And now for something completely different…

Congressman Alan Grayson is mixing things up pretty good. It’s kind of a man-bites-dog story – Republicans are all over the page with insults and smears, death panels and granny dying off in a waiting queue. Some pundits, like Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck, earn their paychecks by being outrageous. They are mediocre at best, hardly worth a mention. They surely know that their stock goes up with each insult.

Grayson got up on the floor of the House and merely said something true – that Republicans have no health care plan. Therefore, their plan must be “don’t get sick”. Or, if you do get sick, “die quickly”.

Screams of indignation followed. Republicans demanded an apology. Instead, Grayson countered by apologizing to the 44,000 plus who (according to a Harvard study) die each year due to lack of health care.

Rachel Maddow noted the other night that Grayson’s opponents are not to be found, and that the Florida Republican Party is barrel-bottom-scraping to come up with an opponent for Grayson. I don’t know what poll results show, but I’d be very surprised if Grayson’s numbers did not shoot up for saying something true. That sometimes happens – politicians sometimes say something that is true, that is. Polls alwasy shoot up in the aftermath.

Which highlights the frustration of being a Democrat. They are such wimps and weasels, many coached to be that way, others merely filling the role of the ratchet. The health care debate was theirs to win- they started out ahead by two touchdowns and a field goal. They had the numbers, they had public support. But because they have Emmanuel’s and Baucus’s and Reid’s instead of Grayson’s for leadership, they have blown it. The very best we can hope for a this point is co-ops, or as Steve W. calls them, “co-opts”.

Anyway, Grayson has made a high profile for himself. Let’s hope the Democrats don’t try to cut him off at the knees in 2010.

P.S. Grayson has an impressive biography (courtesy Wiki, no doubt supplied by Grayson’s people):

Grayson was born in the Bronx, New York and grew up in the tenements. He graduated from Bronx High School of Science and worked his way through Harvard University, graduating in three years, summa cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa. He worked as an economist for two years, but then returned to Harvard for graduate studies. Within four years, he earned a law degree with honors from Harvard Law School, a masters in public policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government and completed the course work and passed the general exams for a Ph.D. in government.[3][4]

After writing his master’s thesis on gerontology, Grayson founded the Alliance for Aging Research, and served as an officer of the organization for more than 20 years.

Sunny Portland

We spent the day yesterday in Astoria, Oregon, with Steve. He’s doing counseling and some administrative work while teaching out there, and it looks like it might be a place where he spends some time.

Steve is doing well, even seems to be thriving. He has studied the history of the area for teaching purposes, and so was a good tour guide. He took us out to see an early twentieth century shipwreck, and then later to Fort Clatsop.

Clatsop was not at all what I expected. It was tiny – a small fort housing 34 men, one room for the two captains, and four each housing eight men. It’s a reconstruction based on notes- they haven’t found any remnants of the original. They are generally sure of the area, but not the precise location. It’s probably long been farmed under.

Three of our kids are out here in the Pacific Northwest – two daughters in Portland. Another was visiting while we were here, so it was almost a family reunion, missing only Annie, who is working in Billings. It’s beautiful country. We have thought now and then about moving out here, but realized that the rainy winters would get to us after a while.

I’ve been depoliticized while out here, hardly caring about writing here. I’ve got something going with Budge down below – maybe. He wants to set me straight on three things: tariffs, unions, and minimum wage. All are bad for workers, he says, and furthermore, he has the numbers to prove it.

I did mention that minimum wage workers have not lately commissioned any studies on what might be good for them, so we are pretty much stuck with the conservative economists and think tanks to determine how best to care for them. The thrust from that sector seems to be that low wages and no unions are the best salve for their wounds.

Who am I to argue?

I guess I’m never really depoliticized. But I have decompressed. We’re going into Portland today to shop. I looooooves me some shopping. For lunch we’re going to find a Whole Bowl – I looooooves me some of them them beans and rice. And we’re looking for a Nike factory outlet. I looooooves me some of that overpriced sweatshop stuff. But in the end, I am justified buying Nike shoes because I know that tariffs, minimum wages and unions only produce bad outcomes for working people.

Helicopters chasing balloons

All of the fuss yesterday over the boy in the balloon merely reinforced my belief that the “free market” cannot do television news unless they remove the profit motive and stop competing for audiences. It’s a race to get the dumbest asses among us to watch their channels.

At least newspapers have the advantage of screening out all those who cannot read.

What’s the alternative? In Britain, news is subsidized by government.
That doesn’t work either.

I was just reading again this AM about that remarkable feat of Daniel Ellsberg wherein he overcame government power and released the Pentagon Papers to the public (with the assistance of powerful private corporations acting out the First Amendment). Question: Could that happen today?

Somehow, delivery of news has to be insulated from power, public and private.

Free parking …

From Dave Budge:

Mark, when are you going to answer the questions about tariffs, unions and minimum wages? That’s your run and hide m.o. I’ve asked you several times.

From me:

Bring it over to my place. We’ll have at it. I’ll set aside special space for you later today.

I’m not exactly sure what questions I am supposed to be answering, but I think it has something to do with tariffs, unions and minimum wages harming working people. I’ll wait.

Hiking on Thursday.

Clear Channel is the Boss

Click here

Click on the above link to be taken to a song called “Broadcast Blues”. The singers are anonymous.

Here’s why: Sue Wilson has made a movie of the same name, Broadcast Blues. I haven’t seen the film yet, as it has not been released, but it has had great success at various film festivals, and I’ve listened to her interviewed (click here, scroll down to October 11). As I understand it, the film is a riff on AM radio in America, a one-note tune if ever there were one, and dominated by right-wing giant Clear Channel.

Clear Channel owns 58 “blow torches” (50,000 watt stations) in the largest markets in the U.S., and over a thousand stations in total. It is the reason why the right wing dominates the airwaves. It is not popular demand. It is monopoly ownership.

Originally, before release, the theme song for Broadcast Blues was going to be Bruce Springsteen’s “Your Hometown”. Wilson had written permission to use the song. However, the Boss had released a new album and was embarking on his 2007-2008 Magic Tour, and backed out of the deal. His people told Wilson that if Bruce played in her movie, he would risk pissing off Clear Channel.

Clear Channel, in addition to controlling most radio stations in the country, also controls most concert venues. With that kind of power, they cannot resist flexing the political muscles (power corrupts …). Just as they shut down the Dixie Chicks for being politically impudent, so too are they powerful enough to shut down The Boss.

Of course, Springsteen is no profile in courage. I’ll never hear him again with the same ears. “Born in the USA” was a great song. Maybe The Boss is just a dog who’s been beat too much.

Wilson searched around for another song to replace Your Hometown, but could not find another artist willing to take on Clear Channel. In the end, she found several volunteers who were willing to record an original tune, but only anonymously.

The Ratchet Effect …

A commenter calling himself “Lizard” at 4&20 Blackbirds put up the following, which is a quote taken from another place. Apparently it is a concept widely understood in economics – even Malthusians use it. But for this purpose, it is used to describe the dynamic between Democrats and Republicans in our faux-democratic system.

“The American political system, since at least 1968, has been operating like a ratchet, and both parties — Republicans and Democrats — play crucial, mutually reinforcing roles in its operation. The electoral ratchet permits movement only in the rightward direction. The Republican role is fairly clear; the Republicans apply the torque that rotates the thing rightward.”

“The Democrats’ role is a little less obvious. The Democrats are the pawl. They don’t resist the rightward movement — they let it happen — but whenever the rightward force slackens momentarily, for whatever reason, the Democrats click into place and keep the machine from rotating back to the left. Here’s how it works. In every election year, the Democrats come and tell us that the country has moved to the right, and so the Democratic Party has to move right too in the name of realism and electability. Gotta keep these right-wing madmen out of the White House, no matter what it takes.”

If you came to this website today because you like my inability to economize on words, you came to the wrong place. He nailed it.

Michael Moore, a love story

We went to see Michael Moore’s movie, Capitalism, a Love Story, this weekend. It was enjoyable and moving. If it were a speech, it would be called merely anecdotal. But that’s what art does – it tells a big story through a little one.

This is by far Moore’s best work. This is the film he hinted at with Roger and Me, strongly suggested with Sicko.

Our daughter-in-law hit us right off with what appears a glaring contradiction: Moore makes money with his films. She repeats the oft-misunderstood notion that our daily efforts to make money and stay alive are “capitalism”, which is also known as “free enterprise” which is the essence of “democracy”.

We all strive to make money. People everywhere are committed to this ideal – we must contribute as we are able to take care of ourselves. Earning something for doing nothing is not a healthy thing. But then, that is the definition of capitalism: Earning money on capital. Capitalism has made a religion out of getting something for nothing.

Earning money by means of labor? That is enterprise, for sure, but I do not place traders at Goldman Sachs in the same league with an ordinary plumber or Wal-Mart clerk. One can only earn what his labor allows, while the other can make money on the labor of others. One is a mere worker, the other a capitalist.

Moore takes us to houses in foreclosure, kids in private for-profit detention, workers on strike, and to a bakery in California where everyone earns a living wage. He squeezes every bit of emotion he can out of people removed from their homes and the bastards that do the removing. That’s entertainment 101 – heroes and villains. I especially liked the guy who offered to Moore when ambushed with cameras that he could do us all a service if he would “stop making movies”.

He’s a gifted film maker, and knows to build slowly to a point. And I did not see it coming.

Rep.Marcy Captor, D-OH, has a large part in the movie. She talks about the meltdown before the election last fall, and states her belief that it was a setup, done deliberately as the election drew near to frighten legislators into giving Wall Street the key to the Treasury. George W. Bush used the same scare tactics prior to that bailout that he did with Iraq – a speech predicting doom if we did not turn $700 million in funds (all borrowed) over to Henry Paulson’s Goldman people.

The surprise twist in the plot was the House Republicans. No one in the White House or on Wall Street expected them to balk. But they did. In an extraordinary act of courage, the House voted to turn down the bailout. The Dow crashed, sinking over 700 points in one day.

Here’s where Moore makes his most salient point, one that ought to make every Republican want see the movie. Failing to get what they wanted from the Republicans, Wall Street turned to the Democrats. And sure enough, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank fell in line, as did Barack Obama. The issue was re-voted, and Wall Street got their money. But it was mostly Republicans on the Maginot line that tried to stop it.

Moore does his usual theatrics, ambushing people on Wall Street, demanding our cash back, speaking to buildings through a megaphone and cordoning off the area with “Crime Scene” tape. (This was clearly done on a Sunday). But he closes with a few thoughts that resonated with me:

One, no matter how bad it gets, it’s very difficult to energize the American public. Obama became the Pied Piper, leading us all down the wrong path, absorbing all the discontent and stuffing it. But beyond that, beyond merely getting people to vote, it is virtually impossible to organize here in the land of the free. We seem unable to get off our collective asses, and are morally bankrupt. Our forebears, even as recently as the 1960’s, knew how to throw fear into leadership. That impulse seems to have dissipated along with the expansion of bellies and preoccupation with John and Kate.

Two, Moore says something like “Hey folks – I can’t do this forever, and I can’t do it alone.” We don’t need leaders, we need organizers, and as the movie so well points out, organization through the Democratic Party is futile.

And finally, he makes clear, our choice is not Capitalism vs. Socialism or Communism. China makes it quite clear that capitalism and communism get along quite well. Capitalism, in fact, can exist comfortably in communist and fascist systems alike. But it threatens to undo our system.

Our choice is between Capitalism, and democracy.

One passed over …

“Big Swede”, a man who causes me no shortage of pain as he shoots his sling shot from across the room – remote and vaguely related reference here, a YouTube there, here a link, there a link, everywhere a link link – put up the following post at Electric City Weblog in a thread about OBama’s receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize:

Chinese Human Rights Activist Hu Jia – imprisoned for campaigning for human rights in the PRC, not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Wei Jingsheng, who spent 17 years in Chinese prisons for urging reforms of China’s communist system. — not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama. (Not to mention the symbolic value of awarding a Chinese dissident on the 20th Anniversary of the Tianenmen Square Massacre.)

Greg Mortenson, founder of the Central Asia Institute has built nearly 80 schools, especially for girls, in remote areas of northern Pakistan and Afghanistan over the past 15 years – not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad, a philosophy professor in Jordan who risks his life by advocating interfaith dialogue between Jews and Muslims, also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Afghan human rights activist Sima Samar. She currently leads the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and serves as the U.N. special envoy to Darfur and is apparently also not as worthy as Barack Hussein Obama.

Now I’m no fool, or at least not that big a fool. Swede would not be putting up salivating praise for these people had it not been an opportunity for him to savage Obama. But I like it nonetheless. It brings us closer together – Hu Jia, Wei Jingsheng, Greg Mortenson, Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad, and Sima Samar are indeed more worthy of recognition than the man brought to power in the U.S. by a pretty face and a slick ad campaign and who is carrying on its war-making activities.

Greg Mortenson is from Bozeman, MT, and is co-author of the book Three Cups of Tea, which recounts a K-2 mountain climbing expedition that led to near-tragedy. Separated from his group of climbers and exhausted, he was nursed back to by the villagers of Korphe, in Pakistan. Mortenson was charmed by their hospitality, and pledged to raise funds to build them a school.

As so often happens, this side trip became his life’s highway. So far he and his organization, the Central Asia Institute, have built 131 schools that focus on educating young girls.

We attended an event of his in Bozeman while we lived there, and a much larger event at Red Rocks Auditorium in nearby Morrison, Colorado last month. It’s an odd sort of event, as it is surely put together to raise money. But Mortenson is shy and retiring, and so allows his thirteen year old daughter, Amira, to do most of the talking. She’s a natural showman.

He does not ask for money – this ain’t no Billy Graham revival. He merely celebrates life and people. He Skyped in people now in school who got their start in his brick and mortar classrooms. It’s wonderful to see young people brought to life, their little lights afire with knowledge and ambition. Education will do that to a person.

If you want to send him a check … well, send him a check. He’ll use it wisely.

Mortenson is a truly humble and caring man. His work is ongoing. He’s done so much more to foster peace in this world than Barack Obama that the Nobel Peace Prize Committee ought to be disbanded and replaced with a group of humanitarians, people less drawn to political glitter and more to true people of peace, as listed by Swede above.

PS: Since it is Swede I am dealing with here, I cannot help but note that his “communist” China is now also “capitalist” China, and that the two walk hand-in-hand on the beach like young lovers. If you cannot explain the contradiction, perhaps you can internalize it? Cognitive dissonance does a body good.

A little help please …

Roger Ebert says in his review of the Coen Brothers’ movie, A Serious Man,

I’m sure you’ve heard the old joke where Job asks the Lord why everything in his life is going wrong. Remember what the Lord replies? If you don’t remember the joke, ask anyone. I can’t prove it but I’m absolutely certain more than half of everyone on Earth has heard some version of that joke.

I am of the other half of the world. Can someone tell me the punch line?