The Pauline conversion

I was reading this morning the book mentioned in an earlier post, The Cultural Cold War, by Frances Stoner Saunders. I came upon two revelations, one from within the book, the other from without.

First, I stumbled upon the phrase  in CCW, “Pauline Conversion”, and am embarrassed to admit that having been raised Catholic to the nth degree, I did not know what it meant. Who is this “Pauline” I wondered? Is she some goddess of history who has a statue somewhere, like Joan of Arc?

No, stupid. It is who we Catholics called “St. Paul”, aka Paul of Tarsus, a contemporary of the apostles of Jesus and tormentor of Christians, who one day riding a horse was struck by a bolt of light, and thereafter converted to being a follower of Jesus.

I think of such fictions as “literary devices”, or the invention of characters to be used to advance certain plots. Paul, if he was not real, had to be invented, as he advanced the tale of a man who died on the cross and arose from the dead, an utterly fabricated farce. I still cannot advance forward with that tale other than to advise readers that Jesus was said to have died and arisen at age 33, and damned if that number does not come up even today with fake events, such as the assassination of JFK on 11/22 (11+22=33), first shot fired at 12:30 (you do the math). This farce we call history has long been controlled by Freemasons.

I had a Pauline conversion of my own, having been raised conservative and right wing Republican, and yet at the same time deeply curious about the assassination of JFK. RFK, and MLK, and later RFK Jr. I read everything I could get my hands on, to no avail, as the mysteries were riddles wrapped in conundrum surrounded by riddle. At a certain point I realized I was being lied to by right wingers, and did what I called “the jump” to the other side. That was my Pauline moment, to presume that if one side lies, the other does not. 

I made no forward progress until Miles W. Mathis unveiled the probable truth, that all these deaths were fake charades carried out for various purposes. He wrote The Hidden Kings in 2007, which stands on its own without commentary here. I cite below some of the most beautiful and resonant writing from that piece I have encountered anywhere:

People … try to blame his Secret Service, but Kennedy had eyes. Even if it is true that he could not have known about the open windows in the Book Depository until he got there, the other factors were clear to anyone who was awake. He didn’t need to be briefed or to rely on intelligence reports from good guys or bad guys. All he needed to do is look around. Whoever was riding in that motorcade could see that the public was lining the streets, that traffic was uncontrolled, that the car had no protection, and so on. Even if they lied to him about the route, he could see with his own eyes that he was a sitting duck. Do you think a man with so many enemies would be smiling and waving to the crowd, supposing he was ever stupid enough to get caught in that position? No, he would be hiding under the seat, ordering the driver to get him out of there as fast as possible. 

In response to this question, people tell me that Kennedy was naïve, that he was an egomaniac, that he was controlled, and so on. But who is naïve here? Do these responses even begin to answer my question in a meaningful way? No, they are just more propaganda, put forward to keep us from looking at what happened without a preset explanation. An egomaniac would be the last person to get caught in that situation, since he values his own life so much. He would not give his life away just to enjoy a few cheers.

We know that Kennedy was not stupid. He was also not naïve. In that famous speech that the alternate theorists love to play, Kennedy warns us of the secret government and asks us for our help. Does the same man who gave that speech allow himself to be put into an open car in an uncontrolled major city, with a bulls-eye on his head? Of course not.

Thus did MM free me from my Pauline conversion, which freedom slowly brought me back to what I am and who I am today, a conservative in the best sense, and a liberal as well. The seminal event of my lifetime was fake. Other, less seminal events followed, each real in my mind. Today as I read that Trump has suffered two assassination attempts in recent weeks, all I can think is “Yeah. Right.” The question to be asked (and not answered) is “Why?” In my mind, Kamala Harris is the ascendant to the presidency, which is where I found the Mathis reference to Saunders. Would she not then be beneficiary of public sympathy for a gunshot that nicks her ear?

The answer is, I do not know the future. Never have, never will. 

In terms of MM, it is not Phoenicians. Rather Freemasons. What light reading I have done indicates that Freemasonry goes back to the pyramids of Egypt, and the few souls who emerged after a monumental catastrophe that killed most of humanity, world wide. Immanuel Velikovsky wrote about it, and was vilified and scorned in intellectual circles for his efforts, so much so that I suspected he was being marked for elimination from those circles for writing about forbidden knowledge. 

I hearken to dendrochronologist Mike Baillie, author of New Light on the Black Death,  who writes about the events of that era (said to be 1346-1353), said to coincide with events like those described by Velikovsky, such as earthquakes, pillars of fire, masses of insects leaving the ground for air, monumental piles of dead fish atop water and on beaches, and widespread death and illness. Add to this that the Black Death arrived in Iceland long before boats from Europe sailed there and you can set aside rats as the cause. Viral contagion, part of our modern mythology, well, don’t go there. Viruses don’t exist. They too are but a literary device. 

Judas Iscariot was a literary device. He had to be invented to create a villain to blame for the unjust crucifixion of the literary device known as Jesus of Nazareth. More recent such devices are, say, Lee Harvey Oswald, and Julia Lennon, said to be John’s mother hit by a car to remove her from the scene and hide his real family origins. Jeffrey Epstein, the guy who supposedly had an island where he delighted in abusing children, and who died in a jail cell on 8/10/2019 (need I say it?) was a literary device, still alive and well somewhere, maybe hidden in plain sight, like Martin Luther King. My goodness but what a lengthy biography given to this real man who became a fictional persona. Wikipedia has good writers

The final reason for writing this piece is due to reading a Miles Mathis piece this morning, not a bad experience and, as usual, laden with genealogical references. I cite the following passage:

Another thing Candace [Owen]  missed is the goldmine hiding behind Vioris Cambridge, Oscar’s second wife. Not only was she white, she was the daughter of Vivian Stanley Cambridge. Sounds very aristocratic, doesn’t he, since that is three peerage names stacked. He is well scrubbed, not appearing in the peerage proper, but we can easily link him to the Stuarts anyway. Through the Parchments he links us to the Saunders, whom we recognize from Frances Stonor Saunders.

I have not paid enough attention over the years since Mr. Mathis recommended that we read Saunder’s seminal work, The Cultural Cold War, and it often happens that we, for instance, stumble upon words in common use after we learn of their existence otherwise. I have an ego which I keep in heavy check, as Mathis claims not to read outside sources nor take any inspiration from them, but the appearance of FSS’s name struck me as odd, as I wrote about her and her work on 9/24. It could be that he has mentioned her on many occasions and I have not taken notice, as I don’t read everything he writes. But this was an odd experience, a mention that this very diligent and perceptive author, Saunders, turned up there after I mentioned her here. Mayflies might well litter my cranium. 

It would not be ill-intentioned. It could be, if indeed he was aware of my piece, that he was merely tutoring me not to trust. Anyone. 

25 thoughts on “The Pauline conversion

  1. I watched the FSS video. Very interesting.

    I looked her up and discovered her surname isn’t Saunders by ancestry though. Her father was a Polish refugee and changed his name from Slomnicki. It does seem a coincidence though that you happened to write a post about her just five days ago.

    https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/on-the-run-from-the-nazis-a-polish-family-s-protracted-ordeal/

    I see that MM says Kamala is mainly white. I’ve just been watching this podcast between Peter Duke and Matthew Crawford where Crawford points out a lot of interesting connections Kamala’s Indian ancestors had back in India – the Greater Chennai Corporation (1688) which is the second-oldest corporation in the world after the City of London and the British Empire circle generally as well as the Annie Besant theosophical circle. I haven’t been listening carefully just picking bits up here and there.

    https://thedukereport.substack.com/p/unveiling-kamala-harris-british-empire

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Did you watch the entire one hour 51 minute Duke report? I’ve not enough time today, but it must have been worth your while since you linked to it.

      PS: That’s really interesting about the Saunders real name … in my mind, that delinks her from the Peerage entirely.

      Like

  2. Comment to Petra: you mention Mark’s blog about FSS and then MM’s addition to her as well.

    Yesterday I read MM’s latest blog about the fake killing of 14 year old Emmitt Till. Lo and behold on the Home Screen of my Roku tv, there is a movie or documentary now showing titled TILL with the boy’s mother’s face quite a great match to the photo of her and the actress who portrays her.

    Mind reading? Mel Gibson in Signs said there are no coincidences. Can anyone explain such occurrences technologically or some other way? Synchronicity?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. The concept of races is fake and illogical. When I was growing up in the 1970s you would refer to someone by their nationality, or geographic region they were from. That is a much more accurate description of a person than a so-called “race”. For example a “Mexican”, “Puerto Rican”, etc. instead of the ridiculous term “LatinX”.

    I have a feeling a certain wandering tribe is touchy about not having a “home country”, and prefers to identify themselves as race, and others as well. Speaking of that, when is it OK to declare you have a homeland? For example, my ancestors founded Delaware, and were the first Governers of Virginia. But if I claim to be proud of that I am a racist white nationalist, right?

    Like

  4. I have not said this yet

    The concept of races is fake and illogical. When I was growing up in the 1970s you would refer to someone by their nationality, or geographic region they were from. That is a much more accurate description of a person than a so-called “race”. For example a “Mexican”, “Puerto Rican”, etc. instead of the ridiculous term “LatinX”.

    I have a feeling a certain wandering tribe is touchy about not having a “home country”, and prefers to identify themselves as race, and others as well. Speaking of that, when is it OK to declare you have a homeland? For example, my ancestors founded Delaware, and were the first Governers of Virginia. But if I claim to be proud of that I am a racist white nationalist, right?

    Like

    1. I still refer to people by their looks, I.e hipster, mod, boho, conservativeage and race so as to give context to what I’m talking about.

      Like

  5. FYI I believe MAG Bitter Truth covered Emmitt Till some time ago. And MM appears to have taken a lot of content from Clues Forum and claimed discovery. Fake nukes, which I consider the most important discovery of the 21st century, was first broken by nukelies.org, and then CF, around 2008 or so.

    Like

  6. Miles by the way is the equivalent of the National Enquirer for so called truthers. Tons of celebrity trash, including articles about Matthew Perry, and not-a-one about World War One, or Spanish Influenza, or Slavery, or the Civil War, for example.

    I have started thinking sometimes the worst sins are by omission. There are so many important topics to be investigated, that popular culture of the last 50+ years should be dispensed with quickly. E.g. the beetles (i.e. the Beatles), and other trash culture.

    Like

    1. If you’ve actually read all his output you would know he’s mentioned slavery, US civil war, freemasons umpteen times. Nitpicking, classic agent tactic.

      Why don’t you write your own as minime said?

      Like

  7. I lived in Salinas, CA from 1993 until 2017 and during that time maybe the early 2000s local police would ask for the public’s help in locating a suspect. Everything but ethnicity was released to the public. Needless to say the police didn’t get too far in apprehending anyone because no one knew who to look for. They finally dropped their bid not to include that vital bit of info.

    Like

  8. Hi Mark, it’s been a while since I was allowed to comment here the last time. Then I couldn’t anymore. I’m trying now again.

    As for Freemasons, they are a creation of the Jesuits. And they belong to the Vatican, which has German roots aka “der Vatti kann” (daddy can do). Daddy is of course the pope or papa. I’m not kidding you.

    This story is not as long as they tell us, it does not go back 2000 years but maybe only 300 years. It startet after the last Great Reset. Before that there was the Heartland and also Great Tartaria, which ist not a fake of course. Even Jonathan Swift mentions Great Tartaria in his Gulivers Travel from 1726 a couple of times.

    At the time the current USA was empty and in ruins. The Heartland was a huge land which went from todays Spain to todays Russia, the folks were known as Asen and Vanen and they spoke a common language, which was the language of Odin. In todays German it was “the Odische Sprache” ==> “theodische Sprache” ==> “die Deutsche Sprache”. The Word “German” is an invention of the Jesuits to hide the powerful past of the Deutschen.

    All European languages are Indo-Germanic, even Latin and even Hebrew was created after that since it uses old gothic letters from the theodic language.

    regards

    Barbara Müller (barbm124)

    Like

    1. I forgot to mention, that the Jesuits invented all European Languages using local dialects and school educiation which also is the invention of the Jesuits. Actually all we know of our past we know from them. Even India and China or Japan have no independent records and use the history written to them by the Jesuits. Every printed word comes from the Jesuits.

      Like

    2. Hi Barb been a long time! I don’t recall ever having any problem with your commenting, but I know a former writer here did. Did I ban you? Ever? If so, please accept my sincere apologies. I read the piece regarding MM submitted with your permission … hard to disagree with it, as these are common complaints about him. For instance, he lists Frances Stonor Saunders as a member of the pedigree based solely on her last name, which we learned from Petra Liverani is an invented name, her given name being Slomnicki, her father a Polish refugee who changed it.

      I don’t mess with him, however, having run a long piece by a former writer that contained personal insinuations. Kind of took away any creditability I might have to critique him.

      Stay in touch!

      Methodological Flaws in Mathisian Conspiracy Theory and Directions for Future Research

      Like

      1. Frances Stonor Saunders’ father and grandfather are both in the British peerage. No wife is given for her grandfather, but on her mother’s side, her forebears go all the way back to Robert Stonore b. circa 1150:-https://www.thepeerage.com/p19987.htm#i199869

        Stonors are related to the Nevilles, for one, who go back even further to the Norman/Norseman **Eystein Glumra**, Jarl of the Uplanders who was born in 788.

        Like

        1. OK, I accept that as you have looked into it and I have not. I will take your word on the matter. Note that I have no patience for ancestry, that is, not a slam against you, but rather that it bores me to tears. My wife, on the other hand, loves it, spends countless hours doing her own tree, which goes ack to W the C. I take her word for it. Last May we went to Long Island and visited cemeteries, looking for her ancestors, and I took over 300 photos of various tombstones. She was so fulfilled, so satisfied, at having located her G and GG (GGG?) ancestors.

          Ever been to Jones Beach? Of course it is named after her forebears.

          Like

  9. Barb – Interesting take. So how did the Jesuits achieve that, did they have some link to the previous civilization, or knowledge of it, in your view? That gave them an advantage over other groups?

    Like

    1. All I’m writing here is just IMO. I have only bits of information, mostly from old books, which are not many and are hardly to find. You have to connect lots of dots to get the picture. Remember, this happened after the last Great Reset. It happened only maybe 300-350 years ago and the Jesuits invented 2000 years of history to hide it. The planet was depopulated, Europe obviously got off relatively ligthly, the controllers took charge and installed what we call Vatican and what controls the world until today. It was a simple structure: the pope tells the cardinals, they tell the bishops, they the priests and the priests tell the sheep. The Jesuits are the main tool of Vatican. They even have their own Black Pope, which now is Arturo Sosa. But it seems that this times are over and something new will be installed. As for your question, the controllers keep their own records of course. They know about our real past and all that. They locked the old knowledge and then released parts of it as what we call the industrial revolutions. To prepare the new world for the new times they organized many World Exhibitions everywhere in the world. Jon Levi and Jarid Boosters have lots of stuff about that on YT. The Jesuits were just told what to do. They first created languages using local dialects and their school programms. How this work can be observed on the Ukrainian language which didn’t exist as such before the Ukraine was created as a state after the collaps of the Soviet Union. Ukrainian students now complain that the Ukrainian they have to learn now is totally different to the Ukrainian they had to learn as kids. And before that there was only Russian with some local accent. The origin of the National State is a linguistic community. It takes maybe 2-3 Generations to implement a new language. Parents send their kids to school, where they have to memorize stuff to get a degree and a better job. This children then get their own children and the new language is being spread. We call it Indo Germanic, or more often now Indo European to hide the German roots. And even the term Germanic is fake and hides the old theodic (Deutsch) history of the Heartland. I found a book from a Peter Franz Joseph Müller (no relation) called “My take on history”, which he wrote for the Vienna Congress at the beginning of the 19-th century where he complains about the artificial changes in languages and history at his time. Indo Germanic means that the “Germanic” in it was first. Latin is a German derivative. And languages like French, Spanish, Italian, Romanian, etc. are all Latin languages. The National State (we have about 200 of them now) came out with the so called French Revolution, which probably never happend. It seems to me that this National State is now being replaced with new structures like EU oder US and more will be created all around the world. Brics may be just temporary. But TPTB didn’t decided yet which way they will go. Next year will be crucial. At the beginning of the recent Corona show they even mentioned that “this” will go on at least until 2025. They didn’t mean Corona, which was only a temporary distraction. The new world order is still being prepared and will be shown to us when it’s complete and then we will accept it.

      regards

      B.M.

      Like

      1. Thank you Barb. I come across this idea, or overlapping related ideas, from time to time.. podcast interviews, forums, even a couple people on facebook post about it. It is very intriguing, our possible hidden history, or even the nature of reality being different than we think, being heavily steeped in materialism and the “disenchantment” of the world.

        Like

Leave a comment