Some things I do not understand

Note: This post was published by accident. I had many more topics to cover. I will continue with this in “Some things I do not understand, Part II.

____________________________________

Face chops might be fatally flawed in that I am not in the room with the people I am studying. It could be, for instance, that Matt Damon has a head the size of a watermelon, while Tom Brady is more a cantaloupe.

Still, I get this:

It is not a perfect match in that the ears don’t align, but everything else does, and perfectly. The eyes and eyebrows, the noses, nose shape, mouth, lips, head shape and hairline. People are like snowflakes in that no two align, but these two do.

I’ve done this kind of work with Matt Damon as the principle face, and found similar results with Ben Affleck, George Clooney, Greg Kinnear, Heath Ledger, Paul Newman, Hugh Grant, Jimmy Kimmel, Rob Lowe and Chris Pratt.  Then I quit looking, years ago actually. You can see that this is an aging group and that these pictures have them in youthful prime.

Once more:

Not as perfect as I would like, but still notice in Pierce Brosnan and Charlie Sheen the hairline, widow’s peak, eyes, bulbous nose, almost aligned lips and chin, and tops of ears. Others who bear more than passing resemblance to Charlie Sheen are Justin Bateman, Michael J. Fox, Kit Harington (John Snow of Game of Thrones), Michael Landon, Patrick McGoohan, Steve McQueen, Al Pacino, and Christian Slater.

I have other groups of actors, and have named them all “Bokanovsky Brats” after the process described in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. In that process, as many as 96 identical eggs could be split from one egg, each of the eggs having a predetermined role to play in life, be they actors or postal workers. The thing that has always amazed me is that even as we are looking at virtually identical facial plates, these actors are very easily distinguished. There are also a few women involved … Jennifer Garner and Hilary Swank fit well in the Matt Damon grouping.

Now for a twist. I also have a Jack Nicholson group of Brats which includes Timothy Olyphant, Leonardo DiCaprio, Roger Moore, Rock Hudson and Brad Pitt. But check out the facial matches below:

They are (aside Jack) Jeffrey Dahmer, John Hinckley, Mark David Chapman, John Wayne Gacy, and Richard Rameriz (The Night Stalker). Once upon a time I would take famous serial killers (three of our five here – the other two are assassin wannabes) and check out their alleged victims in various search engines, matching birth dates with people with the same name who were still alive. I found quite a few still living, from which I gathered that they were paid to be victims of a fake killer. Then I would assume they are being paid to remain quiet, a lifetime of  monthly checks.

I would have done this for Ted Bundy’s victims, but he supposedly preyed on women during a time when women did not keep their names after marriage. I did some useful work, however, in this post.

In doing this, I noticed a resemblance between Dahmer and Nicholson. Could it be? This set me on a path to find the others.

Of course, using computer software they can now invent victims out of whole cloth, and have done so in most recent mass shootings. No real people were harmed in the making of those events. I first noticed this in the Pulse Nightclub shootings, supposed victims that resembled one another, with two “vicsims,” as Ab calls them, merely the same person with the photo flipped. That link is to a very long post I wrote on Pulse. I used to work much harder than now.

I just now stumbled on these photos below.

That is Miley Cyrus on the left, Justin Beiber on the right. They appear interchangeable. Have they ever been seen together?

That is as close as I can come to how they appear today. They are not just trading places. They have performed, been seen together.

What gives? I speculate that they are each one of 96 eggs from a Bokanovsky test tube. But it does no good to invoke a process not even proven to exist.

In the Cyrus photo here she appears to lack female curves, but that can be deceiving, just a manner of dress. He appears masculine and has grown facial hair, it appears. That too can deceive. He has an Adam’s apple. She does not.

Go figure this on your own.

 

24 thoughts on “Some things I do not understand

  1. I used to say that there’s only so many molds to go around, but it’s more likely that the computer programming that it takes to create people is at the apex. There are only so many changes that can be done.

    Do you really believe we are flesh and blood? hmmm…

    Like

  2. I always confused John Hinckley and Mark David Chapman for the same person. Nice to see a face matchup article, been waiting on a good one. Maybe you’ll get a 2nd wind and dazzle us. I’m still not seeing Dr. Phil is Freddy Mecury, or Bill Hicks is Alex Jones. If there are clones, then they wouldn’t need to fake deaths for reassignments.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I’ve just recently discovered the POM site, and greatly enjoy it. I’m fascinated by your face chop technique, and wonder if it’s possible to perform this on the same person? In other words, a chop based on a photo taken in the past of someone, and a more current photo.

    I ask because, maybe it’s just my imagination, but I’m starting to think that there may have been two George Carlins. He looks and sounds quite a but different in his later years, in ways that I don’t know can be accounted for by just the natural aging process.

    Like

    1. I have photos of myself 30 years apart. Interestingly I bear the same posture and smile in both, 30 years apart. The only discernible difference in me 30 years later is that I have better teeth and longer ear lobes.

      I have never thought about Carlin as two people, and don’t plan on it as I’ve so much other stuff to do. A guy last week asked me to compare Martin Sheen and Michael Douglas. At a glance, that has potential.

      Like

      1. George Carlin not so independent, antigov standupper?

        Laurel Canyon

        Main actors (children from military families, mind controlled and trained to become actors or pop stars in the music industry):

        Lenny Bruce

        (comedian, mentor of Richard Pryor and George Carlin,

        Navy, guest on Hugh Hefner’s Playboy Penthouse, married to stripper, had a daughter named Kitty=kitten programming?.

        He was a friend of Paul Krassner of Ken Kesey’s Merry Pranksters and Youth International Party with Abbie Hoffman, a student of Herbert Marcuse. Bruce died in his bathroom august 1966.

        His unreleased material was released by Frank Zappa and Phil Spector, he appeared on The Beatles Sgt Pepper’s cover with Crowley)

        Like

        1. Yes, an actor. We discussed this in 2016, with his Milwaukee 7 an obvious avant garde move to move the prudish public forward out of public virtue private vice. That there were two of him … that’s the rub atween you and me.

          Like

  4. Some of the celebrities here are on my transgender suspects list. It’s what makes these people so special, combining the poles. In the past, I also found these people charismatic, but when you’ve seen it once, the spell is broken. You finally see, why the action hero moves so special, the posture. Breeding celebs in tubes, as suggested here, means we’re dealing with completely scripted public figures. Roles planned decades ahead. A sex change could be done from an early age on. All time could be used on training, no school, no parents would intervene on anything. The outcome would be a completely owned person, which would never use public reach against TPTB. That’s the reason, why this never happens, besides the scandals, moral nagging, controlled opposition. Modern eunuchs, as in ancient times. There are also politicians, those ever young boyish charismatic “males” are hard to spot. No names from me.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. David Cameron’s wife Samantha.
      Definitely born male for me.
      A certain ex first lady, a black one, but looking at photos of previous US presidents’ wives the list is long enough.
      I’ll shut up now, don’t wanna get thrown out of the blog over this trivia 😊😊

      Like

  5. I don’t understand either, but one thing I know for sure is the power of make up.
    There’s loads of videos on youtube and articles with before and after make up photos on blogs and websites which are mindblowing.
    They show you the face of a person, male or female doesn’t even matter, usually a make up artist, without make up and after, and they look like anyone, and I mean anyone, from Brad Pitt to Angelina Jolie to Boris Johnson, it’s insane.
    So, as far as I’m concerned Marilyn Manson at least in recent years has been played by Nicholas Cage with tons of make up on; and it shouldn’t take long for Pierce Brosnan to become Charlie Sheen and viceversa…
    For me Joe Biden is someone with a rubber mask on, I always thought the same about Theresa May, the ex UK Prime Minister, who for me is a man posing as a woman.
    I could name a few but you get the idea.
    They can fake anything, so I don’t even know whether the Bokanovsky Brats really exist all as separate individuals or it’s just one or two of them with heavy make up and rubber masks or small pieces on to look different on ears, nose and stuff like that if someone like Mark wants to venture on photo analysis.
    Photos can be altered, and so can facial features.
    Nothing easier.

    Like

      1. We’re not twins but of course I wrote my comment yesterday basing also on your previous posts about the Matt Damon batch, including the one you linked. Needless to say, I enjoyed all of them and at this point I seriously think they switch from one role to another, they’re all actors and impersonators after all, using make up for them is natural like breathing.
        The rabbit hole is much deeper than we’ll ever know.

        Like

        1. You two may not be twins, but some of the celebrity doubles may well be.

          Is there a technique to create identical twins by separating cells soon after the zygote begins dividing? Can this be used to create any number of identical twins?

          I seems it would be easier than cloning, because nature does the same thing on occasion.

          Could some of these twins be “feminized” or “masculized” at the embryo stage to produce multiple copies of Justine and Miley?

          I wouldn’t put it beyond the bounds of possibility that it could be done and has been done.

          Like

          1. Well, it’d be interesting a tour inside Area 51, 52, 53, Dulce and so on…
            I bet you can find everything there but aliens and bullcrap like that.
            And by everything I mean all possible experiments. A friend of mine is convinced they’re even trying to make creatures half animal half human down there.
            Maybe we’re just watching too many sci-fi movies, it’s all fiction after all isn’t it?

            Like

  6. Or maybe face chops do not indicate anything, and most people, especially celebrities, have, or prefer, the same (golden) ratio? Have you considered that?

    Like

  7. This is hilarious . . I do the same thing . . I just did the creepy kid from American Beauty (1999) and JFK. I took a profile of each and matched them up, superposing one over the other, using the opacity lever to transition between them. I also used a blue dot to mark the tip of the chin, tip of the nose, inside corner of the eye, and where earlobe attaches. It’s almost exact.

    There’s also tibees (youtuber), katie couric, the prime minisiter of denmark, and scarlett johansson — all in one group.

    I’ve also found multiples of the following people . . joe namath, malcolm x, peewee herman, rudy giuliani, abraham lincoln

    I’ll post a link to my blog when I put it up.

    Like

  8. I look at white New Zealanders and can see a sign of close breeding/in=breeding going on. Not all, but a decent percentage.

    Like

Leave a comment