Are your perceptions under proper management yet?

Reality
The Obama administration only had to suggest to Mubarak of Egypt that he step down, and he does so. That demonstrates pretty well that he was only in power at the behest of American power. The fact that 87% of Egyptians have a negative view of the United States gives us a clear vision of the nature of the unrest in that country. They’ve had enough of Mubarak, they’ve had enough of U.S. foreign policy.

Withing the bowels of the administration (and it would not be different with a different president) it is not a question of democratic rule. Their problem is that they seem unable to stop it, just as with Iran in 1979. So it is a question of how to manage the unrest, how to solidify U.S. dominance even in the face of popular will. They are surely working with the Egyptian military and secret police behind the scenes to keep a lid on things. In the meantime, Obama’s job is to present a public face of pro-democratic governance while working to prevent it behind the scenes. It’s a real balancing act, and the reason why the U.S. needs a smooth spokesperson at this time.

Notice that the official line now is that Mubarak will not stand for “re-election” this September. When was he ever elected? This is a blatant attempt to buy time, probably to work behind the scenes to suppress the dissidents. Egypt is, after all, a terror and torture state.

Are you perceptions under management now? Or, have I introduced cognitive dissonance into your thinking?

Senator Dennis Rehberg?

Dennis Rehberg and ...

Dear Mark,

I’m Preston Elliott, and I’ve just signed on as Jon’s campaign manager. I would tell you a little more about myself, but this just hit my inbox:

Denny Rehberg to Announce Senate Bid Saturday – Roll Call, 1.31.11

Our race is now officially underway — please consider a secure online donation to show our new opponent that we’re ready for a tough campaign!

Oh, I know, progressives are trembling in their boots, and soon they’ll be saying “Yeah, Jon Tester ain’t so hot, but he’s better than Denny!!!

... Jim Hightower .. separated at birth?
And here is where that logic goes haywire, and it’s just one example: The Forest Jobs and Recreation Act. Had Dennis Rehberg come forth with that legislation, progressives and Democrats would have rightly condemned it as a massive sellout to industry in the name of jobs that will never be. Because it is being put forward by Jon Tester, it has a chance, as Democrats are snoozing and progressives are confused.

Bad legislation has a chance of passage because it is carried by a Democrat, and not in spite of Democrats. Triangulation is worse than having Republicans in office. Republicans create their own opposition. Triangulators deliberately undermine their own base.

Go Denny! Montana Democrats need a long cold shower.

Patient care versus the bottom line

This sort of thing is outrageous enough to be exposed by local news, and remedied. A Florida-based insurance company, Ceridian Cobra Services, is the administrator of COBRA-based insurance for people who have lost their employment but are still allowed for a period of time thereafter to carry their insurance and pay their own premiums. From Forbes Rick Ungar:

Ronald Flanagan, a veteran suffering from Multiple Myeloma – a particularly deadly form of blood cancer which Ronald suspects may be the result of his exposure to Agent Orange when serving in Viet Nam – was in the doctor’s office getting ready for a bone marrow biopsy when his wife rushed into the room and announced, “Stop. We don’t have health insurance.”

While Ron had been preparing for the procedure, the office staff had informed Mrs. Flanagan that the family’s health care coverage had lapsed. Confused, Ron’s wife, Frances, got on the phone with an administrator at Florida based Ceridian Cobra Services to get an explanation.

It turns out that Mrs. Flanagan had made an error in her November premium payment, shorting the insurer two cents.

Ron and Frances Flanagan - the good guys win for once
Denver News Channel Seven now reports that Ceridian has relented, and will cover the treatment for myeloma.

Not everyone who is mistreated by their insurance company has the benefit of a story that receives national attention and goes viral. Most just have to eat it. Remember that once they have a condition, it is a preexisting condition, so changing insurers is not an option. Without some worthy news reporting, Flanagan was totally hosed.

People will say “bad apple,” and that might be true.

People will say that they did the right thing in the end, and that is true as well, though only due to bad publicity that they determined would be costlier in the long run than paying the claims.

People will say that most insurers are good and try to do the right thing. Not true, or only partially true. While most people are good, and the army of bureaucrats that works for the insurance companies are just like the rest of us, bad behavior is incentivized within these companies because every claim denied is applied directly to the bottom line.

The problem with Ceridian is the problem with American private health insurance in general: The profit motive.

Making money and serving customers are adverse incentives, or two masters. It’s a classic conflict of interest, and the reason why no other industrialized country has our crazy health care system.
_______________
Question: Why is Flanagan not eligible for VA coverage?

The Electric City circle jerk

I paid a brief visit to Electric City Weblog yesterday, just for old time sake. It’s not as busy as it once was. Most of the posts are written by Dave Budge, and there is little dissent in the comments. (The only “dissenter” I saw was David Crisp, a Democrat who thinks in that frame of mind, and so is allowed to comment there. His bomb has long been defused.) Others are Craig Moore, Lt. Col (R) Rich Liebert (does that title tell us anything about his attitudes?), Mike Mikulski and Aaron Flint, all reliable right wingers.

"The Perfesser"
Rob Natelson writes there now and then. His posts are so predictable that I’ve come to believe that he suffers from a myopia brought about by constant reinforcement of his own views, a process of self-indoctrination that we are all susceptible to. He is incapable of seeing beyond his own prejudices, and does not leave that nest to engage in debate.

Gregg Smith still writes there, though not so much as Budge. who dominates the site.

Travis Kavulla, now a Montana office holder, is apparently absent. (Kavulla is now in a position of power, and is a truly dangerous man. He has no self-edit ability. Given his chance now he will put his ideas in action without laboratory trial, awareness of untoward effects, or respect for wisdom of the past. He is quite sure he is right about everything. This is the definition of a “radical.”)

Electric City Weblog is now, officially, what it was always meant to be, a right wing circle jerk.

Here’s a post that caught my eye: “Bias,” written by Dave Budge. I cite it in full as it is very short:

Bryan Caplan asks why there is so much attention paid to media bias when there are other institutions that have a more durable effect:

Both the media and schools are largely in left-wing hands – and the content reflects this fact. But consider the stark contrast between the two. Schools, unlike the media, largely target impressionable youth. Schools, unlike the media, are heavily tax-supported. Schools, unlike the media, usually can’t go bankrupt. And finally, schools, unlike the media, have a very high switching cost. Even with a voucher system, changing your kid’s school would remain a much bigger deal than changing the channel.

In short:
Aimed largely at impressionable youth (Media: no, Schools: yes)
Tax-supported (Media: no, Schools: yes)
Can’t go bankrupt (Media: no, Schools: yes)
High switching cost (Media: no, Schools: yes)

It’s a good question.

Kavulla: Portrait of the radical as a young man
Here’s what is interesting – this is not up for debate. There is no question in their minds that the media and schools are “largely in left-wing hands,” and so there is no burden of proof. Without that burden, there is no need for discipline, and they are free to go off in any way they please without fear of being called out for lack of rigor. It’s not a “good question.” It’s a joke.

And it nicely sums up our media culture (understanding, at least here, that the “left” is an imagined monster that hardly even exists in this country). I watch The Daily Show each night, and only because it is funny. They often skewer FOX News, calling them out for their obvious mistakes. It doesn’t matter. The people who watch FOX news do not watch The Daily Show, and so are immune to any hosing down with reality. FOX does exactly what it is meant to do – agitprop, which requires intellectual isolation to be effective.

And so in this manner to has Budge, who has banned dissenters from ECW, created a vacuum where he, Natelson and Smith can spout their nonsense without detractors.

It’s apparently all he ever wanted – intellectual isolation, preaching without dissent from the congregation.
______________________
Disclaimer: This site is no way affiliated with Electric City Weblog, The Perfesser, Budge or Kavulla. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not of the management of Piece of Mind, Inc. “The Perfesser” is registered trademark of Rob Natelson.
______________________
PS: This isn’t a terribly well-written piece, getting absorbed in personalities as it does, but I had it in my mind at the outset that what is happening at ECW, where they are cloistering and talking amongst themselves fairly typifies the nature of discourse in the country as a whole, and especially among right wingers who like to talk about “Econ 101” for the rest of us as they are daily confronted with the failures of their ideology. It is comfortable to fall into a self-affirming group in that situation. ECW is just a blog, like this one.

State-sanctioned terrorists

The scene was one of horror, with shocked men holding their heads in sorrow and women shrieking in rage and anger. Bodies were strewn about. It was yet another incident in the ongoing war of terror … not the bombing in the Moscow airport, which we are allowed to know about, but an American bombing of Afghan civilians, which we are not allowed to know about.

Since The Pentagon does not do body counts, we do not know the death toll. I heard the words of the interpreter – survivors expressed their outrage at the American invaders, wanting only that we go home. Given a choice between Taliban and Americans, they choose … the one that does not drop bombs on them.

I watched that report last night on Al Jazeera. We are conditioned, of course, and as always, to automatically disbelieve anything said about us by those characterized as enemies. So even though the report was aired on Link TV here in the home of the brave, it will not be noted elsewhere. Only those of us with minds freed up a bit will lend it any credence. The rest will not even see it, and so will be spared the resulting cognitive dissonance.

The dispatcher
Murder is murder. I don’t care if the murderers are highly trained American pilots. Murder is murder. It is not “first degree” murder, as these young pilots are deeply indoctrinated in American ideology, and so think they are performing a necessary task. But it is not “manslaughter” either – that is, they are deliberately putting people in harm’s way, and so are responsible for the resulting carnage (which, fortunate for them, they never have to witness). Forgiving the naïveté of youth, real responsibility lies up the line in the command centers that order the air strikes. These are more seasoned veterans, likely more world-wise, and surely aware of the dangers of bombs launched from aircraft into civilian-occupied areas.

Will there ever be another Nuremberg? Will state-sanctioned murderers ever again be brought to justice? I doubt it, at least not in my lifetime. Far from being brought to justice, one of them recently received the Republican presidential nomination. He is some kind of “hero” because the people he dropped bombs on imprisoned him and (gasp!) possibly even mistreated him.

I am not a pacifist. I believe in the necessity of self defense, and just war. I want to be on the “just” side of the conflicts, those engaged in self-defense. They are the ones who do not have the stars and stripes on their uniforms.

NPR blahs …

I was recently listening to David Marsh on satellite radio – I really like the guy, as I rarely leave his show without having heard something new and different. Marsh is the sole extent of the sourcing that I will do for this post. I’m just putting it up because it has explanatory power.

Dave Marsh: rock critic, historian, anticensorship activist, talk show host, and “Louie Louie” expert
NPR is a perfect complement to the liberals and intellectuals who support Obama and the Democrats. It’s mild, and full of programming that has no political significance. Its news is identical in content to the corporate networks, but has better production values than other radio news outlets. The only times I listen to NPR are when Terry Gross has something interesting going, and of course, for Car Talk and Wait Wait… . I think that Garrison Keillor fills up six hours of weekend programming. It seems much, much longer than that.

NPR was founded in 1970, and has from time-to-time over the years offered independent news and views. But it’s independence was untenable for two reasons: One, congressional oversight, and two, corporate funding. These are enough to keep it bland and unoffensive.

And this, according to Dave Marsh, is the purpose of NPR. The year 1970 is significant because there was an outbreak of democracy going on, and local radio played a significant role in spreading information for organizing purposes. All large cities had independent channels, and many mid-sized ones as well. Since 1970, even with rocky early years, NPR has sucked up all of the bandwidth oxygen from radio. We now have Pacifica, with three outlets, left out of the hundreds of local stations that existed in 1970. It’s flagship show, Democracy Now!, which started in 1996, now broadcasts over 900 outlets, but most of them are insignificant, and its audience reach is limited.

Rebel radio ... step aside! It's Garrison Keillor!
I don’t know how much credence to put on that narrative – I don’t know that NPR was specifically intended to put an end to rebel radio. I do know that its fund raising drives suck up a lot of energy and money from liberal-leaning groups and individuals, and that me-too news is not exactly a prize investment.

Unreforming fake reform

The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of great political importance: the growth of democracy, the growth of corporate power, and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of protecting corporate power against democracy. (Alex Carey, Taking the Risk out of Democracy: Propaganda in the U.S. and Australia, 1995) [This is the opening citation in Potter’s book.]

One of the nagging questions about health care “reform” is “Why now?” Health care reform has been one our primary concerns for decades. The problems we face now were minor when Clinton proposed his plan in the early 1990’s. It was a festering problem in 2004 when John Kerry avoided it. Why now?

We drove into Denver last night to hear Wendell Potter discuss the issues. Potter was a PR executive for CIGNA, but also a man with a conscience who, in the end, did the right thing, the costly thing. He walked away from CIGNA and turned against his former employers. He became an advocate for true reform.

He answered the question, though I did not like the answer. I paraphrase: Wall Street is making severe demands of health insurance companies. They have to deliver excellent returns to investors, or the investors flee. In 1993, when Clinton proposed his plan, the “medical loss ratio” (“MLR” – the amount that insurance companies pay out in actual medical expenses for clients) was around 95%. Most companies were not-for-profit.

Then the for-profits moved in.

Most of the not-for-profits are gone now, and the industry is driven by Wall Street. MLR now hovers around 80%. Insurers are looking for new and better ways to squeeze more profit out of this system. Their long-term plan is to force us all into crappy high-cost high-deductible policies, and sell junk insurance for the more destitute (these are plans that cover some in-system doctor bills, but not hospitalization). But they know that the fallout for this will be more pressure for true reform, even single payer (or at least a public option).

So they went to Obama and the Democrats for “reform.” That’s why it finally became a campaign issue. The lobby called “AHIP” (America’s Health Insurance Plans) wanted it.

AHIP went into the game knowing exactly what they needed, and got it. One, they want a private mandate – the ability for force us to buy their products. Second, they wanted no government competition, no public option. In the reform charade, the Kabuki theater that Obama, Baucus, Lieberman, Nelson and the other Democrats put us through in 2009, it had already been decided that there would be no public option and a private mandate. The insurers bought Obama, and Obama delivered.

That’s why we finally got reform. Wall Street decided it was time.

____________________

Potter is at heart a journalist who lost his way, finding his way back after decades of public relations. He watched the health care debate unfold, and understood the forces at work. Phrases like “death panels,” “government takeover,” and “job killing” are professionally crafted, the specialty of the PR industry. They are planted in the dialogue, and then spread like viruses. They are short and memorable, and pack emotional punch. That is usually all that is needed to win a debate in our shill-infested environment. (Isn’t it interesting that the Democrats can never manage to come up with a good hard-hitting name for the things they supposedly favor? S-CHIP anyone?)

Potter is on a book tour now, which is why he was in Denver. Most of his talk was Q&A, and there were very good questions.

Here’s his take on what is unfolding right now: While the health insurers got most of what they wanted out of Obama’s bill, there were some unpleasant features that they want eliminated. One, they want the 80% cap on medical losses eliminated. (As outrageous as that number is, it merely froze them in time – that’s where they were already at.) There’s also a provision in the law that mandates basic benefits that must be covered, basically outlawing junk insurance. They have bought the companies that sell the junk, and so want that provision gone.

There is also a provision in the bill (coupled with the private mandate) that prohibits insurers from denying coverage for “preexisting conditions” starting in 2014. Right now these poor schmucks are being sent to state exchanges that are adversely selected and prohibitively expensive. (Potter did not talk about this, but surely the “reform” that now exists is useless – about 8,000 people nationwide have taken advantage of the exchanges.)

“This legislation will set into motion several key reforms. First, it will eliminate the possibility that individuals can be denied coverage because they have a preexisting medical condition. Second, it will require insurance companies to sell coverage to small employer groups and to individuals who lose group coverage without regard to their health risk status. Finally, it will require insurers to renew the policies they sell to groups and individuals.”

Those words are from Bill Clinton’s signing statement for HIPAA, the portability act passed in 1996. The insurers merely countered by making portable insurance unaffordable. I do not believe that there is a real fix in Obamacare for preexisting conditions because there were no cost controls. Nonetheless, expect that the preexisting condition mandate scheduled to take force in 2014 will disappear. Already the PR industry is hard at work – they are saying that we who have preexisting conditions are actually people who wait to buy insurance until we get sick. That’s how they are selling the repeal. It invokes the notion of freeloading, and so has emotional punch.

Anyway, Potter’s message was that current bill that passed the House, the title of which actually contains the PR-written catchphrase “jobs-killing”, is a smokescreen. Of course it won’t pass, but the real negotiating is going on elsewhere. AHIP is under incredible pressure to produce more profit for the investors. Expect that the few actual reforms that were included in reform will disappear.

And Obama will not stop them. He’s no friend of Jack.
__________________

The final siege will take place here ... care to join?
But all hope is not lost – single payer is on the table in Vermont and California. It has a reasonable chance of passage in Vermont, but AHIP is watching closely and has far more clout than the legislators in that small state. The threat of a good example is real – Canada didn’t willy-nilly overhaul their system – it started in the provinces. Because it worked, it spread like a virus, and the insurers were booted.

In the board game Monopoly, there comes a point late in the game when so much power has acceded to one player that he can easily overwhelm all the others. We are probably at that point in the health care game, when our best hope is that a tiny state might boot the for-profits. But it might be our green sprout, our lifeline, a sliver of light in our darkest hour before dawn.

Let’s hope so, as it is all we have right now.

Lindsey Jackson, why don’t you write me? I’m hungry to hear you

Memo:

From: Lindsey Jackson, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana
To: Blue Cross Blue Shield Montana clients

In today’s world, planning health care expenses can seem like an overwhelming task. However, by proactively managing your health care and thoroughly understanding your insurance benefits, you can feel better about how you choose to spend your health care dollars.

Toward that end Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana is pleased to present Health Insurance Essentials education sessions through our Blue University℠ team; this is a select group of our staff dedicated to educating our members about how to most effectively use their benefits while navigating the sometimes confusing waters of the health insurance industry.

Beginning January 18, 2011, Blue University℠ will be hosting the Health Insurance Essentials program throughout Montana to help you learn how to:

Wisely use health insurance benefits
Access the right provider network
Proactively manage health care costs

Sign up today for one of the sessions below. If you have questions, call Lindsey Jackson at 406.437.5369 or send her an email at Lindsey_Jackson@bcbsmt.com.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Montana | 560 N. Park Avenue | Helena, MT 59604 | 1.800.447.7828 | http://www.bcbsmt.com

An independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans. Registered and SM service marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, a registered mark of BCBSMT, serving the residents and businesses of Montana.

Suggested new logo for BCBS of Montana
Memo

To: Lindsey Jackson, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana
Re: Your offer to provide “Health Insurance Education”

Dear Ms. Jackson:

Thank you for your generous offer to provide me and former fellow Montanans with “education” regarding what you do for a living, which is screw us personally and mess up our health care in general.

I have another view of who is in need of education, and offer the following:

1. For-profit health insurance is bad public policy. Health insurance profit and quality patient care are at odds with one another.
2. Due to the profit motive, health insurers seek to avoid any client that might potentially be unprofitable.
3. Because of #2, health insurers created the term “preexisting condition.”
4. Because of #2, health insurers created “rescission.”
5. Because of #2, health insurers invest heavily in politicians so that laws contrary to public policy are passed. Hence, Obama’s health care “reform” package.
6. Because of #2, people with “preexisting conditions” (a term created by insurers) are forced into high-risk pools where generally they have to spend $12,000 or more before insurers pay $1.
7. Because of the high cost of adversely selected pools, people don’t buy in. Hence, millions of people who might get sick are uninsured, and you have conveniently avoided them. (That’s bad public policy.)
8. Because of #2, health insurers dumped senior citizens on government.
9. Because of #2, health insurers created the hugely profitable “Medicare Supplement”, where you pay 20% of approved Medicare expenses often at a higher price than Medicare charges for the other 80%!
10. Because of #2, health insurers created the hugely profitable Medicare “Advantage”, a subsidized programmed subtly designed to remove profitable clients from Medicare, leaving Medicare with the sick ones. (We spend our working days pining for the day we can get on Medicare and away from you. When finally we are able to join Medicare, there you are again. Weird!)
11. Because of health insurers reluctance to pay claims at all or in full, doctors and hospitals over-bill, hence driving health care costs upward and upward.
12. Because of greed and the profit motive, health insurers often skim 20% or more off the top of each health care dollar for their private use.
13. Because health insurers fear real competition, they convinced their in-pocket politicians to remove any kind of public option from health care “reform”, and want to force private citizens to buy their crappy products.

Hence, because of private health insurers, the United States has the worst health care system of the 34 industrialized democracies, with massive expenses, poor outcomes, and millions of uninsured.

You did this to us. You are leaches on our system. Your bosses are probably sociopaths. We can’t get rid of you because you are politically entrenched in our corrupt political system. You are part of the corruption.

So, how’s my education going, Lindsey? Want me to come lecture, or is the conference really for the purpose of blowing smoke up people’s asses?

Most sincerely,
Mark

PS: Lindsey, why don’ you write me?
______________
PS: It is true that BCBS of Montana is technically “not for profit”, meaning its overhead is 14% instead of 20%. However, its agents and executives are driven by the same motives and play in the same arena as the for-profits, and so are the same animal with a lighter coat.