Facing our inner demons

[Note: Presented throughout are images of evil demons presented to us by our government, offset by photos of those people in reality – quite harmless.]

demonic mohammad atta6148701_f260One of the hardest things to grasp regarding 9/11 is people’s attitude about it. I’m just coming around to having some understanding of it, and it wasn’t 9/11 that helped me along.

The mystery is this: A rational person cannot look at the evidence for the official story of that day and do anything but laugh. It’s absurd.

  • Planes do not fly through buildings of concrete and steel like a knife through butter.
  • The national air defense system was not caught with its pants down.
  • A giant jet aircraft cannot fly through a small hole, as seen in the Pentagon.
  • Untrained pilots cannot perform sophisticated maneuvers with passenger airliners…
  • …even the assumption that untrained pilots could get control of the aircraft using box cutters is an absurdity.
  • An airliner did not disappear into an old strip mine in Shanksville. If it did, they’d dig it up.
  • Buildings do not just fall down.
  • A passport does not magically appear in the debris of a skyscraper while all evidence of the plane itself is missing.

And on and on and on. There is far more going on here with the American public than mere mis(or dis)information. Most people are rational, and a large percentage of us are smart. So they are able, as am I, to see all of the above and know that it is nonsense. But they do not. They believe the incredible, and dismiss the logical as a pack of lies.
____________________
Saddam Hussein demon(FILES): This undated file photograph shI have written quite a bit about “thought control.” That is not what is going on here. Thought control is merely a play towards our suggestibility. People do not form their own opinions, though we believe we do. Who controls our information controls our opinions. That is thought control.

Thought control is easily undone (but the influence of TV news has first to be overcome). All it takes is awareness. Just as children realize one day that there is no Santa Claus, so do we adults quickly adapt to reality when we realize we’ve been snookered.

Osama demonosama happyWhat is happening with the American public and 9/11 is far more sophisticated. There’s a phenomenon known as “dissociation,” a detachment from reality brought about by many things, often trauma. It can be seen in the abused child. Because he could not grasp what was happening, and because it was horrible and frightening, his mind provided a defense mechanism. The experiences were hidden in the deep recesses of the mind. Such individuals are susceptible to hypnosis (and manipulation, as we will see). They can recover those memories, but most wander through life as two people, the buried person expressing itself in various behaviors.

Dissociation is merely our ability to be more than one person – to drive to work, for example, and not remember the trip as we arrive safely. In abused people it’s far more serious as the person within can cause aberrant behavior. Hypnosis is merely an attempt to communicate with suppressed memories – it is not magic. It’s just a testimony to the complexity of the human brain.

The question is, can this be done to us on a mass basis? Can we have a mass disassociation brought about by trauma?

Apparently, yes. For one thing, we are not allowed to think about the details of 9/11, or examine them in detail. That is strictly prohibited in our media, and any who violate that rule are quickly disciplined. Anyone who questions the official story is quickly shuffled to the margins. So we are not allowed to come to grips with the events of that day.

Gaddafi_timemuammar-al-gaddafi-smileIn addition, the traumatic aspects of the day are constantly reinforced with flag-waving and presentation of boogeymen for angry release of pent-up hatred. Such boogeymen as Osama bin Laden, Muhammad Atta, Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi, and most recently the Tsarnaev brothers and Bashar Assad, are presented to us in near demonic fashion. We act out our anger, which is really addressing our hidden trauma from 9/11. The government uses these images as it attacks various countries it had long wanted to attack before 9/11.

There’s a remedy for each of us to this manipulation, also known as “trauma based mind control.” It is simply to look at the evidence of 9/11. And this explains why people are not rational and are even unable to confront that evidence – it is the key to the inner psyche. There’s a mental block in place. What presents itself as irrational behavior is merely an outer manifestation of dissociation.

article-2312378-19673BEC000005DC-42_470x573Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-and-girlfriend-boxingbIf you were to stumble out of the deep woods into civilization, you might regard mere mirrors, radios and motor cars as miracles. It took a long time for such things to develop, and we needed experience and means of storing information from generation to generation to develop them. So too has the study and manipulation of the individual and public mind been under study for generations.

9/11 was a “PSYOP,” that is, a mind control event. All events happened for the benefit of the TV – in fact, the TV screens were taken over that day by a central operation, and all media outlets broadcast the same footage all day long. Much of it was real, such as collapsing buildings. Must of it was merely TV imagery which would not have worked had people not have been in a state of trauma.

This guy has been tough to demonize. They had to resort to caricatures.
This guy has been tough to demonize. They had to resort to caricatures.
assad happy The people who did it did not just stumble on to the methodology. It’s been under development for decades. As long ago as 1968 the Manchurian Candidate was at work, a hypnotized person acted out a programmed assassination attempt (RFK) while the real killer lurked behind him and shot him behind the ear from a few inches away. To this day, Sirhan Sirhan cannot recover his memories. It’s dissociation.

The CIA program that accomplished this was called “MKULTRA,” (Wiki actually does a credible job on this one) and we only know about it due to the Church Committee of the late 1970’s. And we only got to see a little bit of it, the hypnotized assassin. They’ve been apparent throughout the past decades in people like John Hinckley, Mark Chapman, Squeaky Fromme*, Sara Jane Moore*, the Manson Family, Son of Sam. Freaky.

But can the same methodology be applied on a mass scale? I only need ask how you can believe that absurdity is reality, and why when someone presents evidence, easily obtained, that the events of 9/11 were staged, that your reaction is fear, anger, and blocking it out. Have you been gamed? Has someone undermined your thought processes?
_______________
*Squeaky and Sara Jane do not appear as part of any serious assassination attempt, especially as people had gone to such trouble to put Gerald Ford in office. They have (Manson) cult connections, appear to be acting out on suggestion, and took shots at Ford that could not possibly have succeeded other than by sheer luck. Real assassination attempts usually are loaded with double taps, as the objective is to kill the person. It cannot be left to chance. Other than possibly promoting some gun control or state surveillance initiatives, I cannot fathom why these two were used to do what they did. That is truly crazy.

33 thoughts on “Facing our inner demons”

    2. Rather than “probable” I should say “safe assumption pending further revelations.” Since it is in a naval shipyard, the area can be sequestered so that unlike Boston it cannot be quickly dissembled by unwelcome snoops. There is always the possibility that is a real event, but other possibilities are fake event and false flag event. Recent history favors the latter.

      Like

      Reply

    3. Muslim? Source please, Ingy. Is everyone who isn’t a kristyeean fundiwackmentalist a Muslim to you?

      [Larry, please do not slip into those habits again. “Christian fundamentalist” is less annoying than the garbled presentations you give us.]

      Like

      Reply

        1. I’ve not followed the event, as all we are getting now is a pack of lies, if previous events are any indication. Her statement, that gay people do not kill children is obviously false. Gays and straights alike can be murderers – is Oliver North gay? But she’s a Mom, and can be forgiven.

          Like

          Reply

          1. Can’t believe anything Mark. From the right or left. From MSNBC or Fox. From Kos or the Heritage Foundation.

            All you can rely on is yourself. Individualism. Right?

            Like

            Reply

            1. Mainstream news is compromised, and our media is basically state-run. Consequently, you’re left without an anchor, a trust relationship. Deal with it. NPR and FOX offer the same news in different packages to appeal to different audiences.

              Like

              Reply

                  2. Ah jeez – here’s what I’m afraid of: I explain to you the duties of citizenship, including thinking for yourself and never trusting without verification, and you vamoose after I sweat out a thoughtful answer. Then you return in two weeks with some moronic link.

                    Like

                    Reply

                    2. It’s not that I care about what you think, or that I don’t care. I simply ‘nothing’ you. Bring me your thoughts without links, maybe more than one sentence, perhaps even expounding on ideology or or core values. Evidence is always useful, if you understand that word.

                      Otherwise, leave me alone.

                      Like

                    3. Oh, you sell yourself short. You’re everything to me.

                      You’re the perfect example of convoluted thought unable or embarrassed to put forward solutions.

                      Like

                  2. Oh, I see. As a self proclaimed reader of “hundreds of books” do you Mark have an original thought?

                    JFK conspiracy an original thought?

                    9/11 conspiracy an original thought?

                    Boston Marathon conspiracy an original thought?

                    Do you attend Chomsky lectures to debate Noam or do you wait with baited breath for his insights to weave into your posts?

                    Like

                    Reply

                  3. Did not see that coming at all. No sir. Everyone is part of a greater whole, and over time by mere absorbation and exposure to a wide range of raw data and views, we form a world view. Chomsky came along at a critical juncture for me, in 1988, and I learned a real deal from him. Even as an ignorant high school student I did not believe the Warren Commission, but as a stupid right winger, could not make it fit. I knew right off that 9/11 was not what it appeared, but could not make it fit because I did to grasp the extent of psychological manipulation there. Nonetheless, by that time I could easily see that its purpose was to free the MIC to attack the Middle East. Since that time I’ve had trouble understanding the need for fake victims at Boston (so that real families do not demand an investigation, as the 9/11 families did – the fake investigation of 9/11 was a pain in the ass for those whodunit). But I have come to grips with the Strategy of Tension, the immense hold that psychological manipulation has on the whole of the American public, especially the Democrats, who need to feel smarter than your set even as both are equally stupid. With the shipyard incident, I can now feel comfortable that it is fake, but also that it was done in a secure location to avoid prying cell phones and eyewitnesses. I easily saw two years ago that the MIC was going after Syria in the wake of its success in destroying Libya. I am heartended with the resurgence of the Russians.

                    It’s been a long and snail pace struggle to understand a very large complicated world, always a work in progress. Talk to me in five years, and I’ll give a different view.

                    During all of that time, as far as I can see, you read Atlas Shrugged.

                    Any questions?

                    Like

                    Reply

    1. That’s a great link. Thank you. Too often I avoid Counterpunch because Cockburn rode herd on it, keeping really interesting stuff out. Have they opened up? Appears so. Any leftist outfit that is critical of the fake left is worthy of some trust, in my view.

      If you saw one of the crappy sequels to Back to the Future, the one that went forward instead of back, Doc explains timelines to Marty on a chalk board, saying that they had to go back to a point where two lines separated to remedy the damage done by Biff discovering the results of future sporting events.

      But that’s fiction. To say that without JFK’s death we’d still be living in Camelot ignores the fact that black ops were long underway and had nestled in government. We cannot know this stuff, and I can only speculate that even had JFK lived, we were still in for a passel of trouble – just on a different time line.

      Like

      Reply

      2. Link no worky.

        Larry, people are not, for the most part stupid, but rather a product of the information they have access to. They are also busy, and so do not take time to research things in depth. So they take the path of least resistance, which is TV news. The government, knowing this, cannot possibly leave it alone. It is too powerful a control mechanism.

        Television as a medium, as well, is a tool that can induce active participation by the viewer, creating a sense of involvement on a personal level. People offer very little resistance when they are viewing news because they we are actively involved. Ergo, their our critical faculties are suspended, as they we are not viewing from a distance. McLuhan commented on this feature of the tube back in the 1960’s. They We tend to believe everything they we see there that is presented as news*. Tell me that you, like me, were not just the same at some point in your life?

        *Entertainment can monkey with this line too. People willingly suspend disbelief, and in so doing open the door for psychologist manipulation.

        Like

        Reply

    1. My only problem with that scenario is the he was so young at the time. But he was CIA, he was involved in the Cuban terror program, Mongoose (two ships that were part of the Bay of Pigs fiasco were the Zapata and the Barbara), and he is a connected going way back to his family’s involvement in Nazi Germany. But I won’t read the book. Enough. I merely hope the guy dies a painful slow death.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a reply to LK Cancel reply