A little news and opinion from the wilderness fragments still found here in the Wild (northern) Rockies. CounterPunch graciously ran the following piece about a fake “Wilderness Bill” introduced in the U.S. Senate by Montana Senator Jon Tester (D).
NOVEMBER 29, 2021
Sen. Tester’s Wilderness Act Doesn’t Go Far Enough
BY STEVE KELLYFacebookTwitterRedditEmail
There appears to be strong business support for Montana Sen. Jon Tester’s Blackfoot Clearwater Stewardship Act (BCSA). What stewardship? Imagine Tester as the head servant of business, the steward who collects rents and dispenses government (subsidies) provisions.
Paid pollsters with their surveys tell us it is a good thing. Businessmen looking for government handouts tell us the same fairy tale. Yard signs in the well-healed, “smart” parts of university towns – “donor-class” neighborhoods — reinforce this narrow-minded, virtue-signaling, herd mentality. Tester’s collaborators pontificate, regurgitate. It must be so. But is it so?
“Stakeholders” (vested financial interests) proclaim their alleged “…love our mountains, valleys, rivers, fish, wildlife, and everything else available on our public lands.” The difference between “love” and “available” is the difference between loving one’s spouse infinitely and loving a young beauty rented from an escort service for a one-night stand. Or if it is love, it is the kind that sentimentalizes desire and calls it love, where love is reduced to pity and an unconscious desire for exploitation.
“Outdoor” businesses have one primary objective: Exploit the outdoors for financial gain. Love of money comes first. A cynical, authoritarian, use-and-abuse philosophy resonates among businessmen. Legislating commercial opportunity and government-sponsored jobs is music to ears of unrepentant money-worshipers. Using public funds to prop up unprofitable private enterprise is a lose-lose proposition unless you’re a Washington politician looking to buy a few votes.
“The first duty of love is to listen,” said Christian theologian Paul Tillich. Who is listening to wildlife and native trout populations being pushed to the brink of extinction by outdoor business interests, sawmill owners, miners, livestock and farming operations and land speculators?
All these proud supporters of Sen. Tester’s legislation want to dictate terms and conditions that make forests uninhabitable for many native wildlife species. Who is listening? Propaganda makes claims that the BCSA would protect the Blackfoot region’s most beloved and celebrated values. These claims mock nature’s mysteries and treasures. Land speculators could care less about the collateral damage which fragments and destroys the integrity of the habitat. These pro-business “movers and shakers” lack basic human integrity. They aren’t listening to the countless species facing homelessness as a result of permanent loss of habitat legislated by the BCSA.
The 80,000 acres Tester’s bill designates as wilderness is an amputation which represents a small fraction of the much greater de facto wilderness that exists today. The wilderness character of the landscape would persist indefinitely if Tester and his business supporters would just leave well enough alone.
No “new wilderness” will be designated. There is no new wilderness. Wilderness exists by the creator’s hand. It is destroyed by man. When man talks about creating new wilderness, it’s “happy-talk,” a common ploy to fool people into supporting less wilderness, never more. Montanans are being fooled by Tester and his business buddies. What does turning a fast buck have to do with love, truth, or moral responsibility to protect clean water and native fish and wildlife habitat? Absolutely nothing.
This cynical wilderness “stewardship” narrative, born of deceit and propaganda, and repeated since the 1970s, is a total lie without end. Tester’s bill is landscape amputation (fragmentation) without anesthesia. Fragmented landscapes expose wildlife to more harassment, poaching, trapping, and poisoning or assassination by government agents.
Do your own research. Think and observe for yourself. Do what’s right for wilderness, water, fish and wildlife, reject the Blackfoot Clearwater Stewardship Act. Consider instead supporting the maximum-wilderness alternative, The Northern Rockies Ecosystem Act. It protects all roadless areas and biological connecting corridors needed for wildlife movement and habitat security.
Steve Kelly is a an artist and environmental activist. He lives in Bozeman, Montana.
Thanks to my friends at CounterPunch for running this. Wilderness needs no defense, just more defenders.
Speedy recovery, Mark.
3 thoughts on ““More Wilderness” is a big lie.”
Hey Steve, I am using dictation software to write this, as I have a oven mitt on my right hand, and am using the mouse with my left hand. I am surprisingly pain-free, taking no opioids and not even over-the-counter drugs.
I was thinking as I read this how much I despise John Tester. Conrad Burns, we know, was the go to boy for the timber industry, but he was fading and a replacement was needed. It was a very nice feint by the timber lobby to replace the Republican Burns with the Democrat Tester. As much as I despise Tester, the constituency for destruction of wilderness shifted from Republicans to Democrats, as the latter blindly supported anything Tester did even as they would’ve opposed it had Burns done the same thing. Which he did. Oh well, this is how it is in a one party system.
Kudos on getting CP to run this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It only takes 5,000 “legal” signatures to get on the ballot with a new party. I’m thinking the “Montana! No Way, No How” party for Montana. With the 50% who still vote being split by the two divisions of the unified party of piracy, perpetual war and occupation, only half or so of the eligible, non-voting sector could shake things up. Not for long, but “…oh what fun it is to ride in a one-horse, open sleigh…”
Could be popular, but that’s the rub; don’t want to draw anymore attention to an already overcrowded rural state.