Martin Luther King … hidden in plain sight

It’s not every day this happens, but when it does, my heart soars like a hawk. I am going to reprint some comments from You Can Call Me Ray. Since we are leaving on a trip Monday morning, I don’t have time to flesh this out, study the timelines, do multiple face chops. But I am confident that with the face chop above and all of the circumstantial evidence supplied by Ray, that we can make a strong case that Martin Luther King, Jr., who readers of this blog know did not die April 4, 1968, simply became someone else.  Hopefully Ray will be around to flesh it out in the comments. I could wait until our return later in September, but truth is, I can’t wait to publish this. I am waiting on Ray’s permission to proceed. (By the way, face chops like the one above are hard to come by – you’d be surprised how rare it is to find the subjects looking directly at the camera, which is why I elected to use the one of Don King with a cigar in his mouth.)

Definitely some foreshadowing going on in that last MLK quote.

There is much to do here, things to argue about, questions unanswered. Ray mentioned that Don King is said to be 6’2″ while MLK was 5’7″. I’ve dealt with relative heights before and overcome them, but if not, it would be a deal breaker. I wrote about Martin Luther King’s assassination back in 2014, and at that time I still believed that JFK, RFK, and MLK really died back in the 60s. I was looking for clues as to who did it. Miles Mathis wrote about the King assassination in 2017, and pretty much de-mythicized everything. He demonstrates with some ease that the event was faked and brings in much more icing for the cake, as in genealogy, as is his habit and style. He gets to the details of the actual assassination on page 19 of a 21-page dissertation, but all of it is worth reading.

The question then is … what became of him? Now we have some good evidence that he slipped into the shoes of Don King. More to do, much more, but I hope you share my excitement.

16 thoughts on “Martin Luther King … hidden in plain sight

  1. I think you’ve got it, Mark!

    For me, the nose is the same, but the eyebrows, the hairline, and the overall expression on the two faces is quite different.

    However, this YouTube video from Steps of Truth published last years is the clincher.

    You will enjoy watching this, and it’s only about 4 minutes long.

    I’m having trouble posting the link, so if you can’t see it, the title of the video is “Martin Luther King Jr & Don King”.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXuScaNiDDk

    Like

    1. Very nice! I hope all who pass by here take a few minutes to watch that video. I could not get it to load here either.

      The two most convincing pieces of evidence in doing photo comparisons are, in my view, ears and teeth. Believe me I have tried with ears, with limited success. The problem is that with ears I do not have a point of reference. With a full-on face I can set the eye pupils at a common distance. That either reveals or not that we are looking at the same person. But it needs to be done several times. No time for that now. I still have to pack!

      With teeth and passage of years there is often dental work done to change the later photo, making dental comparisons less useful. A guy came through here, however, wanting to do a slam dunk on us that Bill Hicks and Alex Jones were two different people. He gave us a photo side by side of the two of them with shit-eating grins. We were able to do an overlay showing that the teeth of each were identical. Fun fun fun.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. I suspect that, in this case, the eye is going to find what it is looking for. From photographs I have seen of these two gentlemen there is a significant difference in their heights and physiques. Moreover, they were polar opposites in character and temperaments. The only similarity appears to be their ‘complexion’ which might just be enough for the miscreants in various government departments to mess-around with to divert the multitudes down the ‘garden-path’.
      Don’t be so easily distracted by the kabuki-directors. There are more important things to focus on …
      Cheers!

      Liked by 1 person

      1. Having done this work for a decade, I can assure you that the eye does not always find what the mind is looking for. I do not fudge. The results are either there or not. It is rare to get the alignment seen here. I thought the comparison between the two King’s was worth a look, but. did not expect alignment. People often assume, as you have done, that a mere resemblance between two individuals can be twisted into two individuals being one. Not so. Using precise alignment of eye pupils, that alignment is either there or not. In this case there is more work to do, but we are off to a solid start with the face chop and circumstantial evidence. What you have done is what I call a “drive by”. I get that a lot. 

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I’m glad you liked that little gem, Mark. I can across it while searching for comparison photos to complement what you’ve done in this post. That video maker, as far as I can see, only published about half a dozen face match videos, all last year, and has had very few views or likes.

    The other one that I looked at was his comparison of Nichole Brown Simpson against Megyn Kelly. That one really blew me away because I had never really looked closely at Nichole before. She was always just the generic blonde who married and divorced OJ.

    But I’ve seen a lot of Megyn this last few years. Perhaps because I’ve developed a taste for blondes who are far from dumb. But anyway, when I looked at the photo of Nichole that he started with, even without a comparison, I could see a younger version of Megyn there—not her cousin, or her sister, or her identical twin, but the exact same face.

    Either they are the same individual, or else they are clones. And my money would be on the former.

    Yes, I think the bard was onto something when he wrote:

     All the world’s a stage,

    And all the men and women merely players;

    They have their exits and their entrances;

    And one man in his time plays many parts,…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Nice. I have these two pinned to my bulletin board:

      “Those who are able to see beyond the shadows and lies of their culture will never be understood, let alone believed, by the masses.”

      “There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.”

      Those, and how a bullet in his shirt pocket saved Woody Allen’s life from a bible hitting him in the chest from a second floor window, completes my circle.

      Like

  3. Mark, like baseball, if you’re batting above .300 you’re doing pretty good. So if I got MLK=Don King it’s a good lucky guess. And no way to prove it. But there is already a connection there, with Coretta Scott King. A real incestuous mess.

    What Don King looks like to me is a well fed MLK who may have taken some steroids, growth hormone, and weight training. And then put on a wig with some 3″ lifts. If every photo of Don King was scrutinized by AP/Reuters, which they are, it is simple to create the illusion he is 6’2″. Watch someone on stilts and notice how convincingly they can walk.

    The other comment I wanted to make was the Bruce Lee=Judge Ito zombie connection. I agree there is very strong evidence. I determined they had to retire Bruce Lee young, because he could not fight for real, and was total lightweight. In the early 1970s Karate studios became ubiquitous in America, and there were a lot of “real” black belts and trained fighters. As someone who studied martial arts seriously for 3 years in high school, I can tell you Bruce Lee would get his ass kicked by probably any black belt in a legitimate Karate studio. Heck I probably could have kicked his ass when I was 18 and peak strength. They hint as this in “Once upon a time in Hollywood”, where Brad Pitt kicks his ass. So it was dangerous for him to be mixing in with real people, hence was best to retire, and get soft and play Judge Ito.

    Like

  4. Great work Mark! Over the years I’ve read your blog and think you and Miles should join forces, you both have a critical eye for seeing through the fog of deception. The name “Myth Busters” comes to mind but it’s already being used, maybe “The Myth Busters”?

    About Bruce Lee, cheap talk and the reason for his early retirement:

    Living in Hong Kong I’ve met two people who knew Bruce very well, one of them before Bruce left Hong Kong in 1959. One man was a fellow Wing Chun student of Wong Shun Leung or Gong Sau Wong, “King of Talking Hands”. A sifu who was taught by Ip Man, and who was undefeated in over 100 beimo matches or challenge matches where there were only 2 rules: no eye gauging or groin kicks. He was the stuff of legends and had no equal. And was responsible for teaching Bruce Wing Chun kung fu, not Ip Man as the movies keep repeating. These fights usually took place on rooftops to keep the cops from stopping them. This is where Bruce developed his early experience and knowledge for fighting which later became his own art he called Jeet Kune Do.

    The other person that knew Bruce very well who I became friends with was Jon Benn. He was an expat from the US who lived in Hong Kong and was hired to play the mob boss for the movie Return of the Dragon by Ramond Chow, the owner of Golden Harvest Studios, and the producer for the movie. Jon spent told me stories of Bruce on set and in between takes would demonstrate different kicking and punching techniques. And would also go outside for some peace and quiet. And would sometimes be challenged by local tough guy triad members who were always trying to make a name for themselves by defeating Bruce Lee. Jon witnessed one of these fights and said Bruce threw a series of punches so fast that the challenger didn’t know what hit him and fell backwards onto the pavement ending the fight as quickly as it started. The bloodied beaten guy was helped to a car. And Bruce casually walked back inside and filmed another take as if nothing happened.

    Aside from his movies, I suggest you watch Bruce’s demonstrations at the 1967 Long Beach karate tournament where his lightening speed and technique were no match for the black belt that was tasked to block his punch while standing 3 feet away. Also read interviews with his good friend, student and American karate champion Joe Lewis, Chuck Norris and Kenpo karate master Ed Parker. Lewis is an expert on karate and Jeet Kune Do. And Dan Inosanto who was best friends of Bruce’s and continues to teach Jeet Kune Do in the LA area.

    In closing, Bruce believed people would tire of his martial arts movies after a few years. He also told his wife that he didn’t think he could continue with his extreme health regimen (he was most likely taking a diuretic, referring to them as supplements to rid his body of excess water which was popular amongst body builders). And told friends he was living like a monkey in a zoo. And couldn’t walk anywhere in HK without being mobbed. And took to wearing disguises to go unnoticed in public. He courted fame but hated the lack of privacy and attention it brought him.

    I believe he was forced retired. It wasn’t his choice. It was a deal he made long ago to become famous. And was worth more dead then alive. Bruce had ordered a gold coloured Rolls Royce with a telephone in the backseat from which he said he would call Steve McQueen and brag to him about where he was calling from. He was also scheduled to appear on the Johnny Carson show just before Enter the Dragon premiered in LA.

    Bruce was in the “club” as evidenced from his genealogy (ref Miles Mathis) and the many photos of him making different freemason/illuminatti hand signs. It also isn’t a coincidence that the producer of Enter the Dragon, Fred Weintraub was the producer of his last film. A well connected Jewish Hollywood insider who’s also connected to Harry Chapins early retirement.

    It was Bruce Lee’s path of becoming immortal like so many celebrities before him who’s death was faked.

    Like

    1. Bruce Lee was a Hollywood punk. Hollywood can make anyone look tough. They can make movies of teenage girls beating up grown men and people would believe it.

      Nice job with all the urban legends about Bruce Lee but I don’t believe a word of it. Likely they promoted his fighting style because it would ensure you got your ass kicked after many years of wasted study. Who fights with open hands and wild flowery kicks? They’d break your fingers off and then your legs.

      Like

  5. Pretty brazen if so, to not even change the last name? Is the official story that they’re cousins or something.. and that’s why Coretta got involved asking for a pardon?

    Like

  6. Mark, I don’t do facial comparisons using a computer myself, because there is a knack to the technique that I’ve never learned. But especially since reading pieces here and where over the past five or ten years, I do notice more than I used to when the same person has played two roles or when two or more people have played the same role. I’m on the lookout for it now, and rather than being surprised, I’m delighted when I find a new example, a bit like a birdwatcher who spots an exotic specimen.

    For instance, since we have Martin Luther King and Don King, I thought it might be a good idea to look at another King. So I did a Google search of BB King images, and what struck me was that he has the same wide nose as the other two.

    I don’t think young BB looks much like MLK, but the fatter middle-aged BB has a resemblance of sorts to Don King. Same overall face, same nose, same double chin, same hairline, same close-set ears, same frizzy hair—although BB’s was always cropped short and neat, and different teeth—but Don could be wearing oversized dentures, as we seldom see him with his mouth fully closed. I would go as far as to say that BB could impersonate Don and vice versa without many people noticing.

    Probably not the same guys, but it might be worth doing a face chop just to check. In any case, please run your eye over Don and BB when you are next in the mood.

    Like

  7. I noticed someone disparaging Marks efforts in fakeolgist, and using it as an excuse to dismiss this effort.

    Personally I see this post as a lot more than talking about zombies. It is solidifying that MLK faked his death, and his family is involved in a lot of very shady business.

    Past few weeks I spent time researching the King family more. Do people know MLK had a younger brother, A.D. King, who actually looks more like Don King than MLK, who died drowning in a swimming pool in 1969?

    A. D. King – Wikipedia

    And MLKs mother was murdered in a church in 1974. This is what wacky-pedia has to say about her death (it screams pysop).

    Alberta Williams King – Wikipedia

    Two weeks later, he set out for Atlanta, where he shot Alberta King with two handguns as she sat at the organ of the Ebenezer Baptist Church. While Alberta was playing “The Lord’s Prayer” on the church organ, Chenault stood up and yelled, “You are serving a false god,” and fired his gun at her.[16]

    Like

    1. Please direct me to the Fakeologist person disparaging my work. I’d like to hear him/her out.

      Just at a glance, A.D. King does not look enough like either Don or Martin Luther King, but I will give it a good test later today. I’ve repeated this endlessly, unless we are dealing with twins, the resemblance’s between siblings and cousins are few. They are easily distinguished. Even with identical twins Paul and Mike McCartney photos of them at a young age show two different people, one easily seen to have become the crooner Paul, the other Macca. It’s not just the sperm and egg, it is womb experience followed by life experience.

      So, nothing to disparage you as it was you who led me to MLK and Don, but I often get this idea “Well, it could be a cousin or brother.” There are cloning operations going on, manufacture of movie stars. Charlie Sheen and Pierce Brosnan share all of the same facial features and the two line up perfectly, including hair line and widow’s peak. But do you have trouble distinguishing one from the other either now or in their prime? That’s a different psyop. There’s a reason I call them Brokonovsky Brats. Some other game is afoot.

      Like

Leave a reply to Tim Groves Cancel reply