Steven Parent is said to have been a random victim of the Manson Family on the night of August 9th, 1969. He had no connection to anyone there, and had merely driven to the property said to be the scene of the nightmarish murders to visit William Garretson, a caretaker who lived in a cottage behind the Roman Polansky/Sharon Tate house where the murders were staged.
I think it is pretty well established in our circles here that there were no murders that night, that Sharon Tate was not pregnant, that the Manson family was put in show trial, and that Sharon Tate disappeared, reappearing as her newly created younger sister Patty. None of them ever spent a night in jail. That being the case, it is unlikely that Steven Parent was killed that night. But he did disappear.
Born in February of 1951, Parent would be 72 now if still alive. The guy on the left with the shit-eating grin (Tyronian wisdom here) is Richard Branson. He is described as a British “magnate”, controlling over 400 companies. He is most famously known for Virgin Records, founded in 1972. In 1971 he had opened a record shop in London which was run in violation of British import laws. He was, says Wikipedia, bailed out by his parents, paying a large fine and 33% of the sale price of imported records that were sold. Nice touch.
So what about parentage? Branson can be traced back to the 17th century, with many names from India during the time (supposedly ended) of British colonialism. Parent goes back a generation or so as far as I can tell. This needs more research, above my pay grade, as Parent is obviously juiced too, at the very least a plot device. That is his death photo to the right here, pretty obviously a crude fake.
So what’s the mystery here? They are a face chop match (including Parent and the death shot not shown). We can tag Parent as a fake death for sure, given that all the others were faked, but thereafter? Branson’s record-business career ramps up in 1972, three years after the Parent fake death. I am not an ancestry student, as the field seems loaded with pitfalls and false bio’s, fake deaths, and the word “Private” strewn about.” This is all I got here, and please check the name of this post.
It does not end there, however. This Parent kid gets around.
In case you don’t recognize the supposedly long-dead pop star, that is a young John Denver on the left. The photo is grainy because it was lifted from the photo to the left here, said to be Denver’s birth family, that of Lt. Col Henry John Deutschendorf. He was inserted in the family photo in a darkroom. See for yourself how he is lit and textured differently than his supposed family.
What I suspect here is another Bokanovsky Brat Batch, with at least two different people (Parent and Denver) who look very much alike, with Parent possibly becoming Branson. I cannot be sure about that, of course. It is possible that Parent stepped into Branson’s shoes. But the existence of the Denver lookalike messes simple explanations up good. That’s all I got. Check out the name of this post.
________________
This just in: I started watching the hit TV show Veep last night, with Julia Louis-Dreyfus playing the part of Vice President Selena Myer. It is crisp and fast-paced, and Louis-Dreyfus plays her part very well. I enjoyed what I saw.
In season one, episode three, the first three minutes, they are discussing a supposed feud between Meyer and the first lady of the US. Meyer is saying that some diva-like photos of her that were going to be used for promotion had to be done away with. That is where we pick up.
VP Meyer: “It means we’re going to have to lose those huge photos of me. We’re going to have to un-diva. I mean, they’re great photos, but we have to lose them. I know it’s a good idea but they make me look like …”
Chief of Staff Amy Brookheimer: … Stalin
Dan Egan: “I was going to say Eva Peron”.
VP Meyer: “Yeah. I prefer that comparison, without the mustache …and you know, she was kind of sheik.”
Dan Egan: “Gorgeous. Looks like Madonna”.
Selina looks to her right, smiles knowingly.
In body language, a knowing look the right indicates truth-telling, and to the left lying. These are insiders playing a game with us, subtly telling us that the lightly-talented pop star Madonna is the daughter of Eva Peron, who faked her death in 1952 at age 33 (32 says her crypt in Buenos Aires, but 33 is correct). She moved to Michigan, became Madonna Fortin, and gave birth to several children, one of whom was pop-star Madonna.
This episode aired in 2012, and my series on the Eva Peron hoax was published in 2018. This Veep stuff was inside Hollywood business that I merely stumbled on. Madonna’s lineage is well known in inside circles, it seems.
By the way, “Julia Louis-Dreyfus” – can a name be any more peerage? “Louis” (pronounced Looeee) would refer to the kings of France, the XII, XIV and XV’s for sure, and the name Dreyfus to a well connected Jewish family that spoofed a political crisis in the late 1900s, the so-called Dreyfus affair. She’s completely juiced, her fame and selected roles no accident. As a comedic talent she is gifted, and might well have risen to mid-level fame without the juice.
___________
I do not pay enough attention to popular media and entertainment, otherwise the name Scott Bakula would not be new to me. The name Jeffrey Epstein we all know, though not to0 many of us (none outside of this blog and MM’s writings) would know that Epstein’s island was fake, that there was no pedophilia, and that his death was fake as well. Take a look now at these face chops:
I am not sure what I was doing there, as introduction of face chops with three subjects is confusing. Here is another:
Those are of Epstein, Bakula, and Ben Stiller. I’d like a little more precision, which is perhaps why I did not pursue this matter further. I opened a picture file called “Brats: Ben Stiller Group” but never went beyond this.
Stiller is the child of the comedy team of Ann Meara and Jerry Stiller, who also played Frank Costanza on the Seinfeld series. She was supposedly Irish Catholic, he Jewish. However, when I searched for her father, Edward Joseph Meara, at Findagrave, I got the following:
Now, that makes no sense. I looked up the surname Gartner, and found that it means gardener, and that the name was “primarily used by Germans, Slovenians, and Ashkenazi Jews.” So there is a good chance that the Catholic/Jewish union of Stiller and Meara was really Jewish/Jewish. That makes Ben Stiller another Hollywood Jew.
I want to be clear, I like Jews, love their traditions and humor, and know that for decades before now they had to exist out of the mainstream and tend to their own interests, staying out of politics and other pursuits due to prejudice. So the story goes. William Gaines, one of the founders of Mad Magazine, was a comic book artist who could not land a mainstream job at DC Comics or anywhere due to being Jewish, which is why he chose to found the magazine. So I am told. Since his father worked for DC Comics, that story I heard is obviously false, and once again, check out the name of this post.
Piece of Mindful 
Richard Branson comes across as a celebrity CEO. They stick one person in front for the media, but it’s financial institutions and even miltary groups involved within the business pyramid structure. Even at my corp, many military people, but they put the focus on the old man CEO or public relations department people to handle the media statements. Hard to believe one person that began as a failed record store could have formed and headed all those intense high cost Virgin corporations. Younger photos of Branson out there, still looking similar to Parent.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love the face splitting posts Mark. It really gets the wheels turning. I’m not sold on the test tube theory but hey, it’s a possibility. Lots of spooky things going on with celebrities. We have a few things going on it seems.
1. Celebrities played by different people. (Tom Brady, Eminem, McCartney, etc)
2. Test tube Celebrities that seemed to have been cloned or split from the same embryo. One of your past posts included women as well.
3. Blue blood celebrities from nobility families.
#1 would likely be a result of military intelligence doing the age old tactic of using doppelgängers for political or other purposes.
#2 would be the modern day eunuchs that do everything they’re told. Slaves to the top families that never had their own lives.
#3 would be the extremely wealthy wanting their children in the spotlight. I would assume if a noble celebrity doesn’t want to be famous anymore they would pull a doppelgänger from #1 to take over keeping the project alive.
This is all hypothetical but fascinating to think of the possibilities.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“…for decades before now, [Jews] had to exist out of the mainstream and tend to their own interests, staying out of politics and other pursuits due to prejudice.”
If the prejudice that they relentlessly bludgeon us with is actually true, and not just yet another of the socios’ flipped-victimhood psy-op, then the crucial question is: Why the prejudice??!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like it when people ask the right question.,
LikeLike
Thanks. And if you see anything from me in spam, kindly rescue it?
LikeLike
There’s never been any prejudice.
It’s a made up story, like the ” God’s chosen people” one that everyone believes of course. Well, not exactly everyone but still.
And they’ve never stayed out of politics as Mark believes, they’ve been controlling the world in every possible aspect for thousands of years.
LikeLike
Or didn’t disappear but just wasn’t covered in the media. Lead a (relatively) normal private life.
LikeLike
Not disappeared exactly but just wasn’t covered in the media and lead a relatively normal, private life.
LikeLike
While MM may reveal much about how the Controllers operate, in my opinion, he is also controlled by them. His continual claims that they do not participate in paedophilia, occultism, killing and torture are, I believe, untrue and designed to whitewash a particularly violent and dark reality. If he was for real his website would have been taken down years ago. This is also, I believe, the case with Mike Williams. Although, I believe that Williams is misguided but honest in his belief re the PID culture. However, in my opinion, he is being used to promote a p.o.v. which the Controllers want us to follow for reasons known only to them. To be honest, I have yet to find a site or a YouTube channel which does promote the truth without finding that they also promote issues which are encouraged by the mainstream and are therefore false. It leaves me puzzling over what’s really going on and without a belief in anything we are told as being truly based on facts and reality. Everything is fake! Everything is tilted towards an agenda to which we have no inkling but which will, eventually, lead to our total enslavement to a corrupt and evil system designed to keep us that way. But perhaps I’m also fake?
LikeLike
Jon Derreaux: I feel the same way. I think I’m learning SO much from the writings of whomever MM is/are, but at the same time I feel like I’m perhaps being manipulated. By extremely subtle, advanced, high-level manipulation.
Yes, why wasn’t he taken down years ago? Yes, why does he seem to whitewash those dark possibilities?
Also, notice that he has no problem at all with so-called…”gays”? And that he has even taken it upon himself to out probably hundreds of contemporary and historical figures as definitely or probably being…”gay”??! I know that, for reasons that perplex, escape, and frustrate me, even the supposedly-enlightened, supposedly-awake, supposedly-brilliant minds who write and post here don’t care one iota about the actual scientific and psychological reality that “gay” is not actually a thing, and that it’s certainly not a born-that-way phenomenon, but rather just yet another dangerous and destructive psy-op that has been used to manipulate us all.
But whatever. You try to explain to people here the “gay” psy-op and you get usually nothing but crickets, or just half-assed b.s. No discussion! I guess discussion boards where openness is encouraged is not the place for open discussion.
So, MM pushes and excuses…”gay”. Huge red flag.
LikeLike
I would like to hear more about the gay psyop as I think you are on to something but have not seen (or missed) where you have fleshed it out, for lack of a better phrase.
LikeLike
Same here. Would like to hear about it. Sounds like an interesting theory
LikeLike
Gays and Jews. Both psyops used with grand effect to divide, deceive and distract. Phoenicians? Same thing. They are all just human beings same as we are but with the desire to perform evil for their own purpose instead of to do good for all. However, I don’t believe that, however well organised and focused they may appear, they do not have the intelligence to have designed and managed the program which they have implemented over the centuries. This, in my opinion, comes from another intelligent species which predates ours. This ancient species has, for some unknown reasons, been forced to hide perhaps in the bowels of the Earth, but now wants their planet back. Thus the need to eliminate us, return the climate back to what it once was, which suits this ancient lifeform, so that they may take back this planet for their exclusive use but with a group of humans left to serve their needs. And those elite humans will have their small population as slaves to serve them so they may in turn serve their non-human masters. So, not much will change really. There’ll just be fewer of us. More of them. And a climate in which those humans left will suffer in the most awful ways. But that’s my theory. Will I live to see? I am becoming more certain that maybe I will. Even though I was born a “Boomer”.
LikeLike
I don’t think ” gayness” is a problem these days. They’ve almost normalised it. Soon it will be compulsory. The one remaining area which IS blackmailable MM rarely talks about. Strange that!
LikeLike
Jon: My reply to you must have gone to “spam”. If so, hopefully it will be retrieved.
When I write nothing of much import, it posts in milliseconds. When I write something quite important, it usually disappears. Funny how that works.
LikeLike
A.D.:
Like a few up there, I have also requested your “actual scientific and psychological” substantiation for NOT-“gay” – with which I inherently concur.
Also, about the disappearing posts… have you considered that WordPress et al is hard at work behind-the-scenes blocking posts as dictated by its filtering program from the overlords?
LikeLike
Agree with you about MM. Total fake. I once had a verbal run in with him via Cutting thro the Fog comments. I’d actually had the temerity to disagree with something he’d written about women and being one myself thought I’d put him right. Oh the abuse I received from him and his fanbase. I was told by the man himself that ” he’d never go out with a woman like me!!” Oh the devastation ( joking ) I always knew anyway his preference was in a different area and I don’t mean gayland . He wrote how he had to fight the High Schoolgirls off because he looked so young . Spare me! I even think ” Maria” and ” Rolly” are his alter egos …………….they are his most ardent supporters. And he certainly doesn’t like you MT . Now why would that be?
LikeLike
What exactly was the disagreement over?
LikeLike
It’s been a while ago but basically he was saying that women in general were dressing inappropriately for their body shape and it disgusted him . ( fat women in tight leggings etc ) My response was merely to point out that whatever one thinks of the way a woman dresses it’s up to that individual what she wears. The fact that MM thinks they don’t look good is HIS problem , not theirs. Do we have to run it by him now before we decide what to wear ? My main issue with him was his disproportionate response . Almost a rant ending with, ” I wouldn’t go out with a woman like you.” As though THAT justified his argument. Am I supposed to be devastated that MM wouldn’t take me to the cinema/ restaurant and immediately fall in line with his fashion advice to get his approval ? ( I believe white lacy collars were one of his recommendations but I could be wrong on that ) ? Really for such a clever ( allegedly ) man it was a childish narcissistic response. And he is both . Worse still was the deluge of criticism from his loyal sycophantic fan base. They really are brainwashed.
LikeLike
Of course every individual dude or dudette has the right to make their own choices, but others have a right to make cultural critique and commentary about the general lack of taste, as a sign of the times… If they were ranting or making it personal, I can’t support that, although it happens.. you know, on the internet and whatnot..
LikeLike
“If he was for real his website would have been taken down years ago”.
That’s it. It’s all in this one sentence.
Same goes for Assange and his Wikileaks, never taken down.
It’s all fake indeed and I feel exactly like you when I navigate through channels on youtube or Telegram accounts (even worse).
Cases are two here:
Either they let you be a “rebel” because almost nobody knows you and you do not represent a threat, or they use you as “controlled opposition” as you say, to keep up people’s delusion of a “way out” of the system (see David Icke).
We’re doomed I’m afraid, no way out of here. Not alive at least.
Oh, and I totally agree with A.D on the gay subject, I’d add the whole gender/transgender stuff. Total psy-op to destroy society. I’ve been around gay people for as long as I can remember and I’d have stories to tell, tons of them. One is that almost all self proclaimed “gay” slept with girls also -by their own admission- and one gay in particular I used to hang around with never liked anal intercourse, neither active nor passive (sorry for being a bit raw). Also, all this pronouns and deadnames shit didn’t exist back then. And gay people I know do not accept trans people within their lgbt groups.
So yeah, there would be a lot to talk about.
LikeLike
Regarding Assange, something about his arrest footage ain’t right. I think it might be that two arresting officers are parted just enough at shoulder height so that we can see Assange’s face. It looks staged.
LikeLike
Mark, I discussed this at the time and proved the Assange arrest footage was fake. See my comment on this article (under the name Christopher Biggins):
I believe I got one point wrong – I said two of the guys disappeared from the footage when they actually didn’t. Mea culpa. I stand by everything else. Best guess is the guards are carrying a green dummy, then they comped some ridiculous footage of Assange ranting and raving into a camera onto it. The edges are a giveaway, as is Assange’s whole behaviour. “Okay, on ‘action’ – I want you to rant and rave and resist arrest.” The cameraman is across the road even though there’s nothing stopping him from being on the same side of the street, but they had to miss the part where they forced Assange into the van, because that would be too hard to film. The 2 second delay before the cameraman suddenly wakes up and picks up the camera is probably some timing issue. Completely and obviously fake.
LikeLike
I never thought about a green screen dummy. I can see that as a possibility. We agree that Assange was a fake. He is not in jail, was never in the Ecuadorian embassy save for photo ops.
LikeLike
The vast majority of people, besides never hearing of him, also can’t “see” or “hear” what he’s saying, so the fact he’s allowed to continue doesn’t really prove to me that he’s fake… I don’t know for sure either way, but I’d need more than that.
LikeLike
Timr, I think Anna makes a good point in that direct contact with him is fine until you question one of his comments. I had a good email relationship until one day I received a very sympathetic email on a point I had raised with him. It was quite different in tone and writing style to previous emails. Then another email came along which was different again in style. All in all, I believe I had replies from 3 different individuals all under the name of MM. On further questioning, I received a vicious reply from the real MM which was very harsh in criticising me of attacking him personally and accusing me of all sorts of silly stuff. He informed me that I was permanently banned from his list and would receive no further communication from him. His anger when he believes you are criticising him or questioning his opinions knows no bounds. This reaction seems to be the standard reaction of a limited hangout on being sprung. His writings are, in my opinion, the product of a specialised writing team based in the UK. Because of the time difference between my location and the responses I received, they had to have come out of Britain not the US. But the guy we see and claims to be the genius who produces the prolific output of papers is a front only. That’s my opinion based on internet research anyone can do.
LikeLike
No soup for you, huh.. well that’s interesting. I have seen the vicious attack often from limited hangouts, it seems to be part of their training. Especially in front of a group, where they need to nip things in the bud and discourage the others. It is all a bit circumstantial though, as is the nature of these kinds of determinations. I am one who tends to just reserve judgement on things I don’t know definitively, but you may well be right.
LikeLike
Matt Mckinley Quantum Of Conscience YT http://WWW.Freevoice.io
LikeLike
Too much inside baseball in this video, just more misdirection.
LikeLike