30,000 angry, suggestible victims

Vodpod videos no longer available.

This film was produced and edited by New Left Media’s Chase Whiteside (interviewer) and Erick Stoll (camera operator). Critics might suggest that they cherry-picked for the stupidest people they could find. That might be true. Nonetheless, it speaks to a larger phenomenon best described by Matt Taibbi at Smirking Chimp:

After all, the reason the winger crowd can’t find a way to be coherently angry right now is because this country has no healthy avenues for genuine populist outrage. It never has. The setup always goes the other way: when the excesses of business interests and their political proteges in Washington leave the regular guy broke and screwed, the response is always for the lower and middle classes to split down the middle and find reasons to get pissed off not at their greedy bosses but at each other. That’s why even people like Beck’s audience, who I’d wager are mostly lower-income people, can’t imagine themselves protesting against the Wall Street barons who in actuality are the ones who fucked them over. Beck pointedly compared the AIG protesters to Bolsheviks: “[The Communists] basically said ‘Eat the rich, they did this to you, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” He then said the AIG and G20 protesters were identical: “It’s a different style, but the sentiments are exactly the same: Find ‘em, get ‘em, kill ‘em!’” Beck has an audience that’s been trained that the rich are not appropriate targets for anger, unless of course they’re Hollywood liberals, or George Soros, or in some other way linked to some acceptable class of villain, to liberals, immigrants, atheists, etc. — Ted Turner, say, married to Jane Fonda.

But actual rich people can’t ever be the target. It’s a classic peasant mentality: going into fits of groveling and bowing whenever the master’s carriage rides by, then fuming against the Turks in Crimea or the Jews in the Pale or whoever after spending fifteen hard hours in the fields. You know you’re a peasant when you worship the very people who are right now, this minute, conning you and taking your shit. Whatever the master does, you’re on board. When you get frisky, he sticks a big cross in the middle of your village, and you spend the rest of your life praying to it with big googly eyes. Or he puts out newspapers full of innuendo about this or that faraway group and you immediately salute and rush off to join the hate squad. A good peasant is loyal, simpleminded, and full of misdirected anger. And that’s what we’ve got now, a lot of misdirected anger searching around for a non-target to mis-punish… can’t be mad at AIG, can’t be mad at Citi or Goldman Sachs. The real villains have to be the anti-AIG protesters! After all, those people earned those bonuses! If ever there was a textbook case of peasant thinking, it’s struggling middle-class Americans burned up in defense of taxpayer-funded bonuses to millionaires. It’s really weird stuff. And bound to get weirder, I imagine, as this crisis gets worse and more complicated.

This isn’t new in America – the art of public relations (now known as “corporate communications” – the PR people changed the name) is misdirection. Yes, ordinary people are angry. Yes, they are being fucked over. Yes, they know this …. and yet, as noted in the film, when it comes down to specifics, well, they really aren’t sure why. Just who.

It is true that there is racism as a subtext here, but that’s an expression of fear, nothing more. All of us hold out some reservations about other races- it’s part of our makeup. Setting this aside, the key here is that anger is cleverly channeled away from the true culprits – the Wall Street barons who so recently mugged us, the insurance companies who are leaching on our health care system, and the public relations (corporate communications) industry whose propaganda is the Vaseline that eases the pain of rape.

10 thoughts on “30,000 angry, suggestible victims

  1. Mark are you serious???? All of the diversionary name calling by the leftists, including you, reveals a nasty bigotry that doesn’t sell a political product. If someone disagrees with the president, the label “racist” is tossed out with the “progressive” minions cheering. There is Pelosi labeling protesters as un-American, the brown-shit remark that you have embraced, morons, and on and on and on…..

    Except, for this post, I have taken a pause from participating at “progressive” blogs. The rhetoric is way over the top, ugly, divisive, and not worth the effort to respond. Are you guys completely nuts to conflate the fringes with the normative middle, or are you just being disingenuous to hold hands with each other?


    1. Craig – I don’t have to travel far from here to be labeled moonbat or be told what stupid liberals think. I rather enjoy it, as I don’t have reactionary views, and am able to argue for everything I believe, even if I am often wrong. As I have said before, the only things that make me angry are those things said about me that are true. Think about it.

      There comes a time when you’ve got to call a spade a spade. That demonstration in Washington, the teabagging thing – Craig – it’s right out in the open. most people lead busy lives and have very little interaction with politicians and issues, and that leaders know this and seek to grab control of them by offering up and repeating simple thoughts, catchphrases that are focused grouped to gauge effectiveness, and that is what has happened with these protesters and teabaggers. They’ve been undermined, subverted, their legitimate anger directed at the wrong people.

      I have an interview with Wendell Potter that I transcribed that i’m going to put up soon – he’s the CIGNA PR guy that resigned to work for health care reform. He talks about how deliberate this all is, how the insurance companies are pulling strings behind the scenes. And I have studied propaganda, I have thought about it and I think I understand how it works, how it is used to control thoughts and behaviors.

      If you think I’m arrogant and snooty, fine, but I think that’s just one more way of avoiding the issues at hand. If the things I said are wrong, if these angry people are not simply being manipulated, then tell me exactly what they are saying that is true. We’ll debate.

      By the way, I made Hitler comparisons regarding Bush for the following reasons: 1) Preventive war,as Hitler did in Poland and Russia; 2) torture, 3) rule by fear, 4) use of radio as a propaganda tool.

      Comparing that to calling Obama Hitlerlike due ot healht care reform is absurd and stupid.


      1. Mark, you have completely avoided my point to defend the left’s pejorative rhetoric as if it were constructive or revealing to the issues before us. So be it. Good day.


  2. I’ve only read one review, but Taibbi’s timely reality check only makes Nader’s latest book, a fiction, that much more appealing. Uber rich elites taking on the system that made them. Nader, has always been at least one step ahead of the crowd. It should be an interesting read.


    1. Nothing gets by you, Swede. Nothing. Too funny – you do realize that your link is to a fake picture?

      And anyway, I remember your words during the protests of the Iraq invasion – something about tiny angry minorities setting brush fires in people’s minds.

      Oh, wait. That wasn’t you. You were mad because they were protesting in time of war. That was you, no? Support the troops Swede?

      Cognitive dissonance anyone? That’s also a characteristic of the right wing authoritarian. Swede is deeply afflicted with it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s