The machinery that the international bankers and mercantile elite have been creating and maintaining for generations to control and change this world is based on a few basic principles of competition and cooperation, among others; but the lower you get in the echelons of this machine, the more diverse the elaboration of these principles becomes, and the more the mechanisms and interrelationships change like a kaleidoscope.
The only way to form a picture of this world of closely interwoven power structures is to learn to separate the wheat from the chaff and to glean all the pieces of the puzzle bit by bit from a multitude of information written from a multitude of angles.
In studying this subject, it is good to keep in mind that there are works written by persons who are trying to look in from the outside, works written by persons who are accepted but not initiated members, and initiated members whose works belong in the limited hangout category without exception.
Thus far my imaging is far from complete, and there is undoubtedly much to polish. I have started to write down my perceptions in the hope that this will provide a basis for anyone who seriously investigates this subject. I hope for positive contributions from those who are prepared to put their own views next to mine and to weigh them up against each other and add to them.
Because Catholicism was the first hierarchy to transcend national boundaries in the same way that multinational corporations, world banks and fraternities do today I devote much attention to it. It is my strong impression that the driving force behind (and within) Catholicism is the same as that behind all today’s dominant power structures including the major religions which apart from Talmudism were created later and are closely intertwined. As far as I can discern now, this driving force originates in the highest echelons of Talmudic Judaism. These are practically synonymous with the self-appointed elite of this world.
Don’t get me wrong, I am not talking about the Jews but high ranking Talmudists. It is the Jews who have probably suffered more than any other group of people at the hands of these Talmudic leaders.
As you study this matter, keep in mind that civilizations with the additional regulations in the early days of civilization were usually governed by a Priest class. As far as I can tell, politics and regulation have their origins in religion.
Talmudic law is a rehash of Babylonian law and never had anything to do with the law of the twelve tribes of Israel as given to Moses according to the Old Testament. When a rabbi speaks of the Torah, usually referring to the first five books of the Old Testament, he is talking about the Torah SheBea’al Peh, i.e., the Talmud and other rabbinic sacred texts.
(N.B. Israel was the new name given to Jacob after struggling a whole night with an angel to test his merit. This Jacob is the father of ten of the twelve patriarchs of the tribes of Israel and grandfather of the patriarchs of two tribes. When these tribes conquered and occupied Canaan they renamed it Israel after their patriarch of patriarchs. Names in ancient times were more of a title or description of one’s role within a certain context. Upon being assigned a new role or within a different context names also change. Israel means something like “Thou hast behaved royally with God” or “God reigns”. This name has nothing to do with Isis, Ra and El as is regularly assumed, although the “el” in Israel is the Hebrew word for god.)
From the very beginning, a subversive group within the Israelite community who were called the Pharisees sought to rule over the Israelites. It is this group that Christ accuses in the New Testament of calling themselves Jews but not being Jews, and is referred to by him as a synagogue of Satan (Satan is a title meaning adversary. According to the Bible, the adversary against the creator’s original plan started with Lucifer. It is for this reason that he is also called the Satan, but he is not the only one to receive this title.). The New Testament makes it clear that being a Jew is not dependent on outward appearances such as circumcision but on faith. Not being Jewish is probably meant here metaphorically, but some believe that the early Pharisees, who were masters of virtue signaling, came from a Canaanite remnant.
To take over leadership of the tribes of Israel, these Pharisees came up with the story that in addition to the written law as given to Moses, there is an explanation of a deeper meaning of the law that was transmitted orally. This was the first Talmud also called the Jerusalem Talmud. It was also the first time that a deeper or esoteric meaning of the Bible books was mentioned in order to adapt them and derive a totally different regulation or doctrine from them.
It is striking how often this is still done and how credibly it comes across to people who are not familiar with the contents of the Bible. The most common method of coming up with an apparent explanation of the Bible is to take themes, characters, texts, and even numbers from the original context and place them within a context that has nothing to do with the original text and then claim that this explains what the Bible is about. As we will see later, the teachings of Christianity were also shaped in this manner. The books of the Bible are written around a very clear and well-defined storyline that runs from Genesis to Revelation. Since most people are familiar with Biblical characters and themes but not with the context in which they belong, it is very easy to fall for this kind of deception.
It was later, when the Israelites were in exile in Babylon under Nebuchadnezzar, that the Pharisees became acquainted with the Babylonian rules of property, labor and (slave-) trade and began developing a Talmud that distorted the original Jewish law into the Babylonian one. This Talmud is called the The Babylonian Talmud and is one of the most important works on which modern Talmudism is based. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Judaism/FullTalmud.pdf
Both the Roman Empire and Talmudism are the main heirs of this Babylonian rule and are closely intertwined, as the following text shows:
What I think I can also gather from this text is that Babylonia was an autonomous city state in Babylon similar to City of London and the Vatican. Correct me if I’m wrong.
The Pharisees who developed the Talmud and Talmudism were, according to the Bible, causal to the death of Christ and were very fierce and feared persecutors of his first followers. In the early days they worked their way into key positions within the religion established by Constantine as they had done in the Roman governing body when the Roman Empire had conquered the territory of the Israelites. These Pharisees understood well that as counselors they could assert their influence unseen from behind the throne.
Constantine himself was aware of this rise to power and pushed back the influence of Talmudic Jews. His son Constantius got along well with the Pharisees and, after succeeding his father, granted them more influence than they ever had before. I have a strong impression that the Christians who were entrusted with important offices after 324 were crypto Jews as is still often the case with Christians in positions of influence in the dominant hierarchies of this world.
Taking over power by occupying key positions but leaving the façade of a hierarchy intact so that this takeover is not visible, is a common tactic of the ruling oligarchy of this world, as is marrying off sons and daughters to King’s houses and other rich and powerful families. The power that today’s elite has drawn to itself is still maintained by marrying off exclusively within their own ranks, and is still rarely visible.
It is noteworthy that the Old Testament mentions a dream that Nebuchadnezzar is said to have had of a statue with a head of gold representing his empire, then Babylonia. This statue symbolized his empire and the empires to follow, expressed by the chest and arms of silver representing the Mede/Persian empire, the belly and loins of copper representing the Greek empire and the legs of iron representing the Roman empire — thus of an increasingly harder metal — ending in the feet, which were made of pieces of iron held together by loam.
The prophet Daniel’s explanation of this dream, who was in exile in Babylon in those days was the following: “And that ye have seen the feet and the toes partly of potter’s clay and partly of iron, signifies, that this shall be a divided kingdom [ ] That ye have seen iron mingled with clayey loam, means: they shall mingle by marriage, but shall not form a coherent whole with each other, as iron does not mingle with loam” (Daniel 2:41-43)
In the New Testament Revelation 18:23 reads: “For thy merchants were the great men of the earth, for by thy sorceries (deceptions) were all nations deceived.”
RELIGIONS AND SECRET SOCIETIES HAVE THE SAME ORIGINS
The religions and secret societies of this world both have an outer circle with an exoteric teaching for the uninitiated and an inner circle with an esoteric teaching for the initiated. In the end, religious institutions are nothing more than secret societies as secret societies are religious institutions. In the case of Christianity, the exoteric teaching is the teaching that is falsely claimed to be based on the Bible. Christianity disguises its paganistic and mystical beliefs under a layer of complicated theology and Biblical themes texts and characters.
One angle from which to approach the Bible is that it is a collection of books that tell of the harmony that is original to this world and how we lost it when the concept of hierarchy took hold. It is on hierarchy, not harmony that all power in this world is based. For this reason, among others, the Bible has been shrouded in mists for 2,000 years by rulers of religious hierarchies. By using biblical themes to disguise the pagan and mystical teachings of Christianity, the Bible is hidden from view even though it appears to be at the center of Christian doctrine. A very successful execution of hiding in plain sight.
Like all religious institutions including secret societies and fraternities, Christianity has its origins in the Sun Cult as it was known in Babylon under Nimrod, also known as The Old Religion or Baäl worship. There are more and older variations on this theme but almost all of today’s institutions and cults derived from the sun cult find their common origin in this Babylonian empire, not infrequently also by their own admission. They are all elaborations of the same principle and all have the same goal (albeit via different paths) and for this reason they can be perfectly combined.
In the solar cult, the central focus is Sirius. Where the sun illuminates the material world, Sirius illuminates the spiritual world according to these teachings. Every mystery religion and cult represents a system for enlightenment and self-deification. Of all these systems, today the Kabbalah under the influence of Freemasonry is by far the most popular. However I have the impression that this is a watered down version for the goyim. The dark side opposing the light of the sun and it’s life giving properties is often represented in the Solar cult by the planet Saturn. This planet is also referred to as black sun, black star or dark star.
The Talmudic Jews, who have considerably less to do with the twelve tribes of Israel than they like to claim, believe that the god and creator of this earth descended to earth through the sefirot of the kabbalistic tree of life and the paths that connect them and along that way has descended in a form expressed in matter. This form, according to their teaching, we now know as the Jews. The Kabbalah is said to represent a way back to the original divine state. This is very similar to the Gnostic teaching that we are angels trapped in matter.
Kabbalah emerged from the ancient mystery religions, which, along with the regulations for property, trade and labor as practiced in the new Babylonian empire under Nebuchadnezzar, is part of Talmudism. An important addition of the Pharisees to the Babylonian system of contracts and vows was the idea that the Jews have a God-given right to treat non-Jews as slaves and cattle.
It is these Talmudic Jews who also put Gnosticism on the map. Gnosticism and kabbalah are the pillars of the teachings for initiates, both in the great religions and in secret societies and fraternities. The Knights Templar, whose leadership like the Jesuits consisted mainly of Talmudic Jews, preserved the ancient knowledge of the mystics and formed the inner heart of the inner circle of the Catholic religion.
The Knights Templar were exempt from all local laws and only had to answer to the Pope. Since power in this world is not on the throne but behind it I suspect that both the Knights Templar and the Pope answered to the same hidden rulers. Their innovative banking systems — derived from Babylonian money magic — gave them control of some 1,000 fortifications during the Crusades.
The end of the Crusades gave the Knights Templar less purpose, but after 200 years of integration, they still had power and authority in cities across Europe. They became a “state within a state”, and this created a lot of tension.
Banking began with these crypto (Talmudic) Jewish Templars. Their banking system from the beginning generated not only wealth but also power. Thus, I am convinced that both the religious world and the world of lodges and fraternities have been controlled for generations by a relatively small group of families that we now find among the super-rich banking and trading families who almost without exception adhere to Talmudism, at least outwardly, and therefore call themselves Jews.
PAGAN ORIGINS OF DOCTRINES IN CHRISTIANITY
The Roman Catholic Church claims that its origin is the death, resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ and that it is the church for which Jesus Christ died, the church established and built up by the apostles. But even a cursory reading of the New Testament shows that the Catholic Church does not find its origin in the teachings of Jesus or his apostles.
The fact that Christianity seems to want to fight paganism has everything to do with the occult/mystical knowledge that paganism harbors and on which the power of rulers has been based for as long as hierarchy has been a concept in this world.
This is also why it is absurd to think that a ruler like Constantine would have embraced the ideas adhered to by the first followers of Christ and only allowed paganistic influences to make the transition to the new state religion easier for paganists.
This would have meant that he would have favored an ideology that advocates having no ambition in this world, placing no value on status and possessions, living in community of means of livelihood with fellow believers, not waging war or participating in it, preferring harmony strictly to hierarchy, and humbly allowing themselves to be led by God’s holy spirit until Christ comes back to take his God-given place on the world throne, and until then recognizing only God as authority.
This is why this group who said they were “of the way” was perceived as subversive. There is no earthly leader who has use for a population whose philosophy of life is at odds with the position of the ruler himself and the hierarchy he rules. This also makes the idea that Constantine would have made this a state religion because it would be pacifying out of the question.
Constantine is said to have envisioned Christianity as a religion that could unite the Roman Empire at a time when it was beginning to fall apart. At that time, almost every city in the Roman Empire had its own god with its own temple and there were many territories conquered by Rome with their own religions which in turn had their influence on religious thinking in the Roman Empire.
The supremacy of the Roman bishop called pope was created thanks to the power and influence of the Roman emperors. While most other bishops (and Catholics) resisted the idea of the Roman bishop as supreme, the Roman bishop eventually rose to supremacy. After the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed, the popes assumed the title that had previously belonged to the Roman emperors, Pontifex Maximus. The idea that the Roman bishop is the replacement for Christ and the supreme leader of the Christian Church is completely foreign to the Bible.
The original message of the gospel is that thanks to the atoning sacrifice of Christ a personal harmonious relationship with the creator is possible again and that this is the first step on the way to regaining harmony in his creation. There are some guidelines indicated for how to restore and maintain this relationship but according to the Bible, this relationship is personal and how to shape it is everyone’s own responsibility. The idea of a hierarchical institution that places itself between God and his creation is completely at odds with the gospel.
Of the many different variations on the solar cult, from 1st to the 5th century AD, Mithraism was a popular religion especially among Roman soldiers. On Roman territory there were at least 1,500 temples to Mithras, a deity originating in Zoroastrianism of ancient Persia, who balanced the good forces and the evil forces, represented respectively by Ahura Mazdâ (lord wisdom) and Angra Mainyu (evil spirit). Mithras was also called the sun god and on December 25, the birthday of this Sol Invictus or Invincible Sun was celebrated. This celebration took place a few days after the solstice of December 21.
The Romans also celebrated the god Saturn whom they equated with Cronus during the feast of the Saturnalia, this divinity was also celebrated together with the birth of the new Sun, during the Winter Solstice, i.e. in the period when Christians now celebrate the birth of Jesus, unaware of how this is an occult commemoration to the ancient dark god.
Regarding the birth day of Jesus as described in the Bible; Joseph and Mary were on their way to their birthplace because the Emperor Augustus had issued an order that everyone in his empire, which included Israel in those days, must be registered at the place where they came from. According to historiography, this must have been sometime in the spring, about four to six years BC.
It is possible that Constantine, like his father, venerated this sun god. It is also Constantine who proclaimed the Dies Solis (day of the sun, today’s Sunday) as the official day of rest in the Western Roman Empire, not the Catholic Church as is often assumed. The Sabbath, the day of rest as mentioned in the Bible lasted from Friday evening sunset to Saturday evening sunset.
One of the central features of Mithraism was a sacrificial meal, in which the flesh of a bull was eaten and the blood of that bull was drunk. Mithras was said to be present in the flesh and blood of the bull, and when ingested it brought salvation to those who had partaken of the meal.
It was easy for Constantine and his successors to replace the sacrificial meal of Mithraism with the idea of Holy or Christian Communion. On the other hand, the sacrament as a consumption of the literal body and blood of Jesus is not taught in the Bible. The idea of bread and wine being miraculously transformed into the literal body and blood of Jesus (transubstantiation) as taught in the Catholic religion is also not found in the Bible. Mithraism, like Christianity, had seven sacraments. These too are not found anywhere in the Bible.
Luther, who claimed to want to purge Catholicism of pagan influences, added the Christmas tree to the celebration of Christmas. This was originally the midwinter tree from the Germanic solstice or midwinter festival celebrated around December 21.
The midwinter horn blown during this period from December 2 to announce the coming of the light was Christianized in the Middle Ages and is now used to announce the coming of Christ. Since, according to the New Testament, the coming of Christ took place more than 2,000 years ago, this is a peculiar custom for a religion that claims to be Christian. Talmudism rejects the New Testament and teaches that the Messiah has yet to come for the first time.
Another custom from this Germanic tradition is the burning sun wheel that was turned to welcome the returning sun. This is where the Advent wreath originated.
What is now called Easter is associated within Christianity with the Jewish Passover feast. In reality, this is the feast of Ishtar who originated in Mesopotamia where the Assyrians founded the first Babylonian dynasty. She is the main Babylonian and Assyrian goddess, associated with love, fertility and war and counterpart to the Phoenician Astarte.
This feast was a celebration of the rebirth of nature in spring. To make it a little more plausible that this feast was related to the Jewish Passover, it has been made that this Old Testament celebration looked forward not only to the death/sacrifice of the coming Messiah, which means anointed of God (called the Christ in the New Testament, from the Greek word christos meaning anointed one) as was originally the case but also to his resurrection.
On top of that, Easter and Passover do not fall on the same date. The gap between these two celebrations varies from year to year because Passover had a fixed date on the Jewish calendar while Easter has a fixed date on the Roman calendar.
None of the feasts of Christianity can be found in the Bible, nor is there a requirement to celebrate these feasts. The feasts appointed by law in the Old Testament book of Leviticus are described in most Bible translations as holy gatherings, but in Hebrew one can also read that these are holy rehearsals. On a side note, this has nothing to do with the concept of religion as we know it today, there has never been an Old Testament Judaic religion.
Paul declared in the New Testament that these sacred Old Testament rehearsals were shadows of future events that were recent history at the time of Paul’s declaration. He was referring, among other things, to the last atoning sacrifice of the last high priest who would sacrifice himself.
The elements in the Old Testament Jewish culture that are explained as religious are primarily prophetic and had no function after these prophecies were fulfilled in the New Testament. It was with the last sacrifice that the covenant with the Jewish people was fulfilled and the Jewish law was abolished after which a new covenant was made with all mankind. This is why the books of the Bible are divided into an Old Testament and a New Testament. The Hebrew term for covenant is berit, which means “to bind or bind together”. In Greek it is translated as syntheke, “to bind together” or diatheke, “will, testament”.
Even if the feasts of Christianity were truly derived from the Old Testament Jewish feasts, since the coming of Jesus as savior and his sacrifice of which the prescribed Jewish customs were a foreshadowing were fulfilled at the beginning of the New Testament, the continued celebration of these Old Testament feasts is an absolute denial of the atoning sacrifice and therefore of Christ and the gospel. The disciples were instructed by Christ to remember only the supper and the sharing of the bread and wine with the following words: “Do this, time and again, to remember me” (Luke 22:19).
It is custom in Satanist circles to pass the bread and wine around on the date of the original supper but to explicitly not use any of it. Jehovah’s Witnesses do the exact same thing on the exact same date. They are taught that only the anointed, of which there are only a few left, may eat of the bread and drink the wine. For the rest of the believers, as in good Satanic custom, this is strictly forbidden.
Another recognizable theme from the solar cult visible in Christianity is the worship of mother with the child of god. The similarity in the story of Tammuz and Semiramis with Christ and Mary served well in the creation of the Catholic Church and the use of Biblical themes to obscure the true nature of this institution.
Semiramis was the wife of Nimrod. Before that she was his mother, making Nimrod the original bad mf’r. She is depicted in the lore as a beautiful and powerful witch. Nimrod was known as a great hunter and slayer of man. Together they would found the great pagan religions. After Nimrod died, Semirames noticed that she was beginning to lose influence in the Babylonian empire. Therefore, she encouraged the Babylonians to worship the sun as a tribute to her husband Nimrod.
She claimed that she had been fertilized through solar rays by her deceased husband, who had now become the sun. The son she gave birth to — named Tammuz — is said to have been born on December 25. Hence, Christmas is a celebration of the simultaneous birth of the son of darkness and the son of light and the celebration of the returning sun and its dark counterpart Saturn. In this the Gnostic nature of Christianity shines through.
Whereas according to the Bible there is only one worshipable God, in Christianity the mother and child motif (or the mother or child alone) is also worshiped. Most denominations go so far as to claim that Christ is God in human form. The Bible is clear that this Christ who is called the Word in John 1:1 is an expression of an eternal and therefore formless God (eternity is the absence of time and therefore of space and form. Hence, God has neither a beginning nor an end and no shape) as a father can be recognizable in his son but not God himself. And it does not stop there; the paganistic multiplicity of gods has been replaced in Christianity for a whole pantheon of worshipable saints.
The ancient Egyptians, who had great influence on early religious thought, arranged their gods or goddesses into trinities. There is no biblical basis for such a trinity doctrine any more than there is for the idea of an eternal soul, which has its origins in Greek philosophy, or for the departure of this soul to heaven or hell after death. As noted before, what is often done with such teachings is to take a text, theme, or person out of the context of the Bible and place it in the context of a pagan or self-invented teaching.
More on the origin of the trinity doctrine:
The Cult of Isis, a religion centered around the Egyptian mother goddess, was given a pseudo-biblical twist by replacing Isis with Mary. Many titles used for Isis, such as the Queen of Heaven, the Mother of God and Theotokos (meaning God-bearer) were assigned to Mary.
There is not a word in the Bible about the papacy, the worship and adoration of Mary, the perpetual virginity of Mary (the apostle Mark mentions by name four brothers of Christ, begotten by Joseph with Mary), the Assumption of Mary into heaven, or Mary as co-redeemer or co-mediator, praying to saints in heaven, apostolic succession, the regulations for the functioning of the church such as the sacraments, infant baptism, confession of sin to a priest, purgatory, indulgences or the equal authority of church traditions and the Bible.
The pagan narratives on which Christianity is based are older than Christianity, but based on the timeline of the history of this world as used in the Bible, the early Biblical narratives (not necessarily the books themselves) are about as old as Paganism. From the tone in which many Biblical stories are written, it can be concluded that the Bible clearly posits itself against Paganism and the religions that arose from it.
The Bible presents itself not as a religious collection of books but rather historical and prophetic. The 66 books that make up the Bible were written over a period of 3500 years, the last book of which was written almost 2000 years ago. The Christian religion is not based on the Bible but tries very hard to make it appear that way.
Inserting Biblical themes and characters into pagan narratives is still a very widespread practice, even outside of Christianity. Since the comparisons of Mystical/Pagan teachings with those of Christianity are very valid and this world lives in the false belief that Christianity is based on the Bible, Christianity erroneously gives the impression of bridging the gap between the Bible and pagan teachings. In the Netherlands we have the expression: if you want to hit a dog, there is always a stick to be found. The comparisons of pagan and mystical teachings with the Bible fall into this category without exception.
In order to determine whether such comparisons with the Bible are valid, it is necessary to be familiar with the Bible itself. Most persons who value these inaccurate comparisons only know the Bible by hearsay but have never made the effort to be truly familiar with this collection of books. Most people are familiar only with statements about the Bible, fragments of it or narratives or teachings falsely claimed to be Biblical but not with the Bible itself.
Although themes and persons from the gospels describing the life of Christ are often made to fit into mystical narratives like for example the sun passing through the zodiac, these narratives cannot in any way be made to fit into the gospels and certainly not into the full story of the Bible of which the gospels are an inseparable part.
NO PROTEST FROM PROTESTANTISM
That there has really been an authentic protest against the Catholic religion in the form of Protestantism seems to me to be implausible. Protestantism claims to aim to bring Christian doctrine back to the original Biblical teachings but has only added more pagan symbolism and has been a major catalyst for the development of Rosicrucianism.
Moreover, such an protest highlights the lie that Catholicism and by extension all of Christianity would have begun with the teachings of first century followers of Christ who called themselves Nazoraeans (also referred to as Nazarenes, not to be confused with Nazirean) or said to be of “the way”. It is typical, to say the least, that these Nazoreans are described in the writings of some church fathers as an organized Judeo-Christian sect with its own specific views.
The fact that Luther’s seal was a cross with a rose on it suggests that Protestantism was a step towards bridging the gap between Christian and mystical teachings. Consider that Christian teachings are themselves paganistic and mystical narratives in to which Biblical text, themes and characters are forced to sell them as Biblical.
The article “Joseph Smith and Kabbalah – The Occult Connection” gives a concise description of the development of interest in mystical movements in the Renaissance in relation to Protestantism:
This war too, like most wars of the past few hundred years, appears to have been staged and directed from behind the scenes by the usual suspects. Of all the purposes this apparent war has served, one purpose is obvious; related but opposing dynamics reinforce each other. This has been used conveniently many times as with the Democratic and Republican parties, the Beatles and the Stones, Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Mormons, etc.
ORIGINS OF FREEMASONRY
Within Freemasonry, the principle of an outer circle with an exoteric doctrine for the uninitiated and an inner circle with an esoteric doctrine for the initiated is divided between the blue lodge with 3 degrees and a red lodge with 30 degrees of which (of the total of 33 degrees) the thirty-third is an honorary title. This makes the 32nd degree, Master of the Royal Secret, the highest degree of development in the system as broadly practiced within Freemasonry. The third degree, Master Mason, is the highest degree for the uninitiated.
Among members of the echelons of the inner circle in Freemasonry there is the notion that members of the blue lodge often have an even poorer understanding of what Freemasonry really entails than people who are not members at all, such as non-initiates in religious institutions have no idea what the religion they follow really entails. But on the other hand, within the red lodge, members of the lower echelons are unaware of what is going on in the higher ones and within all echelons, there are select groups and networks that the other members don’t know about.
The teachings and objectives of the inner circle are diametrically opposed to those of the outer circle. It is custom within societies, brotherhoods and religious institutes to continue to radiate to the outside world the values and objectives of the outer circle after initiation in to the inner circle and to maintain strict secrecy about the ideas and associated practices of the inner circle.
Since the religious world is very closely intertwined with Freemasonry, I assume that initiation into the inner circle of any religion amounts to pretty much the same thing as initiation into the red lodge including the various echelons in which to ascend and the theory and practice offered.
According to the online Catholic Encyclopedia, the name “Freemason” originally referred to a highly skilled Catholic mason exempt from the supervision of the trade guilds as early as 1155 AD. These former craftsmen were largely responsible for Gothic architecture and the construction of many Gothic cathedrals throughout Europe. They took a vow to remain faithful to the God of the Bible and to the Holy Church and to abhor heresy.
The abundance of pagan and mystical motifs incorporated into cathedrals and churches elucidates the value of such a vow, and what loyalty to the Holy Church really means. The early Freemasons were clearly initiated in the mysteries and pagan traditions. One example is Rosslyn Chapel, which has gained notoriety thanks to pseudo conspiracy works such as The Da Vinci Code and The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail.
Rosslyn Chapel was built as a Christian house of worship, but unknown to the uninitiated, it was designed, through its symbolism and occult features, to honor Lucifer. Like similar buildings on the mainland, it is said to have been secretly consecrated with Babylonian rites, including blood sacrifices and the burial of spellbound objects. The St. Clair family at whose behest Rosslyn Chapel was built had ties to the Knights Templar and Templar symbols can be found in the chapel.
Many of the symbols used by the Knights Templar who were the forerunners of the Jesuits, who have close ties to Freemasonry and which were founded by Ignatius of Loyola at the same time he founded the Alumbrados, now called the Illuminati and the governing body of worldwide Freemasonry, can be found in both Christianity and Freemasonry. The Cross in Crown symbol, which Albert Pike says is a Western variation on lingam yoni but to the uninitiated means Christ is King, is a telling example.
It was these Catholic craftsmen who founded private lodges to share their knowledge among themselves. Later, non-craftsmen who were interested in the mysteries were also admitted to these lodges; they were called accepted or speculative masons. At that time it was only the craftsmen or operative masons who called themselves Freemasons.
The use of the name “Freemason” is said to have changed with the founding of the Grand Lodge of London and Westminster on June 24, 1717(=88). This was the dawn of worldwide Grand Lodge or Grand Orient Freemasonry. In France, the first Grand Lodge was established in 1771(=88). This is the beginning of Freemasonry as we know it today, but Masonic lodges where the mystical traditions of this world are studied and practiced existed long before Grand Orient Freemasonry. http://www.vermontlodgeofresearch.com/Publications/WHAT%20IS%20SCOTTISH-STUART%20FREEMASONRY2017.pdf
Grand Orient or Grand Lodge Freemasonry usually has one Grand Lodge per country (Italy has three) or district that determines whether other Masonic lodges can be recognized as authentic Freemasonry. If a country does not have a Grand Lodge, then Masonic lodges can be recognized by a foreign lodge. Each individual Grand Lodge determines for itself what the criteria are for recognizing lodges as authentic Freemasonry. Each Grand Lodge also determines for itself which other Grand Lodge may officially count itself under Grand Lodge Freemasonry. Representatives of the Grand Lodges that recognize each other meet once a year.
This suggests that lodges and Grand lodges are independent institutions, but that is an illusion. This world of lodges, like the rest of the world, is manipulated and controlled from behind the scenes by networks known to few and, as with religious institutions, most members are severely brainwashed.
In a letter dated January 22, 1870, Giuseppe Mazzini, Director of the Illuminati in the mid-1800s, wrote to Albert Pike, Freemasonry’s most prominent reformer and author of Morals and Dogma (which can be considered the Masonic Bible):
“We must allow all of the federations to continue just as they are, with their systems, their central authorities and diverse modes of correspondence between high grades of the same rite, organized as they are at present, but we must create a super rite, which will remain unknown, to which we will call those Masons of high degree whom we shall select. With regard to our brothers in masonry, these man must be pledged to the strictest secrecy. Trough this supreme rite, we will govern all Freemasonry which will become the one International Center, the more powerful because it’s direction will be unknown.”
There are hundreds of different lodges that are not immediately recognizable as Freemasonry but can be counted among them. Here is a small selection: https://www.stichtingargus.nl/vrijmetselarij/index2.html
That the police also go hand in hand with Freemasonry illustrates that religions and fraternities are traditionally meant to exercise authority. Above are a few examples of police emblems with the masonic compass and square symbol: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/police-freemasonry-irrefutable-connection-james-buchanan-iii
Another telling example is the seal of the Essex police force (https://www.essex.police.uk/)
It’s a variation on the logo of what is know as The Hidden Empire. That logo consists of three bars placed one above the other as can be seen in the logo of Allsave Cybersecurity (hired by Evil Corp with a logo almost identical to that of CIA front Enron) where Eliot works in Mr. Robot: https://mrrobot.fandom.com/es/wiki/Allsafe_Cybersecurity
or in the rather dark video of On to the next one by Jay Z (J.C.):
The difference is that the bars have been replaced by Arab swords used for ritual beheadings like the one in a mural at the Denver Airport:
There was once a fuss over the arrest of three individuals who claimed to be members of an organization they called called The Masonic Fraternal Police Department: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/10/bizarre-tale-kamala-harris-aide-fake-masonic-police-force
The site of this Masonic Fraternal Police Department stated the following:
“The Masonic Fraternal Organization is the oldest and most respected organization in the World.[ ] The first Police Department was created by the Knights Templar’s back in 1100 B.C.”
The idea that the primary purpose of the strong arm of the law is to protect the possessors’ property from the non-possessors is not out of the blue.
Protestantism has an offshoot in the form of small separatist movements that claim to be disappointed in Protestantism and to have formed themselves radically along the lines of the first congregations supposedly founded by the Apostles or groups around individuals who have proclaimed themselves to be contemporary prophets. As far as can be ascertained, these groups such as the Millerites and the Russelites (and the Seventh Day Adventists and Jehovah’s Witnesses that emerged from them), the Mormons, the Pentecostal Congregation etc. all have their origins in Freemasonry. One of the many signs on the wall is the frequent use of the cross in crown symbol. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PltNiBcWEqQ
Other telling examples are in the architecture of the Mormon Nauvoo temple:
or the Salt Lake Assembly Hall:
Another topic is the apparent Catholic origin of Islam, which points to a shared origin of both Christianity and Islam, and by that I do not mean the Bible.
An interesting lecture on this subject was given by Walter Veith, a high-ranking Freemason masquerading as an evangelist who has his origins in the very Masonic little group known as the Seventh-day Adventists. This lecture is a Christian version of a limited hangout but with some basic knowledge, the sense can be fairly well distinguished from the nonsense.
This version has helpful time stamps but the sound quality is compromised:
This version has better sound quality, but the time stamps are not included:
Veith shows that Islam has its origins in Catholicism, but in doing so he obscures the driving force behind the development of both these world religions. Bear in mind that Islam is based on a rewriting of the Bible in which Jesus is reduced to no more than a prophet. It is this reduction of Christ that has pulled the entire backbone out of the Biblical story. The coming of the son of God, a man without sin, as well as his atoning sacrifice are central themes in both the Old and New Testament and are the main part of the thread that runs through the entire Bible from Genesis to Revelation. The Old and New Testament as well as the 66 individual books no longer have any coherence in its Islamic “rewriting”.
I want to reiterate that Talmudists do not recognize the Christ as mentioned in the New Testament as the Messiah whose coming is foreshadowed in the Old Testament.
Following is a quote as used by Walter Veith in his lecture (see either version linked above):
“Islam is the message of the Qur-aan. It’s a perfect and practical religion of Equality, Fraternity and Liberty. Islam as divined by the Qur-aan means Submission to the supreme being, And compliance with His Laws which constitutes Nature including Man himself.” Vide 82:3, 30:30
We know the first part of this quote from the French revolution initiated by French Freemasonry under the auspices of the hidden governing body about which Guiseppe Mazzini wrote to Albert Pike.
What many people who have broken away from the religion in which they were raised (or in which they became involved) do not realize is that they are still brainwashed.
What I often observe, and have experienced myself is that Christian religious brainwashing makes people hungry for anything that sounds different or directly contradicts what they have been taught within these religious institutions not realizing that the Bible itself contradicts Christian teachings.
This leads them from the misconception that their former religion would be based on the Bible, into a world of deception and unsubstantiated theories about the meaning and origin of the Bible, which completely plays into the hands of the shapers and leaders of the Christian world.
Keep in mind that before the Counter-Reformation, a period of renewal within the Roman Catholic Church (in the 16th century through the early 17th century), it was forbidden for Catholics to read the Bible.