By posting this, I hope to explain my working hypothesis for all kinds of space-related anomalies and craft a cohesive model for our perceived reality. This hypothesis could be considered a bridge between generic space fakery theory and Flat Earth theory. I do not believe that the Earth is flat…but if you are a Flat Earther, I encourage you to read on.
We have to consider that Flat Earth is misdirection against something. What exactly? When I read Dubay’s 200 Proofs the Earth is Not a Spinning Ball, I find that his arguments for the flatness of the Earth are some of his weakest…even though this is what he is supposed to be convincing us about. This is a bad sign, and any experienced alternative researcher knows that Flat Earth is the #1 bad source. All kinds of disinformation and deception is found therein.
With disinformation, we are often fed kernels of truth in order to lead us astray. With Dubay’s Flat Earth proofs, the best kernels of truth are the ones stating that the Earth is not moving through space at tens of thousands of miles per hour.
Circling the solar system, circling the galaxy, the galaxy itself moving. There are supposed to be tremendous motions at hand other than the Earth’s daily spin. Dubay says that experiments (Michelson-Morley, Sagnac) have failed to detect these other motions. This has nothing to do with the Earth being flat, so it is an interesting inclusion, and the kind of thing that makes a bad theory (Flat Earth) actually seem compelling. It fits with an inherent conflict we feel as humans…it does not seem right that Earth is moving at all these different tremendous motions.
The illustration above is supposed to represent the motions occurring for the Earth. To me, this is one absurd picture…considering our earthly experiences. Circling the sun, the sun circling the galaxy, and (not pictured) the galaxy moving through the cosmos. Some of the best of Dubay’s proofs state that experiments have shown we are not actually at such wild motions.
Where does Dubay go astray? The arguments for flatness. They simply are not compelling, and they need to be surrounded by more compelling observations to be swallowed. This is how disinformation works.
The flatness concept is easily countered by celestial observations leaving quite literally no doubt that the arrangement of the cosmos matches with globe shape, as part of a solar system. A flat model cannot and has never explained the relative solar motions, celestial motions, and all kinds of other everyday Earth-based observations. It is essentially indisputable that observation verifies the current cosmological model. With that said, remember…I have said that we are not actually circling the solar system and circling the galaxy and moving at incredible rates of speed toward neighboring galaxies. These motions would leave telltale signs that we cannot seem to detect.
What does that leave us with? A somewhat contradictory set of observations. One thing stands out about the celestial observations used to prove that the Earth must be round: They are correct as far as it goes, but what is often overlooked is that these are indirect methods of verification.
It is like Plato’s Cave, the allegory of shadows on cave walls. Looking up at the sky is no better than seeing the shadows of the cave walls and believing that they represent reality. They are an indirect way to observe. While they do seem to confirm that the Earth is part of a solar system circling the sun with the sun as part of a galaxy, this is entirely indirect. This is only how it is made to look.
To this, I ask: Why do you trust that what you see when you look up at the cosmos is actually a reflection of something real?
Imagine yourself to be a character in the computer game “The SIMS”. In this game, a simulation of a human town is run and you are in control of it. If you were a character in an advanced version of The SIMS, the sky could be programmed to seem like exactly what we see on planet Earth. Would that mean that your town in The SIMS is actually situated on a planet within a solar system and galaxy? No, it would not. It is only a simulation.
The people living in that simulation of The SIMS, if conscious, would likely believe themselves to truly be part of a solar system and a galaxy, but they would have been lead astray by their indirect observations of their sky. Their local environment would seem very real to them; they would not know that their sky is not a reflection of something real. Especially if that fact were intentionally kept from them.
This could be exactly what we are experiencing here on Earth.
It has already been postulated that it is highly probable that we live in a simulation and that the cosmos might be a 2D hologram made to look like it is 3D. Apparently, many puzzling cosmological observations work much better when you turn them into 2D holograms. Then, simulation hypothesis has already been around for quite some time. My hypothesis is simply a way to tie these two fascinating theories together into an complete model for our perceived reality.
My hypothesis is that we live on a local simulation of a round planet with a holographic cosmos. The local planet is more-or-less stationary…only made to rotate at a measly 0.000694 RPM (see: Foucault’s pendulum). The planet is indeed round, as this is what our simulators created for us. The cosmos, on the other hand…entirely simulated, holographic, with resolution degrading by distance.
Like any simulation, parameters are built to keep us within the boundaries of the game. Our atmosphere and the Van Allen belts make any travel to the moon, stars, or beyond virtually impossible without a major breakthrough in technology. The Earth is the only real terrain of our simulation. This even ties in with NASA fakery. Perhaps they know that the objects in our local environment are Potemkin bodies. Not real.
This hypothesis also ties in with the incredible improbabilities surrounding the Earth…the origin of our water, the origin of our moon, the origin of life, the maintenance of life on Earth for 500 million straight years. It is as though we live in the most improbable of all improbable worlds, where everything just happened to turn out right. This is all explained by the hypothesis in question.
This would also explain why there is seemingly strong evidence that the local solar system was under a different configuration…even in very recent times. Think Velikovsky. If you are running a simulation, you can test out all kinds of local Solar System configurations.
My theory can be summed up basically as “Holographic Cosmos, Local Simulation”.
This takes the best of Flat Earth theory, strips away the misdirection, and utilizes some of the most exciting outside-the-box theories in current science such as the simulation hypothesis and holographic universe theory.
This might also be able to explain phenomena such as UFOs and ghosts, because if we live in a simulation, then there must be all kinds of backdoor ways for those who have reached “admin” levels to do things that would seem magical to the average human eye.
There would also be a significant incentive for those “in the know” about this to keep it from the regular populace. If the populace were aware that they were living in a local simulation, there would be utter chaos and anarchy. Maintaining secrecy about this would be the bedrock of all order…the foundation of how society is made to operate.
The only reason I post this in such a preliminary state is that I was not sure whether anyone had ever come up with anything similar. Am I the first to tie these theories together into one over-arching concept?
I wanted to publish this idea for posterity…who knows how long I will be around here?