A dissident voice speaks … somewhere else, of course

Vodpod videos no longer available.

I have very little insight on why we invaded Afghanistan, and await some inspiring insight from some foreign source down the road, long after the goals have been achieved. Meanwhile, in true post-Vietnam fashion, the details are being withheld from the American public, and we are shielded by close control of imagery. If we don’t see pictures, we do not comprehend the violence that we are raining down on those people. We do, of course, hear abut our own trials and travails and casualties. The bastards!

The debate is framed as “should we send more troops” or not. The real alternative, getting out, is not given hearing here in the land of the free.

The above interview aired in Great Britain.

Right wing Christians take credit for Jewish accomplishments

The following viral email has something unusual going on in it – it contains truth. It is about Jewish accomplishments in science, economics and literature – they are far disproportionate to their relative numbers in the human population. Of course, the base goal of the email is to degrade Muslims, and the origin is probably in the basement of some stupid right wing Christian.

I answered this email as follows:

Since this is one of those annoying viral emails, it doesn’t deserve a lot of attention. I will only tell you that you are on the precipice of important information. The Jewish culture has indeed produced scholars, artists and scientists far out of proporttion to their numbers. Some have traced the origins of this phenomenon back to the Ashkenazi Jews of northern and central Europe. But it is much more complicated than that, and further research would be warranted on your part.

Just a few observations:

One, Jewish accomplishments far exceed those of all gentiles, not just Muslims. I don’t know what the point is here.

Two, Jewish people, very, very intellectually accomplished, don’t believe in Jesus. Maybe you should rethink your position on that.

Third, and not unrelated, there are very few Jewish Cy Young Award winners. I can only think of one: Sandy Koufax. There are no Jewish linemen in the NFL.

And finally, there are about 13 million Jews in the world today, yet your Revelations tells us that only 144,000 will survive – 12,000 each from the twelve tribes. Your Jesus is going to slaughter all the rest.

What’s up with that?

Very interesting article here, by Charles Murray.

—————

Here’s the email making the rounds:

How could the picture be ‘painted’ any more vividly? The Global Islamic population is approximately 1,200,000,000ONE BILLION TWO HUNDRED MILLION or 20% of the world’s population. They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

Literature:
1988 – Najib Mahfooz

Peace:
1978 – Mohamed Anwar El-Sadat
1990 – Elias James Corey
1994 – Yaser Arafat:
1999 – Ahmed Zewai

Economics:
Physics:
Medicine:
1960 – Peter Brian Medawar
1998 – Ferid Mourad

TOTAL: 7 SEVEN

The Global Jewish population is approximately 14,000,000. Only FOURTEEN MILLION or about 0.02% of the world’s population.

They have received the following Nobel Prizes:

Literature:
1910 – Paul Heyse
1927 – Henri Bergson
1958 – Boris Pasternak
1966 – Shmuel Yosef Agno
1966 – Nelly Sachs
1976 – Saul Bellow
1978 – Isaac Bashevis Singer
1981 – Elias Canetti
1987 – Joseph Brodsky
1991 – Nadine Gordimer World

Peace:
1911 – Alfred Fried
1911 – Tobias Michael Carel Asser
1968 – Rene Cassin
1973 – Henry Kissinger
1978 – Menachem Begin
1986 – Elie Wiesel
1994 – Shimon Peres
1994 – Yitzhak Rabin

Physics:
1905 – Adolph Von Baeyer
1906 – Henri Moissan
1907 – Albert Abraham Michelson
1908 – Gabriel Lippmann
1910 – Otto Wallach
1915 – Richard Willstaetter
1918 – Fritz Haber
1921 – Albert Einstein
1922 – Niels Bohr
1925 – James Franck
1925 – Gustav Hertz
1943 – Gustav Stern
1943 – George Charles de Hevesy
1944 – Isidor Issac Rabi
1952 – Felix Bloch
1954 – Max Born
1958 – Igor Tamm
1959 – Emilio Segre
1960 – Donald A. Glaser
1961 – Robert Hofstadter
1961 – Melvin Calvin
196 2 – Lev Davidovich Landau
1962 – Max Ferdinand Perutz
1965 – Richard Phillips Feynman
1965 – Julian Schwinger
1969 – Murray Gell-Mann
1971 – Dennis Gabor
1972 – William Howard Stein
1973 – Brian David Josephson
1975 – Benjamin Mottleson
1976 – Burton Richter
1977 – Ilya Prigogine
1978 – Arno Allan Penzias
1978 – P eter L Kapitza
1979 – Stephen Weinberg
1979 – Sheldon Glashow
1979 – Herbert Charles Brown
1980 – Paul Berg
1980 – Walter Gilbert
1981 – Roald Hoffmann
1982 – Aaron Klug
1985 – Albert A. Hauptman
1985 – Jerome Karle
1986 – Dudley R. Herschbach
1988 – Robert Huber
1988 – Leon Lederman
1988 – Melvin Schwartz
1988 – Jack Steinberger
1989 – Sidney Altman
1990 – Jerome Friedman
1992 – Rudolph Marcus
1995 – Martin Perl
2000 – Alan J. Heeger

Economics:
1970 – Paul Anthony Samuelson
1971 – Simon Kuznets
1972 – Kenneth Joseph Arrow
1975 – Leonid Kantorovich
1976 – Milton Friedman
1978 – Herbert A. Simon
1980 – Lawrence Robert Klein
1985 – Franco Modigliani
1987 – Robert M. Solow
1990 – Harry Markowitz
1990 – Merton Miller
1992 – Gary Becker
1993 – Robert Fogel

Medicine:
1908 – Elie Metchnikoff
1908 – Paul Erlich
1914 – Robert Barany
1922 – Otto Meyerhof
1930 – Karl Landsteiner
1931 – Otto Warburg
1936 – Otto Loewi
1944 – Joseph Erlanger
1944 – Herb ert Spencer Gasser
1945 – Ernst Boris Chain
1946 – Hermann Joseph Muller
1950 – Tadeus Reichstein
1952 – Selman Abraham Waksman
1953 – Hans Krebs
1953 – Fritz Albert Lipmann
1958 – Joshua Lederberg
1959 – Arthur Kornberg
1964 – Konrad Bloch
1965 – Francois Jacob
1965 – Andre Lwoff
1967 – George Wald
1968 – Marshall W. Nirenberg
1969 – Salvador Luria
1970 – Julius Axelrod
1970 – Sir Bernard Katz
1972 – Gerald Maurice Edelman
1975 – Howard Martin Temin
1976 – Baruch S. Blumberg
1977 – Roselyn Sussman Yalow
1978 – Daniel Nathans
1980 – Baruj Benacerraf
1984 – Cesar Milstein
1985 – Michael Stuart Brown
1985 – Joseph L. Goldstein
1986 – Stanley Cohen [& Rita Levi-Montalcini]
1988 – Gertrude Elion
1989 – Harold Varmus
1991 – Erwin Neher
1991 – Bert Sakmann
1993 – Richard J. Roberts
1993 – Phillip Sharp
1994 – Alfred Gilman
1995 – Edward B. Lewis

Our choice of poisons

I micro-burst or sorts blew through here these past couple of days, in the post below entitled “A Fun Week“. Dave Budge and “Black Flag” had a discussion going on over at Electric City Weblog and it spilled over here. It reminded me of the closing scenes of Blazing Saddles, and Harvey Korman’s words to the cab driver: “Get me out of this movie“.

But it was interesting and I presume nothing. These are two men representing strains of the libertarian ideology, which is well-grounded and with which I am wholly at odds. I believe in human freedom, and that without government, we cannot be free. That, to the libertarian, if I may so presume, is contradictory, as government itself holds in its hands the chains by which we enslave ourselves.

So Dave and Black Flag fought it out, and were at the boundaries of polite restraint, and did not cross it. Here are some notable snippets from the post below – they are not at all linked -just things that made me go “Hmm” as I read through the exchange. Each one could lead to another micro-burst.

Wisdom is the understanding of one’s own ignorance. (DB, citing Socrates)

Man’s fatal flaw is imposing his assumptions on his fellow men. (Black Flag)

You fall into the trap of many libertarian ideologues that ideological purity holds primacy over politics. Fine, but what we have is politics to deal with. (Budge)

Absolutely – randomness does not defile consistency. Do you think a dice is consistent? Does it not provide an ‘answer’ with a range? Every time? Today as it did yesterday, and will tomorrow? (BF)

Yes, but you see Dave, I’m chatting with you, not them – because they’re dead, and hopefully, you’re not. BF

Ayn Rand said that there were no contradictions in nature, and that apparent contradictions could be resolved by changing underlying thought assumptions. I’ve been troubled by one of very large implications for many years now. It was called the “Kirkpatrick Doctrine” and was used as justification for U.S. support of right wing dictatorships. In essence, Ambassador Kirkpatrick said that oppressive left wing regimes like the Soviet Union could not be dislodged because they owned the minds of their subjects by means of indoctrination and thought control. Right wing totalitarian states merely acted to control behavior, and could easily be replaced by democratic societies.

My only problem is this: The leadership of the Soviet Union gave up power without bloodshed.

Life in Boulder, part dieux

This more or less recaps a conversation between my wife and I as we ate breakfast this morning while looking though a window at the Court House lawn in Boulder:

H: That must be a homeless guy over there. I wonder where he stays at night.

M: Is that a sleeping bag?

H: I wonder how these people can afford to be homeless in Boulder? It’s pretty expensive here.

M: Maybe they take the bus in from Louisville every day.

H: So they ride a bus here to panhandle during the day, and then go back to Louisville at night?

M: Lotta wealthy people here.

H: Yeah – I suppose they could make more money in Boulder.

M: Yeah. Lotta liberal guilt here.

A fun week …

It’s been quite an interesting week, what with arguing with Craig Moore about the Lancet study on Iraq deaths and all. Plus, as Steve points out below, Electric City Weblog has been great fun. A lot of it has to do with Budge being back on beam, but the subject matter and the wide range of personalities have a lot to do with it too.

That is what blogging is about, in my mind. We don’t inform, we are a small community, the world doesn’t care about us, but it is fun.

I did learn one thing, however, something as obvious as the nose on my face; something that, once I realized it, cleared a whole lot of smoke from the air around US foreign policy.

It is the definition of “terrorism”. Here’s what the Army Field Manual says:

the unlawful use–or threat–of force or violence against people or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives.”

Here is what it means in actual practice as the U.S. patrols the world:

Shooting back.

Adventures in private health care …

My mother was diagnosed with a form of skin cancer. Her doctor decided to treat it by applying Aldara cream over a period of time. 24 tubes of the cream cost $658.50.

Mom’s Medicare D provider, Humana, refused to cover the claim. I got a letter of medical necessity from Mom’s doctor, and then spoke to a Humana representative.

I was told that Humana only allows doctors to prescribe half the amount of cream that her doctor prescribed.

I suggested that they at least consider paying half the claim, the half they would have paid for had it been prescribed according to Hoyle.

I was told that since the claim was for the wrong quantity, the whole claim was rejected, and that was that.

Striaght to DVD

This is really interesting … if you’ve ever wondered how much authors make on books. Dan Brown probably pays for a pack of cigarettes with a million dollar bill, but not so much the others.

Lynn Viehl wrote a book called Twilight Fall. It made the New York Times best seller list (news to this snooty liberal). But she’s promised readers of her blog that she would show them the inside part of the book publishing business.

She did so, revenue statement and everything.

It is very interesting. She only made about thirty grand. I have a book deep inside me, wanting to get out. If my book were a movie script, it would be called “Straight to DVD”.

Inside me. That’s where the book will stay.

You’re welcome.

We sink lower still into banality

Carol at her very interesting Missoulapolis blog broaches a subject that intrigues me – tweeting. She references another blogger (making this a blog circle-jerk) who says that, oh my gosh, President Obama doesn’t write his own tweets.

I would be so disappointed if he did. I find nothing in our society more illustrative of our shallowness than the tweet culture. I once thought of them as haikus, a form of poetry. People were compressing large thoughts down to a few ethereally transmissible words. Since I am not capable of reading or writing poetry, or of compressing thoughts, I thought that the twitter culture was a good thing, or at least would lead to some useful literature.

Of course it’s not and hasn’t led to anything interesting or useful. It’s pop culture made even poppier and banal. There is only one further step downward – the elimination of language as a vehicle for complex thought, or Wordspeak.

BS

All of my blogging energy for a week got used up in one day today. Craig Moore wanted to have it out with me over the “Lancet 2” report from 2006, the one that said that 655,000 Iraqis had died in that war. Gregg set up a special thread over at Electric City Weblog, and I spent some time reading material referenced by Craig, and writing my own summary of the pros and cons of Lancet and the implications of the theater around it.

So I wrote it up, and tried to be thorough and fair, though I could not resist using the expression “Vichy Iraq” for the new government the U.S. installed.

Craig’s response was classic: “BS”. That was it.

Last anyone heard of him, Craig Moore was farming cattle around Ryegate, Montana. He never again entered a blog site.