The above video is 35 minutes. I happen to be painting a very large room and so have lots of idle brain space and time to listen to such things. I am bringing it here because I think it is very important.
Those who closely followed to alleged AIDS pandemic closely will know that there has never been a connection made in a scientific paper between HIV and AIDS. Nonetheless, the connection is asserted with certainty by supposed scientists. This makes sense, as since 1984, HIV has been the only avenue of research funded. Here’s Wikipedia on the subject:
“A small group of individuals continue to dispute the connection between HIV and AIDS, the existence of HIV itself, or the validity of HIV testing and treatment methods. These claims, known as AIDS denialism, have been examined and rejected by the scientific community. However, they have had a significant political impact, particularly in South Africa*, where the government’s official embrace of AIDS denialism (1999–2005) was responsible for its ineffective response to that country’s AIDS epidemic, and has been blamed for hundreds of thousands of avoidable deaths and HIV infections.”
There’s that word, “denialism,” straight from Propaganda 101, that in the face of honest disputation, one should assume a smug and arrogant posture. That is, frankly, what we are up against, massive scientific fraud supported by massive dollars and scientists either dishonest themselves or in the throes of groupthink. And who are also smug and arrogant. Has it always been this way? I suspect so.
I am told I must step aside, bow down in reverence to experts, but what if experts, like all people in our money-chase existence, lie? What if they are afraid to step out of line? What if they worry about losing their livelihood? What if they are just ordinary people of ordinary intellect in white coats, prone to making mistakes?
The decision to set one’s own brain aside and instead follow experts is really a decision to use someone else’s brain while your own is in hibernation. It also gives supposed experts the power to lie and be believed. Yet that is what our schools teach – how to not think.
If you, like me, suspect that there is no Covid-19 (I just received an article by one of our commenters on this subject, which will appear Sunday if all goes well), then there can be no proof of its existence in scientific papers.
The Kaufman video takes to task the four scientific papers that are said to have isolated the
Covid-19 2003 SARS virus, the predecessor to Covid 19. [My bad there, I was only 3/4 paying attention as I rolled the ceiling.] He finds two of them to be honest but inconclusive, and the other two fraudulent. He is well worth your time if you have time. Paint a room if you must. [Further note, on second listening and this time viewing, without a paint roller in my hand, I think Kaufman has gotten to the nut of the matter. Covid-19 was not a phenomenon, but rather a planned rollout. usual suspects.]
*AIDS is a syndrome wherein scores of opportunistic diseases take advantage of a weakened immune system. It is curable if not too far advanced by stopping its two primary causes: Malnutrition and self-abusive lifestyles. South Africa and much of the African continent have high rates of malnutrition. That, and not HIV, is the underlying problem. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation adds to these miseries by poisoning victims with anti-AIDS medications. This is, in my view, criminal behavior worthy of imprisonment, removing these dangerous people from public influence.