James Burrows, now 83 years old, is indeed a “legendary director”, having directed Taxi, Cheers, Frasier, Friends and Will & Grace and other stuff. He wrote a book, a fun one about his professional years and all the people he came to know and work with. Normally I would not keep a book like that, called Directed by James Burrows. But I kept it for sake of the following paragraph on page 218
David Angell, God rest his soul, was a wonderful man. He was always teased about how he could write so funny and still be the dullest person in the room. David and his wife, Lynn, had been in Cape Cod and were flying back to Los Angeles for the Emmys (as executive producer of Frasier, he had been nominated for Best Comedy Series) when their plane, Flight 11, was taken over by terrorists during the 9/11 attacks and crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center. We had a memorial ceremony for him at Paramount. Steve Weber, who worked closely with David on Wings, said “I can only imagine the last moments, when David and Lynn looked into each other’s eyes and held one another, knowing what was going to happen.”
Angell, if still alive, would be 78 years old. I hope his family and friends do not read this, as they would be furious with me for suggesting that Angell faked his death that day. He, along with 2,976 other people, most of them fictitious, did not sing with the angels that day, nor did 19 supposed hijackers. (2,977+19 = 2,996 for those of you curious about spook markers). As we have come to understand, some of us faster than others, 9/11 was a controlled demolition in New York City, and probably a controlled explosion in Washington, DC. Flight 93, said to have crashed in Pennsylvania and subsumed in an underground mine, was also a phantom flight.
Why do people fake their deaths? We have found quite a few on this blog who have done so, but these are intelligence agents who were merely reassigned new roles in life, Janis Joplin to be Amy Goodman, Stu Sutcliff to become Andy Warhol, Pete Ham to be Bill Maher, Brandon deWilde to became radio personality Thom Hartmann, Bobby Fuller to become FOX news host Bill O’Reilly, Pamela Courson to become Barbara Walters … and others. Each of these people, and surely many others, was reassigned to a prominent position in news or entertainment. Perhaps their early years in and around music or acting was to prepare them to be famous fake people, and to live well with it.
What of David Angell? He was a high profile person in entertainment already, and at 55 years of age had a long career ahead of him. Why was it cut short? I have no idea why, and also, I have no idea if he is still alive, and if so, where he might be.
Piece of Mindful 
Angell looked alot older than 55. I’m sure he was wealthy and took early retirement, not to be reassigned, but to actually quit working life and enjoy the easy life, as he was also probably paid off a handsome amount to go along with the story. There were a number of celebrity deaths around this month. Some were older so I assume they did actually pass away. I’m amazed that all these celeb deaths recently and from the past, were reported on the same day or within 24 hours. Do we the public need to know that fast…With non celebs people usually don’t find out days or weeks later, until their obituary is posted in the newspaper or online or word of mouth. Dr. Ruth, Richard Simmons, Martin Mull, Donald Sutherland, Shannon Doughtry, Shelly Duvall, etc…
I think many have been waiting for Donald Trump’s assassination yet it appears they TPTB still want him around. It was such obvious hokey grade school theater, they’ll have to do something else soon. They could do the same for Biden as a payback attempt. I guess we’ll find out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It appears they want a leader to create maximum stress. Trump will deliver. I autohoaxed that assassination attempt. The best fake one has to be the attempt on Carter by two crazy Mexicans that combined had the names Lee Harvey Osvaldo. Or was it the second attempt on JFK? I harbor the idea Carter could be JFK. I know Mark has dismissed it, but it’s quite possible to me based on “Navy” backgrounds and similar faces. I don’t believe these people get to retire. Why should they? If they are actors they are not high on the totem pole. They are definitely not hidden kings, with great wealth. Look at Trump, if he were an actual billionaire, he would be long retired. An actor. And JFK would know the role of president and be able to do it easily, as they transitioned to the Reagan era. I don’t think the Kennedys have the wealth they claim to do, again actors.
LikeLiked by 2 people
So I was out walking today and remembered some things about JFK that bolster my argument he is much closer to pure actor vs. rich kid/hidden king.
When I was going to grad school in Boston I read it’s history deeply, the conventional history mostly, but especially political history, 19th-20th centuries. JFK had a a very good fake Boston accent, but an obvious fake, based on his pronunciation of many words in a strange way (Cuba = Cuber = not what a New Englander says). Anyhow he had a vocal actor/coach early on, same one as the famous mayor Curley. Same as RFK and Teddy Kennedy, exaggerated fake Boston accents, which no other Harvard grad would have – see George W Bush and his fake Texas accent as a later example of this.
Also JFK and the Kennedys do not look Irish. They look mostly Jewish. He looks like Alfred E. Newmans brother. And the girls all look Jewish, like some girls I dated in college.
LikeLike
They definitely want him around. The cover of The Economist, “The World in 2017”, published the week before the 2016 election shows a very interesting Tarot card display which lines up with a few presentations made to Trump by Israel in the last two years.
Very interesting analysis by eyevolution.
LikeLike
The Economist is also owned by the Rothschilds, which is only fitting in this case. The Rothschilds are connected to Trump and have been since at least the 1980s. And both are Jews, of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Barbara Olson from Flight 77 comes to mind, too. I’m sure she’s still living large somewhere unbeknownst to all but intimate insiders like her “ex” Ted Olson and her family and friends. And if you check her public records in places like FamilySearch, you’ll learn that there’s no valid confirmation of her death beyond places like Find A Grave, including the Social Security Death Index. The same is likely true for those reportedly onboard Flight 11 such as David Angell and his wife.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And speaking of Flight 77, it’s highly doubtful that they could’ve easily identified most of the “victims'” remains from the Pentagon. According to my research, DNA’s burning threshold is 190° Celsius/374° Fahrenheit. Wikipedia claims the burning temperatures at the Pentagon crime scene was 1,090° C/2,000 °F, multitude times higher than the above. The chances of finding perfectly identifiable DNA samples from most of the human remains is next to nothing under such conditions, which challenges the veracity of their DNA results.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Keep in mind that in that same NTSB animation shown above, “Flight 77” is depicted flying over the Navy Annex seconds prior to striking the Pentagon, which is north of the former CITGO gas station (slow down the video to catch this, if you like). This contradicts other official data that imply the plane must’ve flown south of the Navy Annex and the gas station to account for the struck light poles and the damage inside the Pentagon, while confirming the accounts of eyewitnesses who said it flew north of CITGO and over/near the Navy Annex.
If you want a clearer view of the NTSB animation, watch this video. Start at 1:23:27 to see the Navy Annex to your right. Also notice that when the animation ends at 13:37:44 EDT (9:37:44 EST) (which is not to be confused with the video’s end time of 1:31:30), the plane’s altitude is listed at 180 ft. The Pentagon is 71 ft. tall and the struck light poles were approx. 40 ft. tall. The plane’s altitude isn’t compatible with those measurements, nor can it explain the damage sustained by the poles and the building.
LikeLike
I recall going over this stuff way back when, but slowly I came to realize that light poles can be broken by mere dynamite charges … that there was no point in doing close eyeball work on the so-called evidence. The Pentagon was bombed, no one was harmed in the making of the movie. The jetliner that was assigned flight 77 was probably reassigned and still operates today.
LikeLike
I too believe the light poles evidence was staged, possibly with explosives, soon after the Pentagon was attacked. The overall chaos of the event served to distract outsiders from noticing evidence being planted or tampered with by the FBI and ER services, so they could’ve easily downed a few light poles when few people were looking.
I’m still of the opinion that some flying object did hit the building – but it wasn’t Flight 77. Too many people saw a plane fly towards it, so it wasn’t merely bombed from within, though that doesn’t discount the possibility that explosives from inside the Pentagon may have caused some of the damage (which also explains the accounts of secondary bangs being heard seconds after the first one).
LikeLike
The old Navy Annex, which was demolished in 2013, also served as temporary headquarters for the Navy Command Center, whose offices were destroyed in the Pentagon attack nearby. Prior to that, the Navy’s Marine Corps used to have offices there until 1996.
https://web.archive.org/web/20140701234658/http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/navy-annex-being-razed-after-70-years-of-service/2013/01/05/fe1c05ce-50a0-11e2-8b49-64675006147f_story.html
LikeLike
Funny how that works.
LikeLike
A movie quote I particularly like: “The difference between a dead man and a man who’s alive can be very small. What about a man who’s about to die… a man no one will ever see alive again? This is the hard part about looking for time travelers: they don’t want to be found. You must look for them in places where no one is. Or where there are people no one will ever see alive again.” ~millennium (1989)
***for the sake of this blog, just ignore the part about time traveller’s (unless…)
Perhaps people fake their own death through no fault of their own but are forced into it? Sold into a form of slavery, or something even more nefarious. hmmm
LikeLike
Yes, I think it less and less likely someone who “fakes” their death has a choice. Moreover, it should be called retirement of a character, since a simple name change is sufficient to kill off the old character. And chosen names are malleable, they are our personalities, not our essence.
LikeLike
I remember my parents warning me if I joined the military I would be signing my life away. Thank the Lord I am red-green colorblind, they don’t want me. My point is if you sign your life away in the military, do you think lifetime actors, likely in some CIA styled agency, would have it any easier? Highly highly doubtful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that kinda’ depends on the rank of the agents. I’d imagine that high-ranking assets would have a much easier time than their low-level counterparts, especially when they are old and/or have nothing to lose like Angell.
LikeLike
David Angell stinks to high heaven of being a vic-sim. It would not be hard to pad out the lists of especially “producers” in Hollywood with fake entities, for the purposes of future fake sacrifice, or even something as banal as a no-show paycheck that can be skimmed upstairs. This has been well documented in clues forum, you will find a plethora of information on Angell, and I suggest going there to reference this subject.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Looks like Kelsey Grammer is up to his eyeballs in it. It would be funny if DA were a vicsim because he was supposedly pretty high profile.
https://deadline.com/2021/09/david-angell-september-11-kelsey-grammer-remembers-frasier-creator-1234827674/
LikeLike
Kelsey Grammar’s life right now is a virtual tour de psyop. I saw some recent headline in a tabloid newspaper he was “caught” buying a mistress a multimillion dollar apartment, the next minute he’s headlining some big tour as a spiritual guru, or Christian evangelist, whatever they call those shysters.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You know, for someone who reportedly was highly celebrated in his profession, it’s incredibly hard to find any recorded interviews or videos of David himself, or at least that’s so from my end upon researching for any filmed evidence of his existence. That, to me, is further confirmation that he wasn’t what we’re told.
LikeLike
In fact, there’s only one interview I found on YT which shows Dave Angell, this time with the crew & cast of Frasier. You’ll see him at 1:23 and 4:41 of this video below, wearing an olive green suit with a black shirt.
LikeLike
Linda Gronlund was a real person in real life. I do not care how fake the plane imprint in the field in Shankesville looks. I do not care that 93 is ‘Thelemic’. I do not care that some or many of the list of deceased from that Tuesday morning may have been manufactured whole cloth. Linda existed. Of this I am 99.99999% sure. Whether she re-patriated to dead celebrity island is mere speculation by truthers who puff out their chests like they have this realm all figured out, but more often than not – haven’t a clue of what they’re talking about.
LikeLike
Here come the shills, yee-haw!
LikeLike
Yeah and i knew someone on one of the flights and have the guts to admit the dude is 99.99% CIA If you’re going to say 9/11 was as our government presented it you better be prepared to defend it. Or get the hell out of here and go back to your government pension.
LikeLike
RayRay, you’re binary banter is rather weak.
LikeLike
While Linda may have existed, there’s no record of her death in the U.S. Public Death records nor in the Social Security Death Index. This is despite the fact they claim to have accounted for all Flight 93 victims’ remains, including Linda’s, which if true should’ve produced some documentation in the databases that I’ve searched. The fact we don’t see that indicates her passing either wasn’t reported to these databases or, if it was, they’re hiding something.
LikeLike
I am 99.99999% sure that I am a Sim living in an computerized version of reality. But that’s my story, and it’s not for the topic here and now. ~js
LikeLike
Sure there a number of real people who allegedly died in the plane crashes … but there certainly weren’t any plane crashes and we have no reason to believe the alleged plane passengers died another way. Just as we have no reason to believe that any of the people in the buildings weren’t evacuated as they are in every other building demolition.
In the case of the Challenger disaster they didn’t even bother to re-identity the people – it’s just amazing – so no doubt a lot of these real people are just going about even with the same name they had before. Mark spoke about an environmental activist, Judy someone, who seemed like a spook and who allegedly died – he said he looked her name up in the same area a few years later and she was listed.
https://fakeotube.com/video/3665/nasa-challenger-crew-alive
This is an interesting story told by a guy who has zero to do with this psyop stuff but just happened to live next door to someone on the most wanted list but had no idea who he was. Being on the Most Wanted List you’d think would require way, way more discretion than simply being someone who allegedly died when you have the back of the authorities but this Most Wanted person was just living completely normally in exactly the same place for a number of years until one day …
LikeLike
Her existing at some point is still not proof of her death, though. If 9/11 was an elaborate psyop, it’s likely she’s still alive somewhere or died from other causes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And Dante, I’m curious to know why you claim Linda was real. Did you know her personally, by any chance? Had you met her sometime before 9/11?
LikeLike
I believe the light poles evidence was staged, too, possibly with explosives, soon after the Pentagon was attacked. The overall chaos of the event served to distract outsiders from noticing evidence being planted or tampered with by the FBI and ER services, so they could’ve easily downed a few light poles when few people were looking.
I’m still of the opinion that some flying object did hit the building – but it wasn’t Flight 77. Too many people saw a plane fly towards it to have been merely bombed from within, though that doesn’t discount the possibility that explosives from inside the Pentagon may have caused some of the damage (which also explains the accounts of secondary bangs being heard seconds after the first one).
LikeLike
Hi, I guess you have 100% neutral evidence which you also will give me for your words: “Linda Gronlund was a real person in real life.”? Thanks. If not I assume you are a shill:)
LikeLike
That’s good. Are you js? One of my best friends after subjugating him with too many truth videos, like the recent Indian moon lander, said the same thing, that he believes we are living in a simulation. I can see that, but it doesn’t make great sense either. It could be a prison planet, for what I don’t know. It’s probably what you see is what you get.
LikeLike
YCCMR,
You might like Simulacra et Simulation, Jean Baudrillard (1981).
Yes, we live in a media-induced simulation.
LikeLike
It’s a lot easier to create a fake person and then to “kill” it than it is to fake the death of a real person and support a continuing narrative. David Angell never existed, nor his lovely wife who went down with him on non-existant “Flight 11”. If David had been real there would have been no reason to create dummy photos. See:
https://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=1195&p=2365217
As far as Hollywood support of the 9/11 narrative, it was their baby to start with. Keep the book if you wish, Mark, and consider its value. 9/11 is now ancient history. For archival interest, see http://www.bigeye.org/911.htm
LikeLike
All very interesting and kudos to Shack for being miles ahead of me, as usual. It is a shame that every single video link has been pulled or censored.
LikeLike
i find it amusing how many ‘truthers’ parrot this trope. ‘it’s easier to fake a death …because real families would sue / fight the government. and think of the insurance payouts!’
seriously?
LikeLike
Allegedly, many 9/11 “victims'” families and friends did fight the U.S. gov’t to set-up the 9/11 Commission a year after it happened and sued the parties concerned (e.g., American and United Airlines and even Saudi Arabia) for the attacks. Some took the easy route and accepted federal compensation from the 9/11 VCF program. For those who believe the attacks were real, this goes against the scenario that they were complicit with the perpetrators. On the other hand, this could be more propaganda churned out to make people less suspicious of the alleged friends and relatives of the 9/11 “victims” and focus their ire on patsies like the Saudis and Israel. What do you think?
LikeLike
Don’t forget this, too, Steve. It’s a very good article on the sketchy nature of Angell photographs.
https://web.archive.org/web/20111014212043/https://firemansams.blogspot.com/2010/10/simon-shack-and-david-l-angell.html
He also uncovered the equally sketchy nature of their whereabouts, at least when it comes to one of their “friend’s” recollections of the day before. And guess where that friend was on 9/10?
There’s a major problem with this story: David couldn’t possibly have been visiting his sick mother on this date because his mother, Mae Angell, died thirty-one years earlier in August 1970. Nor could the couple be visiting David’s sick father, Henry Angell, who died in August 1973. The only surviving parent at the time was Lynn’s mother, who lived in Birmingham, Alabama. This being the case, what is Stephen Rollins playing at here?”
https://web.archive.org/web/20111014095440/https://firemansams.blogspot.com/2010/10/david-angell-another-impossible-911.html
LikeLike
“Steve Weber, who worked closely with David on Wings, said “I can only imagine the last moments, when David and Lynn looked into each other’s eyes and held one another, knowing what was going to happen.”“
And how would he know this? None of the people onboard – besides the hijackers, of course – were informed that their plane was hijacked and will crash into a tall superstructure in NYC. Most only knew there was a “medical emergency” taking place. And it’s doubtful they would’ve had a clear view of the Twin Towers as the jet was flying closer to them. I guess he wasn’t well-versed on the official narrative about Flight 11.
LikeLike
And, of course, we cannot forget this gem – courtesy of Angell’s sitcom Frasier. Too many red-flags in one video to all be coincidences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
After looking over nohocapito’s stylings on Clues Forum it seems to me the most plausible scenario is this ghost character and his wife were personas controlled by Fraiser writer Christopher Lloyd, whose eyes seem very similar to “Angell’s”, and that the Angell Foundation is the final iteration of this persona- I assume, with no evidence, that this foundation is a joint Hollywood/Mossad local money laundromat. But check out the logo. How about the dotted line being a radical shift in an airplane’s trajectory running straight into a solid black line tipping over.
Okay. As for the name, ‘David’ needs no introduction for those keeping J scores. ‘Angel’ is a Greek word for a messenger of God but its used as a designation for certain investors today: Angel Investors. And, ‘natch, there are twin lower case L’s at the end to round out the conspiracy candy.
https://angellfoundation.org/about-lynn-david-angell/
LikeLike
I wouldn’t be surprised if Chris and his friend Dave were also the scriptwriters of 9/11. After all, the former specialized in producing horror thrillers throughout his extensive career in show business.
And it’s only fitting that a Lloyd would be involved, too. Lloyds of London, after all, insured the WTC complex and one of the alleged witnesses to the Pentagon attack was named Lloyd England, whose wife, btw, worked for the FBI (allegedly as a cleaner).
LikeLike
Even after nearly 23 years in its aftermath, the questions still linger, brave minds still seek the answers. I, like most of you, first believed what came over the airwaves on 9/11. But with the accelerated growth of a new thing called the internet, high-speed cable modems, and PCs with, at that time, lightening fast processing power, the veil was swiftly whisked away and human minds collectively, for the first time, began to see the nakedness of perhaps greatest single fraud ever perpetrated on the human race by the most secretive, nameless, and non-existent perpetrators the world has never known–and never will know, ever. Some have gotten close to proving, beyond a reasonable doubt, that what we saw on television that morning was a complete and utter falsehood.
Simon Shack and his group of tireless researchers pieced together a wild mosaic of all the existing photography and video that has been put before the public through media and internet. They tirelessly examined each piece of the mosaic with intense critical scrutiny. Held vigorous debate, collected and analyzed each piece of that visual mosaic with painstaking scrutiny and agonizing detail, never assuming anything and never accepting anything but what each piece of that mosaic created as a whole picture. And they pieced it together with indefatigable dedication and steadfastness of purpose.
Cluesforum has created an impregnable case, beyond the shadow of any reasonable doubt, that what was broadcast on the morning of September 11th, 2001 was a complete and utter fraud. But not only was it fraudulent, it was produced and broadcast from a central production studio using, at that time, highly advanced CGI digital graphic software, made specifically for that event and then most likely destroyed.
The perpetrators made one critical error, as if they did not learn from what Father Time had taught them about the abhorrent Apollo 11 footage: that super secret state-of-the-art CGI software they used for the 9/11 simulation would decline into the most preposterous desuetude under the hyper-sonic trajectory of modern technology in two decades. Oh what a flimsy and pathetic little archive they left us. So pathetic and painfully manufactured that even they themselves are ashamed to re-broadcast it. When was the last time you saw any of it on television or in mainstream media? They tried desperately to refurbish it using modern technology and under the guise of FOIA, but it was just slapping lipstick on a pig: the preposterous distortions of distance, size, height, length and breadth of all the buildings, the headless glitchy citizens running through each other, steel beams vaporizing into thin air, 425,000 cubic yards of concrete instantly turned into dust–these blatant and obvious visual absurdities still remain to the keen eye.
Case closed for me, and many thanks to Simon Shack, whoever he is, because I still don’t know. Nor do I care. He opened my eyes that had been closed for so long, and by an army of controlled opposition. It took me years to get through that hornet’s nest and finally arrive at the little oasis of Clues Forum. But what Simon Shack and CF have not done, cannot do, and will never do (as well as every other researcher from now until kingdom come, including myself) will be to find the bloody fingerprint.
I’m sure most of the perpetrators have been killed off, probably the day after the event. Silenced immediately by the blood-oath cabal in black robes who have no names, no SSNs, and have lived their whole lives as completely fabricated people with piles of gold living on private islands in parts of the world you and me have never seen, nor ever will see. The underlings for the project were probably most of them unsuspecting well-meaning civil servants working under the deepest level of classification that exists. Perhaps they thought they were running top-secret simulations for some national security project. But you can be damn sure of one thing. As soon as they entered that central studio on that fateful day to broadcast to the world that highly classified CGI simulation they had been working on for the last 24 months, their masters were there waiting and they knew that they would never leave that studio alive after that 102-minute project was transmitted across the entire planet.
Although I won’t be so foolhardy to pretend I know who or what these masters are or were, I can say that I do know their symbols, after long hours of study and observation. In fact two symbols on American soil were attacked that day. Two twin pillars, and one pentagram. Rather convenient that both those symbols rank as the highest symbols of the Freemasonic order, other than the eye of Horus. Strange that a symbol found plastered all over Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs would make its way onto the dollar bill, floating in a triangle above a pyramid. I’ve said this here before, perhaps ad nauseam, that twin pillars signify the twin pillars of Boaz and Jachin, which stood on the porch to the entrance of Solomon’s Temple. They are perhaps the two most sacred symbols of the Ancient and Accepted Rite and, with no coincidence at all, were oriented facing south. The Pentagon is actually a pentagram, because the pentagram hides within the external lines of a pentagon.
On Tuesday (Mar’s Day, the day dedicated to the God of War and the planet Mars), September 11 (actually 7/11 in keeping with the Roman Calendar), 2001, when Saturn was in Gemini, the two most sacred symbols of the Freemasonic order were what? We don’t know, because what we saw on the airwaves was manufactured. However, the symbols are not. They are ancient and hold the deepest and highest reverence in the Ancient and Accepted Rite.
So what is my theory then? Who shall I point the proverbial finger at? Well, I seek to force no dogma on anyone, and there is a good chance I’m wrong, misinformed, or insane. But I believe those symbols are the biggest clue we have, the twin pillars of Boaz and Jachin, and the pentagram or pentalpha. Are those symbols enough to be considered clues? Fingerprints left behind at the scenes the crime? For me, personally, they are. And at the risk of sounding dogmatic, like so many of the cointel gatekeepers and controlled opposition, that flooded the new communication platform, the internet, in astonishing droves to silence researchers, I will let others speculate for themselves.
Although given the proper amount of time and study, I could outline a theory I’ve been turning over now for many years. One which resonates with me the more I research. On that fateful day of Friday, October 13, 1307, when the Papacy and French Nobility decided to end the reign of the Knights Templars, the Rosicrucians were born. When their great champion Jaques De Molay was burned alive at the stake in France, the Templars went deep into hiding, creating a vast and secret network of world power, unassailable by corrupt Roman Prelates and debauched and corrupted Royalty and Nobility. There was a mission of the highest order, handed down from on high to Solomon before he built the first temple. They wielded their vast treasures of wealth and military might behind and impregnable veil a secrecy. They decided they would rule the world at all costs, never relinquishing the iron-clad grip they held the Papacy and the Royal families under. They were militants. And they worked behind the greatest veil of secrecy the world has ever known. They were invincible then, just as they are invincible now. My guess is that they are still a very small group under blood-oath and pain of death. As they did then, so they do now: control the world’s wealth and the world’s military. No way to understand motive, but perhaps they were demonstrating to all world governments and leaders that they still run the show, that they can paralyze entire populations with fear and loathing and psychological trauma. They can break the will of billions in a single day, force mass psychological trauma across the planet in an instant, permeate shockwaves of PTSD on a massive scale. And, most importantly, no one can stop them. The old world order will still be the new world order.
LikeLike
And, of course, there’s no record of David’s death in either the Social Security Death Index or general U.S. public records, at least according to FamilySearch.
https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=100&q.anyDate.from=1946&q.anyDate.to=2001&q.anyPlace=United%20States&q.givenName=David%20Lawrence&q.givenName.exact=on&q.surname=Angell&q.surname.exact=on&f.collectionId=2199956
https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=100&q.anyDate.from=1946&q.anyDate.to=2001&q.anyPlace=United%20States&q.givenName=David%20Lawrence&q.givenName.exact=on&q.surname=Angell&q.surname.exact=on&f.collectionId=1202535
Neither do such results turn up for his wife, Lynn Edwards.
https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=100&q.anyDate.from=1949&q.anyDate.to=2001&q.anyPlace=United%20States&q.deathLikeDate.from=1949&q.deathLikeDate.to=2001&q.deathLikePlace=United%20States&q.givenName=Mary%20Lynn&q.givenName.exact=on&q.surname=Edwards&q.surname.exact=on&f.collectionId=1202535
https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?count=100&q.anyDate.from=1949&q.anyDate.to=2001&q.anyPlace=United%20States&q.deathLikeDate.from=1949&q.deathLikeDate.to=2001&q.deathLikePlace=United%20States&q.givenName=Mary%20Lynn&q.givenName.exact=on&q.surname=Edwards&q.surname.exact=on&f.collectionId=2199956
LikeLike
Regarding information about the Angells and AA Flight 11, it was shown that they actually canceled their boarding of this flight to California on August 27th, 2001 – a few weeks before the 9/11 attacks. However, if the official story is to be believed, for some strange reason they rebooked their passage on this same flight sometime after late August and before September 11th.
We aren’t ever properly explained as to why they did so, which forces me to assume something is awry here. Why would they’ve needed to cancel this trip from the get-go if they were going to travel on the same flight, anyway? Why not book tickets on a different and more expedient flight, instead? The only passable explanation is that Flight 11 was the only American Airlines flight available on 9/11/2001 that offered an uninterrupted trip to LAX airport on the west coast, but so far, we have no solid indicators of that.
https://web.archive.org/web/20111014100400/http://firemansams.blogspot.com/2011/01/flight-11-passenger-manifests.html
For more information about the 9/11 flights, see:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240509170427/https://www.scribd.com/document/16762117/T7-B20-Flights-77-and-11-No-Show-Fdr-Entire-Contents-Notes-and-FBI-Reports-223
LikeLike
FYI – if you’re interested in people being re-assigned to new roles – Chris Spivey does a pretty good job.
Look at the work on the astronauts from the Challenger here.
https://www.christopherspivey.co.uk/2024/07/05/this-is-how-we-do-it-do-it/
LikeLike
The 2nd photo on the website is clearly a paste up. The head sizes are off and so is the resolution. Likewise Angell’s face is pasted into the Cheers scene. All the pictures are pretty poor quality for something like this.
LikeLike
“What of David Angell? He was a high profile person in entertainment already, and at 55 years of age had a long career ahead of him. Why was it cut short? I have no idea why, and also, I have no idea if he is still alive, and if so, where he might be.“
He probably wanted to enjoy early retirement with the millions he made from working at shows like Cheers! and Frasier. At that stage in his life, he certainly could afford to, since his net-worth was $55 million at the time of his “death”, which in today’s money would be valued at almost $100 million.
More importantly, he may also have been involved in shady financial dealings that made him vulnerable to prosecution (tax evasion, embezzlement, etc.), which would also be a good reason for faking his death.
As for whether he’s still alive or not after 2001, it’s really hard to say. But from my research into his public records, there’s no reason to believe he or his wife is dead. I certainly don’t believe they died at the hands of al-Qaeda hijackers using their plane as a large missile to destroy important buildings or monuments.
LikeLike
LikeLike
And to tie it nicely together, I’ve discovered that at least one of the 9/11 planes (N334AA/Flight 11) were still airborne until June 2021, almost 20 years after the attacks. It was last recorded flying from Foley, AL to Mobile, AL – both of which are near Florida, where GWB was on 9/11/2001. And that’s assuming it isn’t a different plane with the same tail number, which is also possible.
https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/N334AA
LikeLike
And what’s peculiar about this plane is that its owner is listed as unknown at FlightAware. This means we have no way of knowing who actually owned the aircraft in the 20 years since AA11 was reportedly hijacked and crashed by terrorists as part of a murder-suicide mission on 9/11. For all we know, it could still have been the same air carrier that it belonged to in 2001 – American Airlines. That might explain why they’re hesitant to disclose the real owner(s) of the plane listed as “N334AA” at FlightAware.
LikeLike
Additionally, one of the locations in Alabama (Mobile) has a large airport, which was around since 2019. It includes hangers big enough for large planes like Airbus and Boeing jets, so if they wanted to hide or store the Boeing 767 there, it wouldn’t be hard to do. (United Airlines also does business in Mobile, btw).
http://www.mobileairportauthority.com/mra/flights/
Also, American Airlines is active in Mobile, AL, so they do business with the town’s airport, as well. It’s not farfetched to assume they relocated Flight 11/N334AA there after 2001.
https://www.aa.com/i18n/travelInformation/destinationInformation/mob-airport.jsp
LikeLike
I was bracing for this years anniversary of 9/11.
Living in Boston I have heard so many pathetic sentimental stories about 9/11, over and over and over again. And the schlocky news stories that ALWAYS have some sort of emotional undercurrent.
However, this year I was shocked. I saw no replayed fake footage on the local news – I made sure to check. Very interesting.
On 9/12/24 a clever, street smart, Boston guy where I work was talking in the cafe during lunch about 9/11 – a real third rail of course, the rest of the table looked mortified. I was very curious to hear what he was said. “Something doesn’t add up about what happened that day”, and, “I’m not saying the government did it, but it just doesn’t make sense”.
I believe most Americans know subliminally that the government is lying and it was all a setup. Yet it is taboo to say it out loud. The masses are frightened to even search online for information that contradicts the official story for fear that the government will come get them.
LikeLike
“Living in Boston I have heard so many pathetic sentimental stories about 9/11, over and over and over again. And the schlocky news stories that ALWAYS have some sort of emotional undercurrent.”
This one takes the cake. Notice how none of the people in the below video is crying despite feigning sadness over reportedly losing their family members to the 9/11 attacks. And what’s even worse are the commenters, many gullibly lapping up the BS and attacking those who dare disbelieve or question the official narrative, such as this one:
“I’m disgusted. How can anyone watch that kid, Jack, sit there crying about his dad’s death, and sit behind a computer screen claiming: CONSPIRACY!”
LikeLike
And the use of children to sell a tragedy is one sickening example of manipulation and exploitation at its prime. I also find it creepy.
LikeLike
“The masses are frightened to even search online for information that contradicts the official story for fear that the government will come get them.”
The power of fear should never be underestimated. If history is any guide, this psychological tool is more effective at keeping the masses in line than even standing armies or police. It’s no different to the social stigma “heretics” suffered from religious nuts for questioning or disbelieving organized religion.
This also harkens back to stories of state-sponsored spying we’ve seen in the press from the likes of Edward Snowden, who’s another controlled opposition asset. I believe such stories were promulgated to do just that – make people fear that if they go against the grain, the government will immediately attack them as they know virtually everything they do online and elsewhere. This is not to say that spying doesn’t happen at all, but we should be skeptical whenever such stories get so much mainstream attention.
LikeLike