Freddie Mercury Revisited

As part of a housecleaning effort, I want to go back and revisit some of our “Zombies” that have caused controversy and doubt, or have kept me awake.

Frankly, Freddie Mercury is not one of them, but I have gotten enough negative feedback that I have decided to start from scratch and re-do the whole business. I do not know where this leads, and if his eventual match-up to Dr. Phil proves to be a reach, so be it. I will retract. (This post will be followed soon by “Dr. Phil Revisited.”)

So for now I will work only on Mercury, then Dr. Phil, and then a comparison of the two to see if the first post regarding these two was on, or off.

Just a few words in advance of photo analysis:

Part of the problem people have had with Mercury/Dr. Phil is that it is just so off the wall. A very popular and tragic pop singer turns into a pasty and smarmy TV psychologist? It doesn’t make any sense!

That part has never troubled me. These people we scrutinize are actors. Freddie Mercury’s provocative and disturbing gay image was an act. I  would bet he was (is) straight, and that doing what he did was a very hard assignment. When finally he faked his death, it was blessed relief.

It appears to me that Farrokh Bulsara, aka Mercury, is a gifted actor. If indeed he turns up as Dr. Phil, he has pulled it off with the same ease as the flaming gay pop singer.

Country singer Garth Brooks was recently on NPR’s Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me, and was asked how it is that his stardom and music caught hold, making him one of the biggest stars ever in that genre. Here’s his answer:

“… I don’t have a clue. A lot of things happened right at the right time. It’s all timing. ‘Cuz here in Nashville , and this isn’t a statement of humble – it’s a statement of honesty, your waiter can out-sing you, out-write you, I mean, everyone here is talented.”

There is a built-in assumption when an individual or group hits the big time, as did Queen in the 1980s, that they got there by hard work and talent. But a surprising percentage of us could become pop icons – given the right management and promotion. There are groups, especially in the Laurel Canyon days, that had very little talent, and yet enjoyed overnight success, record deals and concerts to full houses. It is promotion, use of anonymous song writing teams, hired screaming fans and the power of suggestion that creates this success. Queen was such a group, far more a product of the recording studio than we imagine. (Brian May is now playing an astrophysicist. He too is an actor.)

Music is too important to be left to chance. Songs, groups, messages, subconscious themes are all planned in advance. Bulsara was chosen to play the part of Freddie Mercury because the group was created to advance the gay agenda and promote AIDS, a fake disease. Bulsaro had a nice falsetto voice, and was put through intense training. He learned to project, and sounded good. In his “final” days, stumbling around on stage as if in misery, he was acting. 

To advance the hoax called AIDS, Intel needed some high-profile people to die from it, so Rock Hudson and Mercury were told to fake their deaths. That sold it.

Freddie Mercury was a psyop.

Anyway, on with photo analysis. Part of the initial problem that I had with the Freddie/Phil match-up is that I did not separate Freddie as a set of twins.

Here is Twin One, the performer:

1-mercury-sxs

Below are the same images with some face chopping done to show that there is internal consistency in the grouping.

1-mercury-sxs-internal-match

Here is Twin Two. I do not know how much he performed. He had an unfortunate set of teeth that were apparently not adjusted until later in life.

2-mercury-sxs

And again, some face chops to demonstrate internal consistency:

2-mercury-sxs-internal-match

I see there two distinct men. At the time I did the original work on Mercury, I came away suspecting twins but did not make that assertion due to the troubles we were having with angular distortions. At this time I am sure beyond doubt the Mercury was a set of twins. Here are some face chops highlighting the differences:

The ears stand out, of course, but when either the noses or eyes are aligned, everything else is distorted. These are indeed two different men. However, without seeing their faces aligned side by side like this, it is almost impossible to see. They project as the same person with ease.

So while Dr. Phil is still shrouded in mystery, I am prepared to add Freddie Mercury/Farrokh Bulsara to the honor roll of twins.

These happenstance musicians do not stumble into the studio off the street in talent searches. They are given to us in full butterfly form without our having known them as larvae. We are to imagine that they randomly found fame, as if any if us can in a Gidget Gets Her Big Break world. We are not supposed to know that they were chosen, perhaps even bred for fame in a system that only promotes its own club members.

So much of it is merely suggestion. Bob Dylan cannot sing.

17 thoughts on “Freddie Mercury Revisited

  1. The musical programming on PBS provides a lot of tells when you know how to read between the lines. They recently had an awards show which featured several of the key intel artists.

    Linda Ronstadt is an exceptional talent, so whether or not she is in on things, at least she’s good. Sadly (if her) she’s got Parkinson’s and looked to be in rough shape. She didn’t sing but gave a brief acceptance speech.

    But Kris Kristofferson got an award, and MM has shown what he’s all about. Watching the footage of him with Waylon, Willie and Johnny Cash should be enough to convince anyone that he’s a talentless plant. They could bring up people randomly from the audience and get better.

    John Cage was featured, a flamer who brought modern art garbage into classical music. They had a guy “performing” one of his “works” which included dropping gongs into a bathtub, and turning off and on various appliances. An A+ example of the whole racket.

    Jefferson Airplane was featured, with a couple of the lesser known members still performing with some newer folks. Grace Slick didn’t try to perform, probably can’t sing at all anymore if she ever could. One of the originals spoke of being called to the bay area to try out for the group, and mentioned that they met in “what would become the so-and-so club where we would be headlining…” Who has ever heard of a nightclub trying out bands before they’ve even opened?

    PBS constantly shows the John Denver and Carpenters stories, and there’s a lot of fishy stuff there. John Denver talks like a programmed robot, and looks very uncomfortable for someone who performed so long. The Carpenters program was apparently scripted from Wikipedia. Seriously, I looked them up and the article followed the outline of the program. Richard Carpenter came across as a very odd duck in the whole thing.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Part of the reason we had such backlash was because Freddie Mercury has been promoted so well he has reached legend/icon status among the 21-49 demographic. And now with gay being untouchable in a politically correct sense, Mercury is heavily tied into that. An attack on Mercury is an attack on gay marriage/homosexuality, etc. His archive footage is now appearing in major commercials. You can see how putting a flamboyant, shirtless guy on posters pushes the right 2016 agendas.

    In fact, he is so untouchable right now I’m not seeing anybody attacking Mercury in any way. They’re trying to turn him into Einstein, Elvis, Monroe, Marley, etc.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I am glad to have a chance to revisit the man, as it gave me new insight. There were no accidents here, not in naming the group or with the highly polished studio sound they put out. It was all contrived, and probably had some of the best studio musicians in the U.K. behind the music. No way was it spontaneous or ground-up. It was, like the Beatles, highly polished but made to seem not. The voice we came to know as Mercury might have been the only real thing about it, but was it his? It was falsetto, made to match the “Queen” image. I assume so, I assume that’s why they chose him for the part despite his teeth, which really distracted, but they are capable of such high deception … who really knows.

      Like

  3. Love love love your articles in fact I just told my boyfriend Phillip Solesky I am so addicted to this website like a junkie hooked on drugs. I always get excited when my email alerts me that a new article has been posted. I say,” keep them coming” have a great day….

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Nice work here, Mark. I have to say I don’t see any reason to believe Freddie was straight. Have we not been discovering or at least suspecting that most celebrities are gay and their hetero relationships are faked with ‘beards,’ etc? Do they send in gay celebrities to fake being straight and their straight celebrities to fake being gay? I admit the idea is deliciously ironic and wouldn’t put it past them, I don’t see the logic in it.

    In other news, we’re told Castro just died. Was he twins? And more than that, the young Castro sure as hell looks a lot like Liam Neeson. Cross-generation twins? Doing a google image search on Liam Neeson Fidel Castro, reveals I’m not the first person to have noticed this:

    Like

    1. This can be too much to take in at times. Castro would fall under the replica category, and perhaps Freddie and Dr. Phil too.

      Dr. Phil is either straight or has a beard. The thing that made me suspect that Freddie was/is straight is that he lived with a woman, and she claimed that he was in inner turmoil about his sexual orientation, denying his inner gay man, in essence. In other words, she was selling the idea that he was gay. Since Freddie was flamboyant to the world that’s odd – she was not his beard, since he didn’t need one. This would make her a reverse beard.

      But who knows. The important thing is that he was hired to push the gay agenda, and for that actually being gay was not required.

      Like

  5. There was only one Freddie Mercury. The ‘face chopping’ technique is very flawed – different angles of the face shorten or lengthen some features. Anyone who is a fan of Queen knows Freddie has extraordinary features that are familiar if you watch enough footage from different years. You can fake it or substitute it. Not a ‘twin’!! Sorry – these are just fanciful random thoughts with no real investigation or basis.

    Like

    1. You may well be right, as I cannot offer solid proof except that in all of the hours of work that went into this, we kept getting results that were not making sense, that is, we know all about angular distortion and all of that, and try to beware of its effects. Still, the match up we got with Dr. Phil is interesting, particularly knowing that Dr. Phil has a son who sings with a rock band … falsetto. Also, not only show biz, but Intelligence loves twins. If you think that Queen just sprung up spontaneously, four talented kids that worked it out on their garage, I have a bridge to sell you. Like just about every band that makes it big, they are recruited, formed from above, auditioned, and handed the music written by others. Many times members of such bands “die,” usually retired, but often reassigned, as Freddie was.

      Like

      1. In 2016, a team of scientists decided to study Mercury’s voice. Among the many facts they concluded was that Mercury’s vocal cords moved faster than the average person’s. “While a typical vibrato will fluctuate between 5.4 Hz and 6.9 Hz, Mercury’s was 7.04 Hz,” Consequence of Sound reported. ( 7.04?)

        https://didyouknowfacts.com/9-legendary-reasons-freddie-mercury-boss/
        At #4: ‘He claimed he could barely read music…yet, in the era of electric guitar, he composed music on a grand piano and played it during concerts.’ (Sound familiar?)

        Kurt Cobain’s suicide note mentions how he both admired and envied the way Freddie Mercury “seemed to love, relish in the love and adoration from the crowd.” (Say what?)

        Like

        1. May be the twins idea isn’t so bad, and may be the other twin couldn’t play piano so good?:-
          ”Mercury didn’t consider himself a particularly great pianist. As a result, he always dreaded performing ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ in concert because he worried he would mess up on the piano in the process. In future years, he started using the piano less on albums so he would be free to dance and run wildly during concerts.”
          https://www.clashmusic.com/feature/10-things-you-never-knew-about-freddie-mercury

          Like

          1. I am less certain of this set of twins than others … and would not have asserted it had we not had such difficulty getting even known photos of Freddie to match, and of Dr. Phil. But it is a shaky assertion at best. Others … Drake, Rihanna, McCartney, we have photos of them together. With McC they are now easily distinguished, as age has not been kind to original Paul. With the Janis Joplins, they were easy to tell apart even then, which is why the big hair and wild eyeglasses. Freddie … I just ain’t sure we nailed it. (I say we, meaning Straight and me.)

            Nonetheless, Freddie >>> Dr. Phil I stand by.

            Like

          2. Also, Freddie was used to sell AIDS, not that AIDS does not exist, but it is not caused by HIV and is not contageous, so that mere gay sex is not risky. But that was the agenda, and they needed high-profile people to die of it, so Freddie, Rock Hudson and Magic Johnson were chosen. Johnson got out from under it but still publicly asserts that HIV is dangerous, probably part of his contract that allowed him to remain a public figure.

            That’s a longwinded way of saying I doubt Freddie was gay. Dr. Phil is not, to my knowledge, gay. (I also question whether Ellen DeGeneres is gay, a phenomenon I call a reverse closeting.)

            Why the AIDS hoax? As far as I can tell, to put a damper on sex, lower birthrates, get people to use condoms. I agree that population is a problem, and am not offended when they use psyops rather than outright killing to put some limits in place.

            Like

  6. Did a quick peek into Fredrick. The company/owners of the band release a greatest hits a month before the exit. Mo’ $ of course. And yet another surge in catalog sales of the band when the day of departure is announced. In reality nearly all the revenue generated by the band goes right back to the creator/master/owner(s). Now, what is deeper here? The unseen influence the music created upon the masses? Prepping the public to accept sodomite life style w/a sympathetic figure? Yes, the logo/band has been milking the cash cow before & after, what 40+ years. There is more than making millions of $. Where does this huge money trail lead to? NOT the middle men along the way. The upper crust. Z’spose the OG Fred is tending a garden or childhood home like Paul McFistcough?

    Like

    1. Brian May deserves research all on his own. The music industry uses fake deaths as a way to cash in on the “body of work” (John Denver’s post “death” sales are either $27 or $33 million, I forget which). However, Queen was a bigger psyop than the others, as you say, pushing the gay lifestyle out into the open, long since accomplished.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s