda.
LikeLike
One other story which I believe was part of the greater Covid pre-2019 setup is Theranos, the analytical company which was caught faking results. In the book “Bad Blood” we learn that it’s just a few bad apples (the CEO Elizabeth Holmes and her boyfriend), that George Schultz, Kissinger, and all the other 4 star generals were just old dupes, and a crusading newspaper journalist and brave grandson of George Schultz save the day by unmasking the devious culprits. No need to worry John Q Public, the system always works! In a fraud as big as covid someone would talk (sarcasm intended). Probably some short selling of the stock greased the wheels to get those old generals out of retirement and out working too.
LikeLike
Lol. Yes. Exactly. Just a complete coincidence that so many highly placed DoD and former government employees were involved in that fraud/grift.
Did you know Elizabeth Holme’s father was an ex Enron executive? She was incubated (chosen) at Stanford. Her alleged older boyfriend looked like her handler.
She was placed to head up that DoD or DARPA project, and the real founders and board made a boat load of money on the stock, by hyping it in the press before setting up the short sells. Then Holmes was supposedly “exposed” as a fraudster, by Schultz’s grand son. Talk about a psy-op and racketeering fraud. Classic pump and dump scam.
The trial was likely fake too, as is Holme’s alleged sentence and imprisonment.
LikeLike
Thank you for the reply! I sadly fell for that one hook, line, and sinker when I read Bad Blood back in 2019, and was even recommending the book as a great case study in how to spot fraud in analytical chemistry. I thought it was just a case of silicon greed/excess gone bad, and the system catching the fraud in the act of it being perpetrated. And it contributed to my faith in the system through 2020 when Covid was in full flower. Hence I believe it’s important to expose and discuss all these other sub-frauds that were perpetrated without moving onto the next scandal. The biggest advantage the powers that have is the pathetically short attention spans modern Americans (I pick on Americans because I know them best) – most people think World War 2 is ancient history, whereas IMHO one needs to understand as much history and the big picture over the past 200 years to see where we are now, and what is wrong. My Italian grandfather, born in 1910 with zero days of any school only went to the doctor a few times in his life, lived to be 95, and told me he had never heard of cancer before moving to the United States. That tells you something about modern medicine.
LikeLike
I had no idea it was all fraud until I looked at the board of directors. Then it was incontrovertible.
I’ve since realized if they make a movie about an event, you can probably bet money it’s staged and scripted.
95… and rarely visited the doctor. And a mom who knows the moon landing is suspicious. You have an impressive family!
Mine, unfortunately believed every word broadcast by the msm, then dutifully rolled up their sleeves. I wasted hours of my life trying to explain there are no pathogenic, zombie, unicorn “viruses” taking over anyone’s cell machinery. And they think I’m “irrational”. Lol
LikeLike
Thanks everyone for your further comments. I’m not advocating arkmedic’s view or any view in particular, just found his arguments interesting. Admittedly it’s a lengthy article and if your mind is made up I understand not everyone would have an interest in reading it.
On the question of PCR testing, I agree it could be producing totally bogus or contrived results. The stats arkmedic shows from Australia are interesting in the sense that they don’t conveniently fit the official propaganda narrative, and if they were synthesized, it would be a very subtle production.. something aimed not at the general public, but only someone with the ability to interpret them with the kind of analysis arkmedic does, which then results in putting the vaccine in an unfavorable light. Ie they’re not just random results, testing more doesn’t automatically produce the same percent of positives or whatever. You have to read his breakdown to understand, I’m just saying it would be a weirdly subtle data synthesis (if generated by some simulator program.)
LikeLike
Hi TIMR, I mentioned previously that at my workplace, a manufacturing facility, required weekly PCR covid tests from 2020-2023, with individuals self-swabbing. Positive test cases went from ~10 out of 1000 employees in 2020 for covid to ~1000 cases during 2021, with ~95% of them occurring in the final 6 months of 2021, and the largest uptick coming late summer/early fall 2021, when >95% of the workplace population had been double vaccinated. Most of the vaccinated testing positive for Covid~2-4 months after the second vaccination.
LikeLike
Yes. All the “tests” are done in closed door labs. There’s actually no way to know if any or all alleged tests were actually performed at all. More likely to be a racketeering scam.
PCR, as a research tool generates noise over and above 16/18 cycles.
The primers and probes in the “tests” all used non unique sequences commonly found in the human genome and bacteria dozens of times per each sequence. I cross referenced in BLAST. So did others.
LikeLike
Do you think the PCR was detecting a sequence they got from the mRNA injection, or do you think they had just upped the cycles or something, and the test results had no relation to the samples? Or just purely cooked numbers?
In the earlier days of low case numbers, they just had the cycle rate set low maybe, in your opinion?
Researcher – interesting, I had read that the primers were a proprietary black box labs couldn’t access.. but they published the primer contents? Or you were able to examine it directly?
LikeLike
Hi TimR.
I found both primers and probes on the CDC website. In one of their published COVID “virology” papers.
I also found primer and probe sequences on a WHO Pasteur Institute PCR assay PDF.
When other skeptics started checking published genomic sequences in BLAST, they found what I found.
PCR isn’t a diagnostic test. It’s a research tool. It was misused as a random number generator and racketeering scam.
All positives are false, all negatives are also false.
We can’t know if and how many Ct counts were run per assay or per lab. We can only know the recommended Ct counts. Higher Ct counts will generate higher false positive percentages.
I read numerous accounts of people who signed up to be assaulted by the nasal probe but left the long lines without ultimately getting the swab. Then were contacted days later by phone and advised they “tested” positive.
There’s no proof the closed door labs ran all the PCR assays as claimed.
It’s like voting. Or poll numbers. Or clinical trial results. The numbers aren’t verifiable. They could be manipulated by a technician, or a lab, or a country, or in some cases completely fabricated.
Low case numbers likely corresponded to less PCR assays run in total.
LikeLike
If you read arkmedic’s parsing of the Australia data on his site, it seems like either they were really running a legit, ie consistent, test of some sort (whatever it was finding), OR they were fabricating the data using some sort of pandemic simulation software. Ie, the numbers don’t look like just random results from labs randomly doing whatever the f*** they want.
LikeLike
@arkmedic… The Freemason who has a black and white panda on his latest story? Lol
He’s part of (what I consider) the controlled opposition network, paid to promote multiple psyops and fear narratives.
The data itself was released by a a criminal cartel masquerading as a government. It’s unverifiable.
LikeLike
None of that changes the point I’m my.. I didn’t say the data was reliable, I said it is either generated from some actual consistent process OR from a data generator/ simulator that created realistic results. Not just random results of labs randomly doing random processes. I never said you need to trust arkmedic or Australian officials.
LikeLike
My reply to you is further down the thread. If you can’t trust the data source or the accuracy of the data how can you glean anything or even draw conclusions from the data?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The numbers were not random, but the results appeared to be controlled. They could turn them up or down by increasing or decreasing amplifications. Since we know by Massey’s work that the genome is not a real thing, and I know that the isolation process is bogus, they were obviously looking for something they knew they would find or not find, predictably for them. This strand they were looking for had to be able to fool medical personnel as well as the general public.
LikeLike
I came across an interesting comment on Naked Capitalism (dot com) but now it’s been “disappeared.” It was a biologist talking about being disappointed by the poor showing from scientists during covid. He said that when he really realized things were off the rails was when a “study” appeared in Nature Medicine (or Nature Health, I forget) that read more like an editorial. It was by virologists, upset about dissension from their official conclusions, and warning everyone to “stay in their lane.” He said it had the effect that most scientists took it as somehow persuasive, and he was less able to express contrary views. And it was a heavily cited paper, used to dismiss anyone who wasn’t going along. Sounded like it would be interesting to read.
LikeLike
It’s not surprising that scientists were exposed as hive minded greedy narcissists, because thats what most of them are. I can’t recall meeting any fellow scientists in grad school who were there because they loved knowledge and science for it’s own sake (as I did). Most of them believe they are doing the lords work finding “cures” for diseases, but that just shows their total lack of awareness of how profit based science works.
Scientists are also often anti-social to the point of being sociopaths, and very poorly educated in other fields like history, or anything outside their narrow sphere. The top guys in science are typically politicians, and very ruthless. Scientists also typically don’t collaborate well with other scientists, making a mass opposition unlikely.
Also, don’t forget during Covid suddenly scientists were rock stars, they were saving the world, and only they knew how. That may have been a psyop ego boost for scientists to blind them to what was going on – much like they made all the people working in hospitals heros at the beginning of Covid, when we know what really happened at many hospitals. I have a close friend who believes the virus was real because his wife is a nurse and she was overwhelmed/traumatized from the ordeal of Covid – whereas I believe she may be traumatized by the procedures they were forced to carry out.
Last point – in this climate, how could skeptical scientist find an audience to talk to? Up against the government, internet censors, press, DARPA, Big Pharma, and the Jesuit Fauci, who insinuated heretics deserved to be burned at the stake. It would be like military officers openly questioning the government after 9/11, it would never be allowed to happen.
LikeLike
Thanks Ray. Always great to hear the perspective from those with a firsthand view of how the sausage gets made in these somewhat “secret society” type professions. That’s why I listen and relisten to Dr. Jennifer Daniels podcasts (on Odyssey is the best place I’ve found, she’s also got a lot of interviews on bitchute, probably others.)
Likewise there was a podcast I linked here a few months ago, with a career lab worker woman researcher, who was “waking up” during covid (or waking up “more) who had a lot of great insight. It’s quite fascinating! For some of us in the cheap seats. Strange world..
LikeLike
I have another issue with scientists which demonstrates their almost total lack of spirituality and humanity – the development of nuclear weapons and missiles. Now we know that the Manhattan project was almost certainly a psyop of course. However, it really troubled me that people like Einstein and Oppenheimer are celebrated as heroes and considered among the greatest scientists of all time. It’s well documented they advocated for building a militarily useless weapon that was designed for mass genocide of civilian populations. I don’t doubt they actually tried to build explosive devices, but their ideas were just based on alchemy, which is an occult version chemistry. Their justification for building a bomb because “the Nazis might get there first” is completely absurd. As if only a nuclear weapon could stop another nuclear weapon. And the element of pointless revenge in the mutually assured destruction – as if it’s the right thing to do to kill millions of innocent civilians if we are killed. How are these amoral people considered the geniuses of the 20th century and American heroes?
LikeLike
The point of nukes is not one upsmanship with a side effect of widespread fear- its a collaborative effort by the powers to hold the entire world hostage to ‘gawd’s’ wrath. ‘Cept no one really believes in such wrath any more so they have to recontextualize it as ‘science’. And for every saint Albert, there are plenty of Putinesque demons to make such saints seem necessary. And the beat goes on…
LikeLike
It probably doesn’t hurt they got to wet their beaks to the tune of a several trillion dollars for doing nada except makin’ movies ’bout mushroom clouds since 1945. There’s no business like scam business.
LikeLike
There are people who believe in such a wrath. And old friend was fearful of Trump being in office because “he had nukes” and wouldn’t be afraid to use them. Lol. I haven’t talked to him much since he praised the support for Ukraine and loved Pelosi’s tough stance against China. Sigh…
LikeLike
Cashiering friends comes with the territory. As the old saying goes: You can be right or you can be married.
LikeLike
Nukes, viruses and eeeevil tewwowists … are since WW2 the biggest fear monger tactics from the cabal. They recently seemed not content that this fear was enough and added 2 moooarrr: CO2/climate and now also u have white nazi / rightwing shooter and tewwowists. while the islamistic ones went on holiday. Also during covid when there was even more opportunity they did nothing? and u know why? cause the big computer making headlines cannot deal with many subjects. he can push only 2-3 subjects (imo). now covid/islamists gone, but climate, putin and nazis (here in Europe at least) are all over the place .. as u see 2-3 main topics are pushed.
LikeLike
That’s right. And see how much clearer and with understandable wordings speak those who want to reach and reach people:
Quite simple, clear and understandable messages. And more:
In addition, the “cyborgs” are on the agenda, and soon the word may “acquire a positive connotation”, but these are already spicy details.
LikeLike
Read I right that you came here to reinforce all of the mythologies of the fake field of virology? The purported existence of viruses, which might as well be called fear protons, as all they do in reality is scare poor souls too weak of mind to think properly. Then the fake computer-hacked genomes, the abuse and misuse of PCR.
You came all the way to this little old blog to perform such a seedy mission? I am flattered!
LikeLike
Not. Exactly opposite.
I show what real development is being used for, by the authorities in this distant country, the fictional situation. (Something that has almost nowhere to see in the west, by the way)
And about viruses – I never get into a debate about (the alleged) them. The arguments of people who deny the existence of viruses are ironclad – there is no legitimate science behind virology, it is impossible to isolate the (alleged) viral genome, the history of Rockefeller medicine, Pasteur’s fraud, and so on. And specifically for “covid 19” we have the great (I think over 300) requests for isolated virus, all of which were not met.
I accept, everything’s just right. And then we have the personal experience of billions of people. I, for example, who was a rare, extremely sickly child. Literally all autumn and winter I was sick. And how did that come about in many hundreds of these cases? After contact. They’ve always been exosomes, but she’s always stepped up after contact. It was always something of the field, and never, not once in those hundreds of times, was it after the contacts after which it happened. The billions of other people to whom it happened and continues to happen also went astray because of the fears with which they are crammed, and interpreted the impact of the terrain and exosomes through their delusion about the mythological contagion.
It is an exceptional sight when sometimes in ChristineMassey’s blog (which I read very rarely) someone comes and asks about people’s personal experience. I saw several times how Christine almost started to pelt in writing – “Well I don’t know, there may have been something there. I can’t say” – but she very quickly back to the familiar “Show me the science! There is no science!” Everything is rejected on paper, and it must be proven on paper. It’s all on paper.
What about people’s personal experience? The constant return of their children sick from kindergarten and school? If there is no scientific evidence that this is a viral infection, it is the terrain and the exosome. There is no such thing as personal experience, only opposing evidence on paper that creates the reality.
No one has yet accepted my challenge to spend the necessary (according to viroliegy) time for (viroliegi argues) infection with the most terrible (according to viroliegy) viruses, spending in close contact a suspected infected with any of these supposedly most dangerous viruses. (Except for the non-existent covid19.) Last, when I spoke to some of the denial team, they just stopped the conversation.
They start saying, “No science, show me the science!” I say, “I agree with your evidence and I don’t want to hear about it anymore. All I want is to (as I wrote above),” I say, “Show me, don’t tell me and prove. Show me only with action” No answer. It’s all on paper.
(In the last 4 years exactly 3 times I happened to talk to someone about the subject. As I said, I am not interested in stupid conversations about something that I know very well what it is. But I answer you, because now you have contracted the usual virus-free painful reactivity and you ask.)
And “covid19” does not exist, not because “there are no viruses”, but because 2020 is, for decades, the recorded date for the beginning of the acceleration of the transition to the new technological order (target number one, also announced by V.P.). So everything since 2020 has been about advancing the introduction into society of the new technological order, which also includes genetic technologies and implants (including brain implants), which is the focus of what I’ve cited from. But maybe the human genome doesn’t exist either (I’ve heard of this), and biodigital convergence is a purposely spread myth about fear-porno? I wonder what still doesn’t exist to stop worrying about him too.
LikeLike
I’m not interested in vaccines. I can’t go back to my youth when I got vaccinated one last time to not do it.
And, by the way, these “against covid” are not for what they are mostly thought to be (depop). If someone wanted to find out so much, he could also do it through action (rather than thinking, document checking, evidence, research that was plentiful). He could just, as I did, take a magnet and make the necessary effort to persuade 300 “vaccinated” for this extremely simple attempt. Then there would be no doubt, “proof on paper, research, etc. I did and I know. (I obviously didn’t stop at “20th or 30th failed attempts.”) Never mind.
LikeLike
My apologies for not understanding your comment right off.
LikeLike
Hi I want to weigh in about viruses. I like Mark’s “fear proton” term, I may use that in the future.
There are exosomes (messenger particles excreted by cells), that is correct. And bacteriophages, and several other “viral” particles which can be produced by insect or mammalian cell cultures, like adenovirus. However, I do not believe there are specific infectious harmful viruses, e.g. HIV. I heard an interesting talk about microplastics today that suggested the harm was not in the plastic itself, but things soaked into the interstices of the polymer lattice, like metals or toxic compounds. So when you factor all the garbage we inhale all the time, injections of metals, plus psychological stress, it’s a wonder we aren’t sick all the time. Viruses, nah.
LikeLike
So my personal experience with hundreds of infections after contact (and not before or without contact) is again rejected. (It was especially evident in the dozens of cases of the nasty measles with its disgusting little bubbles that cover the body. But it was everything else but measles, apparently, “because Lanka” and so on.) And I’m obviously heavily indoctrinated by viral threats, and aside from quoting Putin from my first post – “We can talk endlessly, just like space is infinite” – I don’t know what else.
I understand that during my improvised “tour” around the Internet, which I took to tell about the real reason for (and behind) the “interview of the century” from mid-February, I came across the wrong blog again. Before here I toured some of these right-wing sites (I think that’s what they call them, or/and “conservative” maybe). Big mistake and lost time. Especially because Donald Father of the Vaccine is connected to the whole thing (not “russiagate”). But they behaved surprisingly decently and just pretended to hear nothing.
The bottom line is that if you touch the local sacred cow, don’t expect anything positive. Or, as a wise friend of mine once told to me: “Do not shout Hare Krishna in an Orthodox church.” Sounds… Okay, normal, maybe even right, who knows. After all, sacred cows are important because they give milk to maintain the necessary spirit.
However, Faith requires sacrifice, after all. 🙂 Here’s what the search engine for “top 10 most dangerous viruses” showed at the top. As many damn sites as possible, like Deutsche Welle, which lists: marburg, ebola, hantavirus, bird flu virus, lassa virus, junin, Crimea-Congo fever, machupo, Kyasanur forest virus (KFD), denga. LiveSciense adds: rabies, hiv, smallpox and the more severe version of the disease, variola major, influenza, MERS.
All of these don’t exist, so Ray, calmly and fearlessly you can meet 10-12 people supposedly infected with these supposed viruses, do what is required according to virology to infect yourself and we to see how nothing will happen to you. (If you can, take the whole virus-free team, along with the whole pro-virus one, I don’t mind.) I’m very interested. But because we know that there will be no such experiment – again the Putin’s quote. Both feet spin the wheel. 🙂
LikeLike
How can you know where arkmedic got his data from, or its accuracy or veracity?
Data and stats can be smoothed, edited. Outliers and anomalies can be removed.
Data that’s missing or doesn’t match their model, can be replaced with manufactured data.
Why would you trust their data? They lie about literally everything.
My point is that because PCR is not a test of ANYTHING, the data whether real or artificially generated, is scientifically meaningless.
LikeLike
Yes I’ve already taken that challenge. I have had “colds and flu” about once every two years, but no verifiable evidence they were viruses.
I have a lot of empirical evidence that if you are healthy you don’t get sick, even with massive exposure to potential viruses. I’m a scientist and not afraid of self experimentation.
WARNING: the following paragraphs contain material that may be disturbing.
I used to be a serious amateur bike racer in my teens and 20s. If you know bike racing people are blowing “snot rockets” all the time. Literally showered in mucus. And yet I was never sick. I would train year round in the northeast USA, training for 10-15 hours a week, at temperatures as low as 10F. Including winter hiking. It made me laugh when people would tell me “you’ll catch a cold”.
Intimacy: i’ve had a lot of partners in the last 30 years. I don’t want to get into the details but lets say I’ve been intimate with many professionals, who have many many partners. Yet I haven’t been sick. I’ve never seen an STD or known anyone who has one. If you watch any porn now nobody wears condoms. Where did HIV go? Into a Hollywood basement?
LikeLike
Joke of the day: Covid-19 is like the Jelly of the Month club, the grift that keeps of giving. See Christmas vacation for original source.
LikeLike
Thank you. Your comment means I do not have to comment.
Dammit! I just did anyway!
LikeLike
By the way, a good guy recently showed me that there was a record in the web archive of my banned (without explanation) Substack. He is modest, but from the heart; there is also for the pseudopandemic, for example >>”archive”(top) or “see all”(down) >> “INTO THE LIST OF 50 FOREMOST (last). Grinin&Grinin” (not via direct address, must be clicked manually):
All this (which is only part of the many other general benefits of the plandemia for the irreconcilable enemies) is of absolutely no interest to absolutely anyone, which is why it does not exist at all – not only in the extra-Russian, but also in the Russian alternative media. They were busy writing about “war”, “Russia opposing the NWO”, or “Putin-bad”, a small part of them, of the “more reliable” (not to mention names, but I can) wrote about their doubts about multipolarity, but no one is interested in such things (and there are many more).
So, to get back to the article we comment under: laboratory covid theory is very important, even the most important, because it provides the necessary imaginary flesh and blood for the existence of the continuation of the Great Reset virus pandemic, which, however, continuing with the ukraine strain (just as real as the first, 19), evolved into a strictly defined battle US/West vs. Russia/China/multipolar world.
And this is a fundamental myth for managing the optimization of the transition to the new/next technological order. For the simple reason that otherwise, as, for example, in mass clarity (as existed briefly in 2020-2021, until alternative media agents accelerated their blurring spells), that “everyone is together and doing something very bad”, it is not known, in such a stressful state, how many problems the masses would create, thus slowing down the transition much more (and, perhaps, optimistically speaking, even a little questioning it… No, it’s too optimistic). It’s another thing when there is a “war” and all the other battles between irreconcilable opponents, it’s fun, there’s intrigue, you never know where a white hat will come from.
LikeLike
Researcher –
Your reply above to L is maybe meant for me, since he doesn’t mention arkmedic?
Anyway, you write
“If you can’t trust the data source or the accuracy of the data how can you glean anything or even draw conclusions from the data?”
I’ve explained this several times and neither you nor Mark seem to understand what seems like a simple uncontroversial point to me. Maybe it’s because you both don’t have the patience to look at that part of arkmedic’s article, maybe that would clarify. But it seems like it would be understandable just from basic logic.
I am NOT saying the data is trustworthy or reliable. I am simply saying the nature of the data given on PCR testing in Australia, is demonstrably not random data, however it was derived – on its face. This is true mathematically, statistically.
For the data to have been generated randomly would be some million to one or more improbability. Even the randomness of labs just jacking around with cycle rates and stuff would not yield this level of order.
Hence there are at least two possibilities –
1. An actual “virus” of some sort being detected through a consistent process
2. Virus simulator software being run to generate plausible, orderly results and fake the appearance of a genuine testing process
This is mathematically true, you don’t need to trust Australia to see that that is what their data shows. The evidence of order is in the data. How that order was arrived at is the question.
LikeLike
WordPress took away my “2”… They’re no bullet list Nazis, I guess..
LikeLike
TimR: I did read arkmedic, though I’ve not returned to review it. I simply integrate it with other things I have come to understand:
PCR testing is very good at finding anything you want it to find. It is a powerful tool, but cannot be used to diagnose disease.
There is no genome available. What we have is a computer simulation of what a genome would be if a virus existed.
There is no virus.
Therefore I conclude that what they are finding in Australia and everywhere else is a bit of DNA that exists in most or all of us and that can be dependably found by turning up the amplifications beyond a reasonable level. They had to do this in order to simulate a pandemic that never was, never will be.
The thousands of people performing PCR tests are true believers , as are most virologists. Medicine is a crazy corrupt world. Just as I don’t do news, I don’t do doctors except for things they can actually fix (hernias, torn tendons). I also don’t do voting, don’t believe in courts or professional sports or the music business. What little is left is just me believing in me. I get by on that.
LikeLike
Very interesting, I don’t think I knew those specific views of yours on which parts are real, which fake.. This deserves to be its own post IMHO. Might start some interesting discussion, plus would easier to respond on a fresh post. Either expanded from this or just hoisted directly?
LikeLike
I’ve got a book I am trying to get through, one I mentioned already, The Indoctrinated Brain by Nehls. Then I will put something up.
LikeLike
I concur with Mark.
There’s no virus so they aren’t finding anything.
Furthermore read What Really Makes You Ill, Bechamp or Pasteur, Virus Mania or Good-Bye Germ Theory. If you really want to understand the fraud of virology. You can find them all on archive.org
LikeLike
Strange, the “Like” link no longer works for me… whether I’m logged in or not, secure or not.
I’m with Mark.
LikeLike
I have the same problems as you with WordPress.
LikeLike
The people who refuse to engage in any post-Covid debate on what happened, and what went wrong, are in la-la land. I have had too many conversations where you get backlash for broaching the topic of was 2+ plus years of lockdown, and getting stabbed with a syringe full of metal and nanoparticles the correct approach? I don’t think so.
I believe the shit will hit the fan sometime between 2030-2050. The elite/powers that have the upper hand in being historically aware and are patient like a serpent, having gorged themselves on assets post-Covid. I can see why don’t give a crap about their lackeys who have been carrying out their scams the past several decades. All they need is a good security service, loyal military, and safe place to hide out. To think you can rely on your 401K is a probably a fantasy. I would spend money now to build a family and learn how to be independent and grow your own food.
I travel to Thailand often, and it is a poor country. One of my wifes friends in Khon Kaen makes $1 per hour at the Nike factory. I spoke to an engineer last week who worked on the heart rate sensor for the apple phone: he said in Shanghai the plant had 180,000 employees, and labor costs for the apple watch are only 3% of the cost. Wrap your head around that. We in the West and America are living off their sweat, and it won’t last forever.
My advice is don’t give your money to a charity, who are unnecessary middleman. I like to give my money directly to people in Thailand, for example.
Long life, health, and wealth. Pick two, because that is all you can have. The fundamental reason we aren’t seeing more people wake up is greed, it is pervasive, and a sin for a reason.
LikeLike
I had a revelation about the revelation of the method today. They make the fakery obvious to fuck with your subconscious, which will pick up inconsistencies in videos and the media and storyline. The public consciously clings to their government masters out of fear, yet subconsciously are aware that something is terribly awry, and feel the stress. I believe Tyrone made an excellent point in his should be Pulitzer prize winning essay JFK TV that cortisol can kill as surely as a frangible bullet to the brain. Hence this stress will result in shorter lives for most, who cannot deny the bullshit and fakery.
LikeLike
Agreed.. someone in YT comments (who I knew as also a critical thinker) recommended to check out this Dr. Nehls and his brain stuff. My usual method is to shortly check the Bio (wiki is good anough for that) and then see what videos I can find. I was not convinced of his stuff much, the talk I found was quite boring and nothing new for me. So I watched 15mins or so and then forgot about Herr Dr Nehls. Seems I was right :)) Another example that I never miss it seems to me… btw I was also a writer in the letsrollforums (now gone) and a small blog for a while. U can find also my comments on bitchute.. Frank/(Nexus77– the best modell of nexus of course most are only modell 6)
LikeLike