How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and how hard it is to undo that work again! (Mark Twain)
“No big deal” are the words used by David Wojick, PhD, an independent analyst who reviewed the proceedings.
The ruling was much more limited than I understood. The kids won a little, but lost a whole lot more.
Continue reading “The ruling in the Montana kids’ environmental lawsuit explained (better)”
Big Swede commented the other day that, amazingly, a nonsense lawsuit filed by some kids in Montana had received a favorable ruling from a judge. Here is the link he supplied. The ruling is simply outrageous, but also chilling. Was there a fix at work? Was it understood in advance that the judge, Kathy Seeley, would allow the bullshit claims to proceed?
Emily Flower, spokeswoman for Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen, correctly slammed the ruling as absurd in an emailed statement and vowed to appeal.
This ruling is absurd, but not surprising from a judge who let the plaintiffs’ attorneys put on a weeklong taxpayer-funded publicity stunt.
Continue reading “Montana Judge Kathy Seeley issues brain-damaged fact-free ruling”
The news media and public officials have been off their rocker lately talking about our “boiling” planet. It is all hyperbole, completely unscientific, and really just a propaganda exercise. But they mean business as follows: Climate lock downs are in store. They saw it done with Covid and thought “We can do that too!” (Actually, “they” and “we” are the same people.)
It is discouraging to see how utterly controlled the news media is, and public officials like Biden as well. Has it always been like this? (Yes.)
Channel 74 on SXM Satellite Radio is BB King Bluesville. I’ve been listening quite a bit lately, as I find the music to be pleasant background for just about any mood. This morning as I was driving to the gym BB King (1925-2015) was interviewed. He said, oh by the way, “I am a Mason”.
He said he had been one since his youth, and matter of factly stated that all judges and police officers were Masons. He then told a story about his youth, where he was to perform one evening but accidentally ended up in a building that housed illegal card games and alcohol and God only knows what else. The place was busted by police, and he was about to be arrested. Continue reading “Amazing BB King Interview”
I’ve been on hiatus with visitors aboard, and so only glanced occasionally at the blog. Not much going on. Today I want to wrap up my trip down memory lane with the subject of John Lennon. I left this subject long ago having given up, simply not enough evidence to draw far-fetched conclusions.
John was said to be the son of Julia Stanley. As far as I know there is only one photo of the two of them together.
It’s fake. Check out the lighting on the faces, the unusual straight line down her left side dress, the fact that the young boy’s head is bigger than hers.
I have on hand a treasure trove of photos and face comparisons, as I’ve been doing this for years. Most of the face chops turn up negative, showing two people to be different individuals, and that does not draw a lot of interest. But it is the primary use of face chops, to show differences.
_____________________
I think the photo to the left started the OWT that anorexia nervosa causes distortion of the skull shape. That is Karen Carpenter with her head stretched in a darkroom, done to make her look grotesque and seal her fake death as a real thing.
In fact, the only distorted skull shape I have ever seen is to the right here, Stephen Hawking suffering from ALS. Look at the bulbous protrusion of the back of his head. I agree with Mr. Mathis that Hawking indeed died in 1985 in Switzerland, and was replaced with an actor. They apparently had things left to accomplish with the Hawking character, including A Brief History of Time. That is, I think, a distortion of astrophysics, done with purpose. I should understand better why they did it.
[After posting this, I realized that the real Hawking who died 1985 and was replaced by an actor who then fake died in 2018 … it was 33 years later. Maybe, just maybe, it was not Mr. M who brought him down. Can it be?]
__________________________
Continue reading “Some things I might (but probably don’t) understand, Part 3”
Steven Parent is said to have been a random victim of the Manson Family on the night of August 9th, 1969. He had no connection to anyone there, and had merely driven to the property said to be the scene of the nightmarish murders to visit William Garretson, a caretaker who lived in a cottage behind the Roman Polansky/Sharon Tate house where the murders were staged.
I think it is pretty well established in our circles here that there were no murders that night, that Sharon Tate was not pregnant, that the Manson family was put in show trial, and that Sharon Tate disappeared, reappearing as her newly created younger sister Patty. None of them ever spent a night in jail. That being the case, it is unlikely that Steven Parent was killed that night. But he did disappear.
Note: This post was published by accident. I had many more topics to cover. I will continue with this in “Some things I do not understand, Part II.
____________________________________
Face chops might be fatally flawed in that I am not in the room with the people I am studying. It could be, for instance, that Matt Damon has a head the size of a watermelon, while Tom Brady is more a cantaloupe.
Still, I get this:
It is not a perfect match in that the ears don’t align, but everything else does, and perfectly. The eyes and eyebrows, the noses, nose shape, mouth, lips, head shape and hairline. People are like snowflakes in that no two align, but these two do.
Relentless heat propaganda
Below is a temperature chart put out by the BBC:
That red coloration is deliberate, a not-so-subtle way of suggesting that the planet is burning up. It is not. Two things I will bet BBC never mentions are …
We can never be sure that the opinion we are endeavoring to to stifle is a false opinion; and if we were sure, stifling it would still be an evil. All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility. (John Stuart Mill)*
I was raised Catholic and maintained that faith until age 38, that is, 1988. You may think me a fool for holding on that long, but they got me when I was a kid. As the old priest said, give him to me as a child, I will have him for life. My first twelve years of education were Catholic.
We were taught about papal infallibility, that is, when the Pope speaks on matters of faith and morals, he is guided by the Holy Spirit, therefore cannot be wrong. He is said to be speaking ex cathedra.**
Piece of Mindful 