The shooters in the images to the left are, we are told, the Kouachi Brothers. How do we know that? They are masked, after all. They could be anyone from CIA to Mossad to MI6 to the Tsarnaev … Hey! The news says those are the Kouachi Brothers! That’s all you need to know. Shut off your mind. Get those swirlies going in those eyes. Believe, dammit. Believe.

Here’s a news item from Le Monde, which ought to seal the case.

PARIS (AFP) – Investigators disclosed today that Bernard Maris, chief editor of Charlie Hebdo, was mortally wounded by Warren Commission Exhibit 399, otherwise known as the “magic bullet.” Officials at the National Archives in Washington, DC, confirmed on Thursday that the bullet, long encased in a thick plastic display, had escaped the week prior and was known to be on the loose, doing its thing again. Its whereabouts are currently unknown. Citizens world-wide are advised to be on the lookout for a pristine bullet that stops in midair, makes sharp turns, and shows no wear despite having caused unimaginable human suffering.

In other news, from trusted source New York Times…

PARIS – Investigators, who thought they had found Said Kouachi’s ID in a getaway vehicle backtracked, saying that to their own amazement the ID was actually that of 9/11 hijacker Satam Al Suqami (whose ID was also found in the rubble of seven buildings in New York in 2001 even as no plane parts manage to survive the cataclysm). How it made its way to the scene of the Paris shootings is a mystery. “But,” said a police investigator, “we have found with events of this nature that strange things happen and that we are wise just to keep quiet and believe what we see. Otherwise, we might get 399’d.”

I love to make fun of the ordinary Joe, the doe-eyed casual news observer who sees events like this and unquestioningly accepts all the evidence as real. But I have been that doe-eyed person. I have taken events on the news at face, only later being set straight by those of more skeptical bent. So after years of observation, getting better as time goes on, it is easy to see the holes in Charlie Hebdo and be highly suspicious that this is yet another false flag.

That, of course, does not solve the crime. As anyone who as plunged the depths of these events knows, the underworld of intelligence operations is littered with false clues, false leads, and real domestic white Christian criminal masterminds. It is important, then, to try to keep eyes on the prize. To what end? It was easy to see with 9/11 that the object was a clash of civilizations, and attacks on a string of Middle East countries that happened to be Muslim. Charlie Hebdo appears to be designed to advance that narrative.

I do not know, of course. I do live in a parallel universe to the typical observer of events, seeing through most lies, probably only fooled on a higher level. After all, the “clues” left behind in events like 9/11, Boston, Hebdo are so stinking obvious that it is almost as if we are being taunted. “Look,” they are saying. “Look at the ease with which we fool John Q. Citizen. What are you gonna do about us?”

Here’s a guy who can string together clues over decades, making a case that many major events in our recent past are contrived for higher purposes.

“There have been four incapacitating political crisis in Washington since World War II: McCarthyism, Dallas, Watergate and Contragate. Students have been struck by the deep continuities between them: continuities of personnel, transnationality, and outcome. … By their decadic regularity, they deserve to be regarded as period readjustments of the open political system in which we live. At the center of all four crisis have been perceived threats to the prosecution of the Cold War. … I am not suggesting that the four crises were part of some single conspiracy, only that we should recognize that in all cases the outcome was roughly the same: a prolongation of a system committed to the Cold War. … In all four crises, one sees the recurrence of CIA and other intelligence officials and assets, repeatedly those with more militant anti-Communist stances than the Presidents they have worked under. Another common denominator for such individuals has been the exposure to narcotic trafficking, from the China Lobby of the 1950s to the Contra support networks of the 1980s’.

In the case of Dallas, Watergate, and Contragate, a common denominator at a lower level has been former CIA Cubans working with [Johnny] Roselli and [John] Martino at the JM/WAVE CIA station in Miami. I suspect this continuity is more of a symptom of deeper relationships than a major causal factor in itself, but the symptoms are over and hardly marginal. (Peter Dale Scott, Deep Politics and the Death of JFK)

Since the end of the Cold War all of the happenstance events of terror involve a clash of cultures of a different type. Once it was Commies under every bed, now it is terrorists. Every event from 1990 forward has invoked Islamic archetypes. In the next theater, after the Middle East is subdued, I suppose our nightmares will be occupied by Chinese, or Russians, or who knows … but the obvious point is that within our own societies there exists an evil force that is managing our in-house movie, making sure we hate and fear the correct enemies so that the state is not impeded in its ongoing wars of aggression.

Images of Abu Ghraib torture were kept off American media, as our president did not want to upset our sensitivities. Recently images of beheadings by supposed ISIS members (more likely covert Western agents, says parallel universe guy) have made their way directly to our screens unimpeded by any thoughts of our sensitivities.

C’mon, people. Think about it. Who is managing your internal movie screen?

Throughout history one person has been at the center of the most important events … the patsy. The events in France clearly indicate that Said and Charif Kouachi were patsies. My prime evidence in this matter is this: They are now dead. There will be no trial. That’s key in false flag operations. There can be no inquiry after the fact.

Here’s an interesting sequence of events, back in 1963 (the use of patsies goes way back in history, to Guy Fawkes and before). It’s one of those things that we simply accept at face value until we realize that it had to be planned. Lee Oswald was given a ride to work on the day Kennedy was murdered by a co-worker, Buell Frazier, who later testified that Oswald was carrying a package that the Warren Commission would say contained his gun.

But stop and think. If Oswald was being sheepdipped in the months prior to the assassination, he had to be monitored. He had to be kept available, out of jail, in the area. And indeed Oswald had a collection of ‘friends” – people of high station who we now know were CIA agents, Michael and Ruth Paine, and the white Russian immigrant George de Mohrenschildt. Such people are assigned the task of “babysitting” the patsy.

But what about Frazier? His job, it would appear, was critical, and not to be left to any ordinary Joe. He was assigned the task of making sure that Oswald went to work that day. What if Kennedy was murdered, and the patsy had called in sick?

Was Frazier part of the plot? Most likely he was hired and paid to do a job, and then later understood his role, and knew he’d be wise to shut up. After all, he is still alive. That’s a tell.

Patsies are housed and stabled and kept available for events as needed. When we hear that the Kouachi’s were on a “terrorist watch” list, I quickly understood the real meaning of that phrase. They were being watched by the real terrorists, and made ready when needed to take the fall for a crime.

So too, as the discerning eye looks at 9/11, for instance, we see the supposed hijackers kept on the loose, and reports on the suspicious activates mysteriously bottled up at lower levels of our law enforcement bureaucracy. The patsies were being babysat, moles inside the agencies were protecting them. They had to kelp kept free and available to take the fall on 9/11.

I assume they are all dead for real now, but imagine the horror that Mohammad Atta experienced when he saw what the photoshoppers at CIA had done with his photograph – they made him into a monster! They widened his head, lowered his ears (look at how they are almost down on his neck!), gave him a brand new mouth and chin, and made his eyes into sinister torches. Why, it’s the stuff nightmares are made of!

False flaggery, and this attack in France has all the earmarks of that, can only work if the ground is fertile. It plays into hatred. People love to hate selected groups, and Muslims right now are that group. The murders in France, now pinned on Muslim terrorists, feed hatred. People are loving it, eating it up. It feels so very good to be so morally superior. Now we get to go on a killing spree of our own. Hatred fuels more hatred, murder fuels massacres.

Americans, lock and load! More massacres are about to be committed in your name. Stand up, be counted. Be part of it.
_____________
PS: By the way, you have to develop an eye for this sort of thing, but if you focus on the “Atta” photo above and on the right, you’ll easily see that under the nose is someone else’s mouth and chin, a total paste up, with the real Atta’s eyes and lowered ears, widened face. The lines where two photos are blended are obvious. Look closely, you’ll see two people in one photo. I can’t believe they get away with this stuff, but hell, it was on TV news. It’s true.

Afghanistan is often referred to as the “Heartland” in world history, the center of the “Great Game,” a colossal struggle between the British and Russian empires up until World War I. A mere glance at the map easily shows its importance, as a trade route with borders on or near China, Pakistan, India, the old Soviet republics (the ‘stans’), and leading to the Indian Ocean south and north to Russia herself. By 1979 The Soviet Union dominated the region. US power had been in decline for decades. So the decision by US planners (while Jimmy Carter happened to be president) to lure the Soviets into an Afghan trap is perhaps a pivot point in the survival of the US military empire, the only thing that has allowed survival of the US as an economic power.

So pity the poor schmucks who happen to live there. Making a living in arid soil is difficult, but tribes had perfected techniques over the eons, moving cattle and sheep from low to high pasture, and growing trees that tapped and preserved deep moisture in the soils. The US/Soviet proxy war of the 1980’s destroyed that economy. After the US succeeded, much to the delight of Zbigniew Brzezinski, both countries abandoned the region, leaving it to flail in the wind. (Zbig, easily diagnosed as a classic sociopath, delights in destruction but is short on know-how about regional development and human resources.) Without regard to anything else, the decision in 1979 to lure the Soviets into the trap devastated a fragile economy, and the lone surviving cash crop that Afghans could use for survival became opium.

In the wake of that war, both Afghanistan and Pakistan were essentially narco-states, with Afghanistan having none of the formal structure of government to gain formal recognition as a state in the world system. Its devastated economy left it as nothing more than a battleground for various drug and war lords. It was into that failed system that Pakistani intelligence, known as ISI (fostered and deeply infiltrated by the CIA), promoted the Taliban. While demonized in the US propaganda system, the Taliban were nothing more than the survivors and inheritors of a tragedy. However, to gain acceptance on the world stage, the regime cracked down on opium production, so that by 2001 the harvests had dwindled to nearly scratch.

The US had long wished for military dominance of the region, wanting to put bases on the southern perimeter of the new Russian Federations in the ‘stans. The false flag attack by the US on itself on 9/11 was used as justification for a bombing attack on Afghanistan, centered around Kabul. (Prior to 9/11, the Taliban had been warned that their territory was needed for a gas pipeline from the Caspian Basin, and were told that they would be given either a carpet of gold or be buried under a carpet of bombs.) The Taliban, which had lost most of its internal support due to its repressive policy on opium production, easily collapsed, and Afghanistan was again a battleground among competing factions for geopolitical maneuvering.

2013, the twelfth year after the US bombing attack and occupation of Afghanistan, saw the country produce a record crop of opium, historically significant. Observers wonder about this remarkable resurgence in production despite the presence of US troops. I don’t wonder about that at all. In the post-war era, drugs and the CIA and the US military have gone hand-in-hand around the world, from the Golden Triangle of Thailand, Laos and Burma, to the fields of Colombia and Mexico, to Afghanistan. Wherever there is US presence, there is a surge in drug production and trafficking.

The cash flow from opium and coca fields is an important component in many wars and armed insurgencies. The CIA usually allies itself with the cartels that produce the drugs as a matter of necessity, something that ought to be cause for wonder (why are we always allied with the bad guys?). But CIA itself is not in the drug business. It is simply that arm of capitalism that fosters war and overthrow of governments that Wall Street and London do not like. Alliance with the drug business is a necessity to achieve their end. As we saw with the Taliban, even as that regime was working diligently to end opium production in Afghanistan, CIA was working to undo the Taliban. Drugs were not an issue.

So what have we learned?

• The great powers do not care about regional people or economies.
• The great powers do not care about drugs or the devastation of lives and economies they render.
• While we know where the opium and coca fields are, the path of the crops to the labs to convert them to heroin and cocaine are shrouded in mystery.
• The money that derives from those labs are an even greater mystery. I would bet that no one on Wall Street or in London has a clue where it goes.*

Let’s be frank. A large part of the problem with opium and coca is prohibition, which increases the value of the crops and spawns criminal networks. Eradication of fields in one place merely moves them to another. Even as the US wages a two-faced battle on drugs (one to eradicate, one to foster their growth), the drug business is built on demand. The only viable option for curtailment of growth, distribution and cash flow is by lessening demand, i.e. … treatment. The problem will never go away, and a certain percentage of the population will always be drawn to addiction. We can only minimize that.

What we probably should not do is to support drug dealers, war lords, cartels, banks, and narco-states like Pakistan and Colombia to advance capitalism. That’s actually kind of cynical, ya know?
____________________
*This is sarcasm. I always forget to tell people when I do that, leading to confusion.

Bernie Goldberg used his position as a sports analyst on Bryant Gumbel’s Real Sports last week to announce that the Russians had shot down Malaysian Flight MH17 on July 17, 2014. Goldberg had no evidence to support his view. Why he felt the need to interject it into a panel discussions on sports injuries is unknown, but prior to doing so, you can see his eyes darting to off-screen sources – he seems nervous. His use of that platform to advance the theory that the Russians did it was rude, calculated, and dishonest. It begins at 5:20 in the video that follows:

_____________________
On August 8th, Ukraine, The Netherlands, Belgium and Australia signed an agreement allowing the disclosure of information regarding the investigation of July 17 the crash of MH17 only at the consent of all parties involved. In other words, built into that investigation is a conflict of interest, for it turns out that the Kiev government was responsible for the shoot down, as evidence that follows demonstrates to be highly possible, then that government, which Vladimir Putin refers to as a “putsch,” has the power to quash the release of the information.

The following are the conclusions of a group of experts from the Russian Union of Engineers that was gathered to analyze the loss of Malaysian Airlines Flight MH17 on July 17, 2014.

The expert group included retired AA officers, who had combat experience with surface-to-air missile systems, as well as pilots experienced in using air-to-air weapons. The problem was also discussed at the meeting of the Academy of Geopolitical Affairs, where many different versions were tested and discussed once again. In the course of the analysis, the experts used materials received from open sources published in mass media. The situation was also analyzed with the help of the Su-25 aircraft flight simulator.

The conclusions are detailed by Ivan A. Andrievskii, First Vice-President of the All-Russian Public Organization Russian Union of Engineers, Chairman of the Board of Engineering Company “2К”. See the entire report at Voltaire Network.

Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 was conducting the flight Amsterdam-Kuala-Lumpur, on 17.07.2014, according to the tunnel set by the air traffic controllers. It is most probable that manual steering was offline and the airplane was flying in autopilot mode, performing horizontal flight following the route which was laid out on the ground and adjusted by Ukrainian air traffic controllers.

At 17.17–17.20 the Boeing 777 was in Ukrainian airspace, in Donetsk area, at the altitude of 10100m. An unidentified fighter aircraft (presumably Su-25 or MiG-29), which was previously at a lower echelon, on a head-on course in a layer of clouds, ascended rapidly, unexpectedly emerging in front of the passenger plane out of the clouds and opened fire at the control cabin (cockpit), using 30mm or smaller cannon armament. The targeting could have been performed not only by the pilot of a fighter aircraft in “free hunt” conditions (using the aircraft radar), but also by a navigation officer on the ground, using the airspace data received from ground-based radars.

The cockpit of the airliner was damaged in the result of numerous rounds hitting the aircraft fuselage. The control cabin was depressurized, which caused the instant death of the crew, due to mechanical influences and decompression. The attack was quite unexpected and lasted only a fraction of a second. Due to the surprise situation, the crew was unable to give any alarm signals intended for such situations, as the flight was following its scheduled route and the attack was unexpected for everyone.

As neither the engines, nor the hydraulic system, nor other devices crucial to the continuation of the flight, were set out of operation, the Boeing 777 continued its horizontal flight in autopilot mode (which is a standard situation), perhaps gradually losing altitude.

After that, the pilot of the unidentified fighter aircraft maneuvered and repositioned himself into the rear hemisphere of the Boeing 777. He entered an engagement course, performed the targeting using onboard target tracking equipment, and launched a R-60 or R-73 air-to-air missile (one or multiple).

As a result of the missile impact, the entire cabin was depressurized, the flight control system was incapacitated, the autopilot was switched off, the plane ceased its horizontal flight and went into a tail-spin. The created g-forces caused a mechanical disruption of the airframe at high altitude.

As indicated by the available flight recorder data, the plane fell apart in the air, but this is possible mainly in the case of vertical falling from a 10000m altitude, which can typically happen only in a case of exceeding the maximum allowed g-force. As a rule, such a tail-spin can be explained by the inability of the crew to control the airplane as a result of some emergency case in the cabin and subsequent instant depressurization of the cockpit and passenger compartment. The destruction of the airplane took place at a high altitude, which explains the fact that the wreckage of the plane was dissimilated over a territory over 15 km².

Finally,

On 17.07.2014 the armed forces of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic possessed neither appropriate fighter aircraft capable of engaging an air target similar to the Boeing 777, nor an airfield network, nor radar detection devices, targeting and guidance equipment.

Fighter aircraft of the Russian Federation Armed Forces did not violate the airspace of Ukraine, which is confirmed by both the Ukrainian side and by third parties performing space-based reconnaissance over the territory of Ukraine and its airspace.

My ex-brother-in-law, Richard McGuire, was a retired fire fighter when on 9/11/2001 he saw that his department friends had a big job to do. Transportation to Manhattan was shut down so he got on his bicycle and rode the thirty miles from Rockville Centre, on the island, to ground zero. That’s how those guys are, tightly knit, watching each others’ backs.

Dick died in December of 2012 of cancer at age 65. 850 first responders have died of cancer since that event. That was, I swear, no ordinary fire.

From RIA Novosti:

On Friday, a source from one of the Ukrainian defense departments told RIA Novosti that a system mix up during a Ukrainian air defense units’ rocket launch exercise could be the cause of the Malaysia Airlines plane crash.

This brief news piece produced an “Aha!” moment for me. But for most folks it’s just part of a mosaic and has no significance. It leads into a world that we have been taught does not exist, the one in which psychopathic forces embedded within governments arrange false flag attacks on innocent civilians to advance their own agendas. Perhaps the affair with an airliner shot down in a foreign country is a good time to review how it is done. After all, as we all know, it can’t happen here.

It takes a lot of people to organize the events that result in a civilian airliner being shot down, if indeed that is what happened in Ukraine. (Remember, we only know what we see and hear via news sources, so that I have to take it on faith that an airliner was shot down and 298 people were killed.) It not only takes a lot of people, but they all have to be evil. They don’t exist in sufficient numbers here in our country of course, but probably do in Russia (…cue evildoer music …)

Continue reading “The fascist signature” →

I write here quite a bit about false-flag attacks. The gas attack in Syria was one. 9/11 was one, Tonkin, Maine, Reichstag, most likely Israel is hammering itself with harmless rockets right now. Poking sticks at unchained monsters is stupid, which is why the people who want the wars have to make the events to start the wars. Read history for, like, all of recorded time if you’ve a chance.

MH17 is looking like a false flag event, and guess who is reading from the script? It is difficult to understand, and I am aghast that the US wants an open confrontation with Russia, but in Ukraine they have been begging for it. In case you don’t follow non-American news, Kiev has been beating the crap out of its own citizens, 400,000 13,500* have fled to Russia. A bomb was launched on a Russian city. The US is begging for war, it appears.

Generally, throughout my life anyway, American wars have been against harmless victims, countries that cannot fight back. This is something new.

Here’s some outside input. And here. And here. Get away from American news if you want a balanced view.
_______________
PS: I just ran across a term that describes the two psychopaths pictured above. If only there were just these two. These are public faces, but the whole of our empire from top to bottom, our political, corporate and military leaders, are of this type. They are “deranged predators.”
*My mistake, as 400,000 is the number of refugees out of Syria fleeing the western back terrorists attacking that country. I do not know the current number of Ukrainian refugees, as 13,500 was a month ago and the Kiev attack as intensified since then.

This cartoon below appeared at Moon of Alabama:

Even BBC’s coverage, however, would be better than we get in the US, where the bloody part on the right would be said to be Israeli victims of Palestinian bombs. That was disgraceful, and good grief, not an accident. Not an accident, OK? If these gaffes were accidental, every now and then one might go the other way.

I know the mind of my readers, most of them anyway … I am just a tad presumptuous, I know. There was a discussion of the USS Liberty incident in 1967 over at 4&20 recently. People struggle to get their arms around that one. After scouting the ship, and knowing it was American, unmarked Israeli aircraft attacked it with intent to sink it and kill all aboard. Radio communications were shut down, but before the job could be completed, sailors managed to get a radio message out. The gig was up. The cover-up began.
Continue reading “Israel attacks Gaza again: “Look here, not there”” →

We had a very busy weekend, with a mountain hike, hours spent on a large carpentry project (which a real carpenter could knock off in two), a family birthday gathering that consumed all of last evening, and a couple of hours spent watching the movie Wonderland. My wife also handily dispatched me in a game of Super Scrabble.

I only mention all of that because in the midst of all of that, I also spent hours reading about the Boston Marathon bombing and viewing photographs thereof. The photos are of a very high quality, and of course it is easily seen that the events are staged, that there were no real injuries, that crisis actors were used, and any amputees after were amputees before.

I am tempted to go on a long rant about the particulars, but anyone who is curious about it can find that information. Here is just a summary, and I am deliberately limiting myself to 100 words:

There were no destructive devices used that day, no shrapnel or pressure cookers. It appears that the some of the actors were gathered inside the Lens Crafters store, and assembled outside after a loud explosion a couple of stories above. The area is quickly emptied, and “victims” appear. They are laboriously drenched in blood and fitted with devices imitating bloody stumps. “Medical” personnel, indifferent to victims, wander about as the major players are dressed and presented to waiting cameras – Jeff Bauman, Krystie Campbell, Sidney Corcoran, et al. Other victims, not present, will appear in staged hospital scenes. That’s 97 words.

I have more important matters to address:

• I took time. I spent probably 3-4 hours looking at the visual evidence. But I had to go find it. If I were a typical citizen, I would wait for information to fall in my lap via the television and Huffington Post.
• This is yet another use of the “conspiracy theory” meme. People are curious, but that curiosity is dulled by mainstream media saturation of the “correct” description of events. Real curiosity is stymied by fear of branding, ridicule and marginalization.
• What’s with the pictures? Just about every image seen by mainstream viewers was vetted by the Boston Globe, CNN and other palace guards. Yet I was able to look at high quality stills, about 216 of them. If every other outlet is guarded and output heavily censored, why is it so easy for me to find these 216 stills? That’s a real question, not rhetorical. Something is amiss.
• Man, the power of suggestion. I watched a video of a TV news reporter interviewing a doctor who had supposedly been on the scene helping victims, and the reporter says “Look at you. You’re covered in blood.” But the doctor has not a drop of blood on him.

I have deliberately not linked to anything nor grabbed any images, but easily could. I am not your curiosity. If you have any, you have to feed it yourself. But if you are tempted and stop in your tracks right here, fearing “conspiracy” talk, understand the power of thought control. The fear that stops you from looking further goes by that name.

The individual is more sensitive to the voice of the herd than to any other influence. It can inhibit or stimulate his thought and conduct. (Wilfred Trotter, British psychologist, 1916)

We live in the post-Lippmann, post-Bernays, post-Dewey, post-Le Bon and post-Trotter age. Their work is long done, generations have passed. Their efforts have been inculcated into our attitudes and industrial practices. Most of it had to do with framing the employee mindset in the industrial society. People had to be melded into efficient groups of employees, unions eliminated, with everyone accepting dominance by others as wholesome and natural. The work of these men translated easily into politics and consumerism.

I was a poor student in high school, a lousy employee who didn’t take well to dominance by insecure territorial dictators, and so escaped (or grew out of) most of it. Self-employment* is true freedom.
Continue reading “Why NSA = STASI” →