I have decided, partly due to lack of reader response, but also due to my own “enough!” feeling, not to write about Climate Change anymore. There is nothing new to learn there. It’s a psyop run by dishonest people, or worse yet, people who mind-meld to be in the right camp. They only want to make a living, and I understand that, so that I take it as a larger statement on the human condition. Like Diogenes, we must all carry lanterns.
I do follow blogs, and the one I have come to like the most is Climate, Etc., run by Judith Curry. She does not write much herself, but when she does it packs a punch. I refer you to that blog’s three most recent articles:
Casting Blame for the Blackouts in Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, by Russ Schussler, Planning Engineer
Why “Cheaper” Wind and Solar Raise Costs – Part I: The Fat Tail Problem, again by Schussler
A Critique of the Apocalyptic Climate Narrative, by Judith Curry and Harry DeAngelo
I can do no better, for sure. All of the work on that blog is substantive, even as it often takes time to digest. That is why I like it. (Curry, I add, was libeled by Michael Mann, who said in a public email that she had “slept her way to the top” at Penn State. She was dating a divorced professor. But Mann’s words stuck, and Curry saw no alternative but to retire from her post, and then to run her own blog on her own terms.)
_________________________
Soon I am going to put up a repeat post on the Challenger Disaster, and work done originally by Clues Forum. It’s a repeat in that I ran it before, using my face splitting technology to ascertain whether the people alive are the people said to be dead.
Yes!, was the result I got, but I then decided that my role should be merely to refer people, in this case, to CF, when outstanding work like that is done. So I took the post down, but saved the photo analysis.
After I ran my original copycat post, I noticed something odd: One of the dead astronauts, Prof. Judith Resnick, changed in her appearance, and CF switched out photos to run the newer, younger Resnick. I did not know why, but supposed that perhaps the real JC was having qualms or cold feet, and was not a solid participant in the hoax. So they found a substitute, did some Photoshop work on her, and slipped her in as the original. Remember, neither had to do anything other than to participate in photoshoots. There was nothing to “train” for.
Now Petra Liverani is telling me that old and new Curry are one and the same, even as my work tells me that the eyes do not line up, and that we are dealing with two different people. (See face split above.) As always with Petra, it’s an argument that is hard to win, as she believes in herself and stands tall in the wind on all these matters. So, with Petra’s permission, of course, and fairly representing her arguments, I am going to feature our exchange, and let the readers decide.
Just as an advance notice as to what I suspect what might be going on with “Resnick” photos and the Challenger, note the McCartney photos above, from various eras. Numbering them 1 on upper left and then left too right to get 1-1,1-2,1-3, 2-1 etc.: Note that 1-2, 1-3, and 3-3 are all original Paul, while the rest are all Mike, except: 4-1, a 1995 photo. It is a clinker.
What they did with that photo was to take the upper half of Paul’s face and blend it with the lower half of Mike’s face. It’s nice work, and unless you’re a wonk like me, will slip by unnoticed. That will be my starting point with Resnick, as can be seen to the left above, indeed all of the facial characteristics line up, except the eyes. In my work, I find that if I don’t get perfect alignment of all important features, that we are dealing with different people.
And, indeed, that is my take on Resnick, that she was replaced, although no one is saying JID, that Judith is Dead, not even Mike Williams. She’s alive.
_________________________
Speaking of Beatles, one of our regular commenters here, You Can Call Me Ray, wondered why, so many years later, that we still seemingly obsess on them.
Si senor, I can see chile y huevos tambien.
What is it with Beetlemania, these people who put so much into worshipping John, Paul etc, etc? They certainly like to mock the Elvis acolytes as dumb hicks, I don’t see the difference with people who spend a lot of time researching Beatles arcana. It was all manufactured, what else do you need to know?
Fair enough, and perhaps enough is enough. I answered, rather longwindedly, as follows:
You make a valid point, sir. I can only respond that you had to be there. Life in our Western world was one thing before the Beatles, and something quite different after. Those of us who “research” the phenomenon are of curious mind, how did they pull this off?
Paul McCartney was “interviewed” by a “news reporter” back in the day about his use of LSD, and claimed he had used it several times, and that he had to admit that because the reporter asked the question and he had to give and honest answer. The upshot? He was telling his fans to use LSD. Maybe he was too stupid to understand his mission, but from what I’ve seen of him otherwise, he does not possess anything resembling a conscience, and is only able to absorb and bask in his unearned fame. How does he sleep. Like a baby.
John Lennon, on the other hand, appeared to have wanted out of the game, suffering remorse at not being available as his son was growing up, wanting to fix that by raising a second son properly. Not a perfect man, maybe not even a good one, but he took the available exit offered in faking his death.
What is going on in the Billy Shears book is what Petra calls “revelation of the method,” the key to the whole scam, not naming the people behind it, but detailing what was done and why. And why. Some might attribute higher motivations in destroying Christian beliefs, driving a wedge between parents and children, changing habits of dress and using music to those ends, and encouraging drug use. I don’t, no more than I see any good in scams like Covid and the vaccines, the underlying motive being to destroy, not to build.
So yes I and many others of my generation are curious about Beatlemania, a contrived phenomenon. How the fuck did they pull this off? The book reveals much of the answer without naming names.
Just to add to that, below is the McCartney interview I noted:
That’s Mike, by the way. Note the eyebrows. He was at that time perhaps at the peak of his influence and popularity. He had to know that his words would serve as encouragement for his followers to experiment with LSD*. Of course he knew that, or if not, is a fool. And that, I think, was in large part the role of the Beatles, among other things, to introduce drug use into mainstream culture. I doubt that this guy ever used LSD, as in my view pop icons (say Jerry Garcia, Willie Nelson, Janis Joplin, so many others) are used to encourage use of drugs, but that they themselves abstain. Their role is to sell, not to buy.
*I am aware now that many advocate use of LSD in a therapeutic setting, that use of the drug can cure alcoholism. That was not the case when Macca was promoting it.
Piece of Mindful 
Wow so when Joseph Fourier published science two hundred years ago in 1827 that “the effects of human industry” would heat up Earth that was a psy-op? That’s the longest running psychological operation on Earth! Or maybe you need to do remedial study of two hundred years of science. Professor Raymond Pierrehumbert, formerly teaching physics at University of Chicago, has provided a book of the top global warming papers, starting with Joseph Fourier. You can find his lecture series on youtube – cotaught with another physics professor and you can even email him at Oxford where he teaches now. You can also get his book with the papers. Or you can read his 2011 Physics Today article explaining the quantum physics origin of global warming (hint it has to do with photon resonance).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we need more specifics from you, that is, what effect has human industry had on temperature since 1827. Just as with today, temperature has been rising gradually, not since 1827, but maybe since 1850, said to be the end of the Little Ice Age. And, with quantum physics, please quantify the effects.
My home state of Colorado has seen a temperature rise of 1.56°F since 1918. If human industry and quantum physics are causing that, those effects are barely perceptible.
LikeLike
thanks for your reply – you’re implying you’re interested in not self-censoring global warming science as a “narrative” or “psy-op” when you discuss temperature change.
So 91% of the temperature increase has been absorbed as thermal mass in water – which means it’s increased over 500 Zettajoules of heat in the oceans accumulated since 1995. This is detailed by Ph.D. oceanographer Jim Massa who has a youtube channel called “science talks with Jim Massa” – he doesn’t twerk so his vids are not viral.
OK you can also find a fascinating debate with a global warming Big Oil denialist Tom Nelson against “Potholer54” – who is a Ph.D. geologist editor for New Scientist magazine – on the Potholer54 channel. Ironically their debate about temperature mirrors my own expose on the disinformation about temperature by Big Oil denialists – see my blogpost (The study: Networks of Climate Obstruction: Discourses of Denial and Delay in US Fossil Energy, Plastic, and Agrichemical Industries, PLOS, January 15, 2025.)
https://www.counterpunch.org/2025/01/24/deniers-insurance-premiums-both-surge/
On the interwebs you’re not cool if you acknowledge global warming is not b.s. hahahaha. Why? That’s just how effective the U.S corporate-state mind control propaganda is for people using their microwave cell phones.
“Our study suggests that climate obstruction in different industries is more coordinated than is generally recognized,” said co-author Jennie Stephens, professor of Sustainability Science and Policy at Northeastern University and of Climate Justice at the National University of Ireland Maynooth.
“Combined with the high engagement of the petrochemical derivative and fuel sectors with government regulatory, policy, and political entities in the energy and environmental in particular, this suggests strategic attempts to undermine and subvert climate policy through social media,” the authors wrote.
wait – that’s not my blogpost yet. Strange my search is not bring it up. https://elixirfield.blogspot.com/2023/05/a-common-misinfo-graph-claim-about.html
I’m gonna change that blogpost title so it comes up more easily. I searched Kurt to find it. Why? I have a long response at the end of that blog post from a Professor who studied temperature from ice cores. He was one of the scientists misused by the graph disinfo people. Kurt M. Cuffey Professor, Department of Geography, University of California.
You gotta scroll way down to get to my blog post. hahaha.
But then again you might just went to play the “if I’m not shown something then it doesn’t exist” willful ignorance argument that is all too common on the interwebs. I prefer just to cover my eyes and pretend people can’t see me – pretty much the same thing. I did just upload a vid last night on the $60 trillion dollar “methane catastrophe” that will double atmosphere temps within the next ten years – and it is ignored by mainstream climate scientists except Peter Wadhams who was at Cambridge (then he got released from Cambridge after he published that $60 trillion claim in the top science journal Nature). hahaha. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j2OhGuT0kE&t=1141s
LikeLike
OK, so you just predicted that atmospheric temperatures will double in the next ten years. This is a part of the climate psyop, to rest “science” on predictions that never come true, knowing that after-the-fact, few will notice. Why, they should make you King! Isn’t that what Charles did when he was just Charles, to predict that if we did not take action by 2017, that it was all over? King Charles now is not connected to that prediction, which never came true and had to be changed to 2030, when it will have to be changed again.
And you use the term “denialist”, a propaganda technique.
Go away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought you were being serious when you said Fourier’s claims about industry heating the earth was a very long-running psyop. There’s loads of long-running psyops – germ theory and vaccination being two notable examples. While the event of the Great Fire of London is over the fraudulent story persists and what emerged from that psyop affects us today.
I was a very strong climate activist – out in marches, knocking doors at election time and very involved with a climate solutions group and to tell the truth I can’t quite jump ship – I think the cognitive dissonance is too great – but nor can I feel the slightest concern about climate change either. Since covid I’ve come to understand how shockingly dishonest scientists can be and how one cannot have any faith in them whatsoever. The website, Skeptical Science, was my “bible”. I felt it gave a fair hearing to the “other side” but ultimately showed it was wrong, however, when I found them censoring my perfectly valid comments on the covid scam I realised that appearances can be deceptive.
Jacob Nordangard is a Swedish researcher who was originally a member of the Green party but then began to research the environmental movement to discover that the Rockefellers were behind it. He also says something about fellow Swede, Arrhenius, being a rather suspect character but I can’t find it now – perhaps it was in a video. In any case, supposedly Arrhenius thought that an increase in CO2 would be a good thing for the planet in greening it.
He published a book: Rockefeller: Controlling the Game which I haven’t read but it seems good. His website:
https://blog.jacobnordangard.se/
48m video – the origins of the Climate Change Cult
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZgEZqMju2M
LikeLike
Yes, Arrhenius.. I think that may have been well promoted at the time, as pro industry and tech optimism propaganda sort of. I suppose they could use the concept that way today if they wanted to, but the pendulum swung and it became an academic “industry” attracting more and more funding, favored by the Club of Rome types for their social agendas.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://studio.youtube.com/video/UJdb5DyE3wA/livestreaming
I made your own personal video showing the Joseph Fourier quote from two hundred years ago! Long before Rockefeller. hahaha. thanks
LikeLike
Not a simple matter of clicking to see your video, however, you misunderstand my comment. Nowhere do I suggest that Rockefeller didn’t come well after Fourier. Fourier may have been perfectly genuine … but still have it wrong about industry heating up the earth or he may have made up the idea – makes no difference. Those in power have been planning things for awhile using CO2 as the bogeyman regardless of how much of a problem CO2 really is or not.
LikeLike
“After I ran my original copycat post, I noticed something odd: One of the dead astronauts, Prof. Judith Curry, changed in her appearance, and CF switched out photos to run the newer, younger Curry. I did not know why, but supposed that perhaps the real JC was having qualms or cold feet, and was not a solid participant in the hoax.”
Not Judith Curry, Mark; Judith Reznick!
If you’re not careful, you’ll be starting a whole new conspiracy theory.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you! Man, do I need an editor.
LikeLike
All I will say is this:
— I have no idea why anyone would doubt that Paul isn’t the same person all the way through because I cannot see any differences that mark a change
— The two Judith Resniks match on hair colour and type, teeth, body shape and size, age, underbite and mouth formation when making certain sounds. Additionally, Judith Resnik, law professor, when questioned about whether she was JR, astronaut, looks very uncomfortable and JR, law professor, was pursuing BA studies at Bryn Mawr College, at the same time that JR, astronaut, was taking master’s evening courses at the University of Pennsylvania, a stone’s throw away.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/the-challenger-disaster-the-plot
I think what Paul says about answering the question honestly about taking LSD is 100% valid and, totally agree with him in his claim that it is not his responsibility to keep it a secret, it is the media’s. I mean, the media accuses him of encouraging people to take LSD but the only reason people know about it is that the media publishes it! So the media expects him to lie in answer to a question about whether he’d ever taken it in order that they don’t broadcast it? Seriously? And if he said he’d never taken it and the media published it would people believe it … like they believed Bill Clinton’s claim? Honestly, Mark, I really don’t understand your view on this.
LikeLike
It seems odd to me to be explaining to you, of all people, that things are not alway as they appear, and behind that, intended results are not always spoken plainly. With Resnick and McC, we have two separate events, one deliberately misleading, and the other to patch a hole left by departure of one of the actors.
With McC you see the same man all the way through, and I want to drive my truck into a concrete barrier, which is what I often have to deal with. Yes it was the same man all the way through in the images that stayed with you, and even as I have repeatedly pointed out those instances where it was the other guy, you’re not seeing it. Can’t help you there. And, if one of the primary thrusts behind the Beatles was to introduce drug use into mainstream culture, then promoting Lucy would be part of it. So they set McC up to deny, knowing full well the thrust of the interview would be “Yes, I used LSD, so should you.” As with Lucy, it is plainly obvious misdirection used to cover real intent. Thus endeth psyops 101, multilevel deceit.
With Judith, I printed the photos of the two different women and ran the face split showing non-alignment of eyes, which is indicative of photo manipulation. I’ll cover more of this later, but have written my own back story here, that the real Judith backed out, and they were so far into it that they had to get a replacement for the photo shoots, and then doctor the photos so that the resulting photos, obviously different on the surface, would look enough alike on close examination to pass. They chose a young model due to facial plate similarities, knowing they could fix it all in post-production.
LikeLike
No more climate talk, what about the covid vax…
NC had a better than usual discussion in a recent piece, thanks to commenter “RM”. KLG (an anonymous bio researcher type) wrote one of his usual tedious long winded and moderate pieces, on mRNA tech this time, and the response –
“The mRNA platform is fundamentally and fatally flawed. No need to invoke conspiracy theories. To prevent rapid breakdown and achieve the persistence required for adequate expression multiple hacks are needed (lipid nanoparticle coating, pseudouridine). This means it gets everywhere, in high concentration. Wherever it is taken up, the mRNA gets expressed and inflammatory proteins end up on the cell surface, driving immune attack and tissue destruction. In the heart, this leads to myocarditis. As many have pointed out, this issue is independent of the genetic payload, and is a feature of the platform itself.
By the way, concerns regarding genetic alteration following covid-19 vaccination are, unfortunately, warranted, largely because of the presence of DNA contamination resulting from the use of plasmids in the manufacturing process (see Buckhaults et al).”
I’m not entirely unfamiliar with this take but I like the clear thinking, logic and details RM provides, here and throughout the comments.
https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2025/05/mrna-vaccines-as-currently-understood-have-poisoned-the-well-for-mrna-therapeutics.html
LikeLike
Just for context, NC is not rabidly pro vax, or anti, in their editorial policy. They’ve been critical of much of it, skeptical, cautious, while also at times seeming to grudgingly condone it(?)… They were rabidly pro mask and all of that.. but sort of moderate, leaning negative, on the vax..
LikeLike
Tim
None of the effects described need any RNA or DNA. They can all be achieved with the lipids protecting a poison, which is exactly what we have. It is certainly the platform that causes the effect not the DNA or RNA which is surplus to requirements may or may not have any significant effect. A discussion for another time
LikeLike
okay just read this article, so nevermind my other comment on Judith, that is a good matchup, everthing looks similar except for the eyes not lining up which points to the photo could have been manipulated so the eyes don’t align. Are there any other photos that can be used?
LikeLike
The only photos available are those of her surrounding the events leading up to the disaster. Remember, she died that day. But I do need to look at the other photos and do comparisons. And I will.
LikeLike
The eyes don’t align in the splice, but note that in the actual Resnick (old or young), the eyes also don’t align.. it appears her right eye (our left) is slightly higher (and smaller in the young one.) Also the old Resnick here is turned slightly and maybe tilted a bit, so that’s going to distort any face splice with the young Resnick, who is looking straight on.
LikeLike