Our culture of fear

“When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest.” – Amicus Solo

I suffer from the illusion that people will actually look at the evidence in matters of criminal behavior, especially the major events of our time. But they don’t. That’s my bailiwick. Most people get their opinions via absorption of mass media. Consequently, evidence can scream at them but they will not hear it.

For example, take just one small matter, that of the murder of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. The coroner’s report by Thomas Naguchi said that RFK died from a gunshot wound fired at close range directly behind his right ear and leaving powder burns. Sirhan was in front of him and too far away to have fired that shot.

There you have it.

But here’s a critical point: Hardly anyone knows about what I just wrote there. It passes into a void of fear and silence, and anyone with a public reputation who brings it up will come under severe attack. That’s why I conclude that there is considerably more power exerted in covering up these crimes than their actual commission. The culture of fear we live under is as oppressive as any Stalinist state, and don’t get me wrong here: I know Stalin had people murdered who knew too much. I am not being hyperbolic.

imageHere’s but one small example, an unimportant person, comedic actor, legendary dissipator, Charlie Sheen. He’s not even terribly bright, but he did have some swagger and had the balls to appear on Alex Jones’ Prison Planet (did I mention that Charlie is not that bright? Jones is nothing but a gatekeeper, in my opinion.) He said he did not believe the official story of 9/11.

We’re conditioned never to connect dots, but what happened to Charlie after that indeed was a direct result of his speaking up. He lost his job on Two and One-Half Men, Where I enjoyed his work, and later found himself locked in a closet in Manhattan covered in cocaine and surrounded by hookers. I assumed at the time that Charlie was supposed to be killed that night, but have since reconsidered. Our spooks are so goddamned good at the art of killing, if they meant to kill him he’d be dead. Charlie merely received a message:


Celebrities have more impact on public opinion than politicians, and certainly more than academics and intellectuals. That’s why Charlie was singled out. His Jones appearance got the attention of a lot of people. He had to be silenced.

More importantly, any other celebrity who did not have his mind right got that message. That’s our culture of fear.

We had a lengthy discussion below, and I am pasting a redacted and long comment I made for the simple reason that it is the evidence contained in Dr. Judy Wood’s book Where Did the Towers Go? Like the bullet that got Bobby, people will shy away from knowing about this. Many will stop reading right here. But I am putting it up here anyway because just like a dog barking in the night, it may recede into the background of your consciousness, but will not go away. If you read this, it will trouble you.

Good bye, then.

In answer to XXX, above:

Since you refuse to go to the evidence, I’ll bring it to you. XXX never looked at her book, easily discerned, which is why I called bullshit on him.

The reason is obvious:

First, Dr. Wood used very little math in her work, and is almost exclusively examining physical evidence on the ground at Ground Zero and trying to explain it. …

Here’s some of what she has done:

  • She used a billiards ball example as evidence that the buildings could not have collapsed under their own weight, and that there had to be a massive injection of outside energy. But that’s mere arithmetic.
  • She examined the near-pristine state of the “Bathtub,” that reinforced wall that holds the Hudson River at bay and keeps Manhattan’s financial district and subways from flooding. The debris suggested a near scalpel effect, with massive buildings destroyed but the Bathtub unaffected. Massive collapse is not controllable, so that that effect is highly unlikely.
  • She examined possible sources of outside energy, including conventional explosives, nuclear bombs, “nanothermites”, and found them wanting. The quantity of explosives would require tens of thousands of bombs placed strategically throughout the buildings. There’s no evidence to suggest that ever happened, and more so, not enough debris. There is not enough heat to justify a nuke. The chemical signatures in the debris, specifically the high presence of tritium, suggest a cold fusion process at work.
  • She examined seismic data and compare the events of that day to others in terms of strength of signals. She found that a much smaller building, The Seattle Kingdome, left far larger seismic signal and more debris, suggesting that much of the buildings had simply turned to dust.
  • She examined photos and movies of the buildings in collapse, trying to understand the process before her eyes. Where Did the Towers Go? is the title of her book for good reason.
  • She examined the phenomena of 1400 cars that burned, including one whole parking lot blocks away that did not catch any debris, and yet where cars incinerated.
  • She examined the vehicles themselves, and found that the fires did not behave like normal fires, but rather seemed to exhibit a cool process and were stopped from spreading by mere plastic seals.
  • She examined the phenomenon of 1200 people voluntarily jumping out of the buildings even as it was not clear that collapse was imminent. That is not how people behave normally. They either wait for rescue or try to save themselves.
  • She wondered how workers could walk over supposedly molten debris, how hoses could lay on top of it, and not burn up. She wondered why, even as cars were burning up, paper under and around them did not.
  • She examined magnetic signals in the earth’s field and found that right around the time that the two building that fell “got their holes” (she does not assume planes hit them, as there is no aircraft debris at Ground Zero), and found that there were huge influxes of energy at that time.
  • She wondered about the presence of Hurricane Erin off the coast on Manhattan/Long Island that day, and why it was not reported on the news.
  • She examined the debris of all seven buildings that were destroyed that day, all bearing the prefix “WTC,” trying to understand the large circular holes in Building Six where offices were still intact, coffee cups still on top of desks, even as a clean hole was cut.

Dr. Wood states at the outset of her work that she is not going to get into who or why, but rather only focus on “what.” Consequentially, her book, 485 pages, names no names, postulates no theories on who or why, and simply asks “What happened that day.” It is an exhibition of evidence, everything left to the reader, no conclusions drawn except that there was an energy force used, a kind of directed energy, that we had not seen before. She did not use the term “beam,” and offered no clues as to its source, which are mysterious to this day.

You, XXX, take but a mere glance at the evidence, turn away, run to a debunking site, and then start hurling invectives at her and us, as if we are stupid and incapable of your level of insight – this as you have not even look at the evidence!

There’s nothing new or different in anything you’ve said or how you have reacted. You’re just like everyone else. You are professional person, if I read you right, so that you do have some technical skills that you can bring to bear on a complex problem. But you refuse to even try. You refuse to look at the evidence!

That’s fear, sir. You are perhaps different than most in that you do possess problem solving skills, but just like everyone else, you are afraid of the implications, and are a product of group think.

Good day.

15 thoughts on “Our culture of fear

  1. Whether it was a Muslim which shot Bobby or a commie that killed brother John the rewrite remains strong.

    As I said below the puzzle pieces align themselves eventually.


    1. I’m sorry Swede – I just read your first couple of words and didn’t bother with the link and jumped down below to comment. What’s this all about anyway?

      OK, Swede, I listened to your link. Rush, like you, operates in an evidence-free zone, free to conjecture without substance, placing his own beliefs in the place of JFK, and ignoring the volumes of evidence surrounding his death that have accumulated over time.

      His opinion is both interesting and worthless. If either he or you would ever man up and confront evidence, you’d be worth a second look.


    2. Siran Siran is a Christian, as are his entire family. Whoever shot Bobby, we don’t know what their religion is or isn’t.

      We know Oswald was a US intelligence asset who The Marines taught to speak Russian and then sent him over to the USSR to try and gather intel as a supposed defector. Oswald then, mysteriously undefected, and was let back into the US with open arms.

      I mean how stupid do they think we are? (not you Swede, they know you are that stupid)

      You can defect and then undefect? Who knew?


      1. If you haven’t yet, go read the extensive excerpts from Russ Baker’s book, “Family of Secrets: The Bush Dynasty, America’s Invisible Government and the Hidden History of the Last Fifty Years.”

        Part one: “GHW Bush & JFK Hit”

        You’ll never look at the JFK assassination (“coup”) in the same way after reading Russ Baker’s work. He outlines in detail Oswald’s connections to the cast of characters involved in the junta — including Jackie O — meticulously investigated and footnoted.

        The excerpted chapter, “Bush And The JFK Hit, Part 8: Prepping A Patsy?” is particularly relevant here:


        1. It’s not a bad book. Baker stirs a little unrest in the research community, which is not unusual. Half of those involved are actually government ops shepherding the investigation away from those who actually did it unto others like the Mafia, LBJ, Castro. So there’s a lot of mistrust, naturally. The assertions about Bush, who was so very young at the time, seem far-fetched to me. The photo of the man in Dealey who looked an awful lot like Bush turned out to be of a guy who looked an awful lot like Bush, from behind. The serious researchers are very careful about this stuff, avoiding conjecture that could prove embarrassing.

          Fletcher Prouty insisted that he was familiar enough with the man to recognize General Edward Lansdale in the photos of the three tramps in Dealey, but again, it is from behind. Prouty had a lot to say, but imagine this: Jean Hill, who witnessed the assassination close up and took photos, had her film confiscated by fake secret service agents in Dealey that day, and later her testimony altered by the a Warren Commission, and was told to STFU at the time and harassed her entire life, threatened, both and her children. She is finally speaking up recently on the assurance that once her information was out, there would be no further motive to murder her. (Possibly true, possibly not, maybe just as an example to others.) But imagine that a bystander like her gets followed and her kids too, yet a guy like Prouty, with a military pension and benefits gets to speak freely. It makes no sense unless Prouty was doing the old limited hangout thing.


          1. Since the book depository was owned by lifelong LBJ friend Byrd, and Byrd was Mr Civilian Air patrol, and since Lyndon became president after the hit, at the very least, LBJ completely covered up the crime after the fact and is as such completely and fully culpable, except that he’s deceased. Don’t make a whit of difference either way.

            You don’t say who you believe is culpable and who is innocent. Or why you exclude LBJ, and organized crime. Castro isn’t held out as a likely suspect by baker or anyone except the reactionary right.

            But that Civilian Air Patrol is really interesting. Barry Seal is in that same photo and was a member of that same patrol at the same time as Oswald.

            Barry Seal, you might remember, was the CIA connected pilot who flew missions for the CIA and also smuggled tons of cocaine into the US and ran tons of arms, etc.

            He ran the Contra coke out/ guns in deal. Iran contra. When he was assassinated he had George Bush’s direct office phone number in his pocket. True story. So I’m not as sure that George Bush is so far away from that. Didn’t he fly missions in wwII? So by 1963 he wasn’t that young. Almost 20 years after the war.

            My assumption is that a number of people were involved either as co-conspirators or as accomplishes before, during and after the fact of the JFK assassination.

            It takes a village.


            1. I think it was more than a few people, a large group, and surprisingly little communication among them, as it just moves forward on its own, a meeting of minds. But when you get down to the level of bush pilots and the like you’re dealing with low level operatives who may not know what they are part of. The mob certainly played a role, LBJ surely suspected at least, but the spear chucker was the CIA, the overall coordination done at that level. That much is clear. But surely the decision came down from nameless men in in high positions of power, perhaps some magnate from one of our wealthiest families simply nodded over cocktails one night that he had to go, and that set it in motion. After the fact, nationwide, there was not one Investigation except Garrison, not one resignation, not one person able to speak up, none in the media even hinting that all was not right … It speaks of massive corruption where even if all of these thousands of people did not know beforehand, they nodded in assent afterward.

              It’s very big when you consider that fifty years later, people are still afraid to speak up. This power is resident in our system.


              1. When Barry Seal was assassinated GHW Bush was VP. the phone number was direct to George’s white house office. Seal knew a lot about a lot. He flew support for the Bay of Pigs and ran the contra arms for coke operation among many other things. And he was assassinated. So someone thought he was worth the expense.

                George is a spook through and through and I bet his son Jebby runs, you watch.

                Then look at the Hinckly deal.

                Hinky is more like it.

                We had a secret coup, and the insiders were wealthy and powerful paranoid raving anti communists from Texas (and other places) who went on to commit hundreds of thousands of men and women to Vietnam because they were insane and just plain wrong. J. Edgar was in on it and so were his “non-existent” mafia buds.

                Johnson appointed the cover-up commission. He put Dulles on it even though JFK had just fired Dulles months before from his head of the CIA position for the failure of the BOP.


            2. You’re right, Bush was 41 in 1963, not young at all. I have to rethink. What I have read of him indicates that he is a man who thrives on connections, but who is not himself terribly smart or valuable. If you cross him, he’ll arrange to have you smeared or killed. He was a pilot in WWII, itself an accomplishment, but his heroics are suspect, perhaps sacrificing other members if his crew to save himself. I am always suspicious of people with an inside track who are also war heroes, like GHWB, John Kerry … I would not be surprised that the same juice that keeps them in high profile public life also supplies them with fake backgrounds. Kerry was easily undone in his presidential race, as his war records fell apart under close scrutiny.

              Bush’s behavior after the murder, taking pains to put it on the record that he was somewhere else and trying to get a friend in trouble, seems spontaneous CYA and not planned, indicating he was in panic mode, perhaps surprised by the events of that day.


  2. That would make quite a list. How about a collectible set of “Empire v. Empire” trading cards with mug shot on the front, stats and bio on the backside? Made in China, of course.


  3. Excellent dissertation Mark. Here is additional information that may help open some eyes…

    “When an honest man, honestly mistaken, comes face-to-face with undeniable and irrefutable truth, he is faced with one of two choices, he must either cease being mistaken or cease being honest.” – Amicus Solo

    If Richard Gage is using AE911Ttruth’s funds to buy Dr. Wood’s book, and Richard Gage is suppressing Dr. Wood’s work, one must conclude that the prime directive of AE911Truth is to suppress the evidence. Mr. Gage cannot refute the overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Wood’s book but only misrepresent it (i.e. promote disinformation about it). Humanity has awoken. If you are worthy and willing to open your eyes to the truth, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood.

    Richard Gage and other Liars for 9/11 Truth

    Image of check from Richard Gage for Dr. Judy Wood Book

    AE911Truth vs Dr. Judy Wood


    Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Part I Summary, 1.) mission statement

    Our mission is to research, compile, and disseminate (some) scientific evidence relative to the destruction of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers, (not all 7, just 3 of the buildings) calling for a truly open and independent investigation and supporting others in the pursuit of justice. (Except Dr. Judy Wood)

    Form 990 ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9-11 TRUTH INC, Schedule A, Part II, Section A

    from 2008 to 2012 AE911Truth income was $1.365 million!!!

    Click to access 26-1532493_990_201212.pdf

    If Mr. Gage was searching for the truth, then he would not be trying to deceive his supporters and the American people by claiming to present the best “scientific forensic evidence”, only to completely ignore the large sum of scientific forensic evidence that thermite does not explain. If a scientist or researcher only presented the evidence that supports their hypothesis while completely ignoring the evidence that countered their hypothesis, they could be stripped of their professional license or degree for presenting such an unscientific and biased fraction of the total sum of important physical evidence that demands consideration.

    Theory, speculation, and belief are not necessary to understand that a type of directed energy was used on 9/11, rather, only detailed study of the empirical evidence from 9/11 is necessary. Situations like this are rare in science, where there is so much empirical evidence that one can bypass theory and speculation to draw an irrefutable conclusion from the evidence. This also helps to illustrate a major difference between Dr. Judy Wood and other 9/11 researchers, as she did not start with theory or speculation and then begin researching to see if it was consistent with the evidence. Instead, Dr. Wood simply did what any objective, vigilant scientist would do, she gathered and studied as much of the empirical evidence from 9/11 as possible, assembling a monumental database of verifiable physical evidence that dwarfs the efforts of any other 9/11 “research”, including the unscientific ‘9/11 Commission Report’. After gathering and studying all of this important evidence, Dr. Wood arrived at the only logical, inescapable conclusion that explains all of this empirical evidence, a general category of weapon technology known as ‘directed energy weapons’ (DEW). It would be theory or speculation to go beyond that by trying to name a specific weapon technology or location, because that is not what the evidence allows us to irrefutably conclude. This is why the term is left as a general one, because that is the only logical, conclusive, and irrefutable conclusion that the evidence allows us to make.

    This download is the Foreword and book review of “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” by Eric Larsen, Professor Emeritus at John Jay College of Criminal Justice 1971 – 2006 (35 years), plus the Author’s Preface.

    Click to access Where%20Did%20The%20Towers%20Go%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood.pdf

    Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book can give at least 10 reasons that rule out the theory by “AE911trutherd” that welding material destroyed the WTC. How many can you list ? Hint: the bottom of page 45, the top of page 171, the diagrams on page 81 and 84, the diagram at the bottom of page 11, and of course pages 122 to 127. The list is endless, actually.

    By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, you know from the EVIDENCE that the Twin Towers turned to dust in mid-air never hitting the ground.

    Bombs don’t do that.
    Thermite does not do that.
    Thermate does not do that.
    Nano-enhanced thermite does not do that.
    Nano-thermite does not do that.
    New-and-improved super-duper mini-micro-nano thermite does not do that.
    Firecrackers do not do that.
    Fire does not do that.
    Nukes do not do that.
    Megga nukes do not do that.
    Milli-nukes do not do that.
    Mini-nukes do not do that.
    Nano-nukes cannot do that.
    A wrecking ball cannot do that.
    A slingshot cannot do that.
    Missiles cannot do that.

    We know this because we know those things above involve Kinetic Energy and/or Thermal Energy and we know that the “dustification” was done without Kinetic Energy and without Thermal Energy. That is, “dustification” was not done with high heat (Thermal Energy) nor with some form of Kinetic Energy (wrecking ball, projectile, gravity collapse). The building was not cooked to death nor was it beaten to death. So Kinetic Energy Weapons (KEW) did not destroy the buildings nor did Thermal Energy Weapons (TEW) destroy the buildings. But we know that Energy was Directed somehow (and controlled within fairly precise boundaries) to cause the building to turn to dust in mid air. That is, some kind of (cold) Directed Energy that was used as a weapon (cDEW) had to have done this. Energy was directed and manipulated within the material such that it came apart without involving high heat (fire, welding materials such as thermite) and without having something fly through the air and hit it (bullets, missile, bombs, wrecking ball, a giant hammer, or many micro hammers)

    If this technology can manipulate energy to do something like this, it can also be manipulated to provide us with “free energy” (i.e. “off the grid”). Simply by looking at the cover of Dr. Wood’s book you can realize there must be a technology that can do this. This is evidence that such technology does exist. This is evidence that a technology capable of providing “free energy” (“off the grid”) exists. The whole world witnessed this which means the whole world can know that “free-energy technology” exists. This realization will change the world. This is probably the biggest reason why there is so much effort spent misrepresenting, distorting, and suppressing Dr. Wood’s research.

    Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing between the two false choices of “9/11 Truthers” verses “The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory” while ignoring the facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence. (Chanting “9/11 Was An Inside Job!” is equivalent to chanting “Yes To Fascism!”)

    Richard Gage is NOT a qualified forensic scientist. Dr. Judy Wood IS a qualified forensic scientist. AE911Truth is calling for a new investigation. This implies an admission that they are NOT qualified to conduct such an investigation of what happened. Otherwise, why are they calling for a new investigation instead of conducting one themselves — unless the intention is to knowingly distract its members and others away from the new investigation that has already been conducted? AE911Truth wants a new investigation? They already have one. It’s contained in a book called “WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?” Why is AE911Truth suppressing it? AE911Truth cannot lobby Congress. They are a 501( c )3 and are prohibited from lobbying Congress. Why didn’t AE911Truth submit their so-called “thermite evidence” to NIST? – Oh, that’s right. It’s a federal crime to defraud the government. Why hasn’t AE911Truth filed a Federal qui tam case? Because they haven’t blown the whistle on anything and they have no evidence and it is past the statute of limitation. So, why didn’t they support Dr. Wood’s Federal qui tam case that was filed instead of banning members who mentioned it? * — I guess they really didn’t want such a case to go forward. So they want “respect and compassion for all people” except for those named “Dr. Judy Wood.”

    AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control” ? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. ** Since Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood is a teacher and promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

    The scientific method, as it came into being during the Enlightenment period, is a method of thought known as empiricism or as the empirical method. Under the terms of empiricism, all conclusions are, must, and can be drawn from observable evidence and from observable evidence only. Evidence must precede any and every conclusion to be drawn from it. Then, if sound logic governs in the relationship between evidence and the conclusion drawn from it, that conclusion will be irrefutable

    Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.

    This is why Dr. Wood’s work is irrefutable. She only presents evidence and an analysis of that evidence. There is no use for a theory in forensic science. Either you know something or you don’t. That is why those in charge of a cover up don’t want people to look at the evidence in Dr. Wood’s book. Dr. Wood does not ask you to believe her. She only wants you to believe yourself and think for yourself and look at the evidence yourself and not argue about opinions of theories of speculation of ideasŠ That is what keeps a cover up in place. Those of us who have read Dr. Wood’s book know this to be true.

    On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining ‘why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,’ the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood’s disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.

    Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry.

    She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers in her areas of expertise. In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood’s investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain.

    *Chapter 31. AE911 “Truth” and Other Sites Again Censor The Evidence 04 Apr 2010
    AE911 – Silently Deletes A Petition Signer (pages 297 to 300) of 9/11Finding the Truth – A Compilation of Articles by Andrew Johnson Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood

    Click to access 9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf

    **In Appendix C, page 238, section C, (Refined searches) of Michael Armenia’s book, “Nanomanagement:The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation”, the name “Judy Wood” is a search term used to disqualify a person’s affiliation with AE911Truth.

    Field Interference 013 AE911Truth: A Failure By Design

    We reported about Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911truth.org) in episode 16 of our audio reports. We worked for them as their systems administrators for almost two years. As a high-level administrator inside the organization, I witnessed a stunning degree of mismanagement and I was privy to everything; including the stuff that nobody was supposed to see.

    Richard Gage and AE911Truth sleep in the same bed with convicted sex offenders?

    Manuel (Manny) Badillo from the conference “Investigate Building 7: A Call to Reexamine the Most Important Event of Our Time,” held March 26, 2011


    US Marine John P DiMatale speaks at Rethink911 Times Square Event 9-11-13


    Wake up sheeple. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Big Brother only has as much power as you grant him. Independent thought is powerful. After reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, Charlie Pound of the U. K. produced the song WAKE UP THIS YOUR ALARM! Unless you enjoy being fleeced, leave the opinion herd and read Dr. Wood’s book too. It will soon be 13 years since a secret technology was used to create terror and mass murder for the sake of imperialism and hegemony based on a fiat money system in its death throes. What are we as a people left with? A published scientific forensic investigation that concludes a type of Directed Energy that was used as a weapon “dustified” the World Trade Center complex and a group of shadowy people determined to suppress that evidence by any means. This is the sad reality that we live in. Wake up!

    © 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound

    BTW…Those who ridicule and marginalize Dr. Judy Wood are promoting the fascist police state that Edward Joseph “Ed” Snowden is alerting us to…

    Fascism Anyone?

    Does any of this ring alarm bells? Of course not. After all, this is America, officially a democracy with the rule of law, a constitution, a free press, honest elections, and a well-informed public constantly being put on guard against evils. Historical comparisons like these are just exercises in verbal gymnastics. Maybe, maybe not. (Remember that fascist regimes have elections too. Covering it up with a red, white, and blue sticker doesn’t make fascism any less despicable. When are people going to wake up and start using the “F” word?)



    1. Thanks – that’s a long comment and WordPress automatically queues anything with more than a couple of links. I hope people read it, but it is the habit most folks on the Internet is to dabble and skim.

      I grabbed the Solo quote and put it at the opening. Thanks for that. Who was he, what it it? “amicus solo” does not return anything on search engines.

      I also noticed at one time that the resale value of Dr. Wood’s book exceeded $400. Now I know why.

      You give strong evidence that she is on the right path, given extra effort taken to ban people from his group who mention her name. Fetzer (who admitted to me that he’s not even read her book) has also taken her on as a special case.

      Pursuit of truth is a worthy cause in and of itself, and needs no justification. The idea that there will ever be an official investigation of the events of that day is ludicrous, as George Carlin reminded us – power does not investigate itself.


  4. Historical and current events would support secret saying 16 of The Gospel According to Thomas which the living Jesus spoke and which Didymos Judas Thomas wrote down

    (16) Jesus said, “Men think, perhaps, that it is peace which I have come to cast upon the world. They do not know that it is dissension which I have come to cast upon the earth: fire, sword, and war. For there will be five in a house: three will be against two, and two against three, the father against the son, and the son against the father. And they will stand solitary.”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s