I refer readers to a paper written by Dr. Stefan Lanka posted on 9/11/20. Dr. Lanka is a noted and controversial virologist of good standing. He was the man who instigated court proceedings in Germany that ultimately found that the existence of the measles virus had never been proven.
The title of the piece is Misinterpretation Virus II: Beginning and End of the Corona Crisis.* Since this is part 2, I assume there is a part 1, but it may not have been translated, as this part was, by James McKumiskey.
*h/t to commenter Alexei for bringing this article to our attention.
I started working on this blog post yesterday, and quickly realized that it was going to end up being very long, and the length of the writing would be my education, as in writing stuff out I sometimes gain understanding. In the same process, I also lose readers. It’s too damned long. So, I am not sure how to present this other than to urge that you read the paper. I printed it out, and it was 6,400 words and 14 pages. So it will take half an hour or more. But I found it absorbing and I was not aware of passing time.
I am only going to single out three sections of the paper, with the understanding that commenters will flesh this and the rest out out and help me in my understanding as well.
… virologists who allege that pathogenic viruses exist suppressed a well-known fact for understandable reasons. The virus test that is used is a genetic test. The genetic sequences which they seek in the test are not isolated from a virus. They isolate typical genetic sequences, which are released in increasing quantities when tissues and cells die. These generally short genetic sequences, which are component parts of the human metabolism need to be studied further. Virologists can theoretically construct, with the help of a computer program, long genetic strands from many short genetic sequences. These are then claimed to be real viral genetic strands. That is the reason why healthy people who are repeatedly tested have a positive test.
Consistently, the virologists ignore two of the prescribed rules of science so that they do not contradict themselves. The first is to consistently verify all assertions oneself. The second is to test all assumptions and methods by means of control experiments. If they would carry out the control experiments, they would discover that all the genetic sequences, which are theoretically connected together to form a viral genetic strand originate from the human metabolism and not from outside, from an alleged virus.” (Emphasis added.)
Lanka goes on the patch together a history of Covid-19, including the alleged death of ophthalmologist Li Wenliang. Lanka notes that he only tried to warn some of his colleagues about SARS being present in a hospital, and to watch out for themselves. One of the recipients of his private message put it on WhatsApp, and it soon spread world wide. A panic was triggered. My suspicion is that this was all staged, and that the panic and resulting draconian lock downs and business closures were planned well in advance, and for other purposes. But enough of that. There’s more to be said about virology.
Much of this piece centers around a Doctor Christian Drosten, who strikes me as the Gallo/Montagnier of this hoax. Hoaxes I have seen center around one person who pushes the narrative forward, and Drosten seemed to be that man back in January of this year.
Because the determination of the quantity of artificially created DNA during the course of the PCR-technique can be approximately determined, this development of the PCR technique is referred to as “real-time PCR”. A “real-time PCR” which is preceded by another step, the transformation of RNA into DNA by means of “Reverse Transcription” RT; It is therefore referred to as “real-time RT-PCR”.
Professor Drosten applies the “real-time RT-PCR in his developed test for proving the new Corona-virus. He searched a data-pool on the internet for short genetic sequences, which are ascribed to the SARS-virus. He used these sequences of short pieces of genetic materials for the PCR-Primer sequence, in order to prove the “still” unknown Chinese virus with his “real-time RT-PCR”.
On the 10th January and 12th January provisional compilations of sequences appeared which were subsequently changed and were published on 01/24/2020 and on 02/03/2020, this represented the results of the first two experiments for identifying the still unknown virus. The CCDC virologists theoretically compiled the sequences of short genetic pieces by means of computer programs to a possible genetic strand. The CCDC virologists state in both publications that there is still no evidence that these suggested sequences actually cause disease. On 01/10/2020 and on 01/12/2020 the suggested Chinese sequences were still provisional and had not been through the strenuous process of scientific verification.
The fact that the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommended the PCR test developed by Professor Drosten for proving the new virus, even before the publication of the two Chinese sequencing suggestions, is proven. Professor Drosten used unproven scientific data for his quickly globalised PCR-test for the 2019-nCoV, which was renamed with his participation SARS-CoV-2 on 02/07/2020[xi].
With the renaming of the description of a mere suspicion of a possibly defective or harmless virus “nCoV” to a dangerous pathogen “SARS-CoV-2” the impression was implanted in the public, that an actual SARS-virus was discovered in China, which causes a dangerous disease, namely SARS, and killed the new Chinese idol Li Wenliang, who had defied the party leadership. Thus, Professor Drosten and his colleagues from the Virus-Nomenclature-Group fulfilled the expectation of the shocked population into being “finally diagnosed”. This expectation was triggered by the momentum of the mass panic caused by Dr Li Wenliang and seemingly fulfilled by Professor Drosten. It is crucial to know that at this time all directly concerned virologists stated – and to date still state – that there is no evidence that this new virus actually causes disease. Or, it occurs in parallel with diseases, with healing processes, after healing processes, by a few healthy people, or by many healthy people, or by everyone? (Edited to change date nomenclature to American.)
This is the single most important part of the Lanka piece, in my view, the fact that virologists proceeded to create a worldwide pandemic centered around a virus not known to even exist, or it it exists, to be a dangerous pathogen. This falls well in line with the words of much-maligned Dr. Andrew Kaufman, that the Wuhan affair did not produce an isolated virus, and that in the opinion of many scientists, virologists do not produce useful information.
The pandemic, in my view, was contrived from the beginning, and the impression that there was a new and dangerous virus was critical, no doubt why WHO and Drosten ran with work that was premature and incomplete, and in fact never was and never will be completed. WHO did not need a virus, only fear of a virus, to launch its campaign. In fact, the only virus that has spread is fear.
Here are Lanka’s conclusions:
The following clear answers, conclusions, and consequences emerge from [Drosten’s] statements.
1) Has Professor Drosten verified whether the gene-sequences, which are the basis of his tests, and were obtained from the Chinese virologists are actually sequences that originate from a virus? The answer is No! He couldn’t verify whether the sequences are from a virus, because the two definitive publications, in which the extraction of the gene sequences used by him are described, were not available before the launch of his test.
2) Has Professor Drosten carried out the prescribed control experiments to determine whether the sequences used actually come from a virus? Has been carried out the control experiments to determine whether the applied sequences, which he ascribes to the new virus, are in reality, not sequences that originate in every metabolism, perhaps even in plants and even more so in the metabolism of sick people?
The answer is: No! Neither he nor the CCDC virologists nor others have demonstrably carried out the necessary control experiments to date and if so, they have not published them. Short genetic sequences from the metabolism of healthy people must be used in order to sequence them for the crucial control experiments. These short genetic sequences must be put together into a long genetic-strand of a virus with the same computer programme as the gene sequences from sick people. This experiment was neither performed nor published. This necessary control experiment, which arises from pure logic, and the logic of virology was never mentioned. The moment in which this experiment is carried out and published, the corona-crisis is immediately ended. (Emphasis added.)
Thus is appears to me to be what I have said all along, that WHO wanted a global pandemic for geopolitical reasons centering around population control; that WHO needed a virus, and that any old virus would have done. The Wahun virologists and Dr. Christian Drosten provided that virus, but they never proved that it either really existed or that it was dangerous. The rest is history.