Some years back I read the book Inventing the AIDS Virus, by Peter H. Duesberg. At 704 pages including footnotes, it was a challenge. In the front, a former owner of the book wrote to a friend he had given it to “A must read! If Duesberg is correct, the powers that be have even more control than we could have ever suspected.” Indeed.
I originally wrote most of what follows in early 2019. Since that time we have had the coronavirus hoax, and I’ve been challenged to understand more about virology, and have developed, I think, a better understanding of how they pulled off the AIDS hoax. Consequently, I am making some additions and deletions, and republishing this article. The similarities between AIDS and COVID-19 are striking, almost as if AIDS was the working model on which they are running the current hoax.
Keep in mind, however:
- I am not a scientist, a molecular biologist, a virologist. This stuff can be complicated, but that does not mean I cannot grasp any of these fields or form conclusions based on the solid reasoning of others. But it does mean that I can be easily misled by someone who intends to mislead me. So the writing is difficult. I will try to stick to the basics, and allow readers to explore on their own rather than relying on me to bring ‘the truth’ to their platters. If any of what follows troubles you, if you think me wrong, then by all means get going. There is a lot of material to cover.
- There are other theories of disease besides germ theory, but they are either ridiculed or ignored by the medical profession. The only theory taught in med schools is germ theory. If any medical practitioner disavows that theory, he will be ostracized. Germ theory is what gives them the good life. It is where the money is. Another theory, however, is “terrain,” a term coined by Antoine Béchamp, a contemporary of Louis Pasteur. I have done considerable reading and viewing now on the subject, and while not decided if it is one or the other (or partly both), I am no longer completely convinced that viruses are dangerous or that they can cause disease. I was convinced when I wrote in January of 2019.
- Peter Duesberg, virologist, unlike other dissenters in the AIDS field, is internationally known. He also insists, unlike other dissenters, that the HIV retrovirus is real (though he maintains it is harmless). He thereby aligns himself with those who have heavily promoted HIV as the cause of AIDS even as he dissents. A paper he wrote in 2011 claims there is no evidence of a viral AIDS epidemic, not even in Africa. Such work gets him labeled an “HIV denier,” a propaganda technique used in Climate Change and vaccinations to denigrate and marginalize honest dissent.
I am going to boldly go, and assert with evidence that AIDS is a fake “pandemic.” The case of Magic Johnson (covered later) has instructive power, as does that of Freddie Mercury, whose death was, in my view, faked. I have not looked into Rock Hudson or Arthur Ashe, but have similar suspicions. In order to ‘sell’ this disease, they needed high-profile people to die from it, just as they now need high-profile people to be infected with COVID-19. AIDS, I will assert, is a real syndrome, but its causes lie in the lifestyle or circumstances of the individual. It is not contagious, not caused by HIV. The two primary causes of AIDS are self-abusive lifestyles, and malnutrition. If not too far advanced, it can be cured by a change of underlying causality.
Peter Heinz Herrmann Duesberg
When I originally wrote this, I suspected Peter Duesberg might be controlled opposition. Such a person would gather up those opposed to controllers and lead them … nowhere. While Duesberg has had no impact on any public official, medical journal, or medical institution, the forces he is up against are very powerful, able to run over him in a stampede. They include PhRMA, AMA, AHIP, CDC, WHO, the news media and FDA. Fortunately, it only takes one person to be right, and I believe Duesberg to be that person.
I will quote him freely. He has the gift that truly intelligent people possess, the ability to make complicated material understandable.
One final note before plunging into this topic – my recent foray into the PSA (prostate specific antigen test) mess convinced me that doctors really do harm patients, even if unwittingly, often blinded by acquisition of great wealth. I did not know in January of 2019 that “iatrogenic” (death by doctor) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. Regarding prostate surgery, hundreds of thousands of men have had unnecessary, even debilitating surgery at the hands of highly trained urologists. It is all based on a test that does not and cannot detect prostate cancer. It is the key that unlocks the door for urologists, leading them to unnecessarily remove men’s prostate glands, often with nasty results such as impotence and incontinence.
If so with PSA, why not with AIDS? Administration of deadly drugs to “cure” something that is not caused by a virus (or retrovirus), doing great harm to the patients, is not unheard of, not even unusual.
Wikipedia says that AIDS is a “pandemic.” This is defined as an epidemic that has spread over continents. We generally have one every year, called “cold and flu season.” An epidemic is a disease that has spread to a large number of people in a short period of time, usually a few weeks. Epidemics usually follow bell-curve-type patterns, as with EBOLA, below.
This is typical if spread of a disease. Ebola was what has been referred to as a “boutique epidemic,” crashing on the scene, used to scare the daylights out of people, and then receding into the backdrop. HPV, Zika, Hanta are similar in this manner, used more to scare people than do any real harm. They were called “pandemics,” but life went on normally. Ebola did result in a movie, Outbreak, (using a virus called “Motaba”). The virus was used as moral justification for bombing a village, wiping it off the map, to contain the outbreak.
AIDS has behaved nothing like an epidemic of that nature. It has behaved more like an illness brought about by an agent, as with tobacco use rising hand-in-hand with emphysema and lung cancer. It grew slowly, and often grew only because the diseases associated with AIDS expanded. AIDS, says Duesberg, is a lifestyle disease, and is neither contagious nor caused by a virus. Therefore, use of the term “pandemic” is scare talk.
AIDS, while real, is a “syndrome,” and not a disease. It exists when a person’s immune system no longer functions properly, making that person susceptible to a wide range of other maladies. Here is a list of commonly associated “HIV” related conditions, such as Kaposi Sarcoma (listed under “Cancer”), symptoms of which are tumors formed under the skin. This was the one most commonly associated with gay men in the early days of the “pandemic.”
This is critical in understand the nature of AIDS – that it appeared to spread as the number of diseases associated with it spread. Say, for example, that someone dies of influenza. During the AIDS epidemic, if that person was also HIV-positive, he would be listed as an AIDS death. If not HIV-positive, it would be a flu death. (Today, it would be a “COVID-19 death.)
So the supposed “pandemic” was nothing more than a list of diseases that already existed. When a patient is found to be “HIV positive”, the associated disease is then officially labeled “AIDS.” During the 1980s and 90s the diseases associated with AIDS were increased, and as a result, the prevalence of AIDS increased, giving rise to the illusion that AIDS was spreading. So while the blue line on the graph above shows AIDS-related deaths, it is very probable that those deaths would have occurred and been labeled something else without the presence of HIV, which in my view has never caused even one death. What do they label a death from pneumonia without presence of HIV? A death from pneumonia.
In sharp contrast to the bell-shaped curve of a conventional new infectious epidemic, the AIDS epidemic increased steadily for fifteen years. American AIDS gradually spread from a few dozen cases annually in 1981 to more than eighty thousand cases in 1994. It did not explode, as the HIV orthodoxy predicted; neither did it decline, as would be expected from antiviral immunity. Instead of resembling an infectious disease, the time course of the AIDS epidemic resembles the slow progressing epidemics of lung cancer and emphysema in industrialized nations, building up over the years in step with tobacco consumption. These noninfectious epidemics neither rose exponentially nor affected all groups of the population or both sexes equally, nor did they disappear as a result of antiviral immunity or natural resistance
In fact, AIDS grew in parallel with drug abuse in the gay community, including widespread use of antibiotics to combat the multitude of infections that went along with the lifestyle. It more resembled the spread of lung cancer and emphysema, which can be tied to tobacco use, and which have declined as tobacco use has declined. Thus, says Duesberg,
“Thus AIDS does not meet the classical epidemiological criteria of an infectious disease. The failure of AIDS to meet these criteria destroys not only all hopes of the HIV orthodoxy ever to prove that HIV causes AIDS, but also any other viral or bacterial theories of AIDS.”
Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR machine currently in use to test for the alleged COVID-19 virus, was once assigned to write a scientific paper, the opening line of which was that AIDS was caused by HIV. Since it was a scientific paper, everything needed to be sourced, and so began his hunt for a paper that showed AIDS to be caused by HIV. None existed. None exist now. That connection has never been proven, only asserted.
But AIDS was and is part of an agenda, which I will try to understand as we work our way through all of the behaviors of the medical community from 1981 forward.
What is a retrovirus?
HIV, said to cause AIDS, is a “retrovirus.” Such a virus, we are told, will enter a cell by making a copy of itself, a process called reverse transcriptase. The result is a strand of DNA in the cell, which is thus infected. Thus the word “retrovirus,” is used for this reverse process.
But it gets murky, as others claim that reverse transcriptase is common and ordinary, part of our existence. Those who advance “retrovirus” theory argue that it is an accident. But if they are wrong, if it is common, then there is no such thing as a retrovirus. It would merely be a part of the cell apart from the cell nucleus. In fact, one source I read said that “retroviruses” actually function as repair centers for damages to cells when they occur. This would then make HIV part of us, existing in all of us, and doing no harm. It would be part of our makeup, like our hair follicles and fingerprints.
The arrival of HIV
Duesberg himself was involved in the failed search for a virus that caused cancer, a Nixon-era legacy that left many “virologists” without a source of government grants. In 1980 Michael Gottlieb of UCLA, in Duesberg’s words, “began scouring the hospital for patients with immune deficiency diseases.” Why? It appears he had a new way of testing “T-cell” counts. He was looking for people to use it on.
He came across one who suffered from a yeast infection in his throat that could not be cured. The microbe that caused the condition, Pneumocystis carinii, exists in all of us but is rarely harmful, usually striking people undergoing chemotherapy and thus having weak immune systems. (Under terrain theory, this microbe would multiply in response to chemo, attempting to repair the damage done.) This patient, in his early thirties, was not undergoing chemo, yet his yeast infection was not healing. In fact, this patient had hardly any white blood cells at all, which Gottlieb found shocking.
He eventually found three similar cases, all suffering yeast infection and Pneumocystis pneumonia, all having low T-cell counts. Excited, he searched for more patients, thinking he had perhaps found a new syndrome, a big deal for medical researchers. Gottlieb hooked up with Wayne Shandera, who added one more case to the list.
All five patients were active homosexuals. Shandera brought the Center for Disease Control (CDC) into it, and AIDS was born, but not under that name. It was called KSOI (Kaposi’s sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections), as Kaposi’s sarcoma was common among those suffering the syndrome. Quite common among those sufferers was use of “poppers.”
So-named because of the sound they make when the bottles are opened, poppers are vials of nitrite inhalants. The use of poppers, along with other recreational drugs (and antibiotics to contain rampant infections) skyrocketed in the late 1970s in the gay communities of San Francisco and LA and New York. Poppers were used to facilitate anal intercourse, as well as to maintain erections and prolong orgasms. Duesberg believes poppers to be a major cause behind the outbreak of AIDS in the California bath houses of the era.
Poppers were marketed as room deodorizers, a ruse. The coincidence of Kaposa’s sarcoma and popper use was heavily correlated, though currently denied by the medical establishment. (By the way, I am not in judgmental mode when writing of these sexual gay activities. These are merely the facts we must deal with.)
Enter Dr. Donald Francis, part of “EIS,” or the Epidemic Intelligence Service, a mole-like organization that had planted agents throughout the country sniffing out disease outbreaks. Francis was involved in the Ebola outbreak, though it was self-contained before he could do anything about it. He was also involved in searching the Feline Leukemia Virus, thought to be caused by a retrovirus, making him a retrovirus hunter. KSOI was right up his alley.
Francis thought that KSOI might be feline leukemia in humans, as retroviruses were generally known to infect white blood cells. He also thought that said retrovirus had a long period of incubation, and saw that KSOI had sprung up in three cities on both coasts unnoticed. Thus, Francis was convinced that KSOI was caused by a retrovirus. If we search hard enough for something, especially if our careers depend on it, we will find something.
At this point Robert Gallo headed a “huge and well-funded” retrovirus lab at the NCI, or National Cancer Institute. He had already discovered “HTLV-1”, which he believed caused T-cell leukemia in humans. He and another staffer, Max Essex, asserted in 1983 that KSOI, which would be renamed AIDS, was caused by HTLV-1. They renamed it, however, as “lymphotropic,” meaning a retrovirus that inhabits, but does not cause cancer or necessarily kill T-cells. (A T-cell is a lymphocyte … are you confused too?) All of this preceded discovery of “HIV.” (“Lymphotropic” then seems to indicate that “retroviruses” are not necessarily harmful. This might explain while most of us carry them in many forms, if indeed “retrovirus” is even a correct term for them.)
Gallo versus Montagnier
Robert Gallo features heavily in the AIDS crisis. Luc Montagnier, a French retrovirologist, thought he had isolated the AIDS virus, not yet given that name. Gallo offered support, but in the end claimed to have discovered one himself that was the cause of AIDS. This was announced in a huge splash even before any scientific papers were published. However, Montagnier had sent to Gallo samples of the retrovirus he had isolated from a patient. Gallo claimed to have then discovered a different retrovirus, but one that was identical to Montagnier’s, whose sample Gallo claimed to have lost. Thus is Gallo said to have “stolen” discovery of HIV from Montagnier.
Gallo and Montagnier would famously “break ranks” in 1990, when the latter mdeclared that HIV alone could not cause AIDS, but instead needed a “co-factor.” This too is suspicious, as it again evades the question of what role HIV plays in the syndrome, and deeper yet, that HIV even exists.
“Misdirection” is the tactic of getting people to ask the wrong question to keep them from discovering truth. The Gallo-Montagnier affair, to me, reads as such. Instead of asking if AIDS was even caused by a retrovirus, or even indeed if a retrovirus even exists or can cause disease, we are asking if one guy stole it from another guy, and if HIV needs a co-factor rather than if it even exists.
People were asking the wrong questions.
Is AIDS a project?
A retrovirus is only detected when antibodies to viral infections are found, meaning that the immune system has done its work. Further, retroviruses do not kill cells. They only inhabit them, if they exist at all.
All of this was set aside, however, and from the Gallo announcement forward, all AIDS research not involving the renamed HIV ceased, and has been nonexistent to this day. This plays out like a project, as if there were already in place big plans to push AIDS on the world as a new pandemic, deadly and contagious disease. Essential to the fraud behind it is a culprit, and Robert Gallo (perhaps with Montagnier’s cooperation) short-circuited the process in place that would have introduced other alternatives to the cause of AIDS, including lifestyles.
What Gallo and Montagnier had done by this charade was to use misdirection to affirm the existence of HIV.
At this point I refer to an interview with Dr. Stefan Lanka. You may know him as the man who offered a 100,000 euro reward for anyone who could prove the existence of the measles virus. Someone took him up on it, provided the evidence, and Lanka denied the value of the evidence and refused to pay. In 2017, Germany’s highest court ruled that existence of the measles virus had not been proven, and no reward was paid.
Dr. Heinrich Kremer is a German medical doctor and former director of the Federal German Drug Abuser Clinics. Dr. Kremer had “HIV-Positive” patients and “the politicians” wanted him to quarantine them. He refused. This is from this interview done by Lanka:
“He said no, because there’s no infectious entity out there. He knew everybody who went through chronic active hepatitis or had the hepatitis B vaccine would test “HIV-positive.” So he knew that there is no infection in his hospital.
He informed the mass media, who went to his hospital to inform themselves, in great detail. He told them all the evidence. And the very same journalists, in talk shows, in Der Spiegel [one of Germany’s largest and most popular magazines] for example, published just the contrary. So he knew that it was intentional from the very beginning. They played war. They all wanted to have a blood and sex plague, contrary to the evidence which he presented to them. So he knew that AIDS was built up on misconceptions. He was dealing at the top political level. They told him, off the record, that they knew, they didn’t care, it was about how to deal with the drug problem and with the homosexuals.” (My emphasis)
Lanka, Kremer, Duesberg, Mullis and others, called “HIV/AIDS deniers”, can be found making their case in a number of publications. I leave it to the reader to form a critical opinion of the value of their contributions. However, the words above struck a chord with me, as they fired up an existing suspicion, that AIDS originated in the halls of high power, in Langley and London, and that it served a purpose having nothing to do with medicine and everything to do with population management. So too does the current COVID-19 scare, much ado about nothing.
Heinrich Hermann Robert Koch (1843-1910) was a German physician and microbiologist, both famous and infamous from what I have read. It was he who was said to have identified the agents that caused tuberculosis, cholera, and anthrax. It is in large part because of him that the concept of infectious disease is so well-known.
Koch came up with four “postulates,” or things that must be true for a certain agent to be the cause of a certain disease, be that agent bacteria, toxin, or virus. These are:
- The microorganism or other pathogen must be present in all cases of the disease.
- The pathogen can be isolated from the diseased host and grown in pure culture.
- The pathogen from the pure culture must cause the disease when inoculated into a healthy, susceptible laboratory animal
- The pathogen must be re-isolated from the new host and shown to be the same as the originally inoculated pathogen.
Needless to say, HIV has never met the criteria as the causal agent of AIDS. However, viruses were not known to exist in Koch’s time, so scientists in modern times have restated Koch’s Postulates to accommodate them. This article lists Koch’s postulates for the 21st century as suggested by Fredericks DN, & Relman DA in 1996. I won’t list them here, but note that number four suggests that “…sequence copy number correlates with severity of disease or pathology…” suggest that they were rewritten to accommodate Dr. Kary Mullis’ polymerase chain reaction test machine, or PCR.
Procedure for detection of a virus
Because viruses are so small, they are quite easy (relatively) to isolate by use of centrifuge. As the smallest particles in a tissue sample (sputum, blood, feces) they will naturally gravitate towards the end of a test tube. Once isolated, they are “purified,” that is, separated from all foreign matter, leaving only the virus. This remaining sample is called the “gold standard.” Virologists can then use the PCR machine to amplify the DNA strand, the technique that won Mullis the 1993 Nobel Prize in chemistry. This is done by doubling the sequence, and then again and again, up to maybe forty times. Once amplified in this manner, the DNA sample is easier to work with.
The DNA sequence in hand, virologists can then test for a similar sequence in patients, using the PCR machine again. If a match is found, the patients are said to be infected with the virus initially studied.
Dr. Kary Mullis did not support this use of his machine, saying that it was “qualitative,” and not quantitative, and thereby could not produce an estimate of viral load, critical if viruses are indeed causing a disease. He also said that the tests done in this manner cannot detect infectious viruses at all, only proteins that “sometimes wrongly” were said to be unique to HIV. Mullis campaigned alongside Duesberg to stop use of the PCR in identifying patients “infected” with HIV, to no avail. He too was labeled an “HIV denier.” (HIV, by the way, has never been isolated or purified.)
But no matter, as Wikipedia tells us that Koch’s Postulates are outdated anyway. They cannot be applied to retroviruses such as HIV, as these require a cell to grow in and cannot exist independent of that. Further, they cannot be applied to asymptomatic carriers, that is, people who carry a pathogen, but do not themselves suffer symptoms. HIV is said to be such a pathogen.
It appears that the rigorous standards for associating a pathogen to a disease have been set aside now, since we freely blame diseases on retroviruses and viruses without making the physical connection to the symptoms and the agents supposedly causing them. We are told HIV causes AIDS, but the “how?” of it is not quite clear. Normally, as with a head cold, the body would be crawling with millions upon millions of them* With AIDS, it takes only a few, and most often, HIV does nothing to us. Over a million Americans are HIV-positive and symptom-free.
*Under terrain theory, the cells of the body would be producing the viruses as agents to purge the body of a toxin of some kind. I must say, this makes more sense than invasion by a foreign agent.
Here’s Duesberg again:
“If HIV were actively infecting T-cells or other members of the body’s immune system, cell-free virus particles, known as virions, should easily be found with great ease circulating in the blood. This is the case with all classical viral diseases: In a patient suffering from hepatitis B, one milliliter of blood (about five or ten drops) contains approximately ten million free virus particles. Likewise, flu-like symptoms appear only in the presence of one million rhinovirus particles per milliliter of nasal mucous, and one to one hundred billion particles of rotavirus per gram of feces will accompany diarrhea in the patient. But in most individuals suffering from AIDS, no virus particles can be found anywhere in the body.” (Page 175)
The Magic Johnson Affair
From the Duesberg book, page 340:
In November, 1991, Magic proved to be HIV-positive when he applied for a marriage license. Magic was totally healthy until AIDS specialists Anthony Fauci, from the NIH, David Ho, now director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York, and Magic’s personal doctor advised AIDS prophylaxis with AZT. Magic’s health changed radically within a few days. The press wrote in December 1991: “Magic Reeling as Worst Nightmare Comes True – He’s Getting Sicker.” Only after he began taking AZT did Magic’s health begin to decline. He “had lost his appetite and suffered from bouts of nausea and fatigue” and complained, “I feel like vomiting almost every day.”
But then suddenly Magic’s AIDS symptoms disappeared – and so did all further news about his AIDS symptoms and treatment. Had Magic’s virus suddenly become harmless, or was Magic taken off AZT? No paper would mention whether Magic was taken off AZT. Nobody knew, except those who joked, “There is no magic in AZT, and there is no AZT in Magic.” Indeed, it is unlikely that he could have won the Olympics in 1992 on AZT, considering his strong reactions to the toxic drug in 1991. The silence of the AIDS establishment seems to confirm this assumption. Nothing would have been a better advertisement for the troubled AIDS drug than having returned AIDS patient Magic to an Olympic victory. But no such announcement was made. At last, Magic broke the silence himself. After a “motivational” AIDS talk in Tallahassee, Florida, in the spring of 1995, Magic responded to a teacher that “He had been taking AZT for a while, but has stopped.” The media preferred not to mention the news.
The Johnson case brings up another facet of AIDS, the cure. Johnson was given AZT. It was originally used in the 1960s as a chemotherapy drug when the retroviral theory of cancer was still in vogue, but was shelved as that research proved fruitless. It was resurrected with AIDS, as the medical/science industrial complex claimed AIDS to be caused by a retrovirus. It seemed logical.
AZT gained faster approval by the FDA than any other drug in its history up to that time. Some of the reasoning behind approval was that AIDS itself was considered to be “invariably fatal”, so that a drug that at least gave sufferers a fighting chance of recovery seemed both ethical and even well-intentioned.
The table to the left here is AIDS deaths in the US from 1987 to 1997. Notice the steep drop off around 1994. This coincides with the reduction by half of the recommended dosage of AZT to patients during that time. Hmmm.
John Lauritson, in his book Poison by Prescription, documents the sloppy research and clinical trials behind AZT.
The multi–center clinical trials of AZT are perhaps the sloppiest and most poorly controlled trials ever to serve as the basis for an FDA drug license licensing approval. Conclusions of efficacy were based on endpoint (mortality) not initially planned or formally followed in the study after the drug failed to demonstrate efficacy on all the originally intended in points. Because mortality was not intended endpoint, causes of death were never verified. Despite this, and a frightening record of toxicity, the FDA approved AZT in record time, granting a treatment IND in less than five days and a full pharmaceutical licensing in less than six months.”
I find this most troubling of all, as it is here where I am seeing patients who found to carry a retrovirus that possibly doesn’t even exist being treated with a drug that does exactly what the alleged disease does … destroy their immune systems. So in many cases death “caused” by AIDS is in fact death caused by the treatment for AIDs. But all of the horrors of AZT were brushed aside by the medical establishment, and AZT was routinely prescribed, along with the others, will into the 1990s.
Up until this time, I had never witnessed an epidemic, even a pandemic, of corruption like AIDS in all my dealings in all of my life. It has invaded every mind, every news reporting source, every hospital and clinic. I once knew a woman, a mere acquaintance of ours, who in allowing men to date her first insisted that they be tested for the presence of HIV. That meant that the fear of AIDS made its way down to the vital center of our existence, individual male/female relations. We stopped trusting one another.
Here is how Charles Ortleb, publisher of The New York native (a publication aimed at homosexuals) described it,
“Ten percent of every brain in America must be filled with posters, news items, condom warnings, etc., etc. The iconography of ‘AIDS’ is everywhere. Part of the Big Lie that some activists promote over and over an Orwellian way is that ‘AIDS’ is somehow not on the front burner of America. ‘AIDS’ propaganda has become part of the very air that Americans breathe.”
I remember how Ronald Reagan was criticized for never using the word “AIDS” in a speech. That was just another way of promoting the hoax, Reagan’s super-inattention.
Wikipedia on AIDS
The Wikipedia piece on HIV/AIDS is written in a matter-of-fact, no-doubt-exists-anywhere manner, as if the matter settled science. No “denier” other than Duesberg is mentioned, and he only in a footnote for an article he wrote claiming that HIV did not cause AIDS. Even that one lonely footnote (#285) is coupled with another article condemning Duesberg. His attitude, Wikipedia tells us, is “HIV/AIDS denialism.” His beliefs, says Wiki, are contradicted by “…conclusive medical and scientific evidence.” (In case you don’t have your logical fallacy guide handy, that is called argumentum ad verecundiam, or an appeal to authority.
The image to the right is said to be an electron microscope (EM) photo of HIV, reproduced in Wiki. The image dates back to 1983, and has been deliberately sexed up, that is, refined and colored, to look like something. But it could easily be nothing. In fact, for all we know, it could be a Hubble photo of deep space.
From Frontiers in Public Health, “Questioning the HIV/AIDS Hypothesis: 30 Years of Dissent” (2014):
“In 2010, Ettiene de Harven – the scientist who “produced the first electron micrograph of a retrovirus (the Friend leukemia virus) …
… All the images of particles supposedly representing HIV and published in scientific as well as in lay publications derive from EM studies of cell cultures. They never show HIV particles coming directly from an AIDS patient” [(7), p. 70 – emphasis added].
In other words, this could be a photo of contaminants, of undefined particles, or the Crab Nebula. It does not come from an AIDS sufferer. It serves only one purpose: To inspire confidence.
In fact, the whole of the Wikipedia piece is formed on the notion that there is the scientific truth of the matter, and nothing but the truth. It is meant to SELL the theory of HIV/AIDS, and so allows no dissent in any form.
I printed out the entire piece, fifty pages long with hundreds of citations. I regard this as the power of lies in our lives, big lies, written in prestigious places and backed by mountains of false evidence. Further, in place in our society is a system of enforcement wherein the lies must be believed for anyone to have a career in research or medicine. The power on display is shocking and intimidating. In Orwell’s 1984, Winston Smith could not just pretend to believe that 2+2=5. He had to accept it as true.
As intimidating as the array of power before me is, I conclude with some basic elements of the disease we call AIDS:
What, after all, is AIDS?
The “IDS” in AIDS stands for Immune Deficiency Syndrome. It is a real thing. The “Acquired” that the “A” stands for is not so real. This “A” is meant to imply that it is contagious and can be “caught” by contact with a person said to be “HIV positive.” That part is false.
It is said that HIV can stay in our bodies for long periods of time, dormant, before it kills us. That too is not true. A true viral infection has massive numbers of them overruning our defenses, Béchamp’s terrain theory temporarily set aside. With HIV we are confronted with the notion that it only takes relatively few of them to kill a person. That too is false.
The immune system can be and is suppressed. We know how to do it. Chemotherapy harms, even destroys immune systems. Nitrites (poppers) are harmful to immune systems. During the heyday of the bathhouse scene in big cities in the late 70s and early 80s, nitrites were everywhere in use, along with other drugs and antibiotics.
Recreational drug use, probably even alcohol, can destroy the immune system. Repeated infections can wear it down, and the use of antibiotics to cure the infections also has the same effect. All of this too was prevalent in the bath house scene.
So it should come as no surprise that Michael Gottlieb discovered immune-deficient patients in Los Angeles in 1981. It should not have been hard to work backwards with his five patients to uncover the causes of the IDS. Instead, it branched out to become AIDS, since, as Dr. Kremer tells us, the people in high power wanted a “blood and sex plague.” AIDS was picked up and used for that purpose.
It is less discussed these days, but it is still sacred. No one is allowed to critique the science behind it, or that HIV is the cause of AIDS. Billions have been spent in research on HIV, and anyone in on the research who doubts HIV to cause AIDS is out.
Why did they want a “blood and sex plague?” I cannot know, of course, and so can only look at the results of the fake AIDS endemic. People slowed down, perhaps having less easy sex with strangers, using condoms. Perhaps, if married, there was less infidelity. People reproduced less, though other factors come into play there, kids getting married at a later age for one. Women distrusted men, were less willing to fool around. Homosexuals were stigmatized even more than already in that era, in fact, almost given leper status. (This was all prior to the gay lifestyle being glamorized on TV and in movies.)
It appears as though AIDS was designed to slow down population growth. That is all I can make of it, other than it is always good for leaders when their populations are scared and in need of protection. Fear is a wonderful governing tool.
AIDS in Africa is a post all by itself, apparently another psyop, as real cases of AIDS on that continent are paltry in relative numbers and the population is growing far more rapidly than in Europe or North America. The so-called epidemic in that country has been used to dump drugs like AZT on the market with exorbitant pricing … is just another scam. Bill Gates features prominently. His primary concern is the booming African population, meaning that AIDS there too would be a population control device.
“IDS” (my name for the disease) is real, people have died from it in large numbers and continue to do so. They do not die of Immune Deficiency specifically, but from any of a host of other maladies that take advantage of a weakened person.
AIDS does not exist, HIV might or might not exist, retroviruses might well be nothing, but “IDS” does exist, and has proven fatal to thousands of mostly gay men, intravenous drug users and people suffering from malnutrition. As things like poppers disappear, as gay men calm down and lead more sedate lives, as drug use diminishes, so too will this thing we call AIDS.
And now I know why I put this post off for so long. Readers, as always, you are on your own, left to use your own brains, do your own research, and draw your own conclusions. What I have written above is just my opinion.
PS: To bookend this tawdry affair called AIDS with the present, I note that our friend Tom Hanks played a gay man infected with AIDS in the movie Philadelphia, winning a Best Actor award. Here in 2020, Hanks also announced (on 3/11?) that he had contracted the COVID-19 virus. He is still just acting, but will get no award.