Who is on top of things – Abraham Lincoln, who said that labor is the source of all wealth, or the Randians and modern-day “conservatives,” who say that wealth is the source of all labor?
Vigilant citizen test, part 438
Two uprisings have occurred in the last few years, the “Tea Party” and the “Occupy” movements. One was spontaneous, the other orchestrated. Guess which.
(Hint) One had strong financial backing by oil oligarchs, and a TV network that showed up whenever two or more gathered. The other, not. (Just a hint.)
Should cops be prosecuted for illegal crackdowns?

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. (From a document that is irrelevant during times when wealth is threatened)
Albany, NY police have refused to enforce illegal orders by Governor Cuomo and Mayor Jennings to break up peaceful demonstrations called the “Occupy Albany”, part of a larger national movement. This is refreshing and good news. It helps that Albany police chief Krokoff is not politically subordinate to the mayor, but the larger issue is a centuries-old debate concerning the liabilities of subordinates when they carry out illegal orders.
The law at stake here is the law of the land, the US Constitution, First Amendment, cited above. It trumps all. As long as demonstrations are peaceful, demonstrators cannot be forced to seek permits or disperiise when ordered to do so by local authorities. Continue reading “Should cops be prosecuted for illegal crackdowns?”
Man of the Year nominee
I am in a motel room today watching football, bored to tears. Glenn Greenwald is putting out his usual outpouring of insight that, due to the depth of thought control in this country, few can grasp. (Who was it who sang “You better free your mind instead”? I did not know what that meant at the time either.)
The US is, surprise to me, pulling out of Iraq on the Bush timeline. It turns out that the Obama Administration did not want that to happen, but the Iraqis insisted that if American troops stayed in Iraq, they would be subject to prosecution in Iraqi courts for their crimes. This, as with all of the Arab Spring, is fallout from Wikileaks.
In other words, whoever leaked that cable [about a massacre of Iraqi civilians by American soldiers and the attempted coverup] cast light on a heinous American war crime and, by doing so, likely played some significant role in thwarting an agreement between the Obama and Maliki governments to keep U.S. troops in Iraq and thus helped end this stage of the Iraq war (h/t Trevor Timm). Moreover, whoever leaked these cables — as even virulent WikiLeaks critic Bill Keller repeatedly acknowledged — likely played some significant in helping spark the Arab Spring protests by documenting just how deeply corrupt those U.S.-supported kleptocrats were. And in general, whoever leaked those cables has done more to publicize the corrupt, illegal and deceitful acts of the world’s most powerful factions — and to educate the world about how they behave — than all “watchdog” media outlets combined (indeed, the amount of news reports on a wide array of topics featuring WikiLeaks cables as the primary source is staggering). In sum, whoever leaked those cables is responsible for one of the most consequential, beneficial and noble acts of this generation.
My nomination for Time Magazine man of the year: Prisoner Bradley Manning, whose newest crime is to force the US to be good to its word for once.
An experiment
The unfortunate passing of a brother has left me in a fortunate position. I am now majority owner of a business. I won’t say anything about its name or location for sake of privacy, though those who know me will know.
I urged my brother over the years (as did another brother) to treat his hired help with more respect and dignity. But, GRHS, my brother thought that hires were a drag on profit, rather than part of its source. Over the years, he refused to offer higher wages, eliminated benefits, and refused to even consider offering more hours than demand justified. He built a nice cushion to insulate himself from downturns, but no one else benefited. GRHS. Continue reading “An experiment”
I so hope so
I heard or read this somewhere, from a person looking on Occupy Wall Street and all of its offshoots:
The kids are OK.
Counterintuition
I’m just picking up on the thread below here: Picture a corporate executive working for, say, Nike, and sitting beside him a sweatshop laborer working for, say, Nike.
One of these people knows a whole lot more about free markets than the other. Guess which one.
OK then. Guess again.
Breaking free
I am looking for positive things to put up here, and scanning the political horizon, there is not much. But there are protests going on, and that is a good thing.
We live in a thought-controlled culture, so that protests are usually seen by the mainstream as aberrant or even goofy. The media adds to this perception by showing the freakiest elements they can find. There are only two ways to keep those who have broken free of thought control in check – marginalization, and violence. The New York police Department, which is protecting criminals inside the buildings of Wall Street from protesters outside, seems aware that violence only feeds the movement.
The complaint most often voiced about Occupy Wall Street and it’s offshoots is that it is mere free-floating anger without an agenda or objective. That is a valid point, but the absence of an agenda should be expected in a nascent movement. If it is going to amount to anything, coalitions must form, leaders must emerge, and thinkers must start forming blueprints. But for now, just the overcoming inertia and breaking free of thought control is a big step.
Continue reading “Breaking free”
Life begins anew
OK. Our family has endured much sadness lately, and out of that came a desire to avoid the incessant negativity of blogging. I’ve followed the usual haunts, and nothing changes. Ever. I continue to admire the work put out by Lizard and JC at 4&20, and will live vicariously through them.
How to deal with loss? We’ve all experienced it, the knowledge that someone we love is just plain gone from our lives. It could be a romantic breakup or death. The feeling is the the same. As I saw bodies lowered into graves these past few weeks, I had uncontrollable sadness. Our family is closer now, more supportive of one another. We share pain, and that makes us stronger, more compassionate.
Does religion help? Do all the people who say that our loved ones are now somewhere else help the wounds heal? No. I don’t believe it, nor do they. Faith is unwavering belief in things we know are not true. Death is the end of a person, never to be hugged or heard again.
Oddly, from death comes from within me a desire to give more of myself and expect less back. It is maturity. I was once told by a wise man that we don’t really become adults until our parents die. Perhaps he meant until we experience profound loss.
So my writing here is no longer offered to induce endless and unproductive political debate. I want more substance. I offer this forum to anyone who wants to share a positive outlook. No sympathy. We’ve had plenty of that. Just positive thoughts.
One lesson learned: The need for, and the healing power of forgiveness – while we are alive. Life, as we all know, is short. We were repeatedly told that hearing is the last sense to go. Maybe so, but is there comprehension? I doubt it. Reconcile with them during life. I am saddened by the loss of two brothers, but gratified that we were friends at the end, all issues long since rectified.
Making decisions, moving forward
Democrats will always be Democrats. Because they do not fulfill their role, and are as often con artists as leaders, they are the problem.
People who think Atlas Shrugged had deep significance will always assume they know more than us.
99.9% of Americans will never penetrate the cloud of propaganda that envelops them.
Meaningless elections that change nothing will continue to absorb our good energy, assuring the owning classes that their wealth and power will not be threatened by public opinion.
Things are shaking a little on the ground. The occupation of Wall Street might be the beginning of a movement, might not. It might be infiltrated, the bankers might send in agents provocateur to break some windows or burn a flag to discredit them. It’s a tried and true tactic.
But maybe change is in the air. It is long awaited.
This is the end of the blog as we know it. I’ve said everything I have to say at least seven times seven. It is fun to write, and I will continue to do so, maybe even here. But a wise man once told me that life is about making decisions, moving forward. This blog is a sideways place.
See ya. Been fun. And check the date. It is not April 1st.