Big tent = no substance

James Conner used an expression I have heard often before, “big tent,” which refers to the need to win elections over advancing any ideology. (He uses the opposite, “small tent” to criticize a fellow Democrat.) In theory, it means that politicians have to forge coalitions of people often at odds with one another, the real talent required in that profession, necessitating the art of the well-told lie.

In practice, it opens the floodgates for Republican leadership of both parties. It’s an odd thing to watch, but Democrats are absorbed in partisan sniping based on party name only. The policy pursued by Senator Conrad Burns was vile, the identical policy (with a new name) pursued by Senator Jon Tester is thoughtful, wise, well-considered and only opposed by “purists.”

In the “big tent” there is only one objective, winning elections. Those events are fraught with high emotion, as if life and death were at stake, when in reality either party is bound by financial backers and the corporate-owned media to pursue the same objective, exactly contrary to anything they might have campaigned about.

This system of fake elections goes back in time to the introduction of the mass franchise and use of mass propaganda in the early twentieth century. In theory, everyone’s vote mattered. In reality, voting ceased to matter.

About Mark Tokarski

Just a man who likes to read, argue, and occasionally be surprised.
This entry was posted in Politics for dummies and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Big tent = no substance

  1. 01stevekelly says:

    “Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that ‘my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.’”
    ― Isaac Asimov

    Like

  2. Lk says:

    Wanna know how to tell if your site is so far in the crapper that it’s time to flush? When you ban Greg Strandberg! As the cowpie site has done. Greg is probably the most inoffensive writer out there. I mean, seriously, who could have a problem with the guy? I enjoy what he has to say. Strange, very strange. I mean it’s the friggin’ comment section. How could a blog master feel threatened by comments? I think he committed the ultimate cowturd site sin. He picked on AbNorma! Some Dims really ARE to wussy to run the state.

    Mt.Temperance | September 4, 2015 3:03 AM at 3:03 AM | Reply

    So apparently you didn’t take my advice Greg? Bashing our site again? Then promoting your own site? Take a vacation and stay on your own site for a few months. You were warned

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s