Category: Climate change

Climate Change: The End Game

I ran across the graph above in a paper I read over the weekend, PHYSICS DEMONSTRATES THAT INCREASING GREENHOUSE GASES CANNOT CAUSE DANGEROUS WARMING, EXTREME WEATHER, OR ANY HARM,  by Richard Lindzen and William Happer. Each man has an impressive CV, and the former is an Emeritus professor at MIT, the latter at Princeton. Of course, none of that means a thing if they are simply advocates who do not follow the scientific method, but in fact the paper is largely an exposition of that method with a complaint that climate scientists long ago abandoned any pretense of using it. They instead resort to “consensus”. In other words Lindzen and Happer assert that climate science is the result of “… opinions of government, consensus, 97% of scientists [long ago proven to be contrived], peer review, or is based on models that do not work, or cherry-picked, fabricated, falsified or omitted contradictory data …”

Continue reading “Climate Change: The End Game” →

Climate Change: Not real, not spectacular

“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” (Albert Einstein)

The above quote is actually “attributed” to Einstein, as he did not say such a thing in those words. In as similar fashion, the Mark Twain quote in the upper right of this blog, “It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled” is merely attributed to him.  He did write, says AI, in 1906: “How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again!” I have tried now for years to substitute the real quote for the attributed one, but WordPress will not allow it. 

It’s OK, however. It is the content of the words rather than to person that matters. Using famous people like Einstein and Twain adds gravitas to words, but the words themselves carry enough truth that no further adornment is needed. The whole of the quotation business is a small industry with various agencies mining each one to get to its source, admirable work, in my view.

I have had an exchange now with Michael Booth, who writes for the Colorado Sun, and I think it is at an end. I quoted his article Climate Change in Colorado extensively. I have found Mr. Booth to be, as I suspected, smart, young, genuine, and a product of the education system such as it is. I won’t quote him, as his article (March of 2026) is a fair representation of his attitude and point of view, and I don’t  have permission outside of that to use his words. However, his private words do not do any disservice to either him or his article.  He’s a nice young man.

Continue reading “Climate Change: Not real, not spectacular” →

Hoaxes, conspiracies, groupthink and money

I watched a discussion between John Robson of Climate Discussion Nexus and Steven Koonin, author of Unsettled, What Climate Science Tells Us, What It Doesn’t, and Why It Matters. You can access the discussion here, but I won’t replay it as it is quite long. Over time I’ve become adverse to sending people off to watch or read things just because I did. You’re on your own.

It’s a good discussion highlighting the shortcomings of the Climate Alarmism movement, including lack of rigor in science, failure to make predictions of any kind at any time that actually come true. That is a bit of what I might call a cornerstone of science, to make accurate predictions validating theories, but the movement exists without that benefit. Al Gore was asked recently in some highlighted interview about the predications made in his movie An Inconvenient Truth,  and he claimed to be lecturing the sky, as all of the movie’s claims have come to fruition but nobody cares. That is a Burger King-grade lie, a whopper, as just the opposite is true. The movie has disintegrated into a pile of high production values carrying with it not a shred of truth. It is classic propaganda.

Continue reading “Hoaxes, conspiracies, groupthink and money” →

Consensus in science can only mean no science is in the works

Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science, consensus is irrelevant. There is no such things as consensus science. If it is consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. (Michael Crichton, 1942-2008)

I don’t know enough of science to say this with any certainty, but I do not think there is much real science going on anymore. It is discussed here on this blog frequently, how Moon landings, space travel in general, atomic bombs, nuclear power (which I suspect is real**) are all fake. I am a complete skeptic about geology and evolution. Weather forecasts are indeed reliable for a few days time – there is good work going on there. Bridges do not collapse, nor buildings, which look like boxes. That says that engineering is reliable, but that architecture is not very creative.

Crichton’s remarks above are aimed directly at the climate change regime, which relies on a fabricated “consensus” of 97% of scientists to sell itself as real. Never mind that the consensus was not real, even as then-president Obama used it in a Tweet. The idea behind it was to prevent questioning of the fabricated science that was underway. It has been used as a hammer, and “scientists” and researchers have been cowed into submission by brute force by the progenitors of this fake movement.

Continue reading “Consensus in science can only mean no science is in the works” →

The power of scepters … sometimes the magic works … sometimes not

 

The photo above is that of Pope Leo XIV. The scepter he holds in his left hand is known as the Papal “ferula”. Coming as I do from a deeply Catholic family I can tell you that the Catholic Church works very hard on the concept of infallibility, that is, that when the Pope speaks on certain matters, he is correct and there can be no disputing the matter. I come from a different era than most people, and am now older than 83% of the American population. I went to grade school at a time when Catholic doctrine was held as sacred. Our school, even though regular buses were available, invested in its own so that we would not mix with public school kids. They took their job of indoctrination of youth seriously.

“When I was a child, I spoke like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I gave up childish ways.” 1 Corinthians 13:11

Sadly, judging by some extended family members and having attended a couple of class reunions, the hold that the Catholic Church has on people my age is still firm. But as an adult and capable of rational thinking, I know that there is no such thing as infallibility. The Pope is just a man, the President is just a man, in reality, actors. But their public role is to project certainty.

Continue reading “The power of scepters … sometimes the magic works … sometimes not” →

2023: A Tambora kind of year

I don’t usually suggest that people drop what they are doing and read something because I read something. That tradition in mind, I am going to link to an article by Javier Vinos. He is author of the book Solving the Climate Puzzle, which I have sitting two feet from me. It is in a stack of books I have read for which I intend to look over Post-It flags and review, maybe even transcribe them.  This, for me, is a memory device. Maybe it helps, maybe not. Vinos has written an article at the Judith Curry website called The 2023 Climate Event Revealed the Greatest Failing of Climate Science.

I do remember from reading the Vinos book about heat transport mechanism that move from the tropics to the poles, primarily the Arctic. When, in winter, there is no sunlight, most of that transported heat is dissipated into space in the form of OLWR, or outgoing long-wave radiation. Climate alarmists have used an assumption called Tropical Hot Spot theory, that the upper troposphere is warming faster than the lower troposphere, and that the lower is warming faster than the surface. This assumption was shown to be without evidence** in a comment on EPA’s repeal of the 2009 Endangerment Finding by Wallace III, MacDougald, and Menton. (Menton, for anyone interested, is also known as the “Manhattan Contrarian“. That is a blog where I am moderated, but not yet banned.)

Continue reading “2023: A Tambora kind of year” →

Honest brokers confront a contrarian

Manhattan Contrarian (attorney Francis Menton) posted, “Why Don’t Global lower Tropospheric Temperatures More Closely Track Atmospheric CO2 Levels?, that “The big news in 2025 for the climate scare was that all of a sudden this scare wasn’t such big news any more.” I left a comment to the effect that the whole CO2 scare was the product of PR, and that like buses, when this one goes away, another eschatological demon would soon follow. I did not use that word, “eschatological”, meaning end times, but I wish I had.

MC did a JFK assassination post, 51 years after the fact still harping on the original script of misdirection from CIA to Russians to Wall Street (he left out the guy under the manhole cover). I suggested that he also consider the umbrella man, who was giving the signal used in movies … “And … action!” I suggested that the assassination was faked, and at that point he decided that my comments needed moderation. This meant that they would appear, and eventually be approved. Today’s comment disappeared. I think that everyone having been been fooled by the CO2 scare is a bridge too far. (I think I stated at the end of the comment that Galileo was not done in only by peer review, but by inability to deal with PR.)

Continue reading “Honest brokers confront a contrarian” →

Sea level rise to begin soon. Be vewy vewy wowwied.

The above graph is of sea level rise projected for the city of San Francisco for the period 2018-2100. Please note the following:

Projected sea level rise is as follows based on “anthropogenic forcing”, or human activity:

Level of rise                     Meters                 Millimeters (mm)             mm per year

Extreme                              2.5                            2,500                                       30

High                                    2.0                           2,000                                       24

Intermediate high            1.5                           1,500                                         18

Intermediate                     1.0                           1,000                                         12

Low                                     0.3                              300                                          3.6

1900-2018 historic          0.23                            230                                          1.95

 

Continue reading “Sea level rise to begin soon. Be vewy vewy wowwied.” →

The Polar Vortex

We here in Colorado (at 7,900 feet) are in the midst of a cold snap, with temperatures in the below-zero range. Typically this time of year in our state we enjoy daytime temperatures in the thirties, though often with sub-freezing at night. This morning as I stepped outside our garage to deliver some recyclables to the bin, I was hit with what is called an “Artic blast”, and that is actually a correct label. Such cold air as we currently have is unnatural for our area, and does indeed originate in the Arctic.

Continue reading “The Polar Vortex” →