Impressions of Michael Mann

This has been bubbling inside me for quite some time now. Maybe it started some years back when Dr. Michael Mann, the hockey stick guy, was on a TV panel show and someone suggested that climate affairs were so bad that it made her/him want to cry. As if on cue, Mann generated crocodile tears, pretending to lament the situation of our climate. It made me want to puke.

But I have a lot of impressions of Mann … perhaps foremost, that while his so-called Hockey Stick is pseudoscience at best, it is very detailed work that requires a great deal of intelligence and effort, even if he was probably exaggerating his case, perhaps even engaging in creative accounting. Steve McIntyre, the Canadian mining engineer who took apart the stick piece by piece, had to devote tremendous effort to replicate Mann’s efforts, not easily dissembled and beyond the reach of us mere mortals. What we found was that tree rings are a complicated science, and without a strong working knowledge of statistics cannot be assembled in a way that sends a “temperature signal” from the past to the present.

Think of it this way: During a typical baseball season, millions of numerical statistics are gathered. For most of my life, these stats, like batting average and ERA, were all we had and Cy Young and MVP awards were based on them. Along came the personal computer and some young Turks, and new and better stats were developed, and players were exposed as less or more valuable than their numbers indicated. All it took was a PC and a statistician.

For instance, down in Denver, hitters appear better and pitchers worse due to thinner air and higher altitude at Coors Field. Colorado Rockies hitters historically do better at home than on the road. AT&T Park (Now Oracle) in San Francisco is the opposite, a place where long fly balls are easily caught instead of leaving the park. Any statistician has to learn how to factor out the ball park factors when evaluating players.

In the same manner, a dendrochronologist (one who studies tree rings) has to know which tree rings are most indicative and likely to send a temperature signal to the future  … the method used by statisticians is called “principle component analysis”. By that method they take the mass of statistical evidence and use the most reliable, ignoring the rest. Mann claims to have relied on PCA in his hockey stick, and honestly, who can argue with him?

Well, for one, Abraham Wyner, a professor of statistics at Wharton, claimed that Mann had cherry picked his data. He testified at the Mann V Steyn defamation trial. Steve McIntyre as well testified. He has been a thorn in Mann’s foot for decades now, as he claims that any set of data used by Mann would produce a hockey stick, include things completely unrelated, like stock market closings. That was the rub, and famously indicates that Mann was engaged, knowing or not, in pseudoscience.

But honestly, no one cares. The Hocky Stick, thoroughly discredited as it is, stands as proof of the claim that there was no Medieval Warm Period, and no Little Ice Age. Even as we know that in England grapes were grown for wine during the MWP, that Vikings farmed both Iceland and Greenland as well during the period, due to Mann’s nature trick, the MWP was claimed to be a local phenomenon, nothing more. Just as well, we know that Vikings were forced to leave Greenland, and that the Thames froze over each winter during the LIA, but Mann wrote that off too – a local matter only.

David Deming, a geoscientist from the University of Oklahoma, gained notoriety when he gathered a 150-year study of North American temperatures using boreholes. He claimed that temperatures were driven upward since 1850 or so (true enough and coincidentally aligning with the end of the Little Ice Age).  Climate alarmists thought he was one of them, and was aligned with the CO2/anthropogenic school. Jonathon Overpeck of the University of Arizona carelessly spoke out of school in an email to Deming, saying “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

Why? Because if the MWP was real, then temperatures then were higher than today, and AGW would go out the window.

The Medieval Warm Period was real, by the way, and we have plenty of evidence to support it and the Little Ice Age, including Vikings and grapes and Thames winter festivals mentioned above. But something far more interesting was going on … facts and evidence are cast aside by warmists. That would not matter except that the whole of the “respectable” climatology community goes along with the cast-aside MWP and LIA, along with all of the news media, the vast majority of the Democratic Party, and both Presidents Obama and Biden (whose reelection appears imminent since – we do not count votes, really).

It’s an odd situation, not uncommon, but just odd. Galileo di Vincenzo Bonaiuti de’ Galilei, or just Galileo to us,  faced similar circumstances when he posited a heliocentric galaxy, crossing the power of the Catholic Church and earning him life imprisonment. One pundit has suggested  that he was merely an early victim of peer review, but I am more inclined to believe that he discovered something true to this day, that power owns truth.

In other words, anthropogenic global warming, aka climate change, while utter bullshit science, is backed by tremendous power. It is affirmed daily in the news media, and taught to our school kids as real, destroying their hope for the future (a form a child abuse). One can easily gather evidence that AGW is fake, but every form of science regarding it is in vogue, and the power of the federal government, which hands out grants for studies on the subject, only offers those dollars to known warmists. Our science in this area today is utterly corrupt.

Which brings me back to Mann. I ran across the following quote recently in a book by A.W. Montford called The Hocky Stick Illusion. Just prior to his stunning Stick success, “Mann was just starting out on his scientific career, receiving his PhD in 1998 at the age of 33.” As the informal title of his first Hockey Stick paper, MBH98, indicates, 1998 was the year he published his paper. He went from late blooming to world wide acclaim and success on the basis of what Wyner above labeled in court testimony as use of selected data to the exclusion of all else, aka cherry-picking.

I do not imagine that that number, 33, means as much to others as it does me. It indicates to me that Michael Mann is most likely a Freemason, or at least in service of Freemasons. Mann is said, due to his late age in attaining his PhD, to be a “late bloomer.” I am more suspicious that perhaps he never attained it at all, and that his record is glorified beyond his real abilities. Think that crazy? I take it one step further: For eight years, we had a president who refused to release his college transcripts showing that he graduated from Columbia and earned his juris doctor degree. Anything is possible when real power rests behind that throne.

Mann was, as I see it, hired to produce a hockey stick and to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period in service of power, the incredible power behind the AGW movement. To advance that cause he was either fast-tracked on finishing up his PhD, or perhaps just handed one. Anything is possible when power is on the loose. I’d like to see his college transcripts.

That is an assertion of opinion on my part, not fact, and I am pretty sure I cannot be sued for expressing an opinion, but we never know with Mann. His lawsuits are legendary. He sued Canadian Dr. Tim Ball over a quip, that rather than being at Penn State, he should be in the State Penn. It’s an old joke. That lawsuit went on for years, and in the end, because Mann was doing nothing to advance his case, it was thrown out by a Canadian high court, and Ball was awarded legal costs. Mann merely turned his back and walked away, paying Ball nary a cent. Dr. Ball later died in “penury,” or poverty. He could not enforce a Canadian verdict on an non-Canadian. (I trust Mann will not soon vacation up north.)

Mann also sued the magazine National Review, and Mark Steyn and Rand Simberg for allegedly defamatory statements on a blog and in that magazine. As with Dr. Ball, the intent of the lawsuits was apparently to simply drain resources, as NR spent a bundle to get released from the suit, and it took 12 years for the Steyn/Simberg matter to come to court. To my and everyone’s astonishment, after presenting virtually no prosecution at all in the face of pro se defense by Steyn, Mann was awarded $1 million in punitive damages. This even as he did not prove he suffered any damages at all! Watching that trial and reading the transcripts, I had the feeling we were in kangaroo court – it seemed unprofessional, illogical, and farcical. Steyn has appealed, but no doubt his appeal will die with him, as he is in poor health. The DC court system is notoriously slow.

Incredibly, Mann testified in the Mann v Steyn/Simberg case that he has never paid a penny in legal costs for his lawsuits, all done on his behalf by mysterious patrons.

Down to the personal level, Michael Mann seems quite an unpleasant fellow. He is legendary for outbursts against anyone who crosses him, including Steve McIntyre, Roger Pielke Jr., and Dr. Judith Curry. About Curry, Mann said that she had “slept her way to the top” at Penn State, even as Curry was already employed on faculty there, and was dating a long-divorced man. The Curry insult was contained in an email from Mann sent to a public server of a colleague of Mann’s at NASA, and was therefore public record. As with lies traveling the world while truth is tying its shoes, Curry was libeled and could not undo it … in the end she resigned and is now self-employed. Mann had destroyed her career.

If ever there was a case for a libel suit, that was it. But Dr. Curry bit her tongue and moved forward.

I think of the nursery rhyme attributed to English poet Tom Brown:

I do not like thee, Dr. Fell.
The reason why I cannot tell.
But this I know and know full well,
I do not like thee, Dr. Fell.

Make up your own rhyme, making sure the last three lines rhyme with “Mann.” And watch out, as you might get your proud ass sued by his sorry ass.

14 thoughts on “Impressions of Michael Mann

  1. The “science” is not driving this fake food fight, and is but a misdirection for the real action: saving capitalism (Ponsi scheme) once again, with synthetic ’emerging markets’ and piles of fiat money. These markets are simulations, with no source, copies of copies that generate fake “growth.”

    steve k

    Like

  2. The new economy demands everyone’s data, not just financials. Who will own YOUR data?

    This is not a game created by the masses for their benefit. This is made very clear by the fact that the sole funder of the Platform Cooperativism Consortium is Google – a $1 million grant in 2018. https://platform.coop/  

    Smile, we’ll all be ‘communists’ in the near future. Own nothing, and be happy.

    Like

  3. Yes, Michael Mann does seem like a very unpleasant fellow.

    Unlike with the virus hoax where the critics have simply shown that no virus has been proven to exist without any strong hypotheses for what causes us to get colds and flu, etc perhaps there is a valid hypothesis for what is causing the climate anomalies current attributed to CO2.

    I’ve just published an article, https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/does-geomagnetism-explain-climate that presents links to the work of geologist, Koen Vogel, which proposes geomagnetism is a better fit for climate anomalies than CO2. In summary of his critique of the IPCC Climate Change Attribution Review, Koen makes the case:

    — That the IPCC chose two models from nine presented undermines the CO2 case at the outset because if CO2 plays the role claimed we wouldn’t expect so many models to choose from in the first place and why go with two? Why isn’t one a standout?

    — The manipulation of the model chosen is against the scientific method, eg, how scaling is done.

    — Models cannot match the time-series trends: the 1909-1943 increase of 0.5 C in GMST, the post-WW2 decrease of 0.2 C, etc

    — Models do not match the geographical trends: the Arctic and North Atlantic are warming faster than other oceans, while GHG effects should be greater where radiated heat is highest, i.e. near the equator.

    Like

    1. It can be a wacky circus, and there is a lot of manipulation and lying behind it. Their most common tactic is the catastrophic prediction that never comes to be … Prince Charles in 2009 claiming we had 100 months before a tragic tipping point. Then 2017 comes and goes, and Charlie merely moves the goalpost. That is their standard operating policy.

      El Nino, La Nina are big factors, one heats, one cools. Polar vortexes have been incorporated into the narrative, caused by warming too, they claim. Hunga Tonga was a big deal, a volcano in January of 2022, putting the equivalent of 58,000 Olympic-size swimming pools of water in the stratosphere. Water vapor really is a greenhouse gas, and it had a lot to do with temperature spikes last year. The alarmists never mention those two words, Hunga Tonga. It takes maybe three years for that amount of water to come back to earth from the stratosphere, one layer above our troposphere. CO2 has very little effect, and outgoing long wave radiation generally counteracts any heating going on. That’s been known since 1979, I read, and Richard Linzden proved it in 2009. I rarely say “proved.”

      Mann was hired to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period. It’s that simple. His Hockey Stick paper, MLB98 is pure trash. I think they chose CO2 as their target because Fossil fuels are a source of wealth, health, and advancement of civilization. These people are true misanthropists. Bill Gates is first and foremost a eugenicist. Noam Chomsky wrote about him years ago that in 1995 he refused to attend meetings about the nascent Internet. He saw no point, no future there. He’s no genius.

      Like

      1. I have my doubts about the legitimacy of the court cases.

        I also think lessening pollution caused by burning stuff near me is is good.

        Global whatever is just a way to legitimise handing out money to get the new industry started for free. And cover up the damage actually done through pollution from the previous energy industry. Just look at any large cities air quality.

        All good moves, the hidden ones deserve some credit.

        Like

        1. We have made great strides in cleaning up pollution since the 1970s, miles to go before we sleep, of course.

          I discovered that satellite photos of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch are fake. What they did in what I saw was to superimpose a map of Australia on the Pacific. Check it out. In real life, there is no GPGP. There is ocean pollution, most of it caused by fishing boats who merely toss their used up lines and nets and gear overboard. We can do something about that.

          Like

      2. Never heard of Hunga Tonga. So many influences. This is the scam.that had me hooked the most … by a very long way.

        Like

      3. All very interesting, especially about volcanos. Aside from water vapor, how much CO2 did hunga Tonga, eg, release I wonder.. Whether it has a large effect or not, if it’s significant, it shows the irrelevancy of reducing manmade carbon emissions, if nature outdoes us anyway.

        Glad you are following the circus and its convoluted intricacies, and reporting on it.. I wish I had time and quick comprehension enough to sort through the whole mess, in books, interviews, etc. I mean without dropping all other interests, so this is helpful.

        Alex Rimmer, I suppose it’s possible there’s benevolent intent, at least some, and the propaganda could be only a necessary evil.. but it seems extremely optimistic and panglossian to assume that’s the case on pure speculation and very little evidence I can see.. rather, much evidence points to using it to implement greater levels of class warfare, technocratic control, and potentially very dark scenarios of eugenics, depopulation, etc.

        Like

  4. Mark, I spent nearly an entire afternoon a few weeks back looking through this Michael Manns publications. The best link is google scholar, here is his page below. Note he has over 500 publications in ~ 30 years which is pretty absurd number. Although not atypical for a “big shot” scientist (to be clear he is not really a scientist, but a leader of a dedicated research group geared towards making money off the system, grifting, along with a brood of young idealistic students, who if cynical and ruthless enough, can rise to obtain a highly prized tenured position at some university, and become a little Mann clone), it is a very large number. And I skimmed many of his articles.

    ‪Michael E. Mann‬ – ‪Google Scholar‬

    He’s a scumbag politician. Period, end of story. However, to qualify this statement, I will say many of his articles are straight politics, coming to his subject from a political view (i.e. WE (the public) must start collecting carbon taxes or we will all die!) He’s also continuously whining about being harassed and threatened. If you were really threatened and harassed, would you give your enemies ammunition that their attacks were working? Or why would you even care, if you were a real scientist, in possession of the truth, about what a bunch of poor bloggers might say. Clearly he’s a grievance/legal harassing machine par excellence.

    To wrap up today, take a look at his article in a recent journal frontiers of new science. In fact, i read most of the articles in a recent edition and determined they were all likely 100% fraudulent and based on previous fraudulent work. I believe “climate science” formed its own “discipline” to get away from the real physical chemists whom you would find in a traditional chemistry department, and who would tear this climate change complete nonsense to shreds.

    Note Mann calls carbon “pollution”. He pleads like some late night infomercial/charity con man who says if you only send $100 now, you can end climate change.

    Frontiers | Warming ends when carbon pollution stops (frontiersin.org)

    Like

    1. I understand your frustration. I share it. I am still on the road but will look into this matter after we return, which is today.

      Michael Mann has dropped the other shoe. Will write about it next week. Got a graduation going on this weekend.

      Like

    2. Extra, extra, read all about it! Did you know most future pathogenic communicable diseases will be the result of climate change, or intergalactic seeding by Andromeda strain like viruses? If you didn’t well then sir you should stay informed by reading Frontiers in Science!

      Like

Leave a reply to YouCanCallMeRay Cancel reply