The Climate Change hoax is a vast and powerful movement whose objectives have nothing to do with climate and everything with command and control. It is propaganda, not the sleek fast moving stuff we see on TV news – stories and plots that are essentially false and meant to leave a psychic footprint. Rather, it is intense, meant to do great harm, and make fundamental changes in the way we live. CO2 is our friend and benefactor, fossil fuels have made us wealthy, our lives easier. It is no coincidence that these are the primary targets of this insidious movement. The people behind it are lying about everything, but are doing it for our own good. Yikes!
I wonder, given that The Green New Deal intends to remove fossil fuels from our lives, how we will fly or drive from place to place using energy generated by windmills or solar panels. You might suggest electric cars, but any fool can quickly calculate that electricity is a product of fossil files, mostly natural gas and coal. The answer is that we won’t be freely moving about. If you think that goal is farcical, that they don’t really mean it, think again. They intend to introduce fundamental economic changes to the lives of ordinary people. They want to chain us down. Things have gotten out of hand in their minds, too many people, too much wealth, and billions of brown and black people wanting better lives. The Climate Change movement is essentially anti-human.
The subject is well-covered here in past blog posts and in the Blogroll links below. I am writing to direct your attention to two articles, one by Judith Curry at Climate Etc., and the other by Christopher Monckton at Watts Up With That. The subject is a paper featured in Nature Communications entitled Discrepancies in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians. It is a gauntlet, naming names and libeling people right and left. It’s obvious purposes is to chill the climate skeptic movement. The authors, AM Peterson, EM Vincent and AL Westerling, are apparently intent on getting people who dispute the “science” behind Climate Change to STFU.
I was happily encouraged by the Monckton paper, as he is doing something. He contacted University of California at Merced and the authors. He communication is labeled …
Notice of intended prosecution: Fraud and libel by you.
He means business. Monckton is a man of science and letters, and wealthy to boot. He is going to sue the bastards. Nature Communications has already withdrawn the article from its website in response:
The others are given seven days to back down before legal action commences.
I don’t know where this will lead. The power behind the Climate Change hoax is immense, one of the largest propaganda campaigns I have ever witnessed. Ron Arnold and Paul Driessen, authors of the 2014 book Cracking the Big Green, are not naive about the odds of success in the face of such indescribably malevolent perfidy. They are simply prepared to dig in and fight a long hard fight, the outcome unknown.
“We don’t propose a revolutionary overthrow, which would be patently impossible, given the current wealth, power and government clout of Big Green, but to find ideas whose time has come and that any person of good will can employ as part of daily living. The process is, some think, like the proverbial riddle “How do you eat an elephant?” with the obvious answer: “One bite at a time.”