As I sit down to write, I do not know how this project will end.The match-up between Freddie Mercury and Dr. Phil in the original post was so dead-on, except for the ears. Now that I know that Freddie was twins/replicas, that problem is receding.
I say “twins/replicas” because we are in transition in outlook here. There is a large program in place wherein duplicate people are somehow manufactured. I hesitate to use the word “clone,” but there have been hints in the back-and-forth among the writers here of farms or factories where people of a certain mold are turned out. See, for example, Straight’s piece on Matt Damon lookalikes. It is shocking. Since he wrote that, at his suggestion, I ran Matt Damon against quarterback Tom Brady. Except for ear height, they match up almost perfectly!
We stuck our foot in the door with the weird match-up of Judy Woodruff and Dalida. Now it branches out into sports, and I would imagine, politics. Here is an interesting comment from another blog piece that was in my mailbox this morning concering our discovery that Brad Pitt was a set of twins:
Hmmmm. Originally we were finding “Zombies,” people who fake their death and reemerge as someone else, Brandon DeWilde as Thom Hartmann for instance. I am now more open to the idea of replicas as well. We have much, much more to learn. The Matt Damon piece was a breakthrough.
Back to Mercury/McGraw:
The transition from musician/pop idol to TV shrink is not as far a reach as one might think … if we remember that these are actors hired to play roles. Freddie Mercury pushed the gay agenda and existence of AIDS as a real disease. Dr. Phil’s role is to make us feel bad about ourselves. He is marketing antidepressants, junk food, consumer products – all the stuff we do to feel better. So it is not that much of a reach for a competent actor.
We must first inspect timelines. In our Zombie projects, we have learned to ignore personal histories before these people become well-known public personalities. Wikipedia is an Intelligence front and can supply fake lives, families, careers as dictated by the writers at Langley.
Mercury was born in 1946, Dr. Phil in 1950. Mercury faked his death in 1991. Dr. Phil emerged through Oprah Winfrey in 1998. That is plenty of time for Freddie to bulk up and have his teeth fixed. Mercury had dental problems, while Phil has beautiful teeth. As an actor, he could also learn to speak American, specifically with a Midwest drawl. So there are no timeline conflicts.
There are not many photos of Phil McGraw as a younger man. I managed to find three.
The one on the left can be tossed – it is not Phil. It was most likely chosen because of the similarity in the eyes. That’s enough to fool people. But this photo is a ‘tell’ in that it shows that they are indeed trying to fool us. Here’s Dr. Phil and that photo.
Anyone defending Dr. Phil is going to have to explain how that false photo got in there. It is deliberate deception.
The other two are a closer match, though not enough to satisfy me.
The head shape is wrong. Phil has a more pointed skull. That is obvious looking at where the skulls meet at the top. In the photo on the right the eyes do not align. It is not Dr. Phil. On the left, it is closer still, but the ears and chin are off. Again, not Dr. Phil.
I would suggest that the Langley photo team using a computer algorithm went through thousands of photos looking to line up certain features, and found only these three. Dr. Phil, born in 1950, would have graduated high school in 1968. Look at the grainy quality of the second and third youth photos presented above. In 1968 we could take much better photographs than those. I suggest the photos are either much older than late 1960s, or that they have monkeyed with them and grained them up to hide the deceptions.
Dr. Phil is twins, or replicas. Once I discovered a second Dr. Phil, I ran him against the youth photos above. I am not showing them here as I need to move on, but the mismatches are even more pronounced. If anyone asks, I will show them in the comments.
Here is Dr. Phil McGraw, Twin One:
And Twin Two:
They are very difficult to tell apart. Here is one of each, side by side:
I can spot them now, but it took some time. Twin One has higher ears, about 12 pixels higher in this comparison and consistent on all. Also, the distance from the center of the eye to the base on the nose is longer on Twin One – about 11 pixels longer. Twin One has a longer nose. There is a bit of angular distortion here, but the apparent shorter schnoz on the right is a real difference.
But as always, it is easier to see the differences by chopping the faces in half. Here are four comparisons:
On all difference in ear height and noses are apparent. As with Freddy Mercury, they are very difficult to tell apart unless you do this, as they both project the same person very effectively. They could easily slip in and out if the TV shoes of Dr. Phil. I imagine they do.
The final part of this series of blog posts is a revisit to the Freddie Mercury/Dr. Phil comparison. It will have to come later. I have been looking at Phil for a long time now, and I am depressed. I feel bad about myself. I am going out to get some antidepressants and a big, big bag of potato chips just to feel better. Dr. Phil’s job is to make us feel bad. Just looking at him these past hours got to me.
I will finish up this project by running Mercury and Phil side by side. Perhaps surprises await, but I doubt it. In the meantime, Dr. Phil is added to the Honor Roll of Twins/Replicas.